Search (153 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Ashton, J.; Kent, C.: FAST: a journey toward sustainability in subject indexing at the British Library (2023) 0.11
    0.110214464 = product of:
      0.3306434 = sum of:
        0.3306434 = weight(_text_:funnel in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3306434 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44452584 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04622078 = queryNorm
            0.74381137 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides an update on progress since the partial roll-out of FAST in 2015 at the British Library. It discusses developments to the product and the provision of community interaction with FAST via a FAST funnel, ensuring the vocabulary is robust and flexible enough to meet the continued needs of Legal Deposit workflows. It describes the planning and implementation methods used in rolling out FAST to the majority of cataloging workflows at the British Library leading to extensive training over the autumn of 2022.
  2. Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020) 0.04
    0.040962033 = product of:
      0.1228861 = sum of:
        0.1228861 = sum of:
          0.07278788 = weight(_text_:project in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07278788 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04622078 = queryNorm
              0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
          0.050098218 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050098218 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04622078 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes experiments in the use of machine learning techniques at the British Library to assign language codes to catalog records, in order to provide information about the language of content of the resources described. In the first phase of the project, language codes were assigned to 1.15 million records with 99.7% confidence. The automated language identification tools developed will be used to contribute to future enhancement of over 4 million legacy records.
    Date
    2. 3.2020 19:04:22
  3. Bullard, J.; Dierking, A.; Grundner, A.: Centring LGBT2QIA+ subjects in knowledge organization systems (2020) 0.03
    0.030721527 = product of:
      0.092164576 = sum of:
        0.092164576 = sum of:
          0.054590914 = weight(_text_:project in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054590914 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04622078 = queryNorm
              0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
          0.03757366 = weight(_text_:22 in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03757366 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04622078 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper contains a report of two interdependent knowledge organization (KO) projects for an LGBT2QIA+ library. The authors, in the context of volunteer library work for an independent library, redesigned the classification system and subject cataloguing guidelines to centre LGBT2QIA+ subjects. We discuss the priorities of creating and maintaining knowledge organization systems for a historically marginalized community and address the challenge that queer subjectivity poses to the goals of KO. The classification system features a focus on identity and physically reorganizes the library space in a way that accounts for the multiple and overlapping labels that constitute the currently articulated boundaries of this community. The subject heading system focuses on making visible topics and elements of identity made invisible by universal systems and by the newly implemented classification system. We discuss how this project may inform KO for other marginalized subjects, particularly through process and documentation that prioritizes transparency and the acceptance of an unfinished endpoint for queer KO.
    Date
    6.10.2020 21:22:33
  4. Du, Q.; Li, J.; Du, Y.; Wang, G.A.; Fan, W.: Predicting crowdfunding project success based on backers' language preferences (2021) 0.03
    0.027295459 = product of:
      0.08188637 = sum of:
        0.08188637 = product of:
          0.16377275 = sum of:
            0.16377275 = weight(_text_:project in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16377275 = score(doc=415,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.8394425 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Project success is critical in the crowdfunding domain. Rather than the existing project-centric prediction methods, we propose a novel backer-centric prediction method. We identify each backer's preferences based on their pledge history and calculate the cosine similarity between backer's preferences and the project as each backer's persuasibility. Finally, we aggregate all the backers' persuasibility to predict project success. To validate our method, we crawled data on 183,886 projects launched during or before December 2014 on Kickstarter, a crowdfunding website. We selected 4,922 backers with a total of 442,793 pledges to identify backers' preferences. The results show that a backer is more likely to be persuaded by a project that is more similar to the backer's preferences. Our findings not only demonstrate the efficacy of backers' pledge history for predicting crowdfunding project success but also verify that a backer-centric method can supplement the existing project-centric approaches. Our model and findings enable crowdfunding platform agencies, fund-seeking entrepreneurs, and investors to predict the success of a crowdfunding project.
  5. Qin, H.; Wang, H.; Johnson, A.: Understanding the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of new-generation engineering designers for effective knowledge management (2020) 0.03
    0.025505973 = product of:
      0.07651792 = sum of:
        0.07651792 = sum of:
          0.05146881 = weight(_text_:project in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05146881 = score(doc=181,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04622078 = queryNorm
              0.26381132 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
          0.025049109 = weight(_text_:22 in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025049109 = score(doc=181,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04622078 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose This paper aims to explore the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of the new generation of engineering designers. A survey study is used to approach what their information needs are, how these needs change during an engineering design project and how their information-seeking behaviours have been influenced by the newly developed information technologies (ITs). Through an in-depth analysis of the survey results, the key functions have been identified for the next-generation management systems. Design/methodology/approach The paper first proposed four hypotheses on the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of young engineers. Then, a survey study was undertaken to understand their information usage in terms of the information needs and information-seeking behaviours during a complete engineering design process. Through analysing the survey results, several findings were obtained and on this basis, further comparisons were made to discuss and evaluate the hypotheses. Findings The paper has revealed that the engineering designers' information needs will evolve throughout the engineering design project; thus, they should be assisted at several different levels. Although they intend to search information and knowledge on know-what and know-how, what they really require is the know-why knowledge in order to help them complete design tasks. Also, the paper has shown how the newly developed ITs and web-based applications have influenced the engineers' information-seeking practices. Research limitations/implications The research subjects chosen in this study are engineering students in universities who, although not as experienced as engineers in companies, do go through a complete design process with the tasks similar to industrial scenarios. In addition, the focus of this study is to understand the information-seeking behaviours of a new generation of design engineers, so that the development of next-generation information and knowledge management systems can be well informed. In this sense, the results obtained do reveal some new knowledge about the information-seeking behaviours during a general design process. Practical implications This paper first identifies the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of the new generation of engineering designers. On this basis, the varied ways to meet these needs and behaviours are discussed and elaborated. This intends to provide the key characteristics for the development of the next-generation knowledge management system for engineering design projects. Originality/value This paper proposes a novel means of exploring the future engineers' information needs and information-seeking behaviours in a collaborative working environment. It also characterises the key features and functions for the next generation of knowledge management systems for engineering design.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.02
    0.024470285 = product of:
      0.073410854 = sum of:
        0.073410854 = product of:
          0.22023255 = sum of:
            0.22023255 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22023255 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39186028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  7. Hutchinson, J.; Nakatomi, J.: Improving subject description of an LGBTQ+ collection (2024) 0.02
    0.021012057 = product of:
      0.063036166 = sum of:
        0.063036166 = product of:
          0.12607233 = sum of:
            0.12607233 = weight(_text_:project in 1157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12607233 = score(doc=1157,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.64620316 = fieldWeight in 1157, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1157)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article summarizes the work done as part of a project to improve subject description of an LGBTQ + collection in the ONE Archives, part of the University of Southern California (USC) Libraries. The project involved adding local subject headings to augment existing Library of Congress Subject Headings. The article describes the steps that the project team took, along with the methods that were rejected. The paper discusses reasons why the team chose their course of action.
  8. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.02
    0.020391904 = product of:
      0.06117571 = sum of:
        0.06117571 = product of:
          0.18352713 = sum of:
            0.18352713 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18352713 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39186028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  9. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.02
    0.020391904 = product of:
      0.06117571 = sum of:
        0.06117571 = product of:
          0.18352713 = sum of:
            0.18352713 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18352713 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39186028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  10. Yon, A.; Willey, E.: Using the Cataloguing Code of Ethics principles for a retrospective project analysis (2022) 0.02
    0.018385548 = product of:
      0.055156644 = sum of:
        0.055156644 = product of:
          0.11031329 = sum of:
            0.11031329 = weight(_text_:project in 729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11031329 = score(doc=729,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.5654278 = fieldWeight in 729, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=729)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study uses the recently released Cataloguing Code of Ethics to evaluate a project which explored how to ethically, efficiently, and accurately add demographic terms for African-American authors to catalog records. By reviewing the project through the lens of these principles the authors were able to examine how their practice was ethical in some ways but could have been improved in others. This helped them identify areas of potential improvement in their current and future research and practice and explore ethical difficulties in cataloging resources with records that are used globally, especially in a linked data environment.
  11. Kord, A.: Evaluating metadata quality in LGBTQ+ digital community archives (2022) 0.02
    0.018385548 = product of:
      0.055156644 = sum of:
        0.055156644 = product of:
          0.11031329 = sum of:
            0.11031329 = weight(_text_:project in 1140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11031329 = score(doc=1140,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.5654278 = fieldWeight in 1140, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1140)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This project evaluated metadata in digital LGBTQ+ community archives in order to determine its quality and how metadata quality effects the sustainability of digital community archives. This project uses a case study approach, using content analysis to evaluate metadata quality of three LGBTQ+ digital archives: Transas City, The History Project, and ONE Archives. Analysis found that the metadata in LGBTQ+ digital community archives is inconsistent and often only meets the minimum requirements for quality metadata. Further, this study concluded that professional guidelines and practices for metadata strip away the personality and uniqueness that is key to community archives success and purpose.
  12. Riley, F.; Allen, D.K.; Wilson, T.D.: When politicians and the experts collide : organization and the creation of information spheres (2022) 0.02
    0.015759042 = product of:
      0.047277123 = sum of:
        0.047277123 = product of:
          0.094554245 = sum of:
            0.094554245 = weight(_text_:project in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094554245 = score(doc=637,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.48465237 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores collaborative information behavior in the context of highly politicized decision making. It draws upon a qualitative case study of project management of a contentious public sector infrastructure project. We noted the creation of spaces for the development and exchange of information by experts and conceptualize these as information spheres. We postulate that these were formed to bypass power-induced information behavior that excludes expert power, such as information avoidance. This approach contrasts with the expected project management and information norms, rules and behavior, however, provides a language that can be used to explain the phenomena of bounded information spaces which complement and may be used as a development of adjunct to small world's theory.
  13. Lynch, J.D.; Gibson, J.; Han, M.-J.: Analyzing and normalizing type metadata for a large aggregated digital library (2020) 0.02
    0.015011735 = product of:
      0.045035206 = sum of:
        0.045035206 = product of:
          0.09007041 = sum of:
            0.09007041 = weight(_text_:project in 5720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09007041 = score(doc=5720,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.4616698 = fieldWeight in 5720, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5720)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Illinois Digital Heritage Hub (IDHH) gathers and enhances metadata from contributing institutions around the state of Illinois and provides this metadata to th Digital Public Library of America (DPLA) for greater access. The IDHH helps contributors shape their metadata to the standards recommended and required by the DPLA in part by analyzing and enhancing aggregated metadata. In late 2018, the IDHH undertook a project to address a particularly problematic field, Type metadata. This paper walks through the project, detailing the process of gathering and analyzing metadata using the DPLA API and OpenRefine, data remediation through XSL transformations in conjunction with local improvements by contributing institutions, and the DPLA ingestion system's quality controls.
  14. Moulaison-Sandy, H.; Adkins, D.; Bossaller, J.; Cho, H.: ¬An automated approach to describing fiction : a methodology to use book reviews to identify affect (2021) 0.02
    0.015011735 = product of:
      0.045035206 = sum of:
        0.045035206 = product of:
          0.09007041 = sum of:
            0.09007041 = weight(_text_:project in 710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09007041 = score(doc=710,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.4616698 = fieldWeight in 710, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Subject headings and genre terms are notoriously difficult to apply, yet are important for fiction. The current project functions as a proof of concept, using a text-mining methodology to identify affective information (emotion and tone) about fiction titles from professional book reviews as a potential first step in automating the subject analysis process. Findings are presented and discussed, comparing results to the range of aboutness and isness information in library cataloging records. The methodology is likewise presented, and how future work might expand on the current project to enhance catalog records through text-mining is explored.
  15. Chou, C.; Chu, T.: ¬An analysis of BERT (NLP) for assisted subject indexing for Project Gutenberg (2022) 0.02
    0.015011735 = product of:
      0.045035206 = sum of:
        0.045035206 = product of:
          0.09007041 = sum of:
            0.09007041 = weight(_text_:project in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09007041 = score(doc=1139,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.4616698 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In light of AI (Artificial Intelligence) and NLP (Natural language processing) technologies, this article examines the feasibility of using AI/NLP models to enhance the subject indexing of digital resources. While BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) models are widely used in scholarly communities, the authors assess whether BERT models can be used in machine-assisted indexing in the Project Gutenberg collection, through suggesting Library of Congress subject headings filtered by certain Library of Congress Classification subclass labels. The findings of this study are informative for further research on BERT models to assist with automatic subject indexing for digital library collections.
  16. McElfresh, L.K.: Creator name standardization using faceted vocabularies in the BTAA geoportal : Michigan State University libraries digital repository case study (2023) 0.02
    0.015011735 = product of:
      0.045035206 = sum of:
        0.045035206 = product of:
          0.09007041 = sum of:
            0.09007041 = weight(_text_:project in 1178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09007041 = score(doc=1178,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.4616698 = fieldWeight in 1178, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1178)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Digital libraries incorporate metadata from varied sources, ranging from traditional catalog data to author-supplied descriptions. The Big Ten Academic Alliance (BTAA) Geoportal unites geospatial resources from the libraries of the BTAA, compounding the variability of metadata. The BTAA Geospatial Information Network's (BTAA GIN) Metadata Committee works to ensure completeness and consistency of metadata in the Geoportal, including a project to standardize the contents of the Creator field. The project comprises an OpenRefine data cleaning phase; evaluation of controlled vocabularies for semiautomated matching via OpenRefine reconciliation; and development and testing of a best practices guide for application of a controlled vocabulary.
  17. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.01
    0.014611981 = product of:
      0.04383594 = sum of:
        0.04383594 = product of:
          0.08767188 = sum of:
            0.08767188 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08767188 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16185729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  18. Kahlawi, A,: ¬An ontology driven ESCO LOD quality enhancement (2020) 0.01
    0.012867201 = product of:
      0.038601603 = sum of:
        0.038601603 = product of:
          0.07720321 = sum of:
            0.07720321 = weight(_text_:project in 5959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07720321 = score(doc=5959,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.39571697 = fieldWeight in 5959, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The labor market is a system that is complex and difficult to manage. To overcome this challenge, the European Union has launched the ESCO project which is a language that aims to describe this labor market. In order to support the spread of this project, its dataset was presented as linked open data (LOD). Since LOD is usable and reusable, a set of conditions have to be met. First, LOD must be feasible and high quality. In addition, it must provide the user with the right answers, and it has to be built according to a clear and correct structure. This study investigates the LOD of ESCO, focusing on data quality and data structure. The former is evaluated through applying a set of SPARQL queries. This provides solutions to improve its quality via a set of rules built in first order logic. This process was conducted based on a new proposed ESCO ontology.
  19. Isaac, A.; Raemy, J.A.; Meijers, E.; Valk, S. De; Freire, N.: Metadata aggregation via linked data : results of the Europeana Common Culture project (2020) 0.01
    0.012867201 = product of:
      0.038601603 = sum of:
        0.038601603 = product of:
          0.07720321 = sum of:
            0.07720321 = weight(_text_:project in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07720321 = score(doc=39,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.39571697 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Digital cultural heritage resources are widely available on the web through the digital libraries of heritage institutions. To address the difficulties of discoverability in cultural heritage, the common practice is metadata aggregation, where centralized efforts like Europeana facilitate discoverability by collecting the resources' metadata. We present the results of the linked data aggregation task conducted within the Europeana Common Culture project, which attempted an innovative approach to aggregation based on linked data made available by cultural heritage institutions. This task ran for one year with participation of eleven organizations, involving the three member roles of the Europeana network: data providers, intermediary aggregators, and the central aggregation hub, Europeana. We report on the challenges that were faced by data providers, the standards and specifications applied, and the resulting aggregated metadata.
  20. Soedring, T.; Borlund, P.; Helfert, M.: ¬The migration and preservation of six Norwegian municipality record-keeping systems : lessons learned (2021) 0.01
    0.012867201 = product of:
      0.038601603 = sum of:
        0.038601603 = product of:
          0.07720321 = sum of:
            0.07720321 = weight(_text_:project in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07720321 = score(doc=241,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19509704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04622078 = queryNorm
                0.39571697 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a rare insight into the migration of municipality record-keeping databases. The migration of a database for preservation purposes poses several challenges. In particular, our findings show that relevant issues are file-format heterogeneity, collection volume, time and database structure evolution, and deviation from the governing standard. This article presents and discusses how such issues interfere with an organization's ability to undertake a migration, for preservation purposes, of records from a relational database. The case study at hand concerns six Norwegian municipality record-keeping databases covering a period from 1999 to 2012. The findings are presented with a discussion on how these issues manifest themselves as a problem for long-term preservation. The results discussed here may help an organization and Information Systems (IS) manager to establish a best practice when undertaking a migration project and enable them to avoid some of the pitfalls that were discovered during this project.

Languages

  • e 124
  • d 29

Types

  • a 142
  • el 27
  • p 5
  • m 3
  • x 1
  • More… Less…