Search (475 results, page 1 of 24)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Warkus, M.: Wie Begriffe das Denken begrenzen können (2022) 0.07
    0.07286476 = product of:
      0.10929714 = sum of:
        0.035156142 = weight(_text_:m in 1424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035156142 = score(doc=1424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051385287 = queryNorm
            0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 1424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1424)
        0.074140996 = product of:
          0.14828199 = sum of:
            0.14828199 = weight(_text_:de in 1424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14828199 = score(doc=1424,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051385287 = queryNorm
                0.6714827 = fieldWeight in 1424, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1424)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    https://www.spektrum.de/kolumne/philosophie-wie-begriffe-das-denken-begrenzen-koennen/2084040?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
  2. Sander, M.; Cronimund, C.: Google anonym nutzen? : Wie ein Zürcher den Tech-Giganten austrickst (2021) 0.07
    0.07286476 = product of:
      0.10929714 = sum of:
        0.035156142 = weight(_text_:m in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035156142 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051385287 = queryNorm
            0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
        0.074140996 = product of:
          0.14828199 = sum of:
            0.14828199 = weight(_text_:de in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14828199 = score(doc=130,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051385287 = queryNorm
                0.6714827 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    https://www.nzz.ch/technologie/google-anonym-nutzen-wie-ein-zuercher-den-tech-giganten-austrickst-ld.1592202?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
  3. Dölle, M.; Mahn, J.: Corona-Selbsttests bei Aldi : Negativ-Zertifikate faktisch wertlos (2021) 0.07
    0.07286476 = product of:
      0.10929714 = sum of:
        0.035156142 = weight(_text_:m in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035156142 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051385287 = queryNorm
            0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
        0.074140996 = product of:
          0.14828199 = sum of:
            0.14828199 = weight(_text_:de in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14828199 = score(doc=192,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051385287 = queryNorm
                0.6714827 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/news/Corona-Selbsttests-bei-Aldi-Negativ-Zertifikate-von-Aesku-faktisch-wertlos-5987246.html?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
  4. Warkus, M.: Führt die Realität ein Eigenleben? (2021) 0.07
    0.07286476 = product of:
      0.10929714 = sum of:
        0.035156142 = weight(_text_:m in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035156142 = score(doc=397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051385287 = queryNorm
            0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
        0.074140996 = product of:
          0.14828199 = sum of:
            0.14828199 = weight(_text_:de in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14828199 = score(doc=397,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051385287 = queryNorm
                0.6714827 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    https://www.spektrum.de/kolumne/warkus-welt-fuehrt-die-realitaet-ein-eigenleben/1939018?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
  5. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.07
    0.07206239 = product of:
      0.10809358 = sum of:
        0.020857997 = product of:
          0.08343199 = sum of:
            0.08343199 = weight(_text_:authors in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08343199 = score(doc=950,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23425597 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051385287 = queryNorm
                0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.087235585 = sum of:
          0.0524256 = weight(_text_:de in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0524256 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051385287 = queryNorm
              0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
          0.034809984 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034809984 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17994252 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051385287 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
  6. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.06
    0.06312214 = sum of:
      0.020857997 = product of:
        0.08343199 = sum of:
          0.08343199 = weight(_text_:authors in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08343199 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23425597 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051385287 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024859145 = weight(_text_:m in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024859145 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051385287 = queryNorm
          0.19441006 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.017404992 = product of:
        0.034809984 = sum of:
          0.034809984 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034809984 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17994252 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051385287 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
  7. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023) 0.06
    0.06259993 = sum of:
      0.01474883 = product of:
        0.05899532 = sum of:
          0.05899532 = weight(_text_:authors in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05899532 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23425597 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051385287 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.03044611 = weight(_text_:m in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03044611 = score(doc=995,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051385287 = queryNorm
          0.2381027 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
      0.017404992 = product of:
        0.034809984 = sum of:
          0.034809984 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034809984 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17994252 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051385287 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Collaboration is encouraged because it is believed to improve academic research, supported by indirect evidence in the form of more coauthored articles being more cited. Nevertheless, this might not reflect quality but increased self-citations or the "audience effect": citations from increased awareness through multiple author networks. We address this with the first science wide investigation into whether author numbers associate with journal article quality, using expert peer quality judgments for 122,331 articles from the 2014-20 UK national assessment. Spearman correlations between author numbers and quality scores show moderately strong positive associations (0.2-0.4) in the health, life, and physical sciences, but weak or no positive associations in engineering and social sciences, with weak negative/positive or no associations in various arts and humanities, and a possible negative association for decision sciences. This gives the first systematic evidence that greater numbers of authors associates with higher quality journal articles in the majority of academia outside the arts and humanities, at least for the UK. Positive associations between team size and citation counts in areas with little association between team size and quality also show that audience effects or other nonquality factors account for the higher citation rates of coauthored articles in some fields.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:11:50
  8. Blume, M.; Stalinski, S.: Sitzt Gott im Gehirn? : Neue Erkenntnisse aus der Hirnforschung (2021) 0.06
    0.058291804 = product of:
      0.087437704 = sum of:
        0.028124912 = weight(_text_:m in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028124912 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051385287 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
        0.059312794 = product of:
          0.11862559 = sum of:
            0.11862559 = weight(_text_:de in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11862559 = score(doc=398,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051385287 = queryNorm
                0.53718615 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    https://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/neue-erkenntnisse-aus-der-hirnforschung-sitzt-gott-im-gehirn.1278.de.html?dram:article_id=504629&utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
  9. Zech, M.: Wie Gelehrte eine Epoche erfanden : Achsenzeit (2023) 0.06
    0.058291804 = product of:
      0.087437704 = sum of:
        0.028124912 = weight(_text_:m in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028124912 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051385287 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
        0.059312794 = product of:
          0.11862559 = sum of:
            0.11862559 = weight(_text_:de in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11862559 = score(doc=867,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051385287 = queryNorm
                0.53718615 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    https://www.spektrum.de/news/achsenzeit-die-erfundene-epoche/2058249?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
  10. Bischoff, M.: Eine (fast) unlösbare Aufgabe mit tragischem Ende : die fabelhafte Welt der Mathematik (2023) 0.06
    0.058291804 = product of:
      0.087437704 = sum of:
        0.028124912 = weight(_text_:m in 932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028124912 = score(doc=932,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051385287 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 932, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=932)
        0.059312794 = product of:
          0.11862559 = sum of:
            0.11862559 = weight(_text_:de in 932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11862559 = score(doc=932,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051385287 = queryNorm
                0.53718615 = fieldWeight in 932, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=932)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    https://www.spektrum.de/kolumne/galois-bewies-die-unloesbarkeit-von-polynomen-fuenften-grades/2119806?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
  11. Bischoff, M.: Hobby-Mathematiker findet die lang ersehnte Einstein-Kachel : Mathematisches Mosaik (2023) 0.06
    0.058291804 = product of:
      0.087437704 = sum of:
        0.028124912 = weight(_text_:m in 936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028124912 = score(doc=936,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051385287 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 936, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=936)
        0.059312794 = product of:
          0.11862559 = sum of:
            0.11862559 = weight(_text_:de in 936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11862559 = score(doc=936,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051385287 = queryNorm
                0.53718615 = fieldWeight in 936, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=936)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    https://www.spektrum.de/news/hobby-mathematiker-findet-lang-ersehnte-einstein-kachel/2124963#Echobox=1680175016?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
  12. Bischoff, M.: Wie eine KI lernt, sich selbst zu erklären (2023) 0.06
    0.058291804 = product of:
      0.087437704 = sum of:
        0.028124912 = weight(_text_:m in 956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028124912 = score(doc=956,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051385287 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 956, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=956)
        0.059312794 = product of:
          0.11862559 = sum of:
            0.11862559 = weight(_text_:de in 956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11862559 = score(doc=956,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051385287 = queryNorm
                0.53718615 = fieldWeight in 956, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=956)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    https://www.spektrum.de/news/sprachmodelle-auf-dem-weg-zu-einer-erklaerbaren-ki/2132727#Echobox=1682669561?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
  13. Baecker, D.: ¬Der Frosch, die Fliege und der Mensch : zum Tod von Humberto Maturana (2021) 0.06
    0.058157057 = product of:
      0.17447117 = sum of:
        0.17447117 = sum of:
          0.1048512 = weight(_text_:de in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1048512 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051385287 = queryNorm
              0.47480997 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
          0.06961997 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06961997 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17994252 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051385287 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die Frage, was Leben ist, hat Humberto Maturana beantwortet. Die Frage, was Erkennen ist, ließ ihn nie los. Nun ist der Forscher an den Schnittstellen von Neurobiologie und Philosophie in Santiago de Chile gestorben.
    Date
    7. 5.2021 22:10:24
  14. Wilke, M.; Pauen, M.; Ayan, S.: »Wir überschätzen die Rolle des Bewusstseins systematisch« : Leib-Seele-Problem (2022) 0.06
    0.057801 = product of:
      0.0867015 = sum of:
        0.034802802 = weight(_text_:m in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034802802 = score(doc=490,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051385287 = queryNorm
            0.27217406 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
        0.051898696 = product of:
          0.10379739 = sum of:
            0.10379739 = weight(_text_:de in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10379739 = score(doc=490,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051385287 = queryNorm
                0.47003788 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    https://www.spektrum.de/news/leib-seele-problem-was-wissen-wir-ueber-das-bewusstsein/1974235?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
  15. Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023) 0.06
    0.0559729 = product of:
      0.08395935 = sum of:
        0.042187367 = weight(_text_:m in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042187367 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051385287 = queryNorm
            0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
        0.041771982 = product of:
          0.083543964 = sum of:
            0.083543964 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083543964 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17994252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051385287 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
  16. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.05
    0.054869186 = product of:
      0.08230378 = sum of:
        0.061210092 = product of:
          0.24484037 = sum of:
            0.24484037 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24484037 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43564504 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051385287 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.021093683 = weight(_text_:m in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021093683 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051385287 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  17. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.05
    0.04973189 = sum of:
      0.01474883 = product of:
        0.05899532 = sum of:
          0.05899532 = weight(_text_:authors in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05899532 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23425597 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051385287 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.017578071 = weight(_text_:m in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017578071 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051385287 = queryNorm
          0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
      0.017404992 = product of:
        0.034809984 = sum of:
          0.034809984 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034809984 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17994252 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051385287 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
  18. Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020) 0.05
    0.048423033 = sum of:
      0.020436581 = product of:
        0.081746325 = sum of:
          0.081746325 = weight(_text_:authors in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.081746325 = score(doc=179,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.23425597 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051385287 = queryNorm
              0.34896153 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.014062456 = weight(_text_:m in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014062456 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051385287 = queryNorm
          0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
      0.013923994 = product of:
        0.027847989 = sum of:
          0.027847989 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027847989 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17994252 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051385287 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The open science movement calls for transparent and retraceable research processes. While infrastructures to support these practices in qualitative research are lacking, the design needs to consider different approaches and workflows. The paper bases on the definition of ontologies as shared conceptualizations of knowledge (Borst, 1999). The authors argue that participatory design is a good way to create these shared conceptualizations by giving domain experts and future users a voice in the design process via interviews, workshops and observations. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a novel approach for creating ontologies in the field of open science using participatory design. As a case study the creation of an ontology for qualitative coding schemas is presented. Coding schemas are an important result of qualitative research, and reuse can yield great potential for open science making qualitative research more transparent, enhance sharing of coding schemas and teaching of qualitative methods. The participatory design process consisted of three parts: a requirement analysis using interviews and an observation, a design phase accompanied by interviews and an evaluation phase based on user tests as well as interviews. Findings The research showed several positive outcomes due to participatory design: higher commitment of users, mutual learning, high quality feedback and better quality of the ontology. However, there are two obstacles in this approach: First, contradictive answers by the interviewees, which needs to be balanced; second, this approach takes more time due to interview planning and analysis. Practical implications The implication of the paper is in the long run to decentralize the design of open science infrastructures and to involve parties affected on several levels. Originality/value In ontology design, several methods exist by using user-centered design or participatory design doing workshops. In this paper, the authors outline the potentials for participatory design using mainly interviews in creating an ontology for open science. The authors focus on close contact to researchers in order to build the ontology upon the expert's knowledge.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  19. Praxishandbuch Forschungsdatenmanagement (2021) 0.05
    0.047667146 = product of:
      0.07150072 = sum of:
        0.034802802 = weight(_text_:m in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034802802 = score(doc=86,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12786965 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051385287 = queryNorm
            0.27217406 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
        0.03669792 = product of:
          0.07339584 = sum of:
            0.07339584 = weight(_text_:de in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07339584 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051385287 = queryNorm
                0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Editor
    Putnings, M., H. Neuroth u. J. Neumann
    Series
    De Gruyter Praxishandbuch
    Type
    m
  20. Rieger, F.: Lügende Computer (2023) 0.05
    0.04652565 = product of:
      0.13957694 = sum of:
        0.13957694 = sum of:
          0.08388096 = weight(_text_:de in 912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08388096 = score(doc=912,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22082771 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051385287 = queryNorm
              0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 912, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=912)
          0.055695977 = weight(_text_:22 in 912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055695977 = score(doc=912,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17994252 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051385287 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 912, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=912)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    16. 3.2023 19:22:55
    Source
    https://steadyhq.com/de/realitatsabzweig/posts/3ed79605-0650-4725-ab35-43f1243b57ee

Languages

  • e 294
  • d 172
  • pt 5
  • m 2
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 387
  • el 89
  • m 64
  • s 10
  • p 4
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications