Search (307 results, page 1 of 16)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Marcondes, C.H.: Towards a vocabulary to implement culturally relevant relationships between digital collections in heritage institutions (2020) 0.08 
    0.078530684 = product of:
  0.1963267 = sum of:
    0.15021834 = weight(_text_:objects in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15021834 = score(doc=5757,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
    0.046108373 = weight(_text_:22 in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046108373 = score(doc=5757,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Cultural heritage institutions are publishing their digital collections over the web as LOD. This is is a new step in the patrimonialization and curatorial processes developed by such institutions. Many of these collections are thematically superimposed and complementary. Frequently, objects in these collections present culturally relevant relationships, such as a book about a painting, or a draft or sketch of a famous painting, etc. LOD technology enables such heritage records to be interlinked, achieving interoperability and adding value to digital collections, thus empowering heritage institutions. An aim of this research is characterizing such culturally relevant relationships and organizing them in a vocabulary. Use cases or examples of relationships between objects suggested by curators or mentioned in literature and in the conceptual models as FRBR/LRM, CIDOC CRM and RiC-CM, were collected and used as examples or inspiration of cultural relevant relationships. Relationships identified are collated and compared for identifying those with the same or similar meaning, synthesized and normalized. A set of thirty-three culturally relevant relationships are identified and formalized as a LOD property vocabulary to be used by digital curators to interlink digital collections. The results presented are provisional and a starting point to be discussed, tested, and enhanced.
    Date
    4. 3.2020 14:22:41
  2. Babcock, K.; Lee, S.; Rajakumar, J.; Wagner, A.: Providing access to digital collections (2020) 0.08 
    0.07659296 = product of:
  0.1914824 = sum of:
    0.15021834 = weight(_text_:objects in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15021834 = score(doc=5855,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
    0.041264053 = weight(_text_:7 in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041264053 = score(doc=5855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The University of Toronto Libraries is currently reviewing technology to support its Collections U of T service. Collections U of T provides search and browse access to 375 digital collections (and over 203,000 digital objects) at the University of Toronto Libraries. Digital objects typically include special collections material from the university as well as faculty digital collections, all with unique metadata requirements. The service is currently supported by IIIF-enabled Islandora, with one Fedora back end and multiple Drupal sites per parent collection (see attached image). Like many institutions making use of Islandora, UTL is now confronted with Drupal 7 end of life and has begun to investigate a migration path forward. This article will summarise the Collections U of T functional requirements and lessons learned from our current technology stack. It will go on to outline our research to date for alternate solutions. The article will review both emerging micro-service solutions, as well as out-of-the-box platforms, to provide an overview of the digital collection technology landscape in 2019. Note that our research is focused on reviewing technology solutions for providing access to digital collections, as preservation services are offered through other services at the University of Toronto Libraries.
  3. Baecker, D.: ¬Der Frosch, die Fliege und der Mensch : zum Tod von Humberto Maturana (2021) 0.07 
    0.06989794 = product of:
  0.17474484 = sum of:
    0.08252811 = weight(_text_:7 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08252811 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.36601263 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
    0.092216745 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.092216745 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    7. 5.2021 22:10:24
  4. Sokolow, A.: Chaostage bei ChatGPT (2023) 0.07 
    0.06989794 = product of:
  0.17474484 = sum of:
    0.08252811 = weight(_text_:7 in 1170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08252811 = score(doc=1170,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.36601263 = fieldWeight in 1170, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1170)
    0.092216745 = weight(_text_:22 in 1170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.092216745 = score(doc=1170,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1170, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1170)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
    Source
    Pirmasenser Zeitung. 2023 vom 23.11.2023, S.7
  5. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.06 
    0.0648618 = product of:
  0.32430896 = sum of:
    0.32430896 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32430896 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5770437 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  6. Acker, A.: Emulation practices for software preservation in libraries, archives, and museums (2021) 0.06 
    0.058993783 = product of:
  0.14748445 = sum of:
    0.1062204 = weight(_text_:objects in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1062204 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
    0.041264053 = weight(_text_:7 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041264053 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Emulation practices are computational, technical processes that allow for one system to reproduce the functions and results of another. This article reports on findings from research following three small teams of information professionals as they implemented emulation practices into their digital preservation programs at a technology museum, a university research library, and a university research archive and technology lab. Results suggest that the distributed teams in this cohort of preservationists have developed different emulation practices for particular kinds of "emulation encounters" in supporting different types of access. I discuss the implications of these findings for digital preservation research and emulation initiatives providing access to software or software-dependent objects, showing how implications of these findings have significance for those developing software preservation workflows and building emulation capacities. These findings suggest that different emulation practices for preservation, research access, and exhibition undertaken in libraries, archives, and museums result in different forms of access to preserved software-accessing information and experiential access. In examining particular types of access, this research calls into question software emulation as a single, static preservation strategy for information institutions and challenges researchers to examine new forms of access and descriptive representation emerging from these digital preservation strategies.
    Date
    7. 8.2021 19:06:40
  7. Järvelin, K.; Vakkari, P.: LIS research across 50 years: content analysis of journal articles : offering an information-centric conception of memes (2022) 0.06 
    0.058993783 = product of:
  0.14748445 = sum of:
    0.1062204 = weight(_text_:objects in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1062204 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
    0.041264053 = weight(_text_:7 in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041264053 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose This paper analyses the research in Library and Information Science (LIS) and reports on (1) the status of LIS research in 2015 and (2) on the evolution of LIS research longitudinally from 1965 to 2015. Design/methodology/approach The study employs a quantitative intellectual content analysis of articles published in 30+ scholarly LIS journals, following the design by Tuomaala et al. (2014). In the content analysis, we classify articles along eight dimensions covering topical content and methodology. Findings The topical findings indicate that the earlier strong LIS emphasis on L&I services has declined notably, while scientific and professional communication has become the most popular topic. Information storage and retrieval has given up its earlier strong position towards the end of the years analyzed. Individuals are increasingly the units of observation. End-user's and developer's viewpoints have strengthened at the cost of intermediaries' viewpoint. LIS research is methodologically increasingly scattered since survey, scientometric methods, experiment, case studies and qualitative studies have all gained in popularity. Consequently, LIS may have become more versatile in the analysis of its research objects during the years analyzed. Originality/value Among quantitative intellectual content analyses of LIS research, the study is unique in its scope: length of analysis period (50 years), width (8 dimensions covering topical content and methodology) and depth (the annual batch of 30+ scholarly journals).
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 78(2022) no.7, S.65-88
  8. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.05 
    0.0540515 = product of:
  0.2702575 = sum of:
    0.2702575 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2702575 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5770437 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  9. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.05 
    0.0540515 = product of:
  0.2702575 = sum of:
    0.2702575 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2702575 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5770437 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  10. Candela, G.: ¬An automatic data quality approach to assess semantic data from cultural heritage institutions (2023) 0.05 
    0.04892856 = product of:
  0.1223214 = sum of:
    0.057769675 = weight(_text_:7 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057769675 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
    0.06455172 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06455172 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:23:31
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.866-878
  11. Koster, L.: Persistent identifiers for heritage objects (2020) 0.04 
    0.04248816 = product of:
  0.2124408 = sum of:
    0.2124408 = weight(_text_:objects in 5718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2124408 = score(doc=5718,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 5718, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5718)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Persistent identifiers (PID's) are essential for getting access and referring to library, archive and museum (LAM) collection objects in a sustainable and unambiguous way, both internally and externally. Heritage institutions need a universal policy for the use of PID's in order to have an efficient digital infrastructure at their disposal and to achieve optimal interoperability, leading to open data, open collections and efficient resource management. Here the discussion is limited to PID's that institutions can assign to objects they own or administer themselves. PID's for people, subjects etc. can be used by heritage institutions, but are generally managed by other parties. The first part of this article consists of a general theoretical description of persistent identifiers. First of all, I discuss the questions of what persistent identifiers are and what they are not, and what is needed to administer and use them. The most commonly used existing PID systems are briefly characterized. Then I discuss the types of objects PID's can be assigned to. This section concludes with an overview of the requirements that apply if PIDs should also be used for linked data. The second part examines current infrastructural practices, and existing PID systems and their advantages and shortcomings. Based on these practical issues and the pros and cons of existing PID systems a list of requirements for PID systems is presented which is used to address a number of practical considerations. This section concludes with a number of recommendations.
  12. MacFarlane, A.; Missaoui, S.; Frankowska-Takhari, S.: On machine learning and knowledge organization in multimedia information retrieval (2020) 0.04 
    0.04248816 = product of:
  0.2124408 = sum of:
    0.2124408 = weight(_text_:objects in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2124408 = score(doc=5732,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Recent technological developments have increased the use of machine learning to solve many problems, including many in information retrieval. Multimedia information retrieval as a problem represents a significant challenge to machine learning as a technological solution, but some problems can still be addressed by using appropriate AI techniques. We review the technological developments and provide a perspective on the use of machine learning in conjunction with knowledge organization to address multimedia IR needs. The semantic gap in multimedia IR remains a significant problem in the field, and solutions to them are many years off. However, new technological developments allow the use of knowledge organization and machine learning in multimedia search systems and services. Specifically, we argue that, the improvement of detection of some classes of lowlevel features in images music and video can be used in conjunction with knowledge organization to tag or label multimedia content for better retrieval performance. We provide an overview of the use of knowledge organization schemes in machine learning and make recommendations to information professionals on the use of this technology with knowledge organization techniques to solve multimedia IR problems. We introduce a five-step process model that extracts features from multimedia objects (Step 1) from both knowledge organization (Step 1a) and machine learning (Step 1b), merging them together (Step 2) to create an index of those multimedia objects (Step 3). We also overview further steps in creating an application to utilize the multimedia objects (Step 4) and maintaining and updating the database of features on those objects (Step 5).
  13. Park, M.S.; Park, J.H.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.H.; Park, H.: Measuring the impacts of quantity and trustworthiness of information on COVID-19 vaccination intent (2023) 0.04 
    0.041785825 = product of:
  0.10446456 = sum of:
    0.058356192 = weight(_text_:7 in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058356192 = score(doc=996,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.25881004 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
    0.046108373 = weight(_text_:22 in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046108373 = score(doc=996,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/23301643/2023/74/7.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:20:47
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.846-865
  14. Tran, Q.-T.: Standardization and the neglect of museum objects : an infrastructure-based approach for inclusive integration of cultural artifacts (2023) 0.04 
    0.03679583 = product of:
  0.18397914 = sum of:
    0.18397914 = weight(_text_:objects in 1136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18397914 = score(doc=1136,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.508563 = fieldWeight in 1136, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1136)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The paper examines the integration of born-digital and digitized content into an outdated classification system within the Museum of European Cultures in Berlin. It underscores the predicament encountered by smaller to medium-sized cultural institutions as they navigate between adhering to established knowl­edge management systems and preserving an expanding array of contemporary cultural artifacts. The perspective of infrastructure studies is employed to scrutinize the representation of diverse viewpoints and voices within the museum's collections. The study delves into museum personnel's challenges in cataloging and classifying ethnographic objects utilizing a numerical-alphabetical categorization scheme from the 1930s. It presents an analysis of the limitations inherent in this method, along with its implications for the assimilation of emerging forms of born-digital and digitized objects. Through an exploration of the case of category 74, as observed at the Museum of European Cultures, the study illustrates the complexities of replacing pre-existing systems due to their intricate integration into the socio-technical components of the museum's information infrastructure. The paper reflects on how resource-constrained cultural institutions can take a proactive and ethical approach to knowl­edge management, re-evaluating their knowl­edge infrastructure to promote inclusion and ensure adaptability.
  15. Dunn, H.; Bourcier, P.: Nomenclature for museum cataloging (2020) 0.04 
    0.036052402 = product of:
  0.180262 = sum of:
    0.180262 = weight(_text_:objects in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.180262 = score(doc=5483,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    We present an overview of Nomenclature's history, characteristics, structure, use, management, development process, limitations, and future. Nomenclature for Museum Cataloging is a bilingual (English/French) structured and controlled list of object terms organized in a classification system to provide a basis for indexing and cataloging collections of human-made objects. It includes illustrations and bibliographic references as well as a user guide. It is used in the creation and management of object records in human history collections within museums and other organizations, and it focuses on objects relevant to North American history and culture. First published in 1978, Nomenclature is the most extensively used museum classification and controlled vocabulary for historical and ethnological collections in North America and represents thereby a de facto standard in the field. An online reference version of Nomenclature was made available in 2018, and it will be available under open license in 2020.
  16. Fremery, W. de; Buckland, M.K.: Copy theory (2022) 0.04 
    0.036052402 = product of:
  0.180262 = sum of:
    0.180262 = weight(_text_:objects in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.180262 = score(doc=487,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In information science, writing, printing, telecommunication, and digital computing have been central concerns because of their ability to distribute information. Overlooked is the obvious fact that these technologies fashion copies, and the theorizing of copies has been neglected. We may think a copy is the same as what it copies, but no two objects can really be the same. "The same" means similar enough as an acceptable substitute for some purpose. The differences between usefully similar things are also often important, in forensic analysis, for example, or inferential processes. Status as a copy is only one form of relationship between objects, but copies are so integral to information science that they demand a theory. Indeed, theorizing copies provides a basis for a more complete and unified view of information science.
