Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zhang, J."
  1. Zhang, L.; Liu, Q.L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.F.; Pan, Y.; Yu, Y.: Semplore: an IR approach to scalable hybrid query of Semantic Web data (2007) 0.04
    0.037243094 = product of:
      0.07448619 = sum of:
        0.07448619 = product of:
          0.11172928 = sum of:
            0.080433756 = weight(_text_:y in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080433756 = score(doc=231,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21393733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04445543 = queryNorm
                0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
            0.031295527 = weight(_text_:k in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031295527 = score(doc=231,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15869603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04445543 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Proceeding ISWC'07/ASWC'07 : Proceedings of the 6th international The semantic web and 2nd Asian conference on Asian semantic web conference. Ed.: K. Aberer et al
  2. Zhang, J.; Wolfram, D.; Wang, P.; Hong, Y.; Gillis, R.: Visualization of health-subject analysis based on query term co-occurrences (2008) 0.03
    0.02939026 = product of:
      0.05878052 = sum of:
        0.05878052 = product of:
          0.08817078 = sum of:
            0.05687525 = weight(_text_:y in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05687525 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21393733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04445543 = queryNorm
                0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
            0.031295527 = weight(_text_:k in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031295527 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15869603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04445543 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A multidimensional-scaling approach is used to analyze frequently used medical-topic terms in queries submitted to a Web-based consumer health information system. Based on a year-long transaction log file, five medical focus keywords (stomach, hip, stroke, depression, and cholesterol) and their co-occurring query terms are analyzed. An overlap-coefficient similarity measure and a conversion measure are used to calculate the proximity of terms to one another based on their co-occurrences in queries. The impact of the dimensionality of the visual configuration, the cutoff point of term co-occurrence for inclusion in the analysis, and the Minkowski metric power k on the stress value are discussed. A visual clustering of groups of terms based on the proximity within each focus-keyword group is also conducted. Term distributions within each visual configuration are characterized and are compared with formal medical vocabulary. This investigation reveals that there are significant differences between consumer health query-term usage and more formal medical terminology used by medical professionals when describing the same medical subject. Future directions are discussed.
  3. Zhang, J.; Wolfram, D.: Visualization of term discrimination analysis (2001) 0.02
    0.016418472 = product of:
      0.032836944 = sum of:
        0.032836944 = product of:
          0.09851083 = sum of:
            0.09851083 = weight(_text_:y in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09851083 = score(doc=5210,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21393733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04445543 = queryNorm
                0.46046585 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Zang and Wolfram compute the discrimination value for terms as the difference between the centroid value of all terms in the corpus and that value without the term in question, and suggest selection be made by comparing density changes with a visualization tool. The Distance Angle Retrieval Environment (DARE) visually projects a document or term space by presenting distance similarity on the X axis and angular similarity on the Y axis. Thus a document icon appearing close to the X axis would be relevant to reference points in terms of a distance similarity measure, while those close to the Y axis are relevant to reference points in terms of an angle based measure. Using 450 Associated Press news reports indexed by 44 distinct terms, the removal of the term ``Yeltsin'' causes the cluster to fall on the Y axis indicating a good discriminator. For an angular measure, cosine say, movement along the X axis to the left will signal good discrimination, as movement to the right will signal poor discrimination. A term density space could also be used. Most terms are shown to be indifferent discriminators. Different measures result in different choices as good and poor discriminators, as does the use of a term space rather than a document space. The visualization approach is clearly feasible, and provides some additional insights not found in the computation of a discrimination value.
  4. Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wolfram, D.; Ma, F.: Public health and social media : a study of Zika virus-related posts on Yahoo! Answers (2020) 0.01
    0.013405627 = product of:
      0.026811253 = sum of:
        0.026811253 = product of:
          0.080433756 = sum of:
            0.080433756 = weight(_text_:y in 5672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080433756 = score(doc=5672,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21393733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04445543 = queryNorm
                0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 5672, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5672)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Zhang, J.; An, L.; Tang, T.; Hong, Y.: Visual health subject directory analysis based on users' traversal activities (2009) 0.01
    0.011375051 = product of:
      0.022750102 = sum of:
        0.022750102 = product of:
          0.068250306 = sum of:
            0.068250306 = weight(_text_:y in 3112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068250306 = score(doc=3112,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21393733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04445543 = queryNorm
                0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 3112, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3112)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Li, D.; Tang, J.; Ding, Y.; Shuai, X.; Chambers, T.; Sun, G.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, J.: Topic-level opinion influence model (TOIM) : an investigation using tencent microblogging (2015) 0.01
    0.009479209 = product of:
      0.018958418 = sum of:
        0.018958418 = product of:
          0.05687525 = sum of:
            0.05687525 = weight(_text_:y in 2345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05687525 = score(doc=2345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21393733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04445543 = queryNorm
                0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 2345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2345)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.: ¬A user term visualization analysis based on a social question and answer log (2013) 0.01
    0.009479209 = product of:
      0.018958418 = sum of:
        0.018958418 = product of:
          0.05687525 = sum of:
            0.05687525 = weight(_text_:y in 2715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05687525 = score(doc=2715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21393733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04445543 = queryNorm
                0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 2715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2715)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Li, D.; Luo, Z.; Ding, Y.; Tang, J.; Sun, G.G.-Z.; Dai, X.; Du, J.; Zhang, J.; Kong, S.: User-level microblogging recommendation incorporating social influence (2017) 0.01
    0.009479209 = product of:
      0.018958418 = sum of:
        0.018958418 = product of:
          0.05687525 = sum of:
            0.05687525 = weight(_text_:y in 3426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05687525 = score(doc=3426,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21393733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04445543 = queryNorm
                0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 3426, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3426)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Geng, Q.; Townley, C.; Huang, K.; Zhang, J.: Comparative knowledge management : a pilot study of Chinese and American universities (2005) 0.01
    0.0073022908 = product of:
      0.0146045815 = sum of:
        0.0146045815 = product of:
          0.043813743 = sum of:
            0.043813743 = weight(_text_:k in 3876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043813743 = score(doc=3876,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15869603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04445543 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3876, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3876)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Zhang, J.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬A new similarity measure for subject hierarchical structures (2014) 0.01
    0.005019248 = product of:
      0.010038496 = sum of:
        0.010038496 = product of:
          0.030115487 = sum of:
            0.030115487 = weight(_text_:22 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030115487 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15567535 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04445543 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 4.2015 16:22:13