-
Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005)
0.08
0.07654582 = product of:
0.15309164 = sum of:
0.15309164 = sum of:
0.0124570755 = weight(_text_:d in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0124570755 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.084779084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.09831342 = weight(_text_:z in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09831342 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23817 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.41278675 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.04232115 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04232115 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15626416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 3.2005 16:23:22
- Language
- d
-
Behnert, C.; Borst, T.: Neue Formen der Relevanz-Sortierung in bibliothekarischen Informationssystemen : das DFG-Projekt LibRank (2015)
0.04
0.04219828 = product of:
0.08439656 = sum of:
0.08439656 = product of:
0.12659484 = sum of:
0.014236658 = weight(_text_:d in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014236658 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.084779084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
0.11235819 = weight(_text_:z in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11235819 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23817 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Das von der DFG geförderte Projekt LibRank erforscht neue Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme, die aufbauend auf Erkenntnissen aus dem Bereich Websuche qualitätsinduzierende Faktoren wie z. B. Aktualität, Popularität und Verfügbarkeit von einzelnen Medien berücksichtigen. Die konzipierten Verfahren werden im Kontext eines in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften häufig genutzten Rechercheportals (EconBiz) entwickelt und in einem Testsystem systematisch evaluiert. Es werden Rankingfaktoren, die für den Bibliotheksbereich von besonderem Interesse sind, vorgestellt und exemplarisch Probleme und Herausforderungen aufgezeigt.
- Language
- d
-
Behnert, C.; Plassmeier, K.; Borst, T.; Lewandowski, D.: Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme (2019)
0.04
0.038643464 = product of:
0.07728693 = sum of:
0.07728693 = product of:
0.115930386 = sum of:
0.017616967 = weight(_text_:d in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017616967 = score(doc=5023,freq=4.0), product of:
0.084779084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
0.09831342 = weight(_text_:z in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09831342 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23817 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.41278675 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Dieser Beitrag beschreibt eine Studie zur Entwicklung und Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme. Dazu wurden mögliche Faktoren für das Relevanzranking ausgehend von den Verfahren in Websuchmaschinen identifiziert, auf den Bibliothekskontext übertragen und systematisch evaluiert. Mithilfe eines Testsystems, das auf dem ZBW-Informationsportal EconBiz und einer web-basierten Software zur Evaluierung von Suchsystemen aufsetzt, wurden verschiedene Relevanzfaktoren (z. B. Popularität in Verbindung mit Aktualität) getestet. Obwohl die getesteten Rankingverfahren auf einer theoretischen Ebene divers sind, konnten keine einheitlichen Verbesserungen gegenüber den Baseline-Rankings gemessen werden. Die Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass eine Adaptierung des Rankings auf individuelle Nutzer bzw. Nutzungskontexte notwendig sein könnte, um eine höhere Performance zu erzielen.
- Language
- d
-
Hora, M.: Methoden für das Ranking in Discovery-Systemen (2018)
0.04
0.036923498 = product of:
0.073846996 = sum of:
0.073846996 = product of:
0.110770494 = sum of:
0.0124570755 = weight(_text_:d in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0124570755 = score(doc=4968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.084779084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
0.09831342 = weight(_text_:z in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09831342 = score(doc=4968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23817 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.41278675 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discovery-Systeme bieten meist als Standardeinstellung eine Sortierung nach Relevanz an. Wie die Relevanz ermittelt wird, ist häufig intransparent. Dabei wären Kenntnisse darüber aus Nutzersicht ein wichtiger Faktor in der Informationskompetenz, während Bibliotheken sicherstellen sollten, dass das Ranking zum eigenen Bestand und Publikum passt. In diesem Aufsatz wird dargestellt, wie Discovery-Systeme Treffer auswählen und bewerten. Dazu gehören Indexierung, Prozessierung, Text-Matching und weitere Relevanzkriterien, z. B. Popularität oder Verfügbarkeit. Schließlich müssen alle betrachteten Kriterien zu einem zentralen Score zusammengefasst werden. Ein besonderer Fokus wird auf das Ranking von EBSCO Discovery Service, Primo und Summon gelegt.
- Language
- d
-
Chen, Z.; Fu, B.: On the complexity of Rocchio's similarity-based relevance feedback algorithm (2007)
0.03
0.031796988 = product of:
0.063593976 = sum of:
0.063593976 = product of:
0.09539096 = sum of:
0.025167095 = weight(_text_:d in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025167095 = score(doc=578,freq=16.0), product of:
0.084779084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.296855 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
0.07022387 = weight(_text_:z in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07022387 = score(doc=578,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23817 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Rocchio's similarity-based relevance feedback algorithm, one of the most important query reformation methods in information retrieval, is essentially an adaptive learning algorithm from examples in searching for documents represented by a linear classifier. Despite its popularity in various applications, there is little rigorous analysis of its learning complexity in literature. In this article, the authors prove for the first time that the learning complexity of Rocchio's algorithm is O(d + d**2(log d + log n)) over the discretized vector space {0, ... , n - 1 }**d when the inner product similarity measure is used. The upper bound on the learning complexity for searching for documents represented by a monotone linear classifier (q, 0) over {0, ... , n - 1 }d can be improved to, at most, 1 + 2k (n - 1) (log d + log(n - 1)), where k is the number of nonzero components in q. Several lower bounds on the learning complexity are also obtained for Rocchio's algorithm. For example, the authors prove that Rocchio's algorithm has a lower bound Omega((d über 2)log n) on its learning complexity over the Boolean vector space {0,1}**d.
-
Li, H.; Wu, H.; Li, D.; Lin, S.; Su, Z.; Luo, X.: PSI: A probabilistic semantic interpretable framework for fine-grained image ranking (2018)
0.03
0.031648714 = product of:
0.06329743 = sum of:
0.06329743 = product of:
0.09494614 = sum of:
0.010677493 = weight(_text_:d in 4577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010677493 = score(doc=4577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.084779084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4577)
0.084268644 = weight(_text_:z in 4577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084268644 = score(doc=4577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23817 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 4577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4577)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.03
0.03130184 = product of:
0.06260368 = sum of:
0.06260368 = product of:
0.09390552 = sum of:
0.021354986 = weight(_text_:d in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021354986 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.084779084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.072550535 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072550535 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15626416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:44
- Language
- d
-
Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.03
0.03130184 = product of:
0.06260368 = sum of:
0.06260368 = product of:
0.09390552 = sum of:
0.021354986 = weight(_text_:d in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021354986 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.084779084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.072550535 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072550535 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15626416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:56
- Language
- d
-
Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014)
0.02
0.022833569 = product of:
0.045667138 = sum of:
0.045667138 = product of:
0.068500705 = sum of:
0.020133676 = weight(_text_:d in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020133676 = score(doc=1484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.084779084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.237484 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
0.048367027 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048367027 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15626416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 9.2014 14:45:22
- Language
- d
-
Longshu, L.; Xia, Z.: On an aproximate fuzzy information retrieval agent (1998)
0.02
0.018726366 = product of:
0.03745273 = sum of:
0.03745273 = product of:
0.11235819 = sum of:
0.11235819 = weight(_text_:z in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11235819 = score(doc=3294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23817 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Pan, M.; Huang, J.X.; He, T.; Mao, Z.; Ying, Z.; Tu, X.: ¬A simple kernel co-occurrence-based enhancement for pseudo-relevance feedback (2020)
0.02
0.016551927 = product of:
0.033103853 = sum of:
0.033103853 = product of:
0.09931155 = sum of:
0.09931155 = weight(_text_:z in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09931155 = score(doc=5678,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23817 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.41697758 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.02
0.016122343 = product of:
0.032244686 = sum of:
0.032244686 = product of:
0.096734054 = sum of:
0.096734054 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096734054 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15626416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.01
0.01410705 = product of:
0.0282141 = sum of:
0.0282141 = product of:
0.0846423 = sum of:
0.0846423 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0846423 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15626416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.01
0.01410705 = product of:
0.0282141 = sum of:
0.0282141 = product of:
0.0846423 = sum of:
0.0846423 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0846423 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15626416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Song, D.; Bruza, P.D.: Towards context sensitive information inference (2003)
0.01
0.013042434 = product of:
0.026084868 = sum of:
0.026084868 = product of:
0.0391273 = sum of:
0.008897911 = weight(_text_:d in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008897911 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.084779084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.030229392 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030229392 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15626416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:35:46
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006)
0.01
0.013042434 = product of:
0.026084868 = sum of:
0.026084868 = product of:
0.0391273 = sum of:
0.008897911 = weight(_text_:d in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008897911 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.084779084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.030229392 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030229392 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15626416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:32:43
-
Chen, Z.; Meng, X.; Fowler, R.H.; Zhu, B.: Real-time adaptive feature and document learning for Web search (2001)
0.01
0.011703978 = product of:
0.023407957 = sum of:
0.023407957 = product of:
0.07022387 = sum of:
0.07022387 = weight(_text_:z in 5209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07022387 = score(doc=5209,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23817 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 5209, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5209)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Li, M.; Li, H.; Zhou, Z.-H.: Semi-supervised document retrieval (2009)
0.01
0.011703978 = product of:
0.023407957 = sum of:
0.023407957 = product of:
0.07022387 = sum of:
0.07022387 = weight(_text_:z in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07022387 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23817 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Tsai, C.-F.; Hu, Y.-H.; Chen, Z.-Y.: Factors affecting rocchio-based pseudorelevance feedback in image retrieval (2015)
0.01
0.011703978 = product of:
0.023407957 = sum of:
0.023407957 = product of:
0.07022387 = sum of:
0.07022387 = weight(_text_:z in 1607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07022387 = score(doc=1607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23817 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 1607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1607)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ye, Z.; Huang, J.X.: ¬A learning to rank approach for quality-aware pseudo-relevance feedback (2016)
0.01
0.011703978 = product of:
0.023407957 = sum of:
0.023407957 = product of:
0.07022387 = sum of:
0.07022387 = weight(_text_:z in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07022387 = score(doc=2855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23817 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.044623576 = queryNorm
0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
