Search (13178 results, page 1 of 659)

  1. Scott, M.L.: Dewey Decimal Classification, 22nd edition : a study manual and number building guide (2005) 0.33
    0.33142483 = sum of:
      0.28382468 = product of:
        0.851474 = sum of:
          0.851474 = weight(_text_:22nd in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.851474 = score(doc=4594,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.61879563 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              1.376018 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.047600135 = product of:
        0.09520027 = sum of:
          0.09520027 = weight(_text_:22 in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09520027 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This work has been fully updated for the 22nd edition of DDC, and is used as reference for the application of Dewey coding or as a course text in the Dewey System
    Object
    DDC-22
  2. Liddy, E.D.; Bishop, A.P.; Settel, B.: Index quality study : pt.2: publishers' survey and qualitative assessment (1991) 0.27
    0.26924178 = sum of:
      0.24083321 = product of:
        0.7224996 = sum of:
          0.7224996 = weight(_text_:22nd in 7767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.7224996 = score(doc=7767,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.61879563 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              1.16759 = fieldWeight in 7767, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7767)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.028408585 = product of:
        0.05681717 = sum of:
          0.05681717 = weight(_text_:2 in 7767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05681717 = score(doc=7767,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.32742465 = fieldWeight in 7767, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7767)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexing tradition and innovation: proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the American Society of Indexers
  3. Kaushik, S.K.: DDC 22 : a practical approach (2004) 0.21
    0.2078121 = sum of:
      0.08027773 = product of:
        0.2408332 = sum of:
          0.2408332 = weight(_text_:22nd in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2408332 = score(doc=1842,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.61879563 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.38919666 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.12753436 = sum of:
        0.02678387 = weight(_text_:2 in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02678387 = score(doc=1842,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.15434946 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
        0.10075049 = weight(_text_:22 in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10075049 = score(doc=1842,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.4094577 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
    
    Abstract
    A system of library classification that flashed across the inquiring mind of young Melvil Louis Kossuth Dewey (known as Melvil Dewey) in 1873 is still the most popular classification scheme.. The modern library classification begins with Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Melvil Dewey devised DDC in 1876. DDC has is credit of 128 years of boudless success. The DDC is being taught as a practical subject throughout the world and it is being used in majority of libraries in about 150 countries. This is the result of continuous revision that 22nd Edition of DDC has been published in July 2003. No other classification scheme has published so many editions. Some welcome changes have been made in DDC 22. To reduce the Christian bias in 200 religion, the numbers 201 to 209 have been devoted to specific aspects of religion. In the previous editions these numbers were devoted to Christianity. to enhance the classifier's efficiency, Table 7 has been removed from DDC 22 and the provision of adding group of persons is made by direct use of notation already available in schedules and in notation -08 from Table 1 Standard Subdivision. The present book is an attempt to explain, with suitable examples, the salient provisions of DDC 22. The book is written in simple language so that the students may not face any difficulty in understanding what is being explained. The examples in the book are explained in a step-by-step procedure. It is hoped that this book will prove of great help and use to the library professionals in general and library and information science students in particular.
    Content
    1. Introduction to DDC 22 2. Major changes in DDC 22 3. Introduction to the schedules 4. Use of Table 1 : Standard Subdivisions 5. Use of Table 2 : Areas 6. Use of Table 3 : Subdivisions for the arts, for individual literatures, for specific literary forms 7. Use to Table 4 : Subdivisions of individual languages and language families 8. Use of Table 5 : Ethic and National groups 9. Use of Table 6 : Languages 10. Treatment of Groups of Persons
    Object
    DDC-22
  4. Batt, C.: ¬The libraries of the future : public libraries and the Internet (1996) 0.19
    0.18597502 = sum of:
      0.07193669 = product of:
        0.21581006 = sum of:
          0.21581006 = weight(_text_:assess in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21581006 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4141998 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.5210289 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11403833 = sum of:
        0.037878115 = weight(_text_:2 in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037878115 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
