Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.05
    0.04991948 = product of:
      0.09983896 = sum of:
        0.09983896 = sum of:
          0.05050239 = weight(_text_:b in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05050239 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045518078 = queryNorm
              0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
          0.04933657 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04933657 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045518078 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
  2. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.02
    0.024668286 = product of:
      0.04933657 = sum of:
        0.04933657 = product of:
          0.09867314 = sum of:
            0.09867314 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09867314 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  3. Rosenberger, B.: ¬Die neue Online-Systematik der Universitätsbibliothek Hagen (2000) 0.02
    0.022094795 = product of:
      0.04418959 = sum of:
        0.04418959 = product of:
          0.08837918 = sum of:
            0.08837918 = weight(_text_:b in 4354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08837918 = score(doc=4354,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 4354, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4354)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001) 0.02
    0.022094795 = product of:
      0.04418959 = sum of:
        0.04418959 = product of:
          0.08837918 = sum of:
            0.08837918 = weight(_text_:b in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08837918 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Lischewsky-Weiser, B.: ¬Die Systematik im OPAC (1992) 0.02
    0.018938396 = product of:
      0.037876792 = sum of:
        0.037876792 = product of:
          0.075753585 = sum of:
            0.075753585 = weight(_text_:b in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075753585 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.02
    0.018501213 = product of:
      0.037002426 = sum of:
        0.037002426 = product of:
          0.07400485 = sum of:
            0.07400485 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07400485 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  7. Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990) 0.02
    0.015417679 = product of:
      0.030835358 = sum of:
        0.030835358 = product of:
          0.061670717 = sum of:
            0.061670717 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061670717 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:22:40
  8. Duncan, E.B.: Structuring knowledge bases for designers of learning materials (1989) 0.01
    0.013667612 = product of:
      0.027335225 = sum of:
        0.027335225 = product of:
          0.05467045 = sum of:
            0.05467045 = weight(_text_:b in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05467045 = score(doc=2478,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.33900195 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  9. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A faceted approach to hypertext (1989) 0.01
    0.013667612 = product of:
      0.027335225 = sum of:
        0.027335225 = product of:
          0.05467045 = sum of:
            0.05467045 = weight(_text_:b in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05467045 = score(doc=2480,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.33900195 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  10. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A concept-map thesaurus as a knowledge-based hypertext interface to a bibliographic database (1990) 0.01
    0.013667612 = product of:
      0.027335225 = sum of:
        0.027335225 = product of:
          0.05467045 = sum of:
            0.05467045 = weight(_text_:b in 2481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05467045 = score(doc=2481,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.33900195 = fieldWeight in 2481, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2481)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  11. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.01
    0.013082335 = product of:
      0.02616467 = sum of:
        0.02616467 = product of:
          0.05232934 = sum of:
            0.05232934 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05232934 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  12. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.01
    0.012334143 = product of:
      0.024668286 = sum of:
        0.024668286 = product of:
          0.04933657 = sum of:
            0.04933657 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04933657 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  13. Slavic, A.; Turkulin, B.: Prevajanje klasifikacijskih oznak v naravni jezik (1998) 0.01
    0.011047398 = product of:
      0.022094795 = sum of:
        0.022094795 = product of:
          0.04418959 = sum of:
            0.04418959 = weight(_text_:b in 3229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04418959 = score(doc=3229,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 3229, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3229)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Gödert, W.: Facettenklassifikation im Online-Retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.011047398 = product of:
      0.022094795 = sum of:
        0.022094795 = product of:
          0.04418959 = sum of:
            0.04418959 = weight(_text_:b in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04418959 = score(doc=4574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Facettenklassifikationen wurden bislang vorwiegend im Hinblick auf ihre Verwendungsmöglichkeiten in präkombinierten systematischen Katalogen bzw. Bibliographien betrachtet, nicht so sehr unter dem Aspekt eines möglichen Einsatzes in postkoordinierenden Retrievalsystemen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag soll nachgewiesen werden, daß Facettenklassifikationen anderen Techniken des Online Retrievals überlegen sein können. Hierzu sollten Begriffs- und Facettenanalyse mit einem strukturabbildenden Notationssystem kombiniert werden, um mit Hilfe Boolescher Operatoren (zur Verknüpfung von Facetten unabhängig von einer definierten Citation order) und Truncierung hierarchisch differenzierte Dokumentenmengen für komplexe Fragestellungen zu erhalten. Die Methode wird an zwei Beispielen illustriert: das erste nutzt eine kleine, von B. Buchanan entwickelte Klassifikation, das zweite das für Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) verwendete Klassifikationssystem. Weiter wird am Beispiel PRECIS diskutiert, welche Möglichkeiten des syntaktischen Retrievals Rollenoperatoren bieten können.
  15. Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989) 0.01
    0.010792375 = product of:
      0.02158475 = sum of:
        0.02158475 = product of:
          0.0431695 = sum of:
            0.0431695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0431695 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.11.1995 11:52:22
  16. Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998) 0.01
    0.010792375 = product of:
      0.02158475 = sum of:
        0.02158475 = product of:
          0.0431695 = sum of:
            0.0431695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0431695 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  17. Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998) 0.01
    0.010792375 = product of:
      0.02158475 = sum of:
        0.02158475 = product of:
          0.0431695 = sum of:
            0.0431695 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0431695 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.12.2001 16:22:41
  18. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.01
    0.010792375 = product of:
      0.02158475 = sum of:
        0.02158475 = product of:
          0.0431695 = sum of:
            0.0431695 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0431695 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  19. Alex, H.; Heiner-Freiling, M.: Melvil (2005) 0.01
    0.010792375 = product of:
      0.02158475 = sum of:
        0.02158475 = product of:
          0.0431695 = sum of:
            0.0431695 = weight(_text_:22 in 4321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0431695 = score(doc=4321,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4321, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4321)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ab Januar 2006 wird Die Deutsche Bibliothek ein neues Webangebot mit dem Namen Melvil starten, das ein Ergebnis ihres Engagements für die DDC und das Projekt DDC Deutsch ist. Der angebotene Webservice basiert auf der Übersetzung der 22. Ausgabe der DDC, die im Oktober 2005 als Druckausgabe im K. G. Saur Verlag erscheint. Er bietet jedoch darüber hinausgehende Features, die den Klassifizierer bei seiner Arbeit unterstützen und erstmals eine verbale Recherche für Endnutzer über DDCerschlossene Titel ermöglichen. Der Webservice Melvil gliedert sich in drei Anwendungen: - MelvilClass, - MelvilSearch und - MelvilSoap.
  20. Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006) 0.01
    0.010792375 = product of:
      0.02158475 = sum of:
        0.02158475 = product of:
          0.0431695 = sum of:
            0.0431695 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0431695 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15939656 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045518078 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22