Search (261 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Engel, B.: Corona-Gesundheitszertifikat als Exitstrategie (2020) 0.06 
    0.06239935 = product of:
  0.1247987 = sum of:
    0.1247987 = sum of:
      0.06312799 = weight(_text_:b in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06312799 = score(doc=5906,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
      0.061670717 = weight(_text_:22 in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061670717 = score(doc=5906,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 5.2020 17:22:28
  2. Lee, D.J.; Stvilia, B.; Ha, S.; Hahn, D.: ¬The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities : a case of institutional research information management system (2023) 0.04 
    0.037736792 = product of:
  0.075473584 = sum of:
    0.075473584 = sum of:
      0.044638228 = weight(_text_:b in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044638228 = score(doc=884,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
      0.030835358 = weight(_text_:22 in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030835358 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Research information management systems (RIMS) have become critical components of information technology infrastructure on university campuses. They are used not just for sharing and promoting faculty research, but also for conducting faculty evaluation and development, facilitating research collaborations, identifying mentors for student projects, and expert consultants for local businesses. This study is one of the first empirical investigations of the structure of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities in a nonmandatory institutional RIMS. By analyzing the RIMS's log data, we identified 11 tasks researchers performed when updating their profiles. These tasks were further grouped into three activities: (a) adding publication, (b) enhancing researcher identity, and (c) improving research discoverability. In addition, we found that junior researchers and female researchers were more engaged in maintaining their RIMS profiles than senior researchers and male researchers. The results provide insights for designing profile maintenance action templates for institutional RIMS that are tailored to researchers' characteristics and help enhance researchers' engagement in the curation of their research information. This also suggests that female and junior researchers can serve as early adopters of institutional RIMS.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:43:02
  3. Ma, L.: Information, platformized (2023) 0.04 
    0.037439607 = product of:
  0.074879214 = sum of:
    0.074879214 = sum of:
      0.037876792 = weight(_text_:b in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037876792 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
      0.037002426 = weight(_text_:22 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037002426 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Scholarly publications are often regarded as "information" by default. They are collected, organized, preserved, and made accessible as knowledge records. However, the instances of article retraction, misconduct and malpractices of researchers and the replication crisis have raised concerns about the informativeness and evidential qualities of information. Among many factors, knowledge production has moved away from "normal science" under the systemic influences of platformization involving the datafication and commodification of scholarly articles, research profiles and research activities. This article aims to understand the platformization of information by examining how research practices and knowledge production are steered by market and platform mechanisms in four ways: (a) ownership of information; (b) metrics for sale; (c) relevance by metrics, and (d) market-based competition. In conclusion, the article argues that information is platformized when platforms hold the dominating power in determining what kinds of information can be disseminated and rewarded and when informativeness is decoupled from the normative agreement or consensus co-constructed and co-determined in an open and public discourse.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 19:01:47
  4. Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023) 0.04 
    0.037439607 = product of:
  0.074879214 = sum of:
    0.074879214 = sum of:
      0.037876792 = weight(_text_:b in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037876792 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
      0.037002426 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037002426 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:14
  5. Haimson, O.L.; Carter, A.J.; Corvite, S.; Wheeler, B.; Wang, L.; Liu, T.; Lige, A.: ¬The major life events taxonomy : social readjustment, social media information sharing, and online network separation during times of life transition (2021) 0.03 
    0.031199675 = product of:
  0.06239935 = sum of:
    0.06239935 = sum of:
      0.031563994 = weight(_text_:b in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031563994 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.030835358 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030835358 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 6.2021 19:22:47
  6. Jörs, B.: ¬Ein kleines Fach zwischen "Daten" und "Wissen" II : Anmerkungen zum (virtuellen) "16th International Symposium of Information Science" (ISI 2021", Regensburg) (2021) 0.03 
    0.031199675 = product of:
  0.06239935 = sum of:
    0.06239935 = sum of:
      0.031563994 = weight(_text_:b in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031563994 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
      0.030835358 = weight(_text_:22 in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030835358 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Nur noch Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz und Information Assessment? Doch gerade die Abschottung von anderen Disziplinen verstärkt die Isolation des "kleinen Faches" Informationswissenschaft in der Scientific Community. So bleiben ihr als letzte "eigenständige" Forschungsrandgebiete nur die, die Wolf Rauch als Keynote Speaker bereits in seinem einführenden, historisch-genetischen Vortrag zur Lage der Informationswissenschaft auf der ISI 2021 benannt hat: "Wenn die universitäre Informationswissenschaft (zumindest in Europa) wohl kaum eine Chance hat, im Bereich der Entwicklung von Systemen und Anwendungen wieder an die Spitze der Entwicklung vorzustoßen, bleiben ihr doch Gebiete, in denen ihr Beitrag in der kommenden Entwicklungsphase dringend erforderlich sein wird: Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz, Information Assessment" (Wolf Rauch: Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist; in: Thomas Schmidt; Christian Wolff (Eds): Information between Data and Knowledge. Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft 74, Regensburg, 2021, Seiten 20-22 - siehe auch die Rezeption des Beitrages von Rauch durch Johannes Elia Panskus, Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist. Sie ist in der Realität angekommen, in: Open Password, 17. März 2021). Das ist alles? Ernüchternd.
  7. Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021) 0.03 
    0.031199675 = product of:
  0.06239935 = sum of:
    0.06239935 = sum of:
      0.031563994 = weight(_text_:b in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031563994 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
      0.030835358 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030835358 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Beschäftigt man sich mit Inhaltserschließung, so sind zunächst zwei Dimensionen zu unterscheiden - die Wissensorganisationssysteme selbst (z. B. Normdateien, Thesauri, Schlagwortsprachen, Klassifikationen und Ontologien) und die Metadaten für Dokumente, die mit diesen Wissensorganisationssystemen erschlossen sind. Beides steht in einer Wechselwirkung zueinander: Die Wissensorganisationssysteme sind die Werkzeuge für die Erschließungsarbeit und bilden die Grundlage für die Erstellung konkreter Erschließungsmetadaten. Die praktische Anwendung der Wissensorganisationssysteme in der Erschließung wiederum ist die Basis für deren Pflege und Weiterentwicklung. Zugleich haben Wissensorganisationssysteme auch einen Eigenwert unabhängig von den Erschließungsmetadaten für einzelne Dokumente, indem sie bestimmte Bereiche von Welt- oder Fachwissen modellartig abbilden. Will man nun Aussagen über die Qualität von inhaltlicher Erschließung treffen, so genügt es nicht, den Input - also die Wissensorganisationssysteme und die damit generierten Metadaten - zu betrachten. Man muss auch den Output betrachten, also das, was die Recherchewerkzeuge daraus machen und was folglich bei den Nutzer:innen konkret ankommt. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden Überlegungen zur Qualität von Recherchewerkzeugen in diesem Bereich angestellt - gewissermaßen als Fortsetzung und Vertiefung der dazu im Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) gegebenen Hinweise. Im Zentrum steht die verbale Erschließung nach den Regeln für die Schlagwortkatalogisierung (RSWK), wie sie sich in Bibliothekskatalogen manifestiert - gleich, ob es sich dabei um herkömmliche Kataloge oder um Resource-Discovery-Systeme (RDS) handelt.
    Date
    24. 9.2021 12:22:02
  8. Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023) 0.03 
    0.031199675 = product of:
  0.06239935 = sum of:
    0.06239935 = sum of:
      0.031563994 = weight(_text_:b in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031563994 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
      0.030835358 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030835358 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:02
  9. Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022) 0.03 
    0.031199675 = product of:
  0.06239935 = sum of:
    0.06239935 = sum of:
      0.031563994 = weight(_text_:b in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031563994 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
      0.030835358 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030835358 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    18.11.2023 13:47:22
  10. Luo, L.; Ju, J.; Li, Y.-F.; Haffari, G.; Xiong, B.; Pan, S.: ChatRule: mining logical rules with large language models for knowledge graph reasoning (2023) 0.03 
    0.031199675 = product of:
  0.06239935 = sum of:
    0.06239935 = sum of:
      0.031563994 = weight(_text_:b in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031563994 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.030835358 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030835358 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045518078 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    23.11.2023 19:07:22
  11. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.03 
    0.02711054 = product of:
  0.05422108 = sum of:
    0.05422108 = product of:
      0.21688432 = sum of:
        0.21688432 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21688432 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38590276 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  12. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.02 
    0.022592116 = product of:
  0.045184232 = sum of:
    0.045184232 = product of:
      0.18073693 = sum of:
        0.18073693 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18073693 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38590276 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  13. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.02 
    0.022592116 = product of:
  0.045184232 = sum of:
    0.045184232 = product of:
      0.18073693 = sum of:
        0.18073693 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18073693 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38590276 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  14. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.02 
    0.02158475 = product of:
  0.0431695 = sum of:
    0.0431695 = product of:
      0.086339 = sum of:
        0.086339 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086339 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  15. Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft (2023) 0.02 
    0.020087203 = product of:
  0.040174406 = sum of:
    0.040174406 = product of:
      0.08034881 = sum of:
        0.08034881 = weight(_text_:b in 1043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08034881 = score(doc=1043,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.49822903 = fieldWeight in 1043, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1043)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: Grußwort Hochschulverband Informationswissenschaft / Vorwort der Herausgeber / Rainer Kuhlen & Wolfgang Semar: A 1 Information - ein Konstrukt mit Folgen - 3 / Marlies Ockenfeld: A 2 Institutionalisierung der Informationswissenschaft und der IuD-Infrastruktur in Deutschland - 27 / Hans-Christoph Hobohm: A 3 Theorien in der Informationswissenschaft - 45 / Julia Maria Struß & Dirk Lewandowski: A 4 Methoden in der Informationswissenschaft - 57 / Ursula Georgy, Frauke Schade & Stefan Schmunk A 5 Ausbildung, Studium und Weiterbildung in der Informationswissenschaft - 71 / Robert Strötgen & René Schneider: A 6 Bibliotheken - 83 / Karin Schwarz: A 7 Archive - 93 / Hartwig Lüdtke: A 8 Museen - 103 / Barbara Müller-Heiden: A 9 Mediatheken - 111 / Ragna Seidler-de Alwis: A 10 Information Professionals - 117 / Axel Ermert: A 11 Normen und Standardisierung im Informationsbereich - 123 / Thomas Bähr: A 12 Langzeitarchivierung - 135 / Ulrich Reimer: B 1 Einführung in die Wissensorganisation - 147 / Gerd Knorz: B 2 Intellektuelles Indexieren - 159 / Klaus Lepsky: B 3 Automatisches Indexieren - 171 / Andreas Oskar Kempf: B 4 Thesauri - 183 / Michael Kleineberg: B 5 Klassifikation - 195 / Heidrun Wiesenmüller: B 6 Formale Erschließung - 207 / Jochen Fassbender: B 7 Register/Indexe - 219 / Udo Hahn: B 8 Abstracting - Textzusammenfassung - 233 / Rolf Assfalg: B 9 Metadaten - 245 / Heiko Rölke & Albert Weichselbraun: B 10 Ontologien und Linked Open Data - 257 / Isabelle Dorsch & Stefanie Haustein: B 11 Bibliometrie - 271 / Udo Hahn: B 12 Automatische Sprachverarbeitung - 281 /
    Hans-Christian Jetter: B 13 Informationsvisualisierung und Visual Analytics - 295 / Melanie Siegel: B 14 Maschinelle Übersetzung - 307 / Ulrich Herb: B 15 Verfahren der wissenschaftlichen Qualitäts-/ Relevanzsicherung / Evaluierung - 317 / Thomas Mandl: B 16 Text Mining und Data Mining - 327 / Heike Neuroth: B 17 Forschungsdaten - 339 / Isabella Peters: B 18 Folksonomies & Social Tagging - 351 / Christa Womser-Hacker: C 1 Informationswissenschaftliche Perspektiven des Information Retrieval - 365 / Norbert Fuhr: C 2 Modelle im Information Retrieval - 379 / Dirk Lewandowski: C 3 Suchmaschinen - 391 / David Elsweiler & Udo Kruschwitz: C 4 Interaktives Information Retrieval - 403 / Thomas Mandl & Sebastian Diem: C 5 Bild- und Video-Retrieval - 413 / Maximilian Eibl, Josef Haupt, Stefan Kahl, Stefan Taubert & Thomas Wilhelm-Stein: C 6 Audio- und Musik-Retrieval - 423 / Christa Womser-Hacker: C 7 Cross-Language Information Retrieval (CLIR) - 433 / Vivien Petras & Christa Womser-Hacker: C 8 Evaluation im Information Retrieval - 443 / Philipp Schaer: C 9 Sprachmodelle und neuronale Netze im Information Retrieval - 455 / Stefanie Elbeshausen: C 10 Modellierung von Benutzer*innen, Kontextualisierung, Personalisierung - 467 / Ragna Seidler-de Alwis: C 11 Informationsrecherche - 477 / Ulrich Reimer: C 12 Empfehlungssysteme - 485 / Elke Greifeneder & Kirsten Schlebbe: D 1 Information Behaviour - 499 / Nicola Döring: D 2 Computervermittelte Kommunikation - 511 / Hans-Christian Jetter: D 3 Mensch-Computer-Interaktion, Usability und User Experience - 525 / Gabriele Irle: D 4 Emotionen im Information Seeking - 535 /
  16. Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020) 0.02 
    0.018501213 = product of:
  0.037002426 = sum of:
    0.037002426 = product of:
      0.07400485 = sum of:
        0.07400485 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07400485 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    2. 3.2020 14:08:22
  17. Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023) 0.02 
    0.018501213 = product of:
  0.037002426 = sum of:
    0.037002426 = product of:
      0.07400485 = sum of:
        0.07400485 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07400485 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
  18. Wiesenmüller, H.: Formale Erschließung (2023) 0.02 
    0.016401134 = product of:
  0.03280227 = sum of:
    0.03280227 = product of:
      0.06560454 = sum of:
        0.06560454 = weight(_text_:b in 784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06560454 = score(doc=784,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.40680233 = fieldWeight in 784, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=784)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Bei der formalen Erschließung bzw. Formalerschließung, die auch als formale Analyse, formale Erfassung, Formalbeschreibung oder (Formal-)Katalogisierung bezeichnet wird, "werden Ressourcen gemäß festgelegten Regeln nach äußerlichen, formalen Kriterien beschrieben und auffindbar gemacht". Diese Ressourcen können alle Arten von physischen und digitalen Objekten sein, die z. B. in Bibliotheken, Archiven, Museen oder Dokumentationsstellen gesammelt oder verzeichnet werden. Formale Aspekte bei einem gedruckten Buch sind u. a. der*die Autor*in, der Titel, der Verlag, das Erscheinungsdatum, der Umfang und die ISBN. Bei einer Skulptur sind es u. a. der*die Künstler*in, das Entstehungsdatum, Werkstoff und Technik, die Maße und die Besitzgeschichte. Bei einem im Internet zur Verfügung gestellten digitalen Foto sind es u. a. der*die Fotograf*in, der Zeitpunkt der Aufnahme und die Koordinaten des Aufnahmeorts, technische Daten zur Aufnahme (z. B. Belichtungszeit), der Dateiname, das Dateiformat und die Dateigröße sowie die URL und ggf. ein Persistent Identifier (z. B. DOI oder URN).
  19. Molor-Erdene, B.: Vertrauen Sie den Medien? (2020) 0.02 
    0.015781997 = product of:
  0.031563994 = sum of:
    0.031563994 = product of:
      0.06312799 = sum of:
        0.06312799 = weight(_text_:b in 5397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06312799 = score(doc=5397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 5397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5397)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  20. Scherer, B.: ¬Die Pandemie ist kein Überfall von Außerirdischen (2020) 0.02 
    0.015781997 = product of:
  0.031563994 = sum of:
    0.031563994 = product of:
      0.06312799 = sum of:
        0.06312799 = weight(_text_:b in 5706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06312799 = score(doc=5706,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 5706, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5706)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Languages

  • e 171
  • d 89

Types

  • a 244
  • el 57
  • m 8
  • p 4
  • s 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications