-
Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023)
0.15
0.14598064 = sum of:
0.025079364 = product of:
0.100317456 = sum of:
0.100317456 = weight(_text_:authors in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.100317456 = score(doc=918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23472176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.12090128 = sum of:
0.07904624 = weight(_text_:y in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07904624 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.041855037 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041855037 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18030031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
- Abstract
- To what extent is the destiny of a scientific paper shaped by the cocitation network in which it is involved? What are the social contexts that can explain these structuring? Using bibliometric data, interviews with researchers, and social network analysis, this article proposes a typology based on egocentric cocitation networks that displays a quadruple structuring (before and after publication): polarization, clusterization, atomization, and attrition. It shows that the academic capital of the authors and the intellectual resources of their research are key factors of these destinies, as are the social relations between the authors concerned. The circumstances of the publishing are also correlated with the structuring of the egocentric cocitation networks, showing how socially embedded they are. Finally, the article discusses the contribution of these original networks to the analyze of scientific production and its dynamics.
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:14
-
Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023)
0.12
0.12165055 = sum of:
0.02089947 = product of:
0.08359788 = sum of:
0.08359788 = weight(_text_:authors in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08359788 = score(doc=950,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23472176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.10075107 = sum of:
0.06587187 = weight(_text_:y in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06587187 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
0.0348792 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348792 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18030031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
- Abstract
- Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
- Date
- 22. 4.2023 19:27:56
-
Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023)
0.12
0.11552923 = sum of:
0.014778158 = product of:
0.05911263 = sum of:
0.05911263 = weight(_text_:authors in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05911263 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23472176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.10075107 = sum of:
0.06587187 = weight(_text_:y in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06587187 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.0348792 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348792 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18030031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
- Abstract
- The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:15:06
-
Lu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Ahn, Y.-Y.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, C.; Ma, D.: Co-contributorship network and division of labor in individual scientific collaborations (2020)
0.08
0.08065003 = sum of:
0.014778158 = product of:
0.05911263 = sum of:
0.05911263 = weight(_text_:authors in 5963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05911263 = score(doc=5963,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23472176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5963, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5963)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.06587187 = product of:
0.13174374 = sum of:
0.13174374 = weight(_text_:y in 5963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13174374 = score(doc=5963,freq=8.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.53170013 = fieldWeight in 5963, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5963)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaborations are pervasive in current science. Collaborations have been studied and encouraged in many disciplines. However, little is known about how a team really functions from the detailed division of labor within. In this research, we investigate the patterns of scientific collaboration and division of labor within individual scholarly articles by analyzing their co-contributorship networks. Co-contributorship networks are constructed by performing the one-mode projection of the author-task bipartite networks obtained from 138,787 articles published in PLoS journals. Given an article, we define 3 types of contributors: Specialists, Team-players, and Versatiles. Specialists are those who contribute to all their tasks alone; team-players are those who contribute to every task with other collaborators; and versatiles are those who do both. We find that team-players are the majority and they tend to contribute to the 5 most common tasks as expected, such as "data analysis" and "performing experiments." The specialists and versatiles are more prevalent than expected by our designed 2 null models. Versatiles tend to be senior authors associated with funding and supervision. Specialists are associated with 2 contrasting roles: the supervising role as team leaders or marginal and specialized contributors.
-
Zhu, Y.; Quan, L.; Chen, P.-Y.; Kim, M.C.; Che, C.: Predicting coauthorship using bibliographic network embedding (2023)
0.08
0.07613476 = sum of:
0.029556315 = product of:
0.11822526 = sum of:
0.11822526 = weight(_text_:authors in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11822526 = score(doc=917,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23472176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.04657845 = product of:
0.0931569 = sum of:
0.0931569 = weight(_text_:y in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0931569 = score(doc=917,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Coauthorship prediction applies predictive analytics to bibliographic data to predict authors who are highly likely to be coauthors. In this study, we propose an approach for coauthorship prediction based on bibliographic network embedding through a graph-based bibliographic data model that can be used to model common bibliographic data, including papers, terms, sources, authors, departments, research interests, universities, and countries. A real-world dataset released by AMiner that includes more than 2 million papers, 8 million citations, and 1.7 million authors were integrated into a large bibliographic network using the proposed bibliographic data model. Translation-based methods were applied to the entities and relationships to generate their low-dimensional embeddings while preserving their connectivity information in the original bibliographic network. We applied machine learning algorithms to embeddings that represent the coauthorship relationships of the two authors and achieved high prediction results. The reference model, which is the combination of a network embedding size of 100, the most basic translation-based method, and a gradient boosting method achieved an F1 score of 0.9 and even higher scores are obtainable with different embedding sizes and more advanced embedding methods. Thus, the strengths of the proposed approach lie in its customizable components under a unified framework.
