Search (99 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  1. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.04
    0.03722297 = product of:
      0.07444594 = sum of:
        0.07444594 = sum of:
          0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024727406 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
          0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049718536 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Keyword based querying has been an immediate and efficient way to specify and retrieve related information that the user inquired. However, conventional document ranking based on an automatic assessment of document relevance to the query may not be the best approach when little information is given. Proposes an idea to integrate 2 existing techniques, query expansion and relevance feedback to achieve a concept-based information search for the Web
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  2. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.04
    0.03722297 = product of:
      0.07444594 = sum of:
        0.07444594 = sum of:
          0.024727406 = weight(_text_:2 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024727406 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
          0.049718536 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049718536 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.2, S.87-92
  3. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.03
    0.028410593 = product of:
      0.056821186 = sum of:
        0.056821186 = product of:
          0.11364237 = sum of:
            0.11364237 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11364237 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  4. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.02
    0.024859268 = product of:
      0.049718536 = sum of:
        0.049718536 = product of:
          0.09943707 = sum of:
            0.09943707 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09943707 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  5. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02
    0.024859268 = product of:
      0.049718536 = sum of:
        0.049718536 = product of:
          0.09943707 = sum of:
            0.09943707 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09943707 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  6. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.021307945 = product of:
      0.04261589 = sum of:
        0.04261589 = product of:
          0.08523178 = sum of:
            0.08523178 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08523178 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  7. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.021307945 = product of:
      0.04261589 = sum of:
        0.04261589 = product of:
          0.08523178 = sum of:
            0.08523178 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08523178 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  8. Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004) 0.02
    0.021172091 = product of:
      0.042344183 = sum of:
        0.042344183 = sum of:
          0.017484916 = weight(_text_:2 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017484916 = score(doc=2509,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.13505578 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.024859268 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024859268 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05242341 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Most Web search engines accept natural language queries, perform some kind of fuzzy matching and produce ranked output, displaying first the documents that are most likely to be relevant. On the other hand, most library online public access catalogs (OPACs) an the Web are still Boolean retrieval systems that perform exact matching, and require users to express their search requests precisely in a Boolean search language and to refine their search statements to improve the search results. It is well-documented that users have difficulty searching Boolean OPACs effectively (e.g. Borgman, 1996; Ensor, 1992; Wallace, 1993). One approach to making OPACs easier to use is to develop a natural language search interface that acts as a middleware between the user's Web browser and the OPAC system. The search interface can accept a natural language query from the user and reformulate it as a series of Boolean search statements that are then submitted to the OPAC. The records retrieved by the OPAC are ranked by the search interface before forwarding them to the user's Web browser. The user, then, does not need to interact directly with the Boolean OPAC but with the natural language search interface or search intermediary. The search interface interacts with the OPAC system an the user's behalf. The advantage of this approach is that no modification to the OPAC or library system is required. Furthermore, the search interface can access multiple OPACs, acting as a meta search engine, and integrate search results from various OPACs before sending them to the user. The search interface needs to incorporate a method for converting the user's natural language query into a series of Boolean search statements, and for ranking the OPAC records retrieved. The purpose of this study was to develop a relevancyranking algorithm for a search interface to Boolean OPAC systems. This is part of an on-going effort to develop a knowledge-based search interface to OPACs called the E-Referencer (Khoo et al., 1998, 1999; Poo et al., 2000). E-Referencer v. 2 that has been implemented applies a repertoire of initial search strategies and reformulation strategies to retrieve records from OPACs using the Z39.50 protocol, and also assists users in mapping query keywords to the Library of Congress subject headings."
    Source
    Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
  9. Clarke, C.L.A.; Cormack, G.V.; Tudhope, E.A.: Relevance ranking for one to three term queries (2000) 0.02
    0.017484916 = product of:
      0.034969833 = sum of:
        0.034969833 = product of:
          0.069939665 = sum of:
            0.069939665 = weight(_text_:2 in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069939665 = score(doc=437,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.5402231 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 4.2002 10:11:15
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.2, S.291-311
  10. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.0142052965 = product of:
      0.028410593 = sum of:
        0.028410593 = product of:
          0.056821186 = sum of:
            0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056821186 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  11. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.01
    0.0142052965 = product of:
      0.028410593 = sum of:
        0.028410593 = product of:
          0.056821186 = sum of:
            0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056821186 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  12. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.01
    0.0142052965 = product of:
      0.028410593 = sum of:
        0.028410593 = product of:
          0.056821186 = sum of:
            0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056821186 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  13. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.01
    0.0142052965 = product of:
      0.028410593 = sum of:
        0.028410593 = product of:
          0.056821186 = sum of:
            0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056821186 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  14. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.01
    0.0142052965 = product of:
      0.028410593 = sum of:
        0.028410593 = product of:
          0.056821186 = sum of:
            0.056821186 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056821186 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  15. Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.01
    0.012555826 = product of:
      0.025111653 = sum of:
        0.025111653 = product of:
          0.050223306 = sum of:
            0.050223306 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050223306 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    18. 9.2018 18:22:56
  16. Zhang, W.; Korf, R.E.: Performance of linear-space search algorithms (1995) 0.01
    0.012489226 = product of:
      0.024978451 = sum of:
        0.024978451 = product of:
          0.049956903 = sum of:
            0.049956903 = weight(_text_:2 in 4744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049956903 = score(doc=4744,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.38587365 = fieldWeight in 4744, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 8.1996 10:29:15
    Source
    Artificial intelligence. 79(1995) no.2, S.241-292
  17. Ziegler, B.: ESS: ein schneller Algorithmus zur Mustersuche in Zeichenfolgen (1996) 0.01
    0.012363703 = product of:
      0.024727406 = sum of:
        0.024727406 = product of:
          0.049454812 = sum of:
            0.049454812 = weight(_text_:2 in 7543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049454812 = score(doc=7543,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.38199544 = fieldWeight in 7543, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7543)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Informatik: Forschung und Entwicklung. 11(1996) no.2, S.69-83
  18. Jones, K.: Linguistic searching versus relevance ranking : DR-LINK and TARGET (1999) 0.01
    0.012363703 = product of:
      0.024727406 = sum of:
        0.024727406 = product of:
          0.049454812 = sum of:
            0.049454812 = weight(_text_:2 in 6423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049454812 = score(doc=6423,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.38199544 = fieldWeight in 6423, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6423)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 23(1999) no.2, S.67-80
  19. Crestani, F.: Combination of similarity measures for effective spoken document retrieval (2003) 0.01
    0.012363703 = product of:
      0.024727406 = sum of:
        0.024727406 = product of:
          0.049454812 = sum of:
            0.049454812 = weight(_text_:2 in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049454812 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1294644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.38199544 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.2, S.87-96
  20. Joss, M.W.; Wszola, S.: ¬The engines that can : text search and retrieval software, their strategies, and vendors (1996) 0.01
    0.010653973 = product of:
      0.021307945 = sum of:
        0.021307945 = product of:
          0.04261589 = sum of:
            0.04261589 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04261589 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18357785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05242341 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 9.1996 13:56:22

Years

Languages

  • e 84
  • d 15

Types

  • a 88
  • m 5
  • x 3
  • r 2
  • p 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…