-
Habermas, J.: Überlegungen und Hypothesen zu einem erneuten Strukturwandel der politischen Öffentlichkeit : ¬Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit? Hrsg.: M. Seeliger u. S. Sevignani (2021)
0.05
0.0462344 = product of:
0.07705733 = sum of:
0.006382961 = weight(_text_:a in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006382961 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.036398914 = weight(_text_:u in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036398914 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.03427546 = weight(_text_:j in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03427546 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Footnote
- Vgl. dazu: El Ouassil, S.: Habermas und die Demokratie 2.0: Philosoph über Soziale Medien. Unter: https://www.spiegel.de/kultur/juergen-habermas-strukturwandel-der-oeffentlichkeit-in-der-2-0-version-a-2e683f52-3ccd-4985-a750-5e1a1823ad08.
- Type
- a
-
Felgner, U.: ¬Die Begriffe der Äquivalenz, der Gleichheit und der Identität (2020)
0.04
0.03843078 = product of:
0.048038475 = sum of:
0.0029257927 = product of:
0.026332134 = sum of:
0.026332134 = weight(_text_:p in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026332134 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.002708061 = weight(_text_:a in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002708061 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
0.021839347 = weight(_text_:u in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021839347 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
0.020565277 = weight(_text_:j in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020565277 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
0.8 = coord(4/5)
- Abstract
- "Der Begriff der Gleichheit ist uns Mathematikern vielleicht der geläufigste; dennoch läßt sich schwer sagen, was wir unter ihm verstehen." - Mit diesem Satz beginnt GERHARD HESSENBERG sein Buch über die .Grundlagen der Geometrie' ([24], Berlin, 1930, §1). Er kommt nach einer ausführlichen Diskussion zum Schluß, daß die Relation der Gleichheit nichts anderes als eine Äquivalenzrelation sei, also eine symmetrische, transitive und reflexive Relation, und daß auch umgekehrt jede symmetrische, transitive und reflexive Relation eine Gleichheitsbeziehung sei. Die Begriffe Gleichheit und Äquivalenz wären demnach synonym. Schaut man im .Mathematischen Wörterbuch' von J. NAAS & H.L. SCHMID (Berlin, 1967) nach, so findet man unter dem Stichwort Gleichheit (p. 639) genau dieselbe Definition: "Die Gleichheit ist eine Äquivalenzrelation und umgekehrt kann jede Äquivalenzrelation als eine besondere Art von Gleichheit aufgefaßt werden."
- Type
- a
-
Wüllner, J.: Obsidian - das Organisationstalent : Ideen, Notizen, Planungen, Projekte - diese App kann für Schule, Uni und Beruf hilfreich sein (2023)
0.04
0.035762247 = product of:
0.059603743 = sum of:
0.0045134346 = weight(_text_:a in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0045134346 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.03427546 = weight(_text_:j in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03427546 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.020814845 = product of:
0.04162969 = sum of:
0.04162969 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04162969 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Date
- 27. 1.2023 16:22:55
- Type
- a
-
Hartel, J.: ¬The red thread of information (2020)
0.03
0.033702534 = product of:
0.042128168 = sum of:
0.0024381608 = product of:
0.021943446 = sum of:
0.021943446 = weight(_text_:p in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021943446 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.005046174 = weight(_text_:a in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005046174 = score(doc=5839,freq=10.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
0.02423641 = weight(_text_:j in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02423641 = score(doc=5839,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
0.010407423 = product of:
0.020814845 = sum of:
0.020814845 = weight(_text_:22 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020814845 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8 = coord(4/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose In The Invisible Substrate of Information Science, a landmark article about the discipline of information science, Marcia J. Bates wrote that ".we are always looking for the red thread of information in the social texture of people's lives" (1999a, p. 1048). To sharpen our understanding of information science and to elaborate Bates' idea, the work at hand answers the question: Just what does the red thread of information entail? Design/methodology/approach Through a close reading of Bates' oeuvre and by applying concepts from the reference literature of information science, nine composite entities that qualify as the red thread of information are identified, elaborated, and related to existing concepts in the information science literature. In the spirit of a scientist-poet (White, 1999), several playful metaphors related to the color red are employed. Findings Bates' red thread of information entails: terms, genres, literatures, classification systems, scholarly communication, information retrieval, information experience, information institutions, and information policy. This same constellation of phenomena can be found in resonant visions of information science, namely, domain analysis (Hjørland, 2002), ethnography of infrastructure (Star, 1999), and social epistemology (Shera, 1968). Research limitations/implications With the vital vermilion filament in clear view, newcomers can more easily engage the material, conceptual, and social machinery of information science, and specialists are reminded of what constitutes information science as a whole. Future researchers and scientist-poets may wish to supplement the nine composite entities with additional, emergent information phenomena. Originality/value Though the explication of information science that follows is relatively orthodox and time-bound, the paper offers an imaginative, accessible, yet technically precise way of understanding the field.
- Date
- 30. 4.2020 21:03:22
- Type
- a
-
Tappenbeck, I.; Michel, A.; Wittich, A.; Werr, N.; Gäde, M.; Spree, U.; Gläser, C.; Griesbaum, J.; Mandl, T.; Keller-Loibl, K.; Stang, R.: Framework Informationskompetenz : Ein gemeinsamer Standard für die Qualifikation in den bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftlichen Studiengängen in Deutschland (2022)
0.03
0.03296659 = product of:
0.054944314 = sum of:
0.0054722494 = weight(_text_:a in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054722494 = score(doc=540,freq=6.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
0.025479238 = weight(_text_:u in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025479238 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
0.023992823 = weight(_text_:j in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023992823 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Type
- a
-
Balakrishnan, U.; Peters, S.; Voß, J.: Coli-conc : eine Infrastruktur zur Nutzung und Erstellung von Konkordanzen (2021)
0.03
0.031578884 = product of:
0.052631468 = sum of:
0.0031594043 = weight(_text_:a in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031594043 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
0.025479238 = weight(_text_:u in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025479238 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
0.023992823 = weight(_text_:j in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023992823 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Type
- a
-
Babcock, K.; Lee, S.; Rajakumar, J.; Wagner, A.: Providing access to digital collections (2020)
0.03
0.03154132 = product of:
0.052568868 = sum of:
0.0039087497 = weight(_text_:a in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039087497 = score(doc=5855,freq=6.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
0.031522386 = weight(_text_:u in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031522386 = score(doc=5855,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.3133093 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
0.01713773 = weight(_text_:j in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01713773 = score(doc=5855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The University of Toronto Libraries is currently reviewing technology to support its Collections U of T service. Collections U of T provides search and browse access to 375 digital collections (and over 203,000 digital objects) at the University of Toronto Libraries. Digital objects typically include special collections material from the university as well as faculty digital collections, all with unique metadata requirements. The service is currently supported by IIIF-enabled Islandora, with one Fedora back end and multiple Drupal sites per parent collection (see attached image). Like many institutions making use of Islandora, UTL is now confronted with Drupal 7 end of life and has begun to investigate a migration path forward. This article will summarise the Collections U of T functional requirements and lessons learned from our current technology stack. It will go on to outline our research to date for alternate solutions. The article will review both emerging micro-service solutions, as well as out-of-the-box platforms, to provide an overview of the digital collection technology landscape in 2019. Note that our research is focused on reviewing technology solutions for providing access to digital collections, as preservation services are offered through other services at the University of Toronto Libraries.
- Type
- a
-
Hutchinson, J.; Nakatomi, J.: Improving subject description of an LGBTQ+ collection (2024)
0.03
0.028671412 = product of:
0.047785684 = sum of:
0.003901057 = product of:
0.035109513 = sum of:
0.035109513 = weight(_text_:p in 1157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035109513 = score(doc=1157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 1157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1157)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.0051063686 = weight(_text_:a in 1157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0051063686 = score(doc=1157,freq=4.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1157, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1157)
0.038778257 = weight(_text_:j in 1157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038778257 = score(doc=1157,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.39718705 = fieldWeight in 1157, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1157)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This article summarizes the work done as part of a project to improve subject description of an LGBTQ + collection in the ONE Archives, part of the University of Southern California (USC) Libraries. The project involved adding local subject headings to augment existing Library of Congress Subject Headings. The article describes the steps that the project team took, along with the methods that were rejected. The paper discusses reasons why the team chose their course of action.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.3-4, p.380-394
- Type
- a
-
Bager, J.: ¬Die Text-KI ChatGPT schreibt Fachtexte, Prosa, Gedichte und Programmcode (2023)
0.03
0.028609797 = product of:
0.047682993 = sum of:
0.0036107479 = weight(_text_:a in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0036107479 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
0.027420368 = weight(_text_:j in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027420368 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
0.016651876 = product of:
0.033303753 = sum of:
0.033303753 = weight(_text_:22 in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033303753 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Date
- 29.12.2022 18:22:55
- Type
- a
-
Liang, Z.; Mao, J.; Li, G.: Bias against scientific novelty : a prepublication perspective (2023)
0.03
0.028257074 = product of:
0.04709512 = sum of:
0.004690499 = weight(_text_:a in 845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004690499 = score(doc=845,freq=6.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 845, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=845)
0.021839347 = weight(_text_:u in 845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021839347 = score(doc=845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=845)
0.020565277 = weight(_text_:j in 845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020565277 = score(doc=845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=845)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Novel ideas often experience resistance from incumbent forces. While evidence of the bias against novelty has been widely identified in science, there is still a lack of large-scale quantitative work to study this problem occurring in the prepublication process of manuscripts. This paper examines the association between manuscript novelty and handling time of publication based on 778,345 articles in 1,159 journals indexed by PubMed. Measuring the novelty as the extent to which manuscripts disrupt existing knowledge, we found systematic evidence that higher novelty is associated with longer handling time. Matching and fixed-effect models were adopted to confirm the statistical significance of this pattern. Moreover, submissions from prestigious authors and institutions have the advantage of shorter handling time, but this advantage is diminishing as manuscript novelty increases. In addition, we found longer handling time is negatively related to the impact of manuscripts, while the relationships between novelty and 3- and 5-year citations are U-shape. This study expands the existing knowledge of the novelty bias by examining its existence in the prepublication process of manuscripts.
- Type
- a
-
Fassbender, J.: Register / Indexe (2023)
0.03
0.02774064 = product of:
0.0462344 = sum of:
0.0038297763 = weight(_text_:a in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0038297763 = score(doc=785,freq=4.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
0.021839347 = weight(_text_:u in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021839347 = score(doc=785,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
0.020565277 = weight(_text_:j in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020565277 = score(doc=785,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Der Fokus dieses Artikels liegt auf der Indexerstellung von Publikationen, d. h. der detaillierten Indexierung der Inhalte von Dokumenten statt der Indexierung auf Dokumentebene, welche sich auf das Gesamtthema von Dokumenten beschränkt. Zu letzterer zählen z. B. das Hauptthema von Artikeln, die Sachkatalogisierung von Büchern oder die Erschließung von Objekten in der Museumsdokumentation. Die Worte Index und Register werden synonym benutzt. Das Wort Index ist nicht nur ein Homonym aus unterschiedlichen Bereichen (z. B. Finanzwesen, Mathematik), sondern auch ein Polysem im Publikationswesen, da es in romanischen Sprachen sowohl Inhaltsverzeichnis als auch Register meinen kann. Während im Finanzwesen, Mathematik u. a. die Pluralform Indizes benutzt wird, ist im bibliographischen Sinn Indexe der korrekte Plural (engl.: indexes), es sei denn, es geht um Indices zu alten Werken in lateinischer Sprache (index rerum, index nominum, index verborum). Etymologie, Bedeutung und Plural des Wortes Index erläutert Wellisch ausführlich.
- Type
- a
-
Luo, L.; Ju, J.; Li, Y.-F.; Haffari, G.; Xiong, B.; Pan, S.: ChatRule: mining logical rules with large language models for knowledge graph reasoning (2023)
0.03
0.027597398 = product of:
0.034496747 = sum of:
0.0024381608 = product of:
0.021943446 = sum of:
0.021943446 = weight(_text_:p in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021943446 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.0045134346 = weight(_text_:a in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0045134346 = score(doc=1171,freq=8.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.01713773 = weight(_text_:j in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01713773 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.010407423 = product of:
0.020814845 = sum of:
0.020814845 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020814845 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8 = coord(4/5)
- Abstract
- Logical rules are essential for uncovering the logical connections between relations, which could improve the reasoning performance and provide interpretable results on knowledge graphs (KGs). Although there have been many efforts to mine meaningful logical rules over KGs, existing methods suffer from the computationally intensive searches over the rule space and a lack of scalability for large-scale KGs. Besides, they often ignore the semantics of relations which is crucial for uncovering logical connections. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance in the field of natural language processing and various applications, owing to their emergent ability and generalizability. In this paper, we propose a novel framework, ChatRule, unleashing the power of large language models for mining logical rules over knowledge graphs. Specifically, the framework is initiated with an LLM-based rule generator, leveraging both the semantic and structural information of KGs to prompt LLMs to generate logical rules. To refine the generated rules, a rule ranking module estimates the rule quality by incorporating facts from existing KGs. Last, a rule validator harnesses the reasoning ability of LLMs to validate the logical correctness of ranked rules through chain-of-thought reasoning. ChatRule is evaluated on four large-scale KGs, w.r.t. different rule quality metrics and downstream tasks, showing the effectiveness and scalability of our method.
- Date
- 23.11.2023 19:07:22
- Type
- p
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.03
0.026539836 = product of:
0.033174794 = sum of:
0.0024381608 = product of:
0.021943446 = sum of:
0.021943446 = weight(_text_:p in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021943446 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.0031914804 = weight(_text_:a in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031914804 = score(doc=995,freq=4.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.01713773 = weight(_text_:j in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01713773 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.010407423 = product of:
0.020814845 = sum of:
0.020814845 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020814845 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8 = coord(4/5)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is encouraged because it is believed to improve academic research, supported by indirect evidence in the form of more coauthored articles being more cited. Nevertheless, this might not reflect quality but increased self-citations or the "audience effect": citations from increased awareness through multiple author networks. We address this with the first science wide investigation into whether author numbers associate with journal article quality, using expert peer quality judgments for 122,331 articles from the 2014-20 UK national assessment. Spearman correlations between author numbers and quality scores show moderately strong positive associations (0.2-0.4) in the health, life, and physical sciences, but weak or no positive associations in engineering and social sciences, with weak negative/positive or no associations in various arts and humanities, and a possible negative association for decision sciences. This gives the first systematic evidence that greater numbers of authors associates with higher quality journal articles in the majority of academia outside the arts and humanities, at least for the UK. Positive associations between team size and citation counts in areas with little association between team size and quality also show that audience effects or other nonquality factors account for the higher citation rates of coauthored articles in some fields.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
- Type
- a
-
Zimmer, M.; Vitak, J.; Wu, P.: Information privacy in the digital age : Editorial introduction (2020)
0.03
0.02619913 = product of:
0.043665215 = sum of:
0.0048763216 = product of:
0.043886892 = sum of:
0.043886892 = weight(_text_:p in 5931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043886892 = score(doc=5931,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 5931, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5931)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.0045134346 = weight(_text_:a in 5931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0045134346 = score(doc=5931,freq=2.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5931, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5931)
0.03427546 = weight(_text_:j in 5931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03427546 = score(doc=5931,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 5931, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5931)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Type
- a
-
Greenberg, J.; Zhao, X.; Monselise, M.; Grabus, S.; Boone, J.: Knowledge organization systems : a network for AI with helping interdisciplinary vocabulary engineering (2021)
0.03
0.025689991 = product of:
0.04281665 = sum of:
0.0034134248 = product of:
0.030720823 = sum of:
0.030720823 = weight(_text_:p in 719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030720823 = score(doc=719,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 719, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=719)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.0054722494 = weight(_text_:a in 719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054722494 = score(doc=719,freq=6.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 719, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=719)
0.033930976 = weight(_text_:j in 719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033930976 = score(doc=719,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 719, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=719)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) as networks of knowledge have the potential to inform AI operations. This paper explores natural language processing and machine learning in the context of KOS and Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) technology. The paper presents three use cases: HIVE and Historical Knowledge Networks, HIVE for Materials Science (HIVE-4-MAT), and Using HIVE to Enhance and Explore Medical Ontologies. The background section reviews AI foundations, while the use cases provide a frame of reference for discussing current progress and implications of connecting KOS to AI in digital resource collections.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.8, p.720-739
- Type
- a
-
Wu, Z.; Li, R.; Zhou, Z.; Guo, J.; Jiang, J.; Su, X.: ¬A user sensitive subject protection approach for book search service (2020)
0.02
0.024368728 = product of:
0.040614545 = sum of:
0.005970713 = weight(_text_:a in 5617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005970713 = score(doc=5617,freq=14.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 5617, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5617)
0.02423641 = weight(_text_:j in 5617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02423641 = score(doc=5617,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 5617, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5617)
0.010407423 = product of:
0.020814845 = sum of:
0.020814845 = weight(_text_:22 in 5617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020814845 = score(doc=5617,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5617, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5617)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- In a digital library, book search is one of the most important information services. However, with the rapid development of network technologies such as cloud computing, the server-side of a digital library is becoming more and more untrusted; thus, how to prevent the disclosure of users' book query privacy is causing people's increasingly extensive concern. In this article, we propose to construct a group of plausible fake queries for each user book query to cover up the sensitive subjects behind users' queries. First, we propose a basic framework for the privacy protection in book search, which requires no change to the book search algorithm running on the server-side, and no compromise to the accuracy of book search. Second, we present a privacy protection model for book search to formulate the constraints that ideal fake queries should satisfy, that is, (i) the feature similarity, which measures the confusion effect of fake queries on users' queries, and (ii) the privacy exposure, which measures the cover-up effect of fake queries on users' sensitive subjects. Third, we discuss the algorithm implementation for the privacy model. Finally, the effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated by theoretical analysis and experimental evaluation.
- Date
- 6. 1.2020 17:22:25
- Type
- a
-
Jansen, B.; Browne, G.M.: Navigating information spaces : index / mind map / topic map? (2021)
0.02
0.024145009 = product of:
0.04024168 = sum of:
0.003901057 = product of:
0.035109513 = sum of:
0.035109513 = weight(_text_:p in 436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035109513 = score(doc=436,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 436, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=436)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.0072214957 = weight(_text_:a in 436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072214957 = score(doc=436,freq=8.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 436, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=436)
0.029119128 = weight(_text_:u in 436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029119128 = score(doc=436,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 436, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=436)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the use of wiki technology to provide a navigation structure for a collection of newspaper clippings. We overview the architecture of the wiki, discuss the navigation structure and pose the question: is the navigation structure an index, and if so, what type, or is it just a linkage structure or topic map. Does such a distinction really matter? Are these definitions in reality function based?
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
- Type
- p
-
Bullard, J.; Dierking, A.; Grundner, A.: Centring LGBT2QIA+ subjects in knowledge organization systems (2020)
0.02
0.024131425 = product of:
0.04021904 = sum of:
0.007164856 = weight(_text_:a in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007164856 = score(doc=5996,freq=14.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.020565277 = weight(_text_:j in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020565277 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.012488906 = product of:
0.024977813 = sum of:
0.024977813 = weight(_text_:22 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024977813 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This paper contains a report of two interdependent knowledge organization (KO) projects for an LGBT2QIA+ library. The authors, in the context of volunteer library work for an independent library, redesigned the classification system and subject cataloguing guidelines to centre LGBT2QIA+ subjects. We discuss the priorities of creating and maintaining knowledge organization systems for a historically marginalized community and address the challenge that queer subjectivity poses to the goals of KO. The classification system features a focus on identity and physically reorganizes the library space in a way that accounts for the multiple and overlapping labels that constitute the currently articulated boundaries of this community. The subject heading system focuses on making visible topics and elements of identity made invisible by universal systems and by the newly implemented classification system. We discuss how this project may inform KO for other marginalized subjects, particularly through process and documentation that prioritizes transparency and the acceptance of an unfinished endpoint for queer KO.
- Date
- 6.10.2020 21:22:33
- Type
- a
-
Kim, J.(im); Kim, J.(enna): Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation (2020)
0.02
0.023494361 = product of:
0.039157268 = sum of:
0.0045134346 = weight(_text_:a in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0045134346 = score(doc=5930,freq=8.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
0.02423641 = weight(_text_:j in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02423641 = score(doc=5930,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09763223 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
0.010407423 = product of:
0.020814845 = sum of:
0.020814845 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020814845 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10759774 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- In author name disambiguation, author forenames are used to decide which name instances are disambiguated together and how much they are likely to refer to the same author. Despite such a crucial role of forenames, their effect on the performance of heuristic (string matching) and algorithmic disambiguation is not well understood. This study assesses the contributions of forenames in author name disambiguation using multiple labeled data sets under varying ratios and lengths of full forenames, reflecting real-world scenarios in which an author is represented by forename variants (synonym) and some authors share the same forenames (homonym). The results show that increasing the ratios of full forenames substantially improves both heuristic and machine-learning-based disambiguation. Performance gains by algorithmic disambiguation are pronounced when many forenames are initialized or homonyms are prevalent. As the ratios of full forenames increase, however, they become marginal compared to those by string matching. Using a small portion of forename strings does not reduce much the performances of both heuristic and algorithmic disambiguation methods compared to using full-length strings. These findings provide practical suggestions, such as restoring initialized forenames into a full-string format via record linkage for improved disambiguation performances.
- Date
- 11. 7.2020 13:22:58
- Type
- a
-
Deng, Z.; Deng, Z.; Fan, G.; Wang, B.; Fan, W.(P.); Liu, S.: More is better? : understanding the effects of online interactions on patients health anxiety (2023)
0.02
0.023404034 = product of:
0.03900672 = sum of:
0.0024381608 = product of:
0.021943446 = sum of:
0.021943446 = weight(_text_:p in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021943446 = score(doc=1082,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11047626 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
0.005046174 = weight(_text_:a in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005046174 = score(doc=1082,freq=10.0), product of:
0.035428695 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
0.031522386 = weight(_text_:u in 1082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031522386 = score(doc=1082,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10061107 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03072615 = queryNorm
0.3133093 = fieldWeight in 1082, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1082)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Online health platforms play an important role in chronic disease management. Patients participate in online health platforms to receive and provide health-related support from each other. However, there remains a debate about whether the influence of social interaction on patient health anxiety is linearly positive. Based on uncertainty, information overload, and the theory of motivational information management, we develop and test a model considering a potential curvilinear relationship between social interaction and health anxiety, as well as a moderating effect of health literacy. We collect patient interaction data from an online health platform based on chronic disease management in China and use text mining and econometrics to test our hypotheses. Specifically, we find an inverted U-shaped relationship between informational provision and health anxiety. Our results also show that information receipt and emotion provision have U-shaped relationships with health anxiety. Interestingly, health literacy can effectively alleviate the U-shaped relationship between information receipt and health anxiety. These findings not only provide new insights into the literature on online patient interactions but also provide decision support for patients and platform managers.
- Type
- a
