Search (42 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.02 
    0.021450995 = product of:
  0.04290199 = sum of:
    0.04290199 = product of:
      0.08580398 = sum of:
        0.08580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08580398 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  2. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.02 
    0.021450995 = product of:
  0.04290199 = sum of:
    0.04290199 = product of:
      0.08580398 = sum of:
        0.08580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08580398 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  3. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.02 
    0.021450995 = product of:
  0.04290199 = sum of:
    0.04290199 = product of:
      0.08580398 = sum of:
        0.08580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08580398 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  4. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.02 
    0.021450995 = product of:
  0.04290199 = sum of:
    0.04290199 = product of:
      0.08580398 = sum of:
        0.08580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08580398 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  5. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.02 
    0.021450995 = product of:
  0.04290199 = sum of:
    0.04290199 = product of:
      0.08580398 = sum of:
        0.08580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08580398 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  6. Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992) 0.02 
    0.018386567 = product of:
  0.036773134 = sum of:
    0.036773134 = product of:
      0.07354627 = sum of:
        0.07354627 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07354627 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
  7. Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999) 0.02 
    0.018386567 = product of:
  0.036773134 = sum of:
    0.036773134 = product of:
      0.07354627 = sum of:
        0.07354627 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07354627 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
  8. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.02 
    0.017335022 = product of:
  0.034670044 = sum of:
    0.034670044 = product of:
      0.06934009 = sum of:
        0.06934009 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06934009 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  9. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.02 
    0.017335022 = product of:
  0.034670044 = sum of:
    0.034670044 = product of:
      0.06934009 = sum of:
        0.06934009 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06934009 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  10. Manley, S.; Harwood, N.: Bringing it home : learning to index books by correspondence (1997) 0.02 
    0.016259817 = product of:
  0.032519635 = sum of:
    0.032519635 = product of:
      0.06503927 = sum of:
        0.06503927 = weight(_text_:n in 3638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06503927 = score(doc=3638,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 3638, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3638)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.02 
    0.0153221395 = product of:
  0.030644279 = sum of:
    0.030644279 = product of:
      0.061288558 = sum of:
        0.061288558 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061288558 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  12. Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991) 0.01 
    0.012257711 = product of:
  0.024515422 = sum of:
    0.024515422 = product of:
      0.049030844 = sum of:
        0.049030844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049030844 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
  13. Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994) 0.01 
    0.012257711 = product of:
  0.024515422 = sum of:
    0.024515422 = product of:
      0.049030844 = sum of:
        0.049030844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049030844 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
  14. Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998) 0.01 
    0.012257711 = product of:
  0.024515422 = sum of:
    0.024515422 = product of:
      0.049030844 = sum of:
        0.049030844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049030844 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
  15. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.01 
    0.012257711 = product of:
  0.024515422 = sum of:
    0.024515422 = product of:
      0.049030844 = sum of:
        0.049030844 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049030844 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  16. Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992) 0.01 
    0.010725497 = product of:
  0.021450995 = sum of:
    0.021450995 = product of:
      0.04290199 = sum of:
        0.04290199 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04290199 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
  17. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.01 
    0.010725497 = product of:
  0.021450995 = sum of:
    0.021450995 = product of:
      0.04290199 = sum of:
        0.04290199 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04290199 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  18. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01 
    0.010725497 = product of:
  0.021450995 = sum of:
    0.021450995 = product of:
      0.04290199 = sum of:
        0.04290199 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04290199 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  19. Fassbender, J.: Register generell in schlechtem Zustand : DNI mahnt mehr Qualität an / Kontakt zu verwandten Organisationen gesucht (2008) 0.01 
    0.009291325 = product of:
  0.01858265 = sum of:
    0.01858265 = product of:
      0.0371653 = sum of:
        0.0371653 = weight(_text_:n in 1823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0371653 = score(doc=1823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.19055009 = fieldWeight in 1823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1823)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Die Qualität der Register und das Fachwissen zur Registererstellung befindet sich hierzulande nach DNI-Einschätzung generell in einem schlechten Zustand - auch im wissenschaftlichen Verlagswesen. Grundlegende Fehler kommen immer wieder vor, sowohl was die Erstellung der Index-Einträge als auch typografische Aspekte angeht. Oft wird auch bei der Vorgehensweise der Registererstellung das Rad neu erfunden, obwohl es bewährte Tech n i ken, Methoden und Software gibt. Das DNI möchte helfen, diesen Zustand zu verbessern und derartige Defizite und verbreitete Fehleinschätzungen zum Indexing abzubauen. Ein Schwerpunkt der bisherigen Info-Veranstaltungen auf der Buchmesse waren Präsentationen moderner Software für die Indexerstellung. Dabei handelt es sich um Programme, die die intellektuelle Arbeit des Indexers auf effektive Weise unterstützen. Diese spezielle lndexing-Software ist in der weltweit führenden Indexing-Szene in angloamerikanischen Ländern weit verbreitet. Das DNI unterhält sehr gute Beziehungen zu den Partnerverbänden in anderen Ländern, so zum Beispiel zum Nederlands Indexers Netwerk (NIN), aber auch zu den großen Fachverbänden, der Society of indexers (SI) in Großbritannien und der American Society of Indexers (ASI). Die SI feierte letztes Jahr ihr 50-jähriges Bestehen und gibt seit 1958 die Fachzeitschrift »The Indexer - The International Journal of lndexing« heraus. Auf der DNI-Website (www.d-indexer.org) werden im Bereich »Fragen« Aspekte der Registererstellung erläutert. Der Bereich »Ressourcen« beinhaltet unter anderem eine Bibliografie mit deutsch sprachigem Kontext, Index-Rezensionen und Links zu Indexer-Fachverbänden. Im Bereich »Mitglieder« finden sich auch diejenigen Indexer, die Registererstellung für Verlage und andere Auftraggeber anbieten. Für eine spezielle Suche innerhalb der Website steht ein ständig aktualisierter Site Index zur Verfügung. Das DNI ist stets daran interessiert, neue Kontakte zu knüpfen, insbesondere auch zu fachlich verwand ten Organisationen und Personen, die ein Interesse daran haben, Registererstellung als eigenständiges Fachgebiet hierzulande voranzubringen."
  20. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.01 
    0.0076610697 = product of:
  0.0153221395 = sum of:
    0.0153221395 = product of:
      0.030644279 = sum of:
        0.030644279 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030644279 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045236014 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 38
  • d 4

Types

  • a 27
  • n 11
  • m 4

Themes