        0.076160215 = weight(_text_:22 in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076160215 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the possible potential for service development in public libraries offered by the Internet and describes the traditional models of network access and their lack of relevance to public libraries. Describes 2 current research projects currently being undertaken by public libraries to assess the value of the Internet to their services; ITPOINT, a project being conducted at Chelmsley Wood Library, Solihull, UK; and CLIP, the Croydon Libraries Internet peoject. Presents a range of new service paradigms and suggests that public libraries will become even more central to people's lives than they are today
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-30
  5. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.19
    0.18597502 = sum of:
      0.07193669 = product of:
        0.21581006 = sum of:
          0.21581006 = weight(_text_:assess in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21581006 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4141998 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.5210289 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11403833 = sum of:
        0.037878115 = weight(_text_:2 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037878115 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
        0.076160215 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076160215 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey to assess the attitudes of scholarly users towards electronic journals and examines the current level of use of these publications by university academics in 2 departments in each of 5 faculties of a UK university
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
  6. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.17
    0.17408039 = sum of:
      0.09300041 = product of:
        0.27900124 = sum of:
          0.27900124 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.27900124 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.595713 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.081079975 = sum of:
        0.033479836 = weight(_text_:2 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033479836 = score(doc=3577,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.19293682 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.047600135 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047600135 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  7. Aghemo, A.: Come valutare il servizio di informazione (1993) 0.16
    0.16272813 = sum of:
      0.0629446 = product of:
        0.18883379 = sum of:
          0.18883379 = weight(_text_:assess in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18883379 = score(doc=4413,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4141998 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.45590025 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.09978353 = sum of:
        0.03314335 = weight(_text_:2 in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03314335 = score(doc=4413,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
        0.06664018 = weight(_text_:22 in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06664018 = score(doc=4413,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: How to assess a library information service
    Source
    Biblioteche oggi. 11(1993) no.2, S.40-42
  8. Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006) 0.16
    0.16272813 = sum of:
      0.0629446 = product of:
        0.18883379 = sum of:
          0.18883379 = weight(_text_:assess in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18883379 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4141998 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.45590025 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.09978353 = sum of:
        0.03314335 = weight(_text_:2 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03314335 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
        0.06664018 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06664018 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a study conducted at the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU-Boulder) to assess the extent to which its catalogers were using Classification Web (Class Web), the subscription-based, online cataloging documentation resource provided by the Library of Congress. In addition, this paper will explore assumptions made by management regarding CU-Boulder catalogers' use of the product, possible reasons for the lower-than-expected use, and recommendations for promoting a more efficient and cost-effective use of Class Web at other institutions similar to CU-Boulder.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.2, S.129-137
  9. Bravo, B.R. -> Rodriguez Bravo, B.: 0.15
    0.15441613 = product of:
      0.30883226 = sum of:
        0.30883226 = sum of:
          0.08035161 = weight(_text_:2 in 1) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08035161 = score(doc=1,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.4630484 = fieldWeight in 1, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=1)
          0.22848064 = weight(_text_:22 in 1) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22848064 = score(doc=1,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 1, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=1)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2007 19:43:53
    2
  10. Sears' list of subject headings (2018) 0.15
    0.14897668 = sum of:
      0.120416604 = product of:
        0.3612498 = sum of:
          0.3612498 = weight(_text_:22nd in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.3612498 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.61879563 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.583795 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.02856008 = product of:
        0.05712016 = sum of:
          0.05712016 = weight(_text_:22 in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05712016 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21.12.2018 18:22:12
    Footnote
    Introduction und Rez. in: Knowledge Organization 45(2018) no.8, S.712-714. u.d.T. "Satija, M. P. 2018: "The 22nd edition (2018) of the Sears List of Subject Headings: A brief introduction." (DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2018-8-712).
  11. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.15
    0.14677225 = sum of:
      0.13020058 = product of:
        0.39060172 = sum of:
          0.39060172 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.39060172 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.595713 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.016571674 = product of:
        0.03314335 = sum of:
          0.03314335 = weight(_text_:2 in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03314335 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
    Isbn
    978-3-11-061738-2
  12. Klauß, H.: SISIS : 10. Anwenderforum Berlin-Brandenburg (1999) 0.15
    0.14558493 = product of:
      0.29116985 = sum of:
        0.29116985 = sum of:
          0.07575623 = weight(_text_:2 in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07575623 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.4365662 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
          0.21541362 = weight(_text_:22 in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21541362 = score(doc=463,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 10:22:52
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 33(1999) H.2, S.346-348
  13. Dewey, M.: Dewey Decimal Classification and relative index (2003) 0.14
    0.14486605 = sum of:
      0.08690321 = product of:
        0.2607096 = sum of:
          0.2607096 = weight(_text_:22nd in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2607096 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.61879563 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.4213178 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.057962842 = sum of:
        0.016739918 = weight(_text_:2 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016739918 = score(doc=129,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.09646841 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
        0.041222926 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041222926 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 31(2004) no.2, S.112-114 (M.P. Satija) : "With nearly 130 years of eventful and checkered history, the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is the oldest living yet thriving modern library classification. Having undergone 21 revisions, it is the most applied library classification structure all over the world. Apart from its use in libraries in more than 135 countries across six continents, many national and trade bibliographies use it for content organization. Furthermore, it is now making successful forays into the world of electronic documents and networked information. The print version of the 22nd edition was released in September 2003, two months later than the scheduled time of July 2003, and two months after the release of the electronic version, WebDewey. The period between print editions now seems settled to seven years as a matter of policy. As WebDewey, an the other hand, is updated an a quarterly basis, what really constitutes a new edition is problematic; edition is rolling, always in a flux without much fixity. The last half century, and more specifically the tenure of Benjamin A. Custer as editor (1956-1980; Editions 16-19), has been an era of structural changes in the DDC, backed by professional management and organizational planning. Custer was instrumental in not only resuscitating the system, but also in putting DDC back an the path of progress. His able successor, Dr. John P. Comaromi, edited the 20`h edition (1989) and ushered in a period of simplification and consolidation. Following the acquisition of Forest Press by OCLC in 1988, much more research has gone into making new editions of the DDC. The OCLC Office of Research has involved itself in classification research, especially in the harmonization of various knowledge classification systems and mapping of DDC numbers to subject headings, above all to make DDC capable of organizing electronic information of every sort. The acquisition of DDC by OCLC has also inaugurated an era of new products and services, along with organized marketing. DDC21 (1996) was a product of high IT, and the 22nd edition can safely be termed a child of network technology. It is indeed the first edition produced in the web environment. To stay abreast of current developments an knowledge practices, the editors relied an the Internet and electronic databases for new topics and terms. Editors and policy makes got constant feedback and suggestions via the Internet to add new features and to achieve accuracy and efficiency. In addition to the feedback and expert advice, this edition, as usual, is based an actual classification of three quarters of a million current books in the Decimal Classification Division of the Library of Congress since 1996.
    Changes DDC22 is the second edition prepared by Joan S. Mitchell who took over as editor in 1993. It carries forward the policies and improvements started in DDC21, especially the onslaught an the Christian and western cultural blas in the schedules and tables. The plan for reducing Christian blas in 200 Religion, initiated in DDC21, has now been completed, with some additional provisions in 296 and 297. An outstanding change has been the abrogation of Table 7 Persons. The functions of Table 7 are now filled by using T1-08 and whatever notation is appropriate from 011-999. There are at least six places in the tables and 12 places in the schedules where the use of T7 was prescribed; what good the abolition of T7 has produced is not clear. In fact, it does make number building in some cases a bit circuitous, especially while using Table 3C. It has also resulted in the reuse of many DDC 21 numbers with new meanings. However, some numbers remain the same e.g., Social customs of artists 390.47 (both in DDC21 and DDC22). A few numbers have also become shorter in length. In compliance with the recommendations of D'Elia's survey, all works relating to directories of travel facilities such as hotels, lodges, Motels, inns, have been shifted to 910.46 and to 913/919 whereas 647.94 continues to be in place for general information about hotels. A common practice in previous editions, that is full class or extensive revisions (phoenix schedules), appear to have been discontinued in the preparation of DDC22. But minor changes are numerous. There are more than one thousand relocations and discontiuations of class numbers. Some 40 numbers have been reused. ... However, all these changes are not those projected as slated changes for DDC22 in the DDC21 (1996), namely in 520 Astronomy, 355-359 Military science, 636-639 Animal husbandry and 690 Buildings. Obviously the switch over to the DDC 22 will put less strain an libraries. There has been considerable improvement in the manual, now shifted to volume 1 of the print edition (pp. 1-182). Notes in the manual have been shortened by removing redundant information and by dividing them into smaller sections. Some information from the manual has been transferred to the schedules and tables, in the form of notes. The manual is now clearer and easier to read. Flow Charts, built-in numbers, and see also references should help classifiers achieve greater consistency. The relative index has been beefed up. With its 928 pages, it is 333 pages longer than the previous one, including new built-in numbers and many additional terms. The entry vocabulary is wide-based and current. DDC 22, the first edition of this millennium, has kept pace with the fast changing information environment to map and organize it squarely. To quote our friends at OCLC: knowledge is a big world, and they have organized it."
    Issue
    22nd ed.
    Object
    DDC-22
    Pages
    4 vols: XXVII, 731 S. (vol.1) - XVI, 1250 S. (vol. 2) - 1074 S. (vol 3) - 934 S. (vol.4)
  14. Gelfand, M.A.: New York Metropolitan reference and research library agency (METRO) (1977) 0.14
    0.14048603 = product of:
      0.28097206 = sum of:
        0.28097206 = product of:
          0.8429162 = sum of:
            0.8429162 = weight(_text_:22nd in 5738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.8429162 = score(doc=5738,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.61879563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.07026566 = queryNorm
                1.3621883 = fieldWeight in 5738, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5738)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    The Bowker annual of library and book trade information. 22nd ed
  15. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.14
    0.14016056 = sum of:
      0.11160049 = product of:
        0.33480147 = sum of:
          0.33480147 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.33480147 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.595713 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.02856008 = product of:
        0.05712016 = sum of:
          0.05712016 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05712016 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  16. Dalip, D.H.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Cristo, M.; Calado, P.: ¬A general multiview framework for assessing the quality of collaboratively created content on web 2.0 (2017) 0.13
    0.1348576 = sum of:
      0.06358364 = product of:
        0.19075093 = sum of:
          0.19075093 = weight(_text_:assess in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19075093 = score(doc=3343,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.4141998 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.4605288 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.07127395 = sum of:
        0.023673821 = weight(_text_:2 in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023673821 = score(doc=3343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.13642694 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
        0.047600135 = weight(_text_:22 in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047600135 = score(doc=3343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.07026566 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
    
    Abstract
    User-generated content is one of the most interesting phenomena of current published media, as users are now able not only to consume, but also to produce content in a much faster and easier manner. However, such freedom also carries concerns about content quality. In this work, we propose an automatic framework to assess the quality of collaboratively generated content. Quality is addressed as a multidimensional concept, modeled as a combination of independent assessments, each regarding different quality dimensions. Accordingly, we adopt a machine-learning (ML)-based multiview approach to assess content quality. We perform a thorough analysis of our framework on two different domains: Questions and Answer Forums and Collaborative Encyclopedias. This allowed us to better understand when and how the proposed multiview approach is able to provide accurate quality assessments. Our main contributions are: (a) a general ML multiview framework that takes advantage of different views of quality indicators; (b) the improvement (up to 30%) in quality assessment over the best state-of-the-art baseline methods; (c) a thorough feature and view analysis regarding impact, informativeness, and correlation, based on two distinct domains.
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:04:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.2, S.286-308
  17. Nanfito, N.: ¬The indexed Web : engineering tools for cataloging, storing and delivering Web based documents (1999) 0.13
    0.12738681 = product of:
      0.25477362 = sum of:
        0.25477362 = sum of:
          0.0662867 = weight(_text_:2 in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0662867 = score(doc=8727,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.38199544 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
          0.18848692 = weight(_text_:22 in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18848692 = score(doc=8727,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2001 12:22:47
    Source
    Information outlook. 3(1999) no.2, S.18-22
  18. Filk, C.: Online, Internet und Digitalkultur : eine Bibliographie zur jüngsten Diskussion um die Informationsgesellschaft (1996) 0.13
    0.12738681 = product of:
      0.25477362 = sum of:
        0.25477362 = sum of:
          0.0662867 = weight(_text_:2 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0662867 = score(doc=44,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.38199544 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
          0.18848692 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18848692 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 9.1997 19:22:27
    Source
    Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193
  19. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.13
    0.12580478 = sum of:
      0.11160049 = product of:
        0.33480147 = sum of:
          0.33480147 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.33480147 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.595713 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.014204293 = product of:
        0.028408585 = sum of:
          0.028408585 = weight(_text_:2 in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028408585 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
    Date
    2. 1.2016 17:27:19
  20. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.13
    0.12580478 = sum of:
      0.11160049 = product of:
        0.33480147 = sum of:
          0.33480147 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.33480147 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.595713 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.014204293 = product of:
        0.028408585 = sum of:
          0.028408585 = weight(_text_:2 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028408585 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.07026566 = queryNorm
              0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 10544
  • m 1702
  • el 590
  • s 557
  • i 212
  • b 104
  • x 82
  • r 77
  • ? 41
  • n 39
  • l 21
  • d 9
  • p 9
  • u 9
  • h 6
  • z 4
  • au 1
  • fi 1
  • ms 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications