Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Waltman, L.; Eck, N.J. van; Raan, A.F.J. van: Universality of citation distributions revisited (2012) 0.04

0.04020237 = product of:
  0.08040474 = sum of:
    0.08040474 = product of:
      0.16080949 = sum of:
        0.16080949 = weight(_text_:n.j in 4963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16080949 = score(doc=4963,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31831396 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048730716 = queryNorm
            0.50519145 = fieldWeight in 4963, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4963)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Waltman, L.; Calero-Medina, C.; Kosten, J.; Noyons, E.C.M.; Tijssen, R.J.W.; Eck, N.J. van; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van; Visser, M.S.; Wouters, P.: ¬The Leiden ranking 2011/2012 : data collection, indicators, and interpretation (2012) 0.03

0.02871598 = product of:
  0.05743196 = sum of:
    0.05743196 = product of:
      0.11486392 = sum of:
        0.11486392 = weight(_text_:n.j in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11486392 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31831396 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048730716 = queryNorm
            0.36085102 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Raan, A.F.J. van: Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European research universities : prevalent scaling rules in the science system (2008) 0.02
```
0.015196591 = product of:
  0.030393181 = sum of:
    0.030393181 = product of:
      0.121572725 = sum of:
        0.121572725 = weight(_text_:author's in 1372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.121572725 = score(doc=1372,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32747787 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048730716 = queryNorm
            0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 1372, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1372)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The statistical properties of bibliometric indicators related to research performance, field citation density, and journal impact were studied for the 100 largest European research universities. A size-dependent cumulative advantage was found for the impact of universities in terms of total number of citations. In the author's previous work, a similar scaling rule was found at the level of research groups. Therefore, this scaling rule is conjectured to be a prevalent property of the science system. The lower performance universities have a larger size-dependent cumulative advantage for receiving citations than top performance universities. For the lower performance universities, the fraction of noncited publications decreases considerably with size. Generally, the higher the average journal impact of the publications of a university, the lower the number of noncited publications. The average research performance was found not to dilute with size. Evidently, large universities, particularly top performance universities are characterized by being big and beautiful. They succeed in keeping a high performance over a broad range of activities. This most probably is an indication of their overall attractive scientific and intellectual power. It was also found that particularly for the lower performance universities, the field citation density provides a strong cumulative advantage in citations per publication. The relation between number of citations and field citation density found in this study can be considered as a second basic scaling rule of the science system. Top performance universities publish in journals with significantly higher journal impact as compared to the lower performance universities. A significant decrease of the fraction of self-citations with increasing research performance, average field citation density, and average journal impact was found.

Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.01

0.014005678 = product of:
  0.028011356 = sum of:
    0.028011356 = product of:
      0.05602271 = sum of:
        0.05602271 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05602271 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17064667 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048730716 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 7.2006 16:20:22

Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008) 0.01

0.009903509 = product of:
  0.019807018 = sum of:
    0.019807018 = product of:
      0.039614037 = sum of:
        0.039614037 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039614037 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17064667 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048730716 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 3.2009 19:03:12

Costas, R.; Bordons, M.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers (2009) 0.01

0.008252924 = product of:
  0.016505849 = sum of:
    0.016505849 = product of:
      0.033011697 = sum of:
        0.033011697 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033011697 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17064667 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048730716 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 3.2009 19:02:48

Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years