-
Cheng, Y.-Y.; Xia, Y.: ¬A systematic review of methods for aligning, mapping, merging taxonomies in information sciences (2023)
0.07
0.07182487 = sum of:
0.014778158 = product of:
0.05911263 = sum of:
0.05911263 = weight(_text_:authors in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05911263 = score(doc=1029,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23472176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.057046715 = product of:
0.11409343 = sum of:
0.11409343 = weight(_text_:y in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11409343 = score(doc=1029,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.46046585 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this study is to provide a systematic literature review on taxonomy alignment methods in information science to explore the common research pipeline and characteristics. Design/methodology/approach The authors implement a five-step systematic literature review process relating to taxonomy alignment. They take on a knowledge organization system (KOS) perspective, and specifically examining the level of KOS on "taxonomies." Findings They synthesize the matching dimensions of 28 taxonomy alignment studies in terms of the taxonomy input, approach and output. In the input dimension, they develop three characteristics: tree shapes, variable names and symmetry; for approach: methodology, unit of matching, comparison type and relation type; for output: the number of merged solutions and whether original taxonomies are preserved in the solutions. Research limitations/implications The main research implications of this study are threefold: (1) to enhance the understanding of the characteristics of a taxonomy alignment work; (2) to provide a novel categorization of taxonomy alignment approaches into natural language processing approach, logic-based approach and heuristic-based approach; (3) to provide a methodological guideline on the must-include characteristics for future taxonomy alignment research. Originality/value There is no existing comprehensive review on the alignment of "taxonomies". Further, no other mapping survey research has discussed the comparison from a KOS perspective. Using a KOS lens is critical in understanding the broader picture of what other similar systems of organizations are, and enables us to define taxonomies more precisely.
-
Wang, S.; Ma, Y.; Mao, J.; Bai, Y.; Liang, Z.; Li, G.: Quantifying scientific breakthroughs by a novel disruption indicator based on knowledge entities : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023)
0.06
0.06401805 = product of:
0.1280361 = sum of:
0.1280361 = sum of:
0.0931569 = weight(_text_:y in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0931569 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.0348792 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348792 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18030031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:37:33
-
Jiang, Y.; Meng, R.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, J.: Generating keyphrases for readers : a controllable keyphrase generation framework (2023)
0.06
0.06401805 = product of:
0.1280361 = sum of:
0.1280361 = sum of:
0.0931569 = weight(_text_:y in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0931569 = score(doc=1012,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
0.0348792 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348792 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18030031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 14:55:20
-
Ma, Y.: Relatedness and compatibility : the concept of privacy in Mandarin Chinese and American English corpora (2023)
0.06
0.06045064 = product of:
0.12090128 = sum of:
0.12090128 = sum of:
0.07904624 = weight(_text_:y in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07904624 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.041855037 = weight(_text_:22 in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041855037 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18030031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:59:40
-
Zhang, X.; Wang, D.; Tang, Y.; Xiao, Q.: How question type influences knowledge withholding in social Q&A community (2023)
0.06
0.06045064 = product of:
0.12090128 = sum of:
0.12090128 = sum of:
0.07904624 = weight(_text_:y in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07904624 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
0.041855037 = weight(_text_:22 in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041855037 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18030031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2023 13:51:47
-
Ali, C.B.; Haddad, H.; Slimani, Y.: Multi-word terms selection for information retrieval (2022)
0.06
0.058532458 = sum of:
0.025596522 = product of:
0.10238609 = sum of:
0.10238609 = weight(_text_:authors in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10238609 = score(doc=900,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23472176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.032935936 = product of:
0.06587187 = sum of:
0.06587187 = weight(_text_:y in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06587187 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose A number of approaches and algorithms have been proposed over the years as a basis for automatic indexing. Many of these approaches suffer from precision inefficiency at low recall. The choice of indexing units has a great impact on search system effectiveness. The authors dive beyond simple terms indexing to propose a framework for multi-word terms (MWT) filtering and indexing. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, the authors rely on ranking MWT to filter them, keeping the most effective ones for the indexing process. The proposed model is based on filtering MWT according to their ability to capture the document topic and distinguish between different documents from the same collection. The authors rely on the hypothesis that the best MWT are those that achieve the greatest association degree. The experiments are carried out with English and French languages data sets. Findings The results indicate that this approach achieved precision enhancements at low recall, and it performed better than more advanced models based on terms dependencies. Originality/value Using and testing different association measures to select MWT that best describe the documents to enhance the precision in the first retrieved documents.
-
Jiang, Y.-C.; Li, H.: ¬The theoretical basis and basic principles of knowledge network construction in digital library (2023)
0.06
0.057256907 = sum of:
0.017733788 = product of:
0.07093515 = sum of:
0.07093515 = weight(_text_:authors in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07093515 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23472176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.03952312 = product of:
0.07904624 = sum of:
0.07904624 = weight(_text_:y in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07904624 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Knowledge network construction (KNC) is the essence of dynamic knowledge architecture, and is helpful to illustrate ubiquitous knowledge service in digital libraries (DLs). The authors explore its theoretical foundations and basic rules to elucidate the basic principles of KNC in DLs. The results indicate that world general connection, small-world phenomenon, relevance theory, unity and continuity of science development have been the production tool, architecture aim and scientific foundation of KNC in DLs. By analyzing both the characteristics of KNC based on different types of knowledge linking and the relationships between different forms of knowledge and the appropriate ways of knowledge linking, the basic principle of KNC is summarized as follows: let each kind of knowledge linking form each shows its ability, each kind of knowledge manifestation each answer the purpose intended in practice, and then subjective knowledge network and objective knowledge network are organically combined. This will lay a solid theoretical foundation and provide an action guide for DLs to construct knowledge networks.
-
Liu, X.; Bu, Y.; Li, M.; Li, J.: Monodisciplinary collaboration disrupts science more than multidisciplinary collaboration (2024)
0.06
0.057256907 = sum of:
0.017733788 = product of:
0.07093515 = sum of:
0.07093515 = weight(_text_:authors in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07093515 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23472176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.03952312 = product of:
0.07904624 = sum of:
0.07904624 = weight(_text_:y in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07904624 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaboration across disciplines is a critical form of scientific collaboration to solve complex problems and make innovative contributions. This study focuses on the association between multidisciplinary collaboration measured by coauthorship in publications and the disruption of publications measured by the Disruption (D) index. We used authors' affiliations as a proxy of the disciplines to which they belong and categorized an article into multidisciplinary collaboration or monodisciplinary collaboration. The D index quantifies the extent to which a study disrupts its predecessors. We selected 13 journals that publish articles in six disciplines from the Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) database and then constructed regression models with fixed effects and estimated the relationship between the variables. The findings show that articles with monodisciplinary collaboration are more disruptive than those with multidisciplinary collaboration. Furthermore, we uncovered the mechanism of how monodisciplinary collaboration disrupts science more than multidisciplinary collaboration by exploring the references of the sampled publications.
-
Tian, W.; Cai, R.; Fang, Z.; Geng, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, Z.: Understanding co-corresponding authorship : a bibliometric analysis and detailed overview (2024)
0.05
0.053835407 = sum of:
0.02089947 = product of:
0.08359788 = sum of:
0.08359788 = weight(_text_:authors in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08359788 = score(doc=1196,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23472176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.032935936 = product of:
0.06587187 = sum of:
0.06587187 = weight(_text_:y in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06587187 = score(doc=1196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The phenomenon of co-corresponding authorship is becoming more and more common. To understand the practice of authorship credit sharing among multiple corresponding authors, we comprehensively analyzed the characteristics of the phenomenon of co-corresponding authorships from the perspectives of countries, disciplines, journals, and articles. This researcher was based on a dataset of nearly 8 million articles indexed in the Web of Science, which provides systematic, cross-disciplinary, and large-scale evidence for understanding the phenomenon of co-corresponding authorship for the first time. Our findings reveal that higher proportions of co-corresponding authorship exist in Asian countries, especially in China. From the perspective of disciplines, there is a relatively higher proportion of co-corresponding authorship in the fields of engineering and medicine, while a lower proportion exists in the humanities, social sciences, and computer science fields. From the perspective of journals, high-quality journals usually have higher proportions of co-corresponding authorship. At the level of the article, our findings proved that, compared to articles with a single corresponding author, articles with multiple corresponding authors have a significant citation advantage.
-
Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, E.; Ni, C.: Gender and country biases in Wikipedia citations to scholarly publications (2023)
0.05
0.05164334 = sum of:
0.030715823 = product of:
0.12286329 = sum of:
0.12286329 = weight(_text_:authors in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12286329 = score(doc=886,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23472176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020927519 = product of:
0.041855037 = sum of:
0.041855037 = weight(_text_:22 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041855037 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18030031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ensuring Wikipedia cites scholarly publications based on quality and relevancy without biases is critical to credible and fair knowledge dissemination. We investigate gender- and country-based biases in Wikipedia citation practices using linked data from the Web of Science and a Wikipedia citation dataset. Using coarsened exact matching, we show that publications by women are cited less by Wikipedia than expected, and publications by women are less likely to be cited than those by men. Scholarly publications by authors affiliated with non-Anglosphere countries are also disadvantaged in getting cited by Wikipedia, compared with those by authors affiliated with Anglosphere countries. The level of gender- or country-based inequalities varies by research field, and the gender-country intersectional bias is prominent in math-intensive STEM fields. To ensure the credibility and equality of knowledge presentation, Wikipedia should consider strategies and guidelines to cite scholarly publications independent of the gender and country of authors.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:53:32
-
Chi, Y.; He, D.; Jeng, W.: Laypeople's source selection in online health information-seeking process (2020)
0.05
0.050375536 = product of:
0.10075107 = sum of:
0.10075107 = sum of:
0.06587187 = weight(_text_:y in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06587187 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
0.0348792 = weight(_text_:22 in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348792 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18030031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12.11.2020 13:22:09
-
Huang, T.; Nie, R.; Zhao, Y.: Archival knowledge in the field of personal archiving : an exploratory study based on grounded theory (2021)
0.05
0.050375536 = product of:
0.10075107 = sum of:
0.10075107 = sum of:
0.06587187 = weight(_text_:y in 173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06587187 = score(doc=173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=173)
0.0348792 = weight(_text_:22 in 173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348792 = score(doc=173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18030031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=173)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2021 14:20:27
-
Oh, H.; Nam, S.; Zhu, Y.: Structured abstract summarization of scientific articles : summarization using full-text section information (2023)
0.05
0.050375536 = product of:
0.10075107 = sum of:
0.10075107 = sum of:
0.06587187 = weight(_text_:y in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06587187 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
0.0348792 = weight(_text_:22 in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348792 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18030031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:57:12
-
Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Song, S.: ¬The design and evaluation of a nudge-based interface to facilitate consumers' evaluation of online health information credibility (2023)
0.05
0.050375536 = product of:
0.10075107 = sum of:
0.10075107 = sum of:
0.06587187 = weight(_text_:y in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06587187 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
0.0348792 = weight(_text_:22 in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348792 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18030031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:18:34
-
Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Lu, J.: Stepping beyond your comfort zone : diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation (2023)
0.05
0.050375536 = product of:
0.10075107 = sum of:
0.10075107 = sum of:
0.06587187 = weight(_text_:y in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06587187 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.0348792 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0348792 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18030031 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05148746 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:07:12
