Search (3773 results, page 1 of 189)

0.17071259 = product of:
  0.34142518 = sum of:
    0.29166457 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29166457 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51895946 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.049760614 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049760614 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21435541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.15741546 = product of:
  0.31483093 = sum of:
    0.24848343 = weight(_text_:assessed in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24848343 = score(doc=4367,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41483074 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.59899956 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
    0.06634749 = weight(_text_:22 in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06634749 = score(doc=4367,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21435541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Reports results of an e-mail questionnaire survey of 161 UK local authorities to determine their use of the WWW for the dissemination of information. Identifies the resons for its adoption, the benefits and disadvantages and the types of information being disseminated by this means. All the Web sites were observed and assessed for relevance and quality and 4 local authorities were used as case studies

Date

10. 1.1999 17:22:49

0.15741546 = product of:
  0.31483093 = sum of:
    0.24848343 = weight(_text_:assessed in 7436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24848343 = score(doc=7436,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41483074 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.59899956 = fieldWeight in 7436, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7436)
    0.06634749 = weight(_text_:22 in 7436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06634749 = score(doc=7436,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21435541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7436, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7436)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Agent modeling - the ability to model and reason other agents' knowledge, beliefs, goals and actions - is central to intelligent systems. Outlines the papers given which assessed the state of the art and discussed the common issues in presentation and reasoning with models of agents

Date

22. 1.1999 18:50:30

0.14583229 = product of:
  0.58332914 = sum of:
    0.58332914 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.58332914 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51895946 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.1422605 = product of:
  0.284521 = sum of:
    0.24305382 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24305382 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51895946 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.04146718 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04146718 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21435541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.13773853 = product of:
  0.27547705 = sum of:
    0.217423 = weight(_text_:assessed in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.217423 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41483074 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.5241246 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
    0.05805405 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05805405 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21435541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

In recent years, cultural heritage institutions have been exploring the benefits of applying Linked Open Data to their catalogs and digital materials. Innovative and creative methods have emerged to publish and reuse digital contents to promote computational access, such as the concepts of Labs and Collections as Data. Data quality has become a requirement for researchers and training methods based on artificial intelligence and machine learning. This article explores how the quality of Linked Open Data made available by cultural heritage institutions can be automatically assessed. The results obtained can be useful for other institutions who wish to publish and assess their collections.

Date

22. 6.2023 18:23:31

0.12152691 = product of:
  0.48610765 = sum of:
    0.48610765 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.48610765 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51895946 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.098384656 = product of:
  0.19676931 = sum of:
    0.15530214 = weight(_text_:assessed in 1894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15530214 = score(doc=1894,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41483074 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.37437472 = fieldWeight in 1894, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1894)
    0.04146718 = weight(_text_:22 in 1894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04146718 = score(doc=1894,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21435541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1894, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1894)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the literature on the information behavior of practicing visual artists to determine if a consistent model emerges and what further research is necessary. Design/methodology/approach - Works dealing with the information needs and uses relevant to the creative activities of visual artists are discussed in the paper. These works are assessed for their contributions toward understanding of the specific information behaviors of practicing artists. Findings - The results show that a consistent model of artists' information behavior emerges. However, nearly all of the literature focuses on art students, academic art faculty, or librarians, and so any claim that practicing artists fit the model is largely unsupported by research. There have been no published studies of communities of practicing visual artists. The implications of defining artists as communities of practice are discussed. Research limitations/implications - Research is proposed that studies the information behavior of communities of practicing visual artists in order to confirm or amend the existing model. Practical implications - Practitioners will have their attention drawn to an underserved user population whose information needs and behaviors have not been directly targeted for research. They will recognize the need for study of their own artist communities and the development of services for them. Originality/value - This paper directs the discussion of artists' information behavior away from the art-library-specific literature, where it has largely resided, as a means of adjusting the focus of research onto the largely unstudied and underserved communities of practicing artists.

Date

7. 6.2008 12:22:23

0.098384656 = product of:
  0.19676931 = sum of:
    0.15530214 = weight(_text_:assessed in 2569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15530214 = score(doc=2569,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41483074 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.37437472 = fieldWeight in 2569, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2569)
    0.04146718 = weight(_text_:22 in 2569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04146718 = score(doc=2569,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21435541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2569, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2569)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Purpose - The "photosharing" site Flickr is one of the most commonly cited examples used to define Web2.0. This paper aims to explore where Flickr's real novelty lies, examining its functionality and its place in the world of amateur photography. Several optimistic views of the impact of Flickr such as its facilitation of citizen journalism, "vernacular creativity" and in learning as an "affinity space" are evaluated. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws on a wide range of sources including published interviews with its developers, user opinions expressed in forums, telephone interviews and content analysis of user profiles and activity. Findings - Flickr's development path passes from an innovative social game to a relatively familiar model of a web site, itself developed through intense user participation but later stabilising with the reassertion of a commercial relationship to the membership. The broader context of the impact of Flickr is examined by looking at the institutions of amateur photography and particularly the code of pictorialism promoted by the clubs and industry during the twentieth century. The nature of Flickr as a benign space is premised on the way the democratic potential of photography is controlled by such institutions. The limits of optimistic claims about Flickr are identified in the way that the system is designed to satisfy commercial purposes, continuing digital divides in access and the low interactivity and criticality on Flickr. Originality/value - Flickr is an interesting source of change, but can only be understood in the perspective of long-term development of the hobby and wider social processes. By setting Flickr in such a broad context, its significance and that of Web2.0 more generally can be fully assessed.

Date

30.12.2008 19:38:22

0.098384656 = product of:
  0.19676931 = sum of:
    0.15530214 = weight(_text_:assessed in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15530214 = score(doc=642,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41483074 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.37437472 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
    0.04146718 = weight(_text_:22 in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04146718 = score(doc=642,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21435541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The past decade has seen the emergence of a new paradigm in the corporate world where organisations emphasised connectivity as a means of exposing decision-makers to wider resources of information within and outside the organisation. Many organisations followed the initiatives of enhancing infrastructures, manipulating cultural shifts and emphasising managerial commitment for creating pools and networks of knowledge. However, the concept of connectivity is not merely presenting people with the data, but more importantly, to create environments where people can seek information efficiently. This paradigm has therefore caused a shift in the function of information systems in organisations. They have to be now assessed in relation to how they underpin people's information-seeking activities within the context of their organisational environment. This research project used interpretative research methods to investigate the nature of people's information-seeking activities at two culturally contrasting organisations. Outcomes of this research project provide insights into phenomena associated with people's information-seeking function, and show how they depend on the organisational context that is defined partly by information systems. It suggests that information-seeking is not just searching for data. The inefficiencies inherent in both people and their environments can bring opaqueness into people's data, which they need to avoid or eliminate as part of seeking information. This seems to have made information-seeking a two-tier process consisting of a primary process of searching and interpreting data and auxiliary process of avoiding and eliminating opaqueness in data. Based on this view, this research suggests that organisational information systems operate naturally as implicit dual-mechanisms to underpin the above two-tier process, and that improvements to information systems should concern maintaining the balance in these dual-mechanisms.

Date

22. 7.2022 12:16:58

0.09722153 = product of:
  0.38888612 = sum of:
    0.38888612 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38888612 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51895946 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.

0.09722153 = product of:
  0.38888612 = sum of:
    0.38888612 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38888612 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51895946 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H

0.08506884 = product of:
  0.34027535 = sum of:
    0.34027535 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.34027535 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51895946 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.

0.08506884 = product of:
  0.34027535 = sum of:
    0.34027535 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.34027535 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51895946 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.08210083 = product of:
  0.32840332 = sum of:
    0.32840332 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32840332 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21435541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 5.1998 20:02:22

0.08210083 = product of:
  0.32840332 = sum of:
    0.32840332 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32840332 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21435541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 5.1998 20:02:22

0.08210083 = product of:
  0.32840332 = sum of:
    0.32840332 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32840332 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21435541 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 5.1998 20:02:22

0.07765107 = product of:
  0.31060427 = sum of:
    0.31060427 = weight(_text_:assessed in 6370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31060427 = score(doc=6370,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41483074 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.74874943 = fieldWeight in 6370, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6370)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Based on the Library of Congress's own formal and informal publications and flyers, summarizes how its digital collections can be assessed globally via the Internet and the WWW

0.07765107 = product of:
  0.31060427 = sum of:
    0.31060427 = weight(_text_:assessed in 1663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31060427 = score(doc=1663,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.41483074 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.74874943 = fieldWeight in 1663, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1663)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

A similarity-oriented approach for deriving reference values used in citation normalization is explored and contrasted with the dominant approach of utilizing database-defined journal sets as a basis for deriving such values. In the similarity-oriented approach, an assessed article's raw citation count is compared with a reference value that is derived from a reference set, which is constructed in such a way that articles in this set are estimated to address a subject matter similar to that of the assessed article. This estimation is based on second-order similarity and utilizes a combination of 2 feature sets: bibliographic references and technical terminology. The contribution of an article in a given reference set to the reference value is dependent on its degree of similarity to the assessed article. It is shown that reference values calculated by the similarity-oriented approach are considerably better at predicting the assessed articles' citation count compared to the reference values given by the journal-set approach, thus significantly reducing the variability in the observed citation distribution that stems from the variability in the articles' addressed subject matter.

0.07291614 = product of:
  0.29166457 = sum of:
    0.29166457 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29166457 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51895946 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.061212406 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.