Search (796 results, page 1 of 40)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.24 
    0.2392368 = product of:
  0.3588552 = sum of:
    0.04996659 = product of:
      0.14989977 = sum of:
        0.14989977 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14989977 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3200604 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14989977 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14989977 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3200604 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.0090890555 = weight(_text_:information in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0090890555 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.14989977 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14989977 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3200604 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
    Imprint
    Wien / Library and Information Studies : Universität
  2. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.21 
    0.20985968 = product of:
  0.41971937 = sum of:
    0.05995991 = product of:
      0.17987972 = sum of:
        0.17987972 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17987972 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3200604 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.17987972 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17987972 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3200604 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.17987972 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17987972 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3200604 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  3. Hertzum, M.: Information seeking by experimentation : trying something out to discover what happens (2023) 0.02 
    0.022970563 = product of:
  0.06891169 = sum of:
    0.027807161 = weight(_text_:information in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027807161 = score(doc=915,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.41958824 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
    0.041104525 = product of:
      0.061656788 = sum of:
        0.030967683 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030967683 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
        0.030689107 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030689107 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Experimentation is the process of trying something out to discover what happens. It is a widespread information practice, yet often bypassed in information-behavior research. This article argues that experimentation complements prior knowledge, documents, and people as an important fourth class of information sources. Relative to the other classes, the distinguishing characteristics of experimentation are that it is a personal-as opposed to interpersonal-source and that it provides "backtalk." When the information seeker tries something out and then attends to the resulting situation, it is as though the materials of the situation talk back: They provide the information seeker with a situated and direct experience of the consequences of the tried-out options. In this way, experimentation involves obtaining information by creating it. It also involves turning material and behavioral processes into information interactions. Thereby, information seeking by experimentation is important to practical information literacy and extends information-behavior research with new insights on the interrelations between creating and seeking information.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:29
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.383-387
  4. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.02 
    0.01952291 = product of:
  0.058568723 = sum of:
    0.04996659 = product of:
      0.14989977 = sum of:
        0.14989977 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14989977 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3200604 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.008602135 = product of:
      0.025806403 = sum of:
        0.025806403 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025806403 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  5. Ermert, A.: Normen und Standardisierung im Informationsbereich (2023) 0.02 
    0.016633868 = product of:
  0.0998032 = sum of:
    0.0998032 = weight(_text_:strukturierung in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0998032 = score(doc=778,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26115823 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.38215607 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Für die Präsentation von Informationsgehalten, für die Bewahrung, das Wiederauffinden (Retrieval) und ihre gezielte Wiederverwendung hat Strukturierung, Organisation, Gleichförmigkeit schon immer eine wichtige Rolle gespielt. Mit z. B. Zedlers und Krünitz' "Encyclopädien" im 18. Jahrhundert, biologischer und chemischer Nomenklatur oder dem "Urmeter" in Paris 1875 (s. Muschalla 1992) findet dies deutlichen Niederschlag, ebenso im Informationsbereich. Der große Bereich, in dem die Durchsetzung international einheitlicher Standardisierung/Normung allerdings bisher nicht gelungen ist, sind die metrischen Maße (DIN 1301, ISO 80 000 [früher ISO 31, ISO 1000]) (und die Papierformate DIN ISO 216, früher DIN 476). Immer aber zeigt sich auch an solchen Beispielen, dass (der Sinn und Erfolg von) Normung stets in einem Wechselverhältnis steht zwischen Ersparnis, Aufwand und Kosten des Umstellens und dem Nutzen sowie der Umgewöhnung der Anwendenden andererseits. Immerhin bilden sich im Lauf der Entwicklung jedenfalls meist auch "Quasi-Standards/defacto-Standards" heraus, die aufgrund vorherrschender Position eines Akteurs oder eingespielter Praktiken entstehen, sowie "Bereichsstandards", die generell einheitliches Vorgehen immerhin in einem abgegrenzten Bereich etablieren - beides z. B. als innerbetriebliche Standards eines Unternehmens oder als "Industriestandards" eines Bereichs.
  6. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.02 
    0.015702548 = product of:
  0.04710764 = sum of:
    0.012853865 = weight(_text_:information in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012853865 = score(doc=178,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
    0.034253776 = product of:
      0.05138066 = sum of:
        0.025806403 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025806403 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
        0.025574258 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025574258 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.6, S.945-962
  7. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.02 
    0.015263874 = product of:
  0.045791622 = sum of:
    0.028742116 = weight(_text_:information in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028742116 = score(doc=1085,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.43369597 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
    0.017049506 = product of:
      0.051148515 = sum of:
        0.051148515 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051148515 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2022-1-3/what-is-information-an-information-veteran-looks-back-jahrgang-49-2022-heft-1?page=1.
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
    Theme
    Information
  8. Huvila, I.: Making and taking information (2022) 0.01 
    0.013723946 = product of:
  0.041171838 = sum of:
    0.030849276 = weight(_text_:information in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030849276 = score(doc=527,freq=32.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.46549138 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
          5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
            32.0 = termFreq=32.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.0103225615 = product of:
      0.030967683 = sum of:
        0.030967683 = weight(_text_:29 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030967683 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Information behavior theory covers different aspects of the totality of information-related human behavior rather unevenly. The transitions or trading zones between different types of information activities have remained perhaps especially under-theorized. This article interrogates and expands a conceptual apparatus of information making and information taking as a pair of substantial concepts for explaining, in part, the mobility of information in terms of doing that unfolds as a process of becoming rather than of being, and in part, what is happening when information comes into being and when something is taken up for use as information. Besides providing an apparatus to describe the nexus of information provision and acquisition, a closer consideration of the parallel doings opens opportunities to enrich the inquiry of the conditions and practice of information seeking, appropriation, discovery, and retrieval as modes taking, and learning and information use as its posterities.
    Date
    10. 3.2022 14:10:29
    Series
    JASIS&Tspecial issue on information behavior and information practices theory
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.4, S.528-541
    Theme
    Information
  9. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.01 
    0.0135602355 = product of:
  0.040680707 = sum of:
    0.0064269323 = weight(_text_:information in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0064269323 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
    0.034253776 = product of:
      0.05138066 = sum of:
        0.025806403 = weight(_text_:29 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025806403 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.025574258 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025574258 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
    Date
    20.11.2023 17:29:13
  10. Hartel, J.: ¬The red thread of information (2020) 0.01 
    0.01242229 = product of:
  0.03726687 = sum of:
    0.028742116 = weight(_text_:information in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028742116 = score(doc=5839,freq=40.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.43369597 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
          6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
            40.0 = termFreq=40.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
    0.008524753 = product of:
      0.025574258 = sum of:
        0.025574258 = weight(_text_:22 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025574258 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose In The Invisible Substrate of Information Science, a landmark article about the discipline of information science, Marcia J. Bates wrote that ".we are always looking for the red thread of information in the social texture of people's lives" (1999a, p. 1048). To sharpen our understanding of information science and to elaborate Bates' idea, the work at hand answers the question: Just what does the red thread of information entail? Design/methodology/approach Through a close reading of Bates' oeuvre and by applying concepts from the reference literature of information science, nine composite entities that qualify as the red thread of information are identified, elaborated, and related to existing concepts in the information science literature. In the spirit of a scientist-poet (White, 1999), several playful metaphors related to the color red are employed. Findings Bates' red thread of information entails: terms, genres, literatures, classification systems, scholarly communication, information retrieval, information experience, information institutions, and information policy. This same constellation of phenomena can be found in resonant visions of information science, namely, domain analysis (Hjørland, 2002), ethnography of infrastructure (Star, 1999), and social epistemology (Shera, 1968). Research limitations/implications With the vital vermilion filament in clear view, newcomers can more easily engage the material, conceptual, and social machinery of information science, and specialists are reminded of what constitutes information science as a whole. Future researchers and scientist-poets may wish to supplement the nine composite entities with additional, emergent information phenomena. Originality/value Though the explication of information science that follows is relatively orthodox and time-bound, the paper offers an imaginative, accessible, yet technically precise way of understanding the field.
    Date
    30. 4.2020 21:03:22
    Theme
    Information
  11. Trace, C.B.; Zhang, Y.; Yi, S.; Williams-Brown, M.Y.: Information practices around genetic testing for ovarian cancer patients (2023) 0.01 
    0.012205495 = product of:
  0.03661648 = sum of:
    0.028014347 = weight(_text_:information in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028014347 = score(doc=1071,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.42271453 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
    0.008602135 = product of:
      0.025806403 = sum of:
        0.025806403 = weight(_text_:29 in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025806403 = score(doc=1071,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Knowledge of ovarian cancer patients' information practices around cancer genetic testing (GT) is needed to inform interventions that promote patient access to GT-related information. We interviewed 21 ovarian cancer patients and survivors who had GT as part of the treatment process and analyzed the transcripts using the qualitative content analysis method. We found that patients' information practices, manifested in their information-seeking mode, information sources utilized, information assessment, and information use, showed three distinct styles: passive, semi-active, and active. Patients with the passive style primarily received information from clinical sources, encountered information, or delegated information-seeking to family members; they were not inclined to assess information themselves and seldom used it to learn or influence others. Women with semi-active and active styles adopted more active information-seeking modes to approach information, utilized information sources beyond clinical settings, attempted to assess the information found, and actively used it to learn, educate others, or advocate GT to family and friends. Guided by the social ecological model, we found multiple levels of influences, including personal, interpersonal, organizational, community, and societal, acting as motivators or barriers to patients' information practice. Based on these findings, we discussed strategies to promote patient access to GT-related information.
    Date
    21.10.2023 17:29:59
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.11, S.1265-1281
  12. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.01 
    0.012179701 = product of:
  0.0365391 = sum of:
    0.028014347 = weight(_text_:information in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028014347 = score(doc=950,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.42271453 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
    0.008524753 = product of:
      0.025574258 = sum of:
        0.025574258 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025574258 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
    Theme
    Information
  13. Kuehn, E.F.: ¬The information ecosystem concept in information literacy : a theoretical approach and definition (2023) 0.01 
    0.011936191 = product of:
  0.03580857 = sum of:
    0.025578868 = weight(_text_:information in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025578868 = score(doc=919,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.38596505 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
    0.010229703 = product of:
      0.030689107 = sum of:
        0.030689107 = weight(_text_:22 in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030689107 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Despite the prominence of the concept of the information ecosystem (hereafter IE) in information literacy documents and literature, it is under-theorized. This article proposes a general definition of IE for information literacy. After reviewing the current use of the IE concept in the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Framework for Information Literacy and other information literacy sources, existing definitions of IE and similar concepts (e.g., "evidence ecosystems") will be examined from other fields. These will form the basis of the definition of IE proposed in the article for the field of information literacy: "all structures, entities, and agents related to the flow of semantic information relevant to a research domain, as well as the information itself."
    Date
    22. 3.2023 11:52:50
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.434-443
  14. Jörs, B.: Über den Grundbegriff der "Information" ist weiter zu reden und über die Existenzberechtigung der Disziplin auch : die Kapitulation der Informationswissenschaft vor dem eigenen Basisbegriff (2020) 0.01 
    0.011675589 = product of:
  0.035026766 = sum of:
    0.017995412 = weight(_text_:information in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017995412 = score(doc=326,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
    0.017031357 = product of:
      0.05109407 = sum of:
        0.05109407 = weight(_text_:29 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05109407 = score(doc=326,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.38474706 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Die Informationswissenschaft, eine Disziplin ohne Theorie, ohne Bezugsrahmen und ohne Klärung ihres Grundbegriffes. Zahlreiche FachvertreterInnen der Informationswissenschaft bereiten erst recht das Feld für Hate Speech und Fake News vor - mit ihrem ungeklärten (Un)begriff der "Information", - mit ihrer Forderung nach "Informationskompetenz", ein Terrain, das eigentlich der Bibliothekswissenschaft zusteht, - mit ihrer Theorielosigkeit, - mit ihrer unkritischen Ablehnung einer ernsthaften Auseinandersetzung sowie - mit ihrem ungeklärten Domänenverständnis.
    Content
    Fortsetzung als: Wie man mit Information umgehen sollte - Das Beispiel der Medienforschung. Unter: Open Password. 2020, Nr.777 vom 29. Juni 2020 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=Wzk0LCIxODU1NzhmZDQ2ZDAiLDAsMCw4NSwxXQ].
    Date
    29. 6.2020 11:11:10
    Theme
    Information
  15. Newell, B.C.: Surveillance as information practice (2023) 0.01 
    0.011674559 = product of:
  0.035023674 = sum of:
    0.026498921 = weight(_text_:information in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026498921 = score(doc=921,freq=34.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.39984792 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
          5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
            34.0 = termFreq=34.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
    0.008524753 = product of:
      0.025574258 = sum of:
        0.025574258 = weight(_text_:22 in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025574258 = score(doc=921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Surveillance, as a concept and social practice, is inextricably linked to information. It is, at its core, about information extraction and analysis conducted for some regulatory purpose. Yet, information science research only sporadically leverages surveillance studies scholarship, and we see a lack of sustained and focused attention to surveillance as an object of research within the domains of information behavior and social informatics. Surveillance, as a range of contextual and culturally based social practices defined by their connections to information seeking and use, should be framed as information practice-as that term is used within information behavior scholarship. Similarly, manifestations of surveillance in society are frequently perfect examples of information and communications technologies situated within everyday social and organizational structures-the very focus of social informatics research. The technological infrastructures and material artifacts of surveillance practice-surveillance technologies-can also be viewed as information tools. Framing surveillance as information practice and conceptualizing surveillance technologies as socially and contextually situated information tools can provide space for new avenues of research within the information sciences, especially within information disciplines that focus their attention on the social aspects of information and information technologies in society.
    Date
    22. 3.2023 11:57:47
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.444-460
  16. Rusho, Y.; Raban, R.R.: Hands on : information experiences as sources of value (2020) 0.01 
    0.011164514 = product of:
  0.03349354 = sum of:
    0.024891404 = weight(_text_:information in 5872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024891404 = score(doc=5872,freq=30.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.37559175 = fieldWeight in 5872, product of:
          5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
            30.0 = termFreq=30.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5872)
    0.008602135 = product of:
      0.025806403 = sum of:
        0.025806403 = weight(_text_:29 in 5872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025806403 = score(doc=5872,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13279912 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5872, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5872)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Value perception increases when people engage in producing physical objects. However, information differs from physical objects by being intangible and easy-to-copy. Information as an experience good is inherently challenging to evaluate a priori; therefore, comparing value before and after different types of experience is likely to inform theory about users' preferences regarding information. Prior research mostly refers to consuming information and rarely considers the experience of producing information as a factor affecting information value. The current research compares the effect of experiencing online information through production and consumption processes on value perception. In a set of 6 experiments with 178 participants, willingness-to-pay by consumers and willingness-to-accept payment by producers are measured before and after consumption and production of information, independently and as repeated measures. In the experiments, we define and implement a framework for an information production process. The results show that the value of information is dynamic. Value perception increased after experiencing information, especially when people engaged in producing information compared to consuming it. This study offers a window toward the practical design of new digital information products.
    Date
    23. 5.2020 16:19:29
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.6, S.671-684
  17. Ma, L.: Information, platformized (2023) 0.01 
    0.010681145 = product of:
  0.032043435 = sum of:
    0.021813732 = weight(_text_:information in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021813732 = score(doc=888,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
    0.010229703 = product of:
      0.030689107 = sum of:
        0.030689107 = weight(_text_:22 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030689107 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Scholarly publications are often regarded as "information" by default. They are collected, organized, preserved, and made accessible as knowledge records. However, the instances of article retraction, misconduct and malpractices of researchers and the replication crisis have raised concerns about the informativeness and evidential qualities of information. Among many factors, knowledge production has moved away from "normal science" under the systemic influences of platformization involving the datafication and commodification of scholarly articles, research profiles and research activities. This article aims to understand the platformization of information by examining how research practices and knowledge production are steered by market and platform mechanisms in four ways: (a) ownership of information; (b) metrics for sale; (c) relevance by metrics, and (d) market-based competition. In conclusion, the article argues that information is platformized when platforms hold the dominating power in determining what kinds of information can be disseminated and rewarded and when informativeness is decoupled from the normative agreement or consensus co-constructed and co-determined in an open and public discourse.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 19:01:47
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.273-282
  18. Qin, H.; Wang, H.; Johnson, A.: Understanding the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of new-generation engineering designers for effective knowledge management (2020) 0.01 
    0.010492597 = product of:
  0.03147779 = sum of:
    0.024657989 = weight(_text_:information in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024657989 = score(doc=181,freq=46.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.37206972 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
          6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
            46.0 = termFreq=46.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
    0.0068198023 = product of:
      0.020459406 = sum of:
        0.020459406 = weight(_text_:22 in 181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020459406 = score(doc=181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=181)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose This paper aims to explore the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of the new generation of engineering designers. A survey study is used to approach what their information needs are, how these needs change during an engineering design project and how their information-seeking behaviours have been influenced by the newly developed information technologies (ITs). Through an in-depth analysis of the survey results, the key functions have been identified for the next-generation management systems. Design/methodology/approach The paper first proposed four hypotheses on the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of young engineers. Then, a survey study was undertaken to understand their information usage in terms of the information needs and information-seeking behaviours during a complete engineering design process. Through analysing the survey results, several findings were obtained and on this basis, further comparisons were made to discuss and evaluate the hypotheses. Findings The paper has revealed that the engineering designers' information needs will evolve throughout the engineering design project; thus, they should be assisted at several different levels. Although they intend to search information and knowledge on know-what and know-how, what they really require is the know-why knowledge in order to help them complete design tasks. Also, the paper has shown how the newly developed ITs and web-based applications have influenced the engineers' information-seeking practices. Research limitations/implications The research subjects chosen in this study are engineering students in universities who, although not as experienced as engineers in companies, do go through a complete design process with the tasks similar to industrial scenarios. In addition, the focus of this study is to understand the information-seeking behaviours of a new generation of design engineers, so that the development of next-generation information and knowledge management systems can be well informed. In this sense, the results obtained do reveal some new knowledge about the information-seeking behaviours during a general design process. Practical implications This paper first identifies the information needs and information-seeking behaviours of the new generation of engineering designers. On this basis, the varied ways to meet these needs and behaviours are discussed and elaborated. This intends to provide the key characteristics for the development of the next-generation knowledge management system for engineering design projects. Originality/value This paper proposes a novel means of exploring the future engineers' information needs and information-seeking behaviours in a collaborative working environment. It also characterises the key features and functions for the next generation of knowledge management systems for engineering design.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.6, S.853-868
  19. Park, M.S.; Park, J.H.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.H.; Park, H.: Measuring the impacts of quantity and trustworthiness of information on COVID-19 vaccination intent (2023) 0.01 
    0.010262768 = product of:
  0.030788302 = sum of:
    0.02226355 = weight(_text_:information in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02226355 = score(doc=996,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
    0.008524753 = product of:
      0.025574258 = sum of:
        0.025574258 = weight(_text_:22 in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025574258 = score(doc=996,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The COVID-19 crisis provided an opportunity for information professionals to rethink the role of information in individuals' decision making such as vaccine uptake. Unlike previous studies, which often considered information as a single factor among others, this study examined the impact of the quantity and trustworthiness of information on people's adoption of information for vaccination decisions based on the information adoption model. We analyzed COVID-19 Preventive Behavior Survey data collected by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology from Facebook users (N = 82,213) in 15 countries between October 2020 and March 2021. The results of logistic regression analyses indicate that reasonable quantity and trustworthiness of information were positively related to COVID-19 vaccination intent. But excessive and less than the desired amount of information was more likely to have negative impacts on vaccination intent. The degrees of trust in the mediums and in the sources were associated with the level of vaccine acceptance. But the effects of trustworthiness accorded to information sources showed variations across sources and mediums. Implications for information professionals and suggestions for policies are discussed.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:20:47
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.846-865
  20. Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020) 0.01 
    0.009967791 = product of:
  0.02990337 = sum of:
    0.012853865 = weight(_text_:information in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012853865 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0662725 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037751827 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
    0.017049506 = product of:
      0.051148515 = sum of:
        0.051148515 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051148515 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13220046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037751827 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    17. 1.2020 22:15:11
    Theme
    Information

Authors

Languages

  • e 651
  • d 139
  • pt 3
  • m 2
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 744
  • el 82
  • m 27
  • p 8
  • s 6
  • A 1
  • EL 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications