Search (6749 results, page 338 of 338)

0.0030829264 = product of:
  0.006165853 = sum of:
    0.006165853 = product of:
      0.012331706 = sum of:
        0.012331706 = weight(_text_:22 in 3125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012331706 = score(doc=3125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045509085 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3125)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2005 19:05:37

0.0030829264 = product of:
  0.006165853 = sum of:
    0.006165853 = product of:
      0.012331706 = sum of:
        0.012331706 = weight(_text_:22 in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012331706 = score(doc=3964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045509085 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: KO 31(2004) no.2, S.117-118 (D. Campbell): "This excellent volume offers 22 papers delivered at an IFLA Satellite meeting in Dublin Ohio in 2001. The conference gathered together information and computer scientists to discuss an important and difficult question: in what specific ways can the accumulated skills, theories and traditions of librarianship be mobilized to face the challenges of providing subject access to information in present and future networked information environments? The papers which grapple with this question are organized in a surprisingly deft and coherent way. Many conferences and proceedings have unhappy sessions that contain a hodge-podge of papers that didn't quite fit any other categories. As befits a good classificationist, editor I.C. McIlwaine has kept this problem to a minimum. The papers are organized into eight sessions, which split into two broad categories. The first five sessions deal with subject domains, and the last three deal with subject access tools. The five sessions and thirteen papers that discuss access in different domains appear in order of in creasing intension. The first papers deal with access in multilingual environments, followed by papers an access across multiple vocabularies and across sectors, ending up with studies of domain-specific retrieval (primarily education). Some of the papers offer predictably strong work by scholars engaged in ongoing, long-term research. Gerard Riesthuis offers a clear analysis of the complexities of negotiating non-identical thesauri, particularly in cases where hierarchical structure varies across different languages. Hope Olson and Dennis Ward use Olson's familiar and welcome method of using provocative and unconventional theory to generate meliorative approaches to blas in general subject access schemes. Many papers, an the other hand, deal with specific ongoing projects: Renardus, The High Level Thesaurus Project, The Colorado Digitization Project and The Iter Bibliography for medieval and Renaissance material. Most of these papers display a similar structure: an explanation of the theory and purpose of the project, an account of problems encountered in the implementation, and a discussion of the results, both promising and disappointing, thus far. Of these papers, the account of the Multilanguage Access to Subjects Project in Europe (MACS) deserves special mention. In describing how the project is founded an the principle of the equality of languages, with each subject heading language maintained in its own database, and with no single language used as a pivot for the others, Elisabeth Freyre and Max Naudi offer a particularly vivid example of the way the ethics of librarianship translate into pragmatic contexts and concrete procedures. The three sessions and nine papers devoted to subject access tools split into two kinds: papers that discuss the use of theory and research to generate new tools for a networked environment, and those that discuss the transformation of traditional subject access tools in this environment. In the new tool development area, Mary Burke provides a promising example of the bidirectional approach that is so often necessary: in her case study of user-driven classification of photographs, she user personal construct theory to clarify the practice of classification, while at the same time using practice to test the theory. Carol Bean and Rebecca Green offer an intriguing combination of librarianship and computer science, importing frame representation technique from artificial intelligence to standardize syntagmatic relationships to enhance recall and precision.

0.0030829264 = product of:
  0.006165853 = sum of:
    0.006165853 = product of:
      0.012331706 = sum of:
        0.012331706 = weight(_text_:22 in 4871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012331706 = score(doc=4871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045509085 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 4871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4871)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2006 18:34:49

0.0030829264 = product of:
  0.006165853 = sum of:
    0.006165853 = product of:
      0.012331706 = sum of:
        0.012331706 = weight(_text_:22 in 5580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012331706 = score(doc=5580,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045509085 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 5580, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=5580)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.90-97

0.0030829264 = product of:
  0.006165853 = sum of:
    0.006165853 = product of:
      0.012331706 = sum of:
        0.012331706 = weight(_text_:22 in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012331706 = score(doc=1789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045509085 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

23. 3.2008 19:10:22

0.0030829264 = product of:
  0.006165853 = sum of:
    0.006165853 = product of:
      0.012331706 = sum of:
        0.012331706 = weight(_text_:22 in 3684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012331706 = score(doc=3684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045509085 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2005 9:52:00

0.0030829264 = product of:
  0.006165853 = sum of:
    0.006165853 = product of:
      0.012331706 = sum of:
        0.012331706 = weight(_text_:22 in 3917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012331706 = score(doc=3917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045509085 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3917)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 7.1996 9:33:22

0.0028032616 = product of:
  0.0056065232 = sum of:
    0.0056065232 = product of:
      0.0112130465 = sum of:
        0.0112130465 = weight(_text_:k in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0112130465 = score(doc=3541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16245733 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045509085 = queryNorm
            0.069021486 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.013671875 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Gregory VL., Perrault, A.H., Ramirez Wohlmuth, S.: Looking from the outside in: an evidente-based model for website usability assesment. - Lichtnow, D., Caring, A., Lucas dos Anjos, P, Saldana, R., Loh, S.: Recomendaciones de documentos electronicos en discusiones on-line [Recommendations of electronic documents in online discussions]. - Lopez Yepes, A., Pdrez Agüera, J.R., Sanchez Jimenez, R.: Un modelo para el diseno de sistemas din micos de gestion de informacion multimedia [A model for dynamic multimedia information management systems design] Paganelli, C., Mounier, E.: Extraccion y representacion del conocimiento contenido en un documento tecnico [Extraction and representation of knowledge contained in a technical document]. - Naumis Pena, C.: Los orientadores de informacion para portales [Reader's advisory for websites]. - Perez Lorenzo, B., Morales Garcia, A.M., Garcia Lopez, F., Monje Jimenez, T.: La organizacfon del conocimiento en los portales de Internet: estudio de los principales proveedores de contenides [The organization of the knowledge in the portals of the main suppliers of information]. - Peset Mancebo, F., Ferrer Sapena, A., Lloret Romeno, N., Tolosa Robledo, L., Moreno Nunez, M.T, Diaz Novillo, S.: EI proyecto WinEcs: una vision practica para la implantacion de bibliotecas digitales [WinEcs project: how to implementing digital libraries]. Prieto Castro, E.: Organizacion del conocimiento de los recursos gratuitos de Internet: el caso de documentacion juridica en las bibliotecas universitarias espanolas [Knowledge management of free internet resources: law related information in academic libraries in Spain]. - Saldana, R., Teixeira Goncalez, A., Barrocco Farias, G., Branco, R.K., Lichtnow, D., Loh, S.: Captura automatica y selectiva de informaciones para bibliotecas digitales [Automatic and selective caption of information for digital libraries]. - Tramullas, J.: Clasificaciones y portales tem ticos especializados. Estudio en recursos de informacion digital sobre ciencas sociales [Classifications and specialized subject gateways. A study in social sciences digital information resources]. - Henriques, R., Worcman, K.: A experiencia do Museu da Pessoa: organizacao da memoria socialaem formato digital [The Museum of the Person's experience: social memory organization in digital Format]. Olson, H.A.: Transgressive deconstructions: feminist/postcolonial methodology for research in knowledge organization. - Brito Santana, J., Cruz Rodriguez, J.M.: Sistema informatico de soporte al analisis del discurso [The computer system for support to discourse analysis]. -

0.0023121946 = product of:
  0.004624389 = sum of:
    0.004624389 = product of:
      0.009248778 = sum of:
        0.009248778 = weight(_text_:22 in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009248778 = score(doc=4344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936506 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045509085 = queryNorm
            0.058035173 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01171875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Chapter 2 (Technology and People) focuses an several theories of technological acceptance and diffusion. Unfortunately, Bruce's presentation is somewhat confusing as he moves from one theory to next, never quite connecting them into a logical sequence or coherent whole. Two theories are of particular interest to Bruce: the Theory of Diffusion of Innovations and the Theory of Planned Behavior. The Theory of Diffusion of Innovations is an "information-centric view of technology acceptance" in which technology adopters are placed in the information flows of society from which they learn about innovations and "drive innovation adoption decisions" (p. 20). The Theory of Planned Behavior maintains that the "performance of a behavior is a joint function of intentions and perceived behavioral control" (i.e., how muck control a person thinks they have) (pp. 22-23). Bruce combines these two theories to form the basis for the Technology Acceptance Model. This model posits that "an individual's acceptance of information technology is based an beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors" (p. 24). In all these theories and models echoes a recurring theme: "individual perceptions of the innovation or technology are critical" in terms of both its characteristics and its use (pp. 24-25). From these, in turn, Bruce derives a predictive theory of the role personal perceptions play in technology adoption: Personal Innovativeness of Information Technology Adoption (PIITA). Personal inventiveness is defined as "the willingness of an individual to try out any new information technology" (p. 26). In general, the PIITA theory predicts that information technology will be adopted by individuals that have a greater exposure to mass media, rely less an the evaluation of information technology by others, exhibit a greater ability to cope with uncertainty and take risks, and requires a less positive perception of an information technology prior to its adoption. Chapter 3 (A Focus an Usings) introduces the User-Centered Paradigm (UCP). The UCP is characteristic of the shift of emphasis from technology to users as the driving force behind technology and research agendas for Internet development [for a dissenting view, see Andrew Dillion's (2003) challenge to the utility of user-centerness for design guidance]. It entails the "broad acceptance of the user-oriented perspective across a range of disciplines and professional fields," such as business, education, cognitive engineering, and information science (p. 34).