Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Papy, F.; Chauvin, S.: Au-delà de la transfiguration du catalogue : Le Visual... Catalog : Mort et transfiguration des catalogues (2005) 0.05
    0.047888722 = product of:
      0.14366616 = sum of:
        0.14366616 = product of:
          0.28733233 = sum of:
            0.28733233 = weight(_text_:le in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28733233 = score(doc=177,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.28605723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359905 = queryNorm
                1.0044575 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Les étudiants méconnaissent le fonctionnement de leur bibliothèque universitaire et sont victimes de l'abondance documentaire. De plus, les catalogues informatisés, au regard des autres vecteurs d'information électronique, apparaissent désormais comme archaïques. Au service commun de la documentation de l'Université Paris VIII, un outil expérimental complète l'Opac depuis octobre 2004 : le Visual... Catalog. Cette interface introduit l'hypertextualité et transpose graphiquement les données du catalogue.
  2. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.05
    0.047041383 = product of:
      0.07056207 = sum of:
        0.052840866 = weight(_text_:p in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052840866 = score(doc=54,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
        0.017721208 = product of:
          0.035442416 = sum of:
            0.035442416 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035442416 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359905 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    Source
    Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
  3. Hider, P.: ¬The bibliographic advantages of a centralised union catalogue for ILL and resource sharing (2003) 0.02
    0.024909422 = product of:
      0.074728265 = sum of:
        0.074728265 = weight(_text_:p in 1737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074728265 = score(doc=1737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 1737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1737)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Krause, J.; Mayr, P.: Allgemeiner Bibliothekszugang und Varianten der Suchtypologie : Konsequenzen für die Modellbildung in vascoda (2007) 0.01
    0.014530497 = product of:
      0.04359149 = sum of:
        0.04359149 = weight(_text_:p in 5998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04359149 = score(doc=5998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 5998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5998)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  5. Hider, P.; Tan, K.-C.: Constructing record quality measures based on catalog use (2008) 0.01
    0.012454711 = product of:
      0.037364133 = sum of:
        0.037364133 = weight(_text_:p in 2724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037364133 = score(doc=2724,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 2724, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2724)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  6. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.01
    0.011814139 = product of:
      0.035442416 = sum of:
        0.035442416 = product of:
          0.07088483 = sum of:
            0.07088483 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07088483 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359905 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  7. Gahn, P.; Schmid, H.; Wagner-Döbler, R.: ¬Die Retrokonversion an der Bibliothek der Philosophisch-Theologischen Hochschule der Salesianer Don Boscos in Benediktbeuren (2002) 0.01
    0.010378927 = product of:
      0.03113678 = sum of:
        0.03113678 = weight(_text_:p in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03113678 = score(doc=1176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  8. Danowski, P.; Heller, L.: Bibliothek 2.0 : Die Zukunft der Bibliothek? (2006) 0.01
    0.010378927 = product of:
      0.03113678 = sum of:
        0.03113678 = weight(_text_:p in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03113678 = score(doc=68,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  9. Lubetzky, S.: Principles of cataloging (2001) 0.01
    0.010378927 = product of:
      0.03113678 = sum of:
        0.03113678 = weight(_text_:p in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03113678 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This report constitutes Phase I of a two-part study; a Phase II report will discuss subject cataloging. Phase I is concerned with the materials of a library as individual records (or documents) and as representations of certain works by certain authors--that is, with descriptive, or bibliographic, cataloging. Discussed in the report are (1) the history, role, function, and oblectives .of the author-and-title catalog; (2) problems and principles of descriptive catalogng, including the use and function of "main entry, the principle of authorship, and the process and problems of cataloging print and nonprint materials; (3) organization of the catalog; and (4) potentialities of automation. The considerations inherent in bibliographic cataloging, such as the distinction between the "book" and the "work," are said to be so elemental that they are essential not only to the effective control of library's materials but also to that of the information contained in the materials. Because of the special concern with information, the author includes a discussion of the "Bibliographic Dimensions of Information Control," 'prepared in collaboration with Robert M. Hayes, which also appears in "American Documentation," VOl.201 July 1969, p. 247-252.
  10. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.01
    0.009845116 = product of:
      0.029535348 = sum of:
        0.029535348 = product of:
          0.059070695 = sum of:
            0.059070695 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059070695 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359905 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.01
    0.008353859 = product of:
      0.025061576 = sum of:
        0.025061576 = product of:
          0.05012315 = sum of:
            0.05012315 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05012315 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359905 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  12. Wessel, H.-P.: RSWK und RAK - die Geschichte einer unendlichen Annäherung? (2005) 0.01
    0.008303141 = product of:
      0.024909424 = sum of:
        0.024909424 = weight(_text_:p in 3666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024909424 = score(doc=3666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 3666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3666)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  13. Kostädt, P.: Innovative Recherchemöglichkeiten in Katalogen und Bibliotheksportalen (2008) 0.01
    0.008303141 = product of:
      0.024909424 = sum of:
        0.024909424 = weight(_text_:p in 2295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024909424 = score(doc=2295,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 2295, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2295)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  14. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01
    0.007876093 = product of:
      0.023628278 = sum of:
        0.023628278 = product of:
          0.047256555 = sum of:
            0.047256555 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047256555 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359905 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.01
    0.007876093 = product of:
      0.023628278 = sum of:
        0.023628278 = product of:
          0.047256555 = sum of:
            0.047256555 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047256555 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359905 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.01
    0.007876093 = product of:
      0.023628278 = sum of:
        0.023628278 = product of:
          0.047256555 = sum of:
            0.047256555 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047256555 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359905 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.01
    0.007876093 = product of:
      0.023628278 = sum of:
        0.023628278 = product of:
          0.047256555 = sum of:
            0.047256555 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047256555 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359905 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  18. Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007) 0.01
    0.0072652483 = product of:
      0.021795744 = sum of:
        0.021795744 = weight(_text_:p in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021795744 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15676093 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04359905 = queryNorm
            0.13903812 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The impetus for this essay is the library community's uncertainty regarding the present and future direction of the library catalog in the era of Google and mass digitization projects. The uncertainty is evident at the highest levels. Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress (LC), is struck by undergraduate students who favor digital resources over the online library catalog because such resources are available at anytime and from anywhere (Marcum, 2006). She suggests that "the detailed attention that we have been paying to descriptive cataloging may no longer be justified ... retooled catalogers could give more time to authority control, subject analysis, [and] resource identification and evaluation" (Marcum, 2006, 8). In an abrupt about-face, LC terminated series added entries in cataloging records, one of the few subject-rich fields in such records (Cataloging Policy and Support Office, 2006). Mann (2006b) and Schniderman (2006) cite evidence of LC's prevailing viewpoint in favor of simplifying cataloging at the expense of subject cataloging. LC commissioned Karen Calhoun (2006) to prepare a report on "revitalizing" the online library catalog. Calhoun's directive is clear: divert resources from cataloging mass-produced formats (e.g., books) to cataloging the unique primary sources (e.g., archives, special collections, teaching objects, research by-products). She sums up her rationale for such a directive, "The existing local catalog's market position has eroded to the point where there is real concern for its ability to weather the competition for information seekers' attention" (p. 10). At the University of California Libraries (2005), a task force's recommendations parallel those in Calhoun report especially regarding the elimination of subject headings in favor of automatically generated metadata. Contemplating these events prompted me to revisit the glorious past of the online library catalog. For a decade and a half beginning in the early 1980s, the online library catalog was the jewel in the crown when people eagerly queued at its terminals to find information written by the world's experts. I despair how eagerly people now embrace Google because of the suspect provenance of the information Google retrieves. Long ago, we could have added more value to the online library catalog but the only thing we changed was the catalog's medium. Our failure to act back then cost the online catalog the crown. Now that the era of mass digitization has begun, we have a second chance at redesigning the online library catalog, getting it right, coaxing back old users, and attracting new ones. Let's revisit the past, reconsidering missed opportunities, reassessing their merits, combining them with new directions, making bold decisions and acting decisively on them.
  19. Erdei, K.: Kein Umzug für Zettel : Die digitalisierten Kataloge im Neubau der UB Kiel (2001) 0.01
    0.006891581 = product of:
      0.020674743 = sum of:
        0.020674743 = product of:
          0.041349486 = sum of:
            0.041349486 = weight(_text_:22 in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041349486 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359905 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    28. 4.2001 16:49:22
  20. Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000) 0.01
    0.006891581 = product of:
      0.020674743 = sum of:
        0.020674743 = product of:
          0.041349486 = sum of:
            0.041349486 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041349486 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15267645 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04359905 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.