Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.06
    0.058307745 = product of:
      0.08746161 = sum of:
        0.06950371 = weight(_text_:v in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06950371 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2152264 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044181384 = queryNorm
            0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
        0.017957903 = product of:
          0.035915807 = sum of:
            0.035915807 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035915807 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  2. Estrada, L.M.; Hildebrand, M.; Boer, V. de; Ossenbruggen, J. van: Time-based tags for fiction movies : comparing experts to novices using a video labeling game (2017) 0.05
    0.05363846 = product of:
      0.08045769 = sum of:
        0.05791976 = weight(_text_:v in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05791976 = score(doc=3347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2152264 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044181384 = queryNorm
            0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
        0.022537926 = product of:
          0.045075852 = sum of:
            0.045075852 = weight(_text_:de in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045075852 = score(doc=3347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18986902 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.23740499 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  3. DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008) 0.04
    0.038871832 = product of:
      0.058307745 = sum of:
        0.04633581 = weight(_text_:v in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04633581 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2152264 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044181384 = queryNorm
            0.21528868 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
        0.011971936 = product of:
          0.023943871 = sum of:
            0.023943871 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023943871 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  4. Kuchler, T.; Pawlowski, J.M.; Zimmermann, V.: Social Tagging and Open Content : a concept for the future of e-learning and knowledge management? (2008) 0.02
    0.023167904 = product of:
      0.06950371 = sum of:
        0.06950371 = weight(_text_:v in 2892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06950371 = score(doc=2892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2152264 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044181384 = queryNorm
            0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 2892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2892)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  5. Braun, S.; Schmidt, A.; Walter, A.; Zacharias, V.: Von Tags zu semantischen Beziehungen : kollaborative Ontologiereifung (2008) 0.02
    0.023167904 = product of:
      0.06950371 = sum of:
        0.06950371 = weight(_text_:v in 2896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06950371 = score(doc=2896,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2152264 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044181384 = queryNorm
            0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 2896, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2896)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  6. Pammer, V.; Ley, T.; Lindstaedt, S.: tagr: Unterstützung in kollaborativen Tagging-Umgebungen durch semantische und assoziative Netzwerke (2008) 0.02
    0.023167904 = product of:
      0.06950371 = sum of:
        0.06950371 = weight(_text_:v in 2898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06950371 = score(doc=2898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2152264 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044181384 = queryNorm
            0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 2898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2898)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  7. Sun, A.; Bhowmick, S.S.; Nguyen, K.T.N.; Bai, G.: Tag-based social image retrieval : an empirical evaluation (2011) 0.02
    0.019306587 = product of:
      0.05791976 = sum of:
        0.05791976 = weight(_text_:v in 4938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05791976 = score(doc=4938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2152264 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044181384 = queryNorm
            0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 4938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4938)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Tags associated with social images are valuable information source for superior image search and retrieval experiences. Although various heuristics are valuable to boost tag-based search for images, there is a lack of general framework to study the impact of these heuristics. Specifically, the task of ranking images matching a given tag query based on their associated tags in descending order of relevance has not been well studied. In this article, we take the first step to propose a generic, flexible, and extensible framework for this task and exploit it for a systematic and comprehensive empirical evaluation of various methods for ranking images. To this end, we identified five orthogonal dimensions to quantify the matching score between a tagged image and a tag query. These five dimensions are: (i) tag relatedness to measure the degree of effectiveness of a tag describing the tagged image; (ii) tag discrimination to quantify the degree of discrimination of a tag with respect to the entire tagged image collection; (iii) tag length normalization analogous to document length normalization in web search; (iv) tag-query matching model for the matching score computation between an image tag and a query tag; and (v) query model for tag query rewriting. For each dimension, we identify a few implementations and evaluate their impact on NUS-WIDE dataset, the largest human-annotated dataset consisting of more than 269K tagged images from Flickr. We evaluated 81 single-tag queries and 443 multi-tag queries over 288 search methods and systematically compare their performances using standard metrics including Precision at top-K, Mean Average Precision (MAP), Recall, and Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG).
  8. Wei, W.; Ram, S.: Utilizing sozial bookmarking tag space for Web content discovery : a social network analysis approach (2010) 0.02
    0.01544527 = product of:
      0.04633581 = sum of:
        0.04633581 = weight(_text_:v in 1) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04633581 = score(doc=1,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2152264 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044181384 = queryNorm
            0.21528868 = fieldWeight in 1, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Social bookmarking has gained popularity since the advent of Web 2.0. Keywords known as tags are created to annotate web content, and the resulting tag space composed of the tags, the resources, and the users arises as a new platform for web content discovery. Useful and interesting web resources can be located through searching and browsing based on tags, as well as following the user-user connections formed in the social bookmarking community. However, the effectiveness of tag-based search is limited due to the lack of explicitly represented semantics in the tag space. In addition, social connections between users are underused for web content discovery because of the inadequate social functions. In this research, we propose a comprehensive framework to reorganize the flat tag space into a hierarchical faceted model. We also studied the structure and properties of various networks emerging from the tag space for the purpose of more efficient web content discovery. The major research approach used in this research is social network analysis (SNA), together with methodologies employed in design science research. The contribution of our research includes: (i) a faceted model to categorize social bookmarking tags; (ii) a relationship ontology to represent the semantics of relationships between tags; (iii) heuristics to reorganize the flat tag space into a hierarchical faceted model using analysis of tag-tag co-occurrence networks; (iv) an implemented prototype system as proof-of-concept to validate the feasibility of the reorganization approach; (v) a set of evaluations of the social functions of the current networking features of social bookmarking and a series of recommendations as to how to improve the social functions to facilitate web content discovery.
  9. Tonkin, E.; Baptista, A.A.; Hooland, S. van; Resmini, A.; Mendéz, E.; Neville, L.: Kinds of Tags : a collaborative research study on tag usage and structure (2007) 0.01
    0.014874272 = product of:
      0.044622816 = sum of:
        0.044622816 = product of:
          0.08924563 = sum of:
            0.08924563 = weight(_text_:de in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08924563 = score(doc=531,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18986902 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.47003788 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    KoT (Kinds of Tags) is an ongoing joint collaborative research effort with many participants worldwide, including the University of Minho, UKOLN, the University of Bologna, the Université Libre de Bruxelles and La Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. It is focused on the analysis of tags that are in common use in the practice of social tagging, with the aim of discovering how easily tags can be 'normalised' for interoperability with standard metadata environments such as the DC Metadata Terms.
  10. Evedove Tartarotti, R. Dal'; Lopes Fujita, M.: ¬The perspective of social indexing in online bibliographic catalogs : between the individual and the collaborative (2016) 0.01
    0.012020227 = product of:
      0.03606068 = sum of:
        0.03606068 = product of:
          0.07212136 = sum of:
            0.07212136 = weight(_text_:de in 4917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07212136 = score(doc=4917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18986902 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.37984797 = fieldWeight in 4917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  11. Weiand, K.; Hartl, A.; Hausmann, S.; Furche, T.; Bry, F.: Keyword-based search over semantic data (2012) 0.01
    0.0106244795 = product of:
      0.03187344 = sum of:
        0.03187344 = product of:
          0.06374688 = sum of:
            0.06374688 = weight(_text_:de in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06374688 = score(doc=432,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18986902 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.33574134 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    For a long while, the creation of Web content required at least basic knowledge of Web technologies, meaning that for many Web users, the Web was de facto a read-only medium. This changed with the arrival of the "social Web," when Web applications started to allow users to publish Web content without technological expertise. Here, content creation is often an inclusive, iterative, and interactive process. Examples of social Web applications include blogs, social networking sites, as well as many specialized applications, for example, for saving and sharing bookmarks and publishing photos. Social semantic Web applications are social Web applications in which knowledge is expressed not only in the form of text and multimedia but also through informal to formal annotations that describe, reflect, and enhance the content. These annotations often take the shape of RDF graphs backed by ontologies, but less formal annotations such as free-form tags or tags from a controlled vocabulary may also be available. Wikis are one example of social Web applications for collecting and sharing knowledge. They allow users to easily create and edit documents, so-called wiki pages, using a Web browser. The pages in a wiki are often heavily interlinked, which makes it easy to find related information and browse the content.
    Source
    Semantic search over the Web. Eds.: R. De Virgilio, et al
  12. Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008) 0.01
    0.010517698 = product of:
      0.031553093 = sum of:
        0.031553093 = product of:
          0.06310619 = sum of:
            0.06310619 = weight(_text_:de in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06310619 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18986902 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.33236697 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    http://dc2008.de/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nkos.pdf
  13. Wang, J.; Clements, M.; Yang, J.; Vries, A.P. de; Reinders, M.J.T.: Personalization of tagging systems (2010) 0.01
    0.00901517 = product of:
      0.027045509 = sum of:
        0.027045509 = product of:
          0.054091018 = sum of:
            0.054091018 = weight(_text_:de in 4229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054091018 = score(doc=4229,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18986902 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 4229, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4229)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  14. Estellés Arolas, E.; González Ladrón-de-Guevar, F.: Uses of explicit and implicit tags in social bookmarking (2012) 0.01
    0.00901517 = product of:
      0.027045509 = sum of:
        0.027045509 = product of:
          0.054091018 = sum of:
            0.054091018 = weight(_text_:de in 4984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054091018 = score(doc=4984,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18986902 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 4984, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4984)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  15. Peters, I.: Folksonomies : indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 (2009) 0.01
    0.008499584 = product of:
      0.025498752 = sum of:
        0.025498752 = product of:
          0.050997503 = sum of:
            0.050997503 = weight(_text_:de in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050997503 = score(doc=4203,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18986902 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.26859307 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Zugl.: Düsseldorf, Univ., Diss., 2009 u.d.T.: Peters, Isabella: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval Rez. in: IWP - Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 61(2010) Heft 8, S.469-470 (U. Spree): "... Nachdem sich die Rezensentin durch 418 Seiten Text hindurch gelesen hat, bleibt sie unentschieden, wie der auffällige Einsatz langer Zitate (im Durchschnitt drei Zitate, die länger als vier kleingedruckte Zeilen sind, pro Seite) zu bewerten ist, zumal die Zitate nicht selten rein illustrativen Charakter haben bzw. Isabella Peters noch einmal zitiert, was sie bereits in eigenen Worten ausgedrückt hat. Redundanz und Verlängerung der Lesezeit halten sich hier die Waage mit der Möglichkeit, dass sich die Leserin einen unmittelbaren Eindruck von Sprache und Duktus der zitierten Literatur verschaffen kann. Eindeutig unschön ist das Beenden eines Gedankens oder einer Argumentation durch ein Zitat (z. B. S. 170). Im deutschen Original entstehen auf diese Weise die für deutsche wissenschaftliche Qualifikationsarbeiten typischen denglischen Texte. Für alle, die sich für Wissensrepräsentation, Information Retrieval und kollaborative Informationsdienste interessieren, ist "Folksonomies : Indexing and Retrieval in Web 2.0" trotz der angeführten kleinen Mängel zur Lektüre und Anschaffung - wegen seines beinahe enzyklopädischen Charakters auch als Nachschlage- oder Referenzwerk geeignet - unbedingt zu empfehlen. Abschließend möchte ich mich in einem Punkt der Produktinfo von de Gruyter uneingeschränkt anschließen: ein "Grundlagenwerk für Folksonomies".
    Imprint
    Berlin : de Gruyter, Saur
  16. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.01
    0.007981291 = product of:
      0.023943871 = sum of:
        0.023943871 = product of:
          0.047887743 = sum of:
            0.047887743 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047887743 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.15-22
  17. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.01
    0.007054531 = product of:
      0.021163592 = sum of:
        0.021163592 = product of:
          0.042327184 = sum of:
            0.042327184 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042327184 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  18. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.01
    0.0069836294 = product of:
      0.020950887 = sum of:
        0.020950887 = product of:
          0.041901775 = sum of:
            0.041901775 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041901775 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  19. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.01
    0.005985968 = product of:
      0.017957903 = sum of:
        0.017957903 = product of:
          0.035915807 = sum of:
            0.035915807 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035915807 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  20. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.01
    0.005985968 = product of:
      0.017957903 = sum of:
        0.017957903 = product of:
          0.035915807 = sum of:
            0.035915807 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035915807 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15471569 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044181384 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Years

Languages

  • e 24
  • d 6

Types

  • a 24
  • el 4
  • m 3
  • b 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…