  17. Dhillon, P.; Singh, M.: ¬An extended ontology model for trust evaluation using advanced hybrid ontology (2023) 0.04 
    0.036052402 = product of:
  0.180262 = sum of:
    0.180262 = weight(_text_:objects in 981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.180262 = score(doc=981,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 981, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=981)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In the blooming area of Internet technology, the concept of Internet-of-Things (IoT) holds a distinct position that interconnects a large number of smart objects. In the context of social IoT (SIoT), the argument of trust and reliability is evaluated in the presented work. The proposed framework is divided into two blocks, namely Verification Block (VB) and Evaluation Block (EB). VB defines various ontology-based relationships computed for the objects that reflect the security and trustworthiness of an accessed service. While, EB is used for the feedback analysis and proves to be a valuable step that computes and governs the success rate of the service. Support vector machine (SVM) is applied to categorise the trust-based evaluation. The security aspect of the proposed approach is comparatively evaluated for DDoS and malware attacks in terms of success rate, trustworthiness and execution time. The proposed secure ontology-based framework provides better performance compared with existing architectures.
  18. Gartner, R.: Metadata in the digital library : building an integrated strategy with XML (2021) 0.04 
    0.03539627 = product of:
  0.08849067 = sum of:
    0.06373224 = weight(_text_:objects in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06373224 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36176273 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.17617138 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
    0.024758434 = weight(_text_:7 in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024758434 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.109803796 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This book provides a practical introduction to metadata for the digital library, describing in detail how to implement a strategic approach which will enable complex digital objects to be discovered, delivered and preserved in the short- and long-term.
    Content
    Inhalt: 1 Introduction, Aims and Definitions -- 1.1 Origins -- 1.2 From information science to libraries -- 1.3 The central place of metadata -- 1.4 The book in outline -- 2 Metadata Basics -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Three types of metadata -- 2.2.1 Descriptive metadata -- 2.2.2 Administrative metadata -- 2.2.3 Structural metadata -- 2.3 The core components of metadata -- 2.3.1 Syntax -- 2.3.2 Semantics -- 2.3.3 Content rules -- 2.4 Metadata standards -- 2.5 Conclusion -- 3 Planning a Metadata Strategy: Basic Principles -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Principle 1: Support all stages of the digital curation lifecycle -- 3.3 Principle 2: Support the long-term preservation of the digital object -- 3.4 Principle 3: Ensure interoperability -- 3.5 Principle 4: Control metadata content wherever possible -- 3.6 Principle 5: Ensure software independence -- 3.7 Principle 6: Impose a logical system of identifiers -- 3.8 Principle 7: Use standards whenever possible -- 3.9 Principle 8: Ensure the integrity of the metadata itself -- 3.10 Summary: the basic principles of a metadata strategy -- 4 Planning a Metadata Strategy: Applying the Basic Principles -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Initial steps: standards as a foundation -- 4.2.1 'Off-the shelf' standards -- 4.2.2 Mapping out an architecture and serialising it into a standard -- 4.2.3 Devising a local metadata scheme -- 4.2.4 How standards support the basic principles -- 4.3 Identifiers: everything in its place -- 5 XML: The Syntactical Foundation of Metadata -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 What XML looks like -- 5.3 XML schemas -- 5.4 Namespaces -- 5.5 Creating and editing XML -- 5.6 Transforming XML -- 5.7 Why use XML? -- 6 METS: The Metadata Package -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Why use METS?.
  19. Kim, J.(im); Kim, J.(enna): Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation (2020) 0.03 
    0.03494897 = product of:
  0.08737242 = sum of:
    0.041264053 = weight(_text_:7 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041264053 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
    0.046108373 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046108373 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    11. 7.2020 13:22:58
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.7, S.839-855
  20. Haimson, O.L.; Carter, A.J.; Corvite, S.; Wheeler, B.; Wang, L.; Liu, T.; Lige, A.: ¬The major life events taxonomy : social readjustment, social media information sharing, and online network separation during times of life transition (2021) 0.03 
    0.03494897 = product of:
  0.08737242 = sum of:
    0.041264053 = weight(_text_:7 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041264053 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22547886 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
    0.046108373 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046108373 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23834704 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06806357 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    10. 6.2021 19:22:47
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.7, S.933-947

Authors

Languages

  • e 188
  • d 116
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 278
  • el 38
  • m 24
  • p 2
  • s 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications