Search (887 results, page 1 of 45)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.06 
    0.064577125 = sum of:
  0.06106652 = product of:
    0.24426608 = sum of:
      0.24426608 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24426608 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4346232 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0035106074 = product of:
    0.007021215 = sum of:
      0.007021215 = weight(_text_:e in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007021215 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Bodoff, D.; Richter-Levin, Y.: Viewpoints in indexing term assignment (2020) 0.04 
    0.041879 = sum of:
  0.03836839 = product of:
    0.15347356 = sum of:
      0.15347356 = weight(_text_:author's in 5765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15347356 = score(doc=5765,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34450704 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 5765, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5765)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0035106074 = product of:
    0.007021215 = sum of:
      0.007021215 = weight(_text_:e in 5765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007021215 = score(doc=5765,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 5765, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5765)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The literature on assigned indexing considers three possible viewpoints-the author's viewpoint as evidenced in the title, the users' viewpoint, and the indexer's viewpoint-and asks whether and which of those views should be reflected in an indexer's choice of terms to assign to an item. We study this question empirically, as opposed to normatively. Based on the literature that discusses whose viewpoints should be reflected, we construct a research model that includes those same three viewpoints as factors that might be influencing term assignment in actual practice. In the unique study design that we employ, the records of term assignments made by identified indexers in academic libraries are cross-referenced with the results of a survey that those same indexers completed on political views. Our results indicate that in our setting, variance in term assignment was best explained by indexers' personal political views.
    Language
    e
  3. Wagner, E.: Über Impfstoffe zur digitalen Identität? (2020) 0.04 
    0.04057935 = product of:
  0.0811587 = sum of:
    0.0811587 = sum of:
      0.011702025 = weight(_text_:e in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011702025 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
      0.069456674 = weight(_text_:22 in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.069456674 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17952046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 5.2020 17:22:40
  4. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.04 
    0.04057935 = product of:
  0.0811587 = sum of:
    0.0811587 = sum of:
      0.011702025 = weight(_text_:e in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011702025 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.069456674 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.069456674 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17952046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
    Language
    e
  5. He, C.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Q.: Research leadership flow determinants and the role of proximity in research collaborations (2020) 0.03 
    0.034899164 = sum of:
  0.031973656 = product of:
    0.12789463 = sum of:
      0.12789463 = weight(_text_:author's in 30) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12789463 = score(doc=30,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34450704 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 30, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=30)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0029255063 = product of:
    0.0058510127 = sum of:
      0.0058510127 = weight(_text_:e in 30) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0058510127 = score(doc=30,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 30, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=30)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Characterizing the leadership in research is important to revealing the interaction pattern and organizational structure through research collaboration. This research defines the leadership role based on the corresponding author's affiliation, and presents the first quantitative research on the factors and evolution of 5 proximity dimensions (geographical, cognitive, institutional, social, and economic) of research leadership. The data to capture research leadership consist of a set of multi-institution articles in the fields of "Life Sciences & Biomedicine," "Technology," "Physical Sciences," "Social Sciences," and "Humanities & Arts" during 2013-2017 from the Web of Science Core Citation Database. A Tobit regression-based gravity model indicates that the mass of research leadership of both the leading and participating institutions and the geographical, cognitive, institutional, social, and economic proximities are important factors for the flow of research leadership among Chinese institutions. In general, the effect of these proximities for research leadership flow has been declining recently. The outcome of this research sheds light on the leadership evolution and flow among Chinese institutions, and thus can provide evidence and support for grant allocation policies to facilitate scientific research and collaborations.
    Language
    e
  6. Vakkari, P.; Völske, M.; Potthast, M.; Hagen, M.; Stein, B.: Predicting essay quality from search and writing behavior (2021) 0.03 
    0.034899164 = sum of:
  0.031973656 = product of:
    0.12789463 = sum of:
      0.12789463 = weight(_text_:author's in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12789463 = score(doc=260,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34450704 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0029255063 = product of:
    0.0058510127 = sum of:
      0.0058510127 = weight(_text_:e in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0058510127 = score(doc=260,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Few studies have investigated how search behavior affects complex writing tasks. We analyze a dataset of 150 long essays whose authors searched the ClueWeb09 corpus for source material, while all querying, clicking, and writing activity was meticulously recorded. We model the effect of search and writing behavior on essay quality using path analysis. Since the boil-down and build-up writing strategies identified in previous research have been found to affect search behavior, we model each writing strategy separately. Our analysis shows that the search process contributes significantly to essay quality through both direct and mediated effects, while the author's writing strategy moderates this relationship. Our models explain 25-35% of the variation in essay quality through rather simple search and writing process characteristics alone, a fact that has implications on how search engines could personalize result pages for writing tasks. Authors' writing strategies and associated searching patterns differ, producing differences in essay quality. In a nutshell: essay quality improves if search and writing strategies harmonize-build-up writers benefit from focused, in-depth querying, while boil-down writers fare better with a broader and shallower querying strategy.
    Language
    e
  7. Mehra, B.: Toward an impact-driven framework to operationalize social justice and implement ICT4D in the field of information (2023) 0.03 
    0.034899164 = sum of:
  0.031973656 = product of:
    0.12789463 = sum of:
      0.12789463 = weight(_text_:author's in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12789463 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34450704 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0029255063 = product of:
    0.0058510127 = sum of:
      0.0058510127 = weight(_text_:e in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0058510127 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Information researchers can further social justice and social equity to meet the needs of minority and underserved populations experiencing intersecting modes of cultural marginalization. Scholars of information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D) can find overlooked intersections with social justice in "community networking" research since the 1980s to overcome the digital divides between the haves and have-nots. To frame social justice initiatives within a consolidated vision of ICT4D in the field of information, this article proposes an impact-driven framework, expounded through five interrelated elements: why (motivations), with who (engaged constituencies), how (at external and internal levels to change traditional practices), and toward what (goal). It is explicated through select historical instances of "community networking" and digital divides, ICT4D, and social justice intersections. Significance of the elements is also demonstrated via this author's select information-related social justice research conducted in the United States. The urgency for critical and reflective conversations is important owing to historically abstracted human information behavior theory development within information research outdated in multiple contextualized needs of contemporary times. Historically situating impact-driven social justice research is important to further the relevance, existence, and growth of the information field as it strengthens its ties with ICT4D.
    Language
    e
  8. Hjoerland, B.: Education in knowledge organization (KO) (2023) 0.03 
    0.034899164 = sum of:
  0.031973656 = product of:
    0.12789463 = sum of:
      0.12789463 = weight(_text_:author's in 1124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12789463 = score(doc=1124,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34450704 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 1124, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1124)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0029255063 = product of:
    0.0058510127 = sum of:
      0.0058510127 = weight(_text_:e in 1124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0058510127 = score(doc=1124,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1124, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1124)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article provides analyses, describes dilemmas, and suggests way forwards in the teaching of knowl­edge organization (KO). The general assumption of the article is that theoretical problems in KO must be the point of departure for teaching KO. Section 2 addresses the teaching of practical, applied and professional KO, focusing on learning about specific knowl­edge organization systems (KOS), specific standards, and specific methods for organizing knowl­edge, but provides arguments for not isolating these aspects from theoretical issues. Section 3 is about teaching theoretical and academic KO, in which the focus is on examining the bases on which KOSs and knowl­edge organization processes such as classifying and indexing are founded. This basically concerns concepts and conceptual relations and should not be based on prejudices about the superiority of either humans or computers for KO. Section 4 is about the study of education in KO, which is considered important because it is about how the field is monitoring itself and about how it should be shaping its own future. Section 5 is about the role of the ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowl­edge Organization in education of KO, emphasizing the need for an interdisciplinary source that may help improve the conceptual clarity in the field. The conclusion suggests some specific recommendations for curricula in KO based on the author's view of KO.
    Language
    e
  9. Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020) 0.03 
    0.03246348 = product of:
  0.06492696 = sum of:
    0.06492696 = sum of:
      0.00936162 = weight(_text_:e in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.00936162 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
      0.05556534 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05556534 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17952046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    2. 3.2020 19:04:22
    Language
    e
  10. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.03 
    0.028405545 = product of:
  0.05681109 = sum of:
    0.05681109 = sum of:
      0.008191418 = weight(_text_:e in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008191418 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.048619673 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048619673 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17952046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
    Language
    e
  11. Bargmann, S.; Blumesberger, S.; Gruber, A.; Luef, E.; Steltzer, R.: Sacherschließung geschlechtergerecht?! : Rückblick auf den Online-Workshop am 11. Mai 2022 und Aufruf zu gemeinsamen Aktivitäten (2022) 0.03 
    0.028405545 = product of:
  0.05681109 = sum of:
    0.05681109 = sum of:
      0.008191418 = weight(_text_:e in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008191418 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
      0.048619673 = weight(_text_:22 in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048619673 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17952046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    15. 2.2023 14:30:22
  12. Manley, S.: Letters to the editor and the race for publication metrics (2022) 0.03 
    0.028405545 = product of:
  0.05681109 = sum of:
    0.05681109 = sum of:
      0.008191418 = weight(_text_:e in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008191418 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
      0.048619673 = weight(_text_:22 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048619673 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17952046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 4.2022 19:22:26
    Language
    e
  13. Wu, P.F.: Veni, vidi, vici? : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023) 0.03 
    0.028405545 = product of:
  0.05681109 = sum of:
    0.05681109 = sum of:
      0.008191418 = weight(_text_:e in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008191418 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
      0.048619673 = weight(_text_:22 in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048619673 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17952046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:33:53
    Language
    e
  14. Candela, G.: ¬An automatic data quality approach to assess semantic data from cultural heritage institutions (2023) 0.03 
    0.028405545 = product of:
  0.05681109 = sum of:
    0.05681109 = sum of:
      0.008191418 = weight(_text_:e in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008191418 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
      0.048619673 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048619673 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17952046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:23:31
    Language
    e
  15. Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023) 0.03 
    0.025801752 = product of:
  0.051603504 = sum of:
    0.051603504 = sum of:
      0.009929499 = weight(_text_:e in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009929499 = score(doc=886,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
      0.041674003 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041674003 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17952046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:53:32
    Language
    e
  16. Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023) 0.03 
    0.025801752 = product of:
  0.051603504 = sum of:
    0.051603504 = sum of:
      0.009929499 = weight(_text_:e in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009929499 = score(doc=1181,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
      0.041674003 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041674003 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17952046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.11.2023 18:59:22
    Language
    e
  17. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.03 
    0.025444385 = product of:
  0.05088877 = sum of:
    0.05088877 = product of:
      0.20355508 = sum of:
        0.20355508 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20355508 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4346232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05126476 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  18. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.03 
    0.025444385 = product of:
  0.05088877 = sum of:
    0.05088877 = product of:
      0.20355508 = sum of:
        0.20355508 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20355508 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4346232 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05126476 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  19. Geras, A.; Siudem, G.; Gagolewski, M.: Should we introduce a dislike button for academic articles? (2020) 0.02 
    0.024347609 = product of:
  0.048695218 = sum of:
    0.048695218 = sum of:
      0.007021215 = weight(_text_:e in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007021215 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
      0.041674003 = weight(_text_:22 in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041674003 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17952046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 1.2020 18:10:22
    Language
    e
  20. Bullard, J.; Dierking, A.; Grundner, A.: Centring LGBT2QIA+ subjects in knowledge organization systems (2020) 0.02 
    0.024347609 = product of:
  0.048695218 = sum of:
    0.048695218 = sum of:
      0.007021215 = weight(_text_:e in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007021215 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07368642 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
      0.041674003 = weight(_text_:22 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041674003 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17952046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05126476 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6.10.2020 21:22:33
    Language
    e

Authors

Languages

  • e 825
  • d 58
  • pt 5
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 835
  • el 96
  • m 23
  • p 13
  • s 5
  • x 2
  • A 1
  • EL 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications