Search (43 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.02 
    0.017443113 = product of:
  0.034886226 = sum of:
    0.034886226 = product of:
      0.06977245 = sum of:
        0.06977245 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06977245 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  2. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.02 
    0.017443113 = product of:
  0.034886226 = sum of:
    0.034886226 = product of:
      0.06977245 = sum of:
        0.06977245 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06977245 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  3. Ramesh Babu, B.: Some thoughts on requirements for a good index to a book (1991) 0.02 
    0.015781997 = product of:
  0.031563994 = sum of:
    0.031563994 = product of:
      0.06312799 = sum of:
        0.06312799 = weight(_text_:b in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06312799 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  4. Booth, P.F.; Piggott, M.: Choice and form of entries (1995) 0.02 
    0.015781997 = product of:
  0.031563994 = sum of:
    0.031563994 = product of:
      0.06312799 = sum of:
        0.06312799 = weight(_text_:b in 4417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06312799 = score(doc=4417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 4417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4417)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Series
    Training in indexing, unit B
  5. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.02 
    0.015417679 = product of:
  0.030835358 = sum of:
    0.030835358 = product of:
      0.061670717 = sum of:
        0.061670717 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061670717 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  6. Fisher, J.: ¬An index to historical fiction for children and young people (1994) 0.01 
    0.013391469 = product of:
  0.026782937 = sum of:
    0.026782937 = product of:
      0.053565875 = sum of:
        0.053565875 = weight(_text_:b in 1517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053565875 = score(doc=1517,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.3321527 = fieldWeight in 1517, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1517)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    Bib B 70 Kinderbuch
    SBB
    Bib B 70 Kinderbuch
  7. Fassbender, J.: Register / Indexe (2023) 0.01 
    0.013391469 = product of:
  0.026782937 = sum of:
    0.026782937 = product of:
      0.053565875 = sum of:
        0.053565875 = weight(_text_:b in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053565875 = score(doc=785,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.3321527 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Der Fokus dieses Artikels liegt auf der Indexerstellung von Publikationen, d. h. der detaillierten Indexierung der Inhalte von Dokumenten statt der Indexierung auf Dokumentebene, welche sich auf das Gesamtthema von Dokumenten beschränkt. Zu letzterer zählen z. B. das Hauptthema von Artikeln, die Sachkatalogisierung von Büchern oder die Erschließung von Objekten in der Museumsdokumentation. Die Worte Index und Register werden synonym benutzt. Das Wort Index ist nicht nur ein Homonym aus unterschiedlichen Bereichen (z. B. Finanzwesen, Mathematik), sondern auch ein Polysem im Publikationswesen, da es in romanischen Sprachen sowohl Inhaltsverzeichnis als auch Register meinen kann. Während im Finanzwesen, Mathematik u. a. die Pluralform Indizes benutzt wird, ist im bibliographischen Sinn Indexe der korrekte Plural (engl.: indexes), es sei denn, es geht um Indices zu alten Werken in lateinischer Sprache (index rerum, index nominum, index verborum). Etymologie, Bedeutung und Plural des Wortes Index erläutert Wellisch ausführlich.
  8. Ramesh Babu, B.: ¬An investigation into the treatment of personal names in book indexes (1991) 0.01 
    0.012625597 = product of:
  0.025251195 = sum of:
    0.025251195 = product of:
      0.05050239 = sum of:
        0.05050239 = weight(_text_:b in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05050239 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Fassbender, J.: ¬Die Register des Buchinhalts : Register oder Konkordanz (2011) 0.01 
    0.012625597 = product of:
  0.025251195 = sum of:
    0.025251195 = product of:
      0.05050239 = sum of:
        0.05050239 = weight(_text_:b in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05050239 = score(doc=4905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Angesichts der wachsenden Zahl von Fachbüchern, die entweder gar kein Sachregister haben oder deren Register nur von schlechter bis indiskutabeler Qualität sind - z. B. automatisch erzeugte Konkordanzen oder eingebettete Register (Index-Marken im Text mit oft übersehenen Nachteilen für die Qualität) -, sieht sich das Deutsche Netzwerk der Indexer zu einem Plädoyer für gute Register veranlasst.
  10. Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991) 0.01 
    0.012334143 = product of:
  0.024668286 = sum of:
    0.024668286 = product of:
      0.04933657 = sum of:
        0.04933657 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04933657 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
  11. Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994) 0.01 
    0.012334143 = product of:
  0.024668286 = sum of:
    0.024668286 = product of:
      0.04933657 = sum of:
        0.04933657 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04933657 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
  12. Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998) 0.01 
    0.012334143 = product of:
  0.024668286 = sum of:
    0.024668286 = product of:
      0.04933657 = sum of:
        0.04933657 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04933657 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
  13. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.01 
    0.012334143 = product of:
  0.024668286 = sum of:
    0.024668286 = product of:
      0.04933657 = sum of:
        0.04933657 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04933657 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  14. Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992) 0.01 
    0.010792375 = product of:
  0.02158475 = sum of:
    0.02158475 = product of:
      0.0431695 = sum of:
        0.0431695 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0431695 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
  15. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.01 
    0.010792375 = product of:
  0.02158475 = sum of:
    0.02158475 = product of:
      0.0431695 = sum of:
        0.0431695 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0431695 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  16. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01 
    0.010792375 = product of:
  0.02158475 = sum of:
    0.02158475 = product of:
      0.0431695 = sum of:
        0.0431695 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0431695 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  17. Lipetz, B.-A.: ¬The usefulness of indexes (1989) 0.01 
    0.009469198 = product of:
  0.018938396 = sum of:
    0.018938396 = product of:
      0.037876792 = sum of:
        0.037876792 = weight(_text_:b in 812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037876792 = score(doc=812,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 812, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=812)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  18. Evans, R.: Indexing computer books : getting started (2007) 0.01 
    0.009469198 = product of:
  0.018938396 = sum of:
    0.018938396 = product of:
      0.037876792 = sum of:
        0.037876792 = weight(_text_:b in 745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037876792 = score(doc=745,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 745, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=745)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Sie wollen Ihr Indexing-Business erweitern? Sie erwägen ein weiteres Fachgebiet, wie z. B. Computer-Bücher? Indexer, die neu im Bereich Computer-Bücher sind, haben wahrscheinlich mehrere Fragen: Was sind Computer-Bücher? Wie unterscheiden sie sich von akademischen Werken? Wo ist der Markt für diesen Bereich? Wer ist die Leserschaft? Wie anspruchsvoll sind sie? Habe ich das nötige technische Fachwissen, um diese Bücher zu verstehen und dafür Register zu erstellen? Gibt es Tipps und Tricks für das Indexieren? Was sind die besten Programme? Wie viel kann man verdienen? Welche Ressourcen sind verfügbar? Dieser Artikel beschreibt den Prozess des Indexierens von Computer-Büchern, der einen Mittelweg zwischen Kosten und Qualität findet, was dem Indexierer erlaubt, mit oft technischem und unvertrautem Material umzugehen und es in einer planmäßigen und logischen Weise zu indexieren.
  19. Hedden, H.: Indexing specialities : Web Sites (2007) 0.01 
    0.009469198 = product of:
  0.018938396 = sum of:
    0.018938396 = product of:
      0.037876792 = sum of:
        0.037876792 = weight(_text_:b in 1146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037876792 = score(doc=1146,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 1146, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1146)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Zwei Kapitel behandeln die Vorgehensweise bei der Index-Erstellung sowie die vielfältigen Aspekte der Index-Gestaltung. Anhand vieler Beispiele werden die Besonderheiten, aber auch Parallelen zu Printregistern beleuchtet, z. B. bestehende und neu einzufügende Anker, Berücksichtigung verschiedener Seiten-Arten und -Formate, Umgang mit mehreren Locatorn pro Eintrag, Navigation innerhalb des Site Indexes. Das Schlusskapitel widmet sich den Business-Aspekten des Website-Indexing, auch aus Freelancer-Sicht. Erläutert werden z. B., welche Arten von Websites in Frage kommen und wie die Fortführung der Indexierung berücksichtigt wird. Der Index des Buches ist insgesamt von guter Qualität, wie man es von den Indexing-Büchern des Information Today-Verlages gewöhnt ist - ja sogar von exzellenter Qualität im Vergleich zu vielen unzureichenden Registern deutschsprachiger Fachbücher. Mit fünf Prozent Umfang im Verhältnis zur Anzahl der inhaltlichen Seiten hat der Index eine gute Standardlänge. Wesentliche Indexierungstechniken, wie Untereinträge, siehe- und siehe auch-Querverweise, vollständige Seitenbereichsangaben (d. h. ohne die wenig hilfreichen ff.-Angaben) kommen zum Einsatz. Einige Untereinträge tauchen allerdings nicht auch als Haupteintrag auf; so findet man z. B. "indexing rates" nur als Untereintrag des Haupteintrages "Business and index market". Die typographische und satztechnische Qualität des Registers ist ebenfalls gut, z. B. unterschiedliche Einrückungen von Untereinträgen und deren Zeilenumbrüchen. Insgesamt gesehen ist Indexing Specialties: Web Sites ein sehr empfehlenswertes Buch, das ein wichtiges (und bisher vernachlässigtes) Thema abdeckt."
  20. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.01 
    0.0077088396 = product of:
  0.015417679 = sum of:
    0.015417679 = product of:
      0.030835358 = sum of:
        0.030835358 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030835358 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 40
  • d 3
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 36
  • m 7

Themes

Subjects

Classifications