Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Kascus, M.A.: Indexing, in theory and practice (1996) 0.05
    0.0520266 = product of:
      0.1560798 = sum of:
        0.105671845 = weight(_text_:et in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105671845 = score(doc=471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03620396 = queryNorm
            0.6220778 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
        0.050407946 = product of:
          0.10081589 = sum of:
            0.10081589 = weight(_text_:al in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10081589 = score(doc=471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.60761654 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Technical services management: 1965-1990. A quarter of a century of change and a look into the future. Festschrift for Kathryn Luther Henderson. Ed.: L.C. Smith et al
  2. Indexing legal materials (1993) 0.04
    0.043355502 = product of:
      0.1300665 = sum of:
        0.08805987 = weight(_text_:et in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08805987 = score(doc=3633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03620396 = queryNorm
            0.5183982 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
        0.042006623 = product of:
          0.084013246 = sum of:
            0.084013246 = weight(_text_:al in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084013246 = score(doc=3633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.5063471 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Editor
    Moys, E.M. et al.
  3. Kaskus, M.A.: Indexing in theory and practice (1996) 0.03
    0.0346844 = product of:
      0.1040532 = sum of:
        0.0704479 = weight(_text_:et in 4448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0704479 = score(doc=4448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03620396 = queryNorm
            0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 4448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4448)
        0.033605296 = product of:
          0.06721059 = sum of:
            0.06721059 = weight(_text_:al in 4448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06721059 = score(doc=4448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 4448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Technical services management: 1965-1990. A quarter of a century of change and a look into the future. Festschrift for Kathryn Luther Henderson. Ed.: L.C. Smith et al
  4. Terris, O.: Indexing in UK library schools : a survey (1986) 0.03
    0.02685146 = product of:
      0.16110876 = sum of:
        0.16110876 = weight(_text_:o in 6174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16110876 = score(doc=6174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1816457 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03620396 = queryNorm
            0.8869396 = fieldWeight in 6174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6174)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  5. Bonura, L.S.: ¬The art of indexing (1994) 0.02
    0.020138597 = product of:
      0.12083158 = sum of:
        0.12083158 = weight(_text_:o in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12083158 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1816457 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03620396 = queryNorm
            0.6652047 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of documentation 51(1995) no.3, S.292-294 (O. Terris)
  6. Lavallee, C.: Indexation manuelle et indexation assistee par ordinateur : comparison de la performance de deux index d'une monographie (1996) 0.02
    0.016604729 = product of:
      0.099628374 = sum of:
        0.099628374 = weight(_text_:et in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099628374 = score(doc=740,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03620396 = queryNorm
            0.58650064 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Documentation et bibliothèques. 42(1996) no.4, S.175-178
  7. Luhn, H.P.: Keyword-in-context index for technical literature (1985) 0.02
    0.015174424 = product of:
      0.04552327 = sum of:
        0.030820955 = weight(_text_:et in 3638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030820955 = score(doc=3638,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16986917 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03620396 = queryNorm
            0.18143937 = fieldWeight in 3638, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3638)
        0.014702318 = product of:
          0.029404636 = sum of:
            0.029404636 = weight(_text_:al in 3638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029404636 = score(doc=3638,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16592026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.17722149 = fieldWeight in 3638, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3638)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
  8. Dienelt, O.: ¬Ein Workshop über Indexing (2003) 0.01
    0.014608844 = product of:
      0.04382653 = sum of:
        0.035242543 = weight(_text_:o in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035242543 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1816457 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03620396 = queryNorm
            0.19401804 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
        0.00858399 = product of:
          0.01716798 = sum of:
            0.01716798 = weight(_text_:22 in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01716798 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    "Unter der Leitung von Frank Merrett von der Socieryy of Indexers (www.indexers.org.uk), die in Sheffield ihren Hauptsitz hat, fand am 22. Januar in London ein Workshop statt, in dem Einblicke in das Indexing (Registererstellung) ermöglicht wurden. SechsTeilnehmerinnen und drei Teilnehmer (Bibliothekare, Katalogisierer, angehende Indexer, Benutzer von Indices) bekamen durch Merrett neben den grundlegenden Dingen auch ein wenig Einblick in die Berufswirklichkeit eines Indexers vermittelt. Zunächst wurden einige Definitionen dessen, was ein Index ist, angesprochen: Ein Index (Register) ist eine systematische Anordnung von Eintragungen, die es dem Benutzer ermöglichen, Informationen in einem Dokument zu finden (nach Norm BS ISO 999,1996). Auch andere Definitionen besagen, dass die im Hauptteil eines Dokuments enthaltenen Informationen so herausgefiltert werden sollen, dass durch die Benutzung des Registers ein möglichst benutzerfreundlicher Zugang zum Hauptteil erfolgen kann. Ein Index soll den einen Benutzer entscheiden lassen, ob ein Dokument etwas für ihn Interessantes enthält. Dem anderen soll es dazu dienen, das Gelesene wieder aufzufrischen. Ein Index muss beiden gerecht werden. Nach Eintreffen des Materials vom Verlag (sehr oft als Papierausdruck) beginnt der erste Schritt, der vom persönlichen Arbeitsstil des Indexers abhängt. Manche beginnen sofort beim Lesen mit dem Niederschreiben von Begriffen, oft unter Verwendung von Software (Macrex, Cindex), andere markieren oder unterstreichen zunächst die relevanten Begriffe. Hier beginnt die eigentliche Arbeit, die darin besteht, wichtige Informationen aus dem Text herauszufiltern und so aufzubereiten, dass ein Buchleser zu Wichtigem hingeführt wird. Dazu gehören Entscheidungen wie zum Beispiel »was ist wichtig«, »was kann/ muss weggelassen werden«, »wo müssen Siehe- beziehungsweise Siehe-auch-Verweise eingebrachtwerden«. Bibliothekarisch gesehen, ist dies Sacherschließung und zugleich formale Erfassung, letztlich das Aufbauen eines Kreuzkatalogs. So wie ein Sacherschließer muss auch ein Indexer ständig überlegen, mit welchen Begriffen er dem Benutzer des Registers einen guten Zugang zur Information verschaffen kann. Ein gutes Verständnis des Faches, das in der Vorlage behandelt wird, ist deshalb unbedingt notwendig. Das wurde anhand einiger Seiten geübt, genauso wie das Aufbe-reiten des Index. Äußerste Genauigkeit ist hier nötig. Anhand eines fertigen Index mit eingebauten Ungenauigkeiten wurde geübt, sehr genau hinzuschauen und kleinste Ungenauigkeiten zu erkennen. Merrett sagte, dass ein gut geschriebenes Buch besser zu bearbeiten sei als eines, das einen weniger guten Hauptteil hat. Oft hat ein Indexer nur zwei Wochen Zeit für die Erstellung eines Registers. Die wenigsten dürften allerdings ständig von morgens bis abends an einem Index arbeiten, und nur sehr wenige verdienen ausschließlich mit dem Erstellen von Registern ihren Lebensunterhalt. Meistens ist dies ein Nebenjob. Nach Frank Merrett sind die Verhandlungen mit einem Verlag über einen zu erstellenden Index recht vorsichtig zu führen. Insbesondere über die Termine (Eintreffen des Manuskripts, Abliefern des Produkts) sowie die Form der Vorlage (welches Format, welcher Umfang) muss sich ein Indexer absichern, um keine Überraschungen zu erleben. So kann es sein, dass die Vorlage nicht als Buch, sondern als ein Stapel von Druckbogen, ungefalzt und unsortiert, ankommt. Auch das Honorar muß vom Indexer in Anbetracht des zu erwartenden Aufwandes verhandelt werden. Indexer ist keine geschützte Bezeichnung, deshalb kann sich jeder so nennen. Die Prüfungen, die man bei der Sociery of Indexers ablegen kann, sind aber ein Qualitätsnachweis. Die Society kann durch das Aufführen der Namen und Spezialgebiete auf der Homepage beziehungsweise in einem Verzeichnis einiges für die Mitglieder tun. Die Sociery legt auf das Kontakthalten mit Verlegern großen Wert, um dort auf die Dienste der Indexer hinzuweisen. Um Aufträge muß sich aber jeder selbst kümmern.
  9. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.01
    0.006540183 = product of:
      0.039241098 = sum of:
        0.039241098 = product of:
          0.078482196 = sum of:
            0.078482196 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078482196 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  10. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.01
    0.006540183 = product of:
      0.039241098 = sum of:
        0.039241098 = product of:
          0.078482196 = sum of:
            0.078482196 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078482196 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  11. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.01
    0.006540183 = product of:
      0.039241098 = sum of:
        0.039241098 = product of:
          0.078482196 = sum of:
            0.078482196 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078482196 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  12. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.01
    0.006540183 = product of:
      0.039241098 = sum of:
        0.039241098 = product of:
          0.078482196 = sum of:
            0.078482196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078482196 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  13. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01
    0.00572266 = product of:
      0.03433596 = sum of:
        0.03433596 = product of:
          0.06867192 = sum of:
            0.06867192 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06867192 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  14. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.01
    0.00572266 = product of:
      0.03433596 = sum of:
        0.03433596 = product of:
          0.06867192 = sum of:
            0.06867192 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06867192 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  15. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.01
    0.00572266 = product of:
      0.03433596 = sum of:
        0.03433596 = product of:
          0.06867192 = sum of:
            0.06867192 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06867192 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  16. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.01
    0.00572266 = product of:
      0.03433596 = sum of:
        0.03433596 = product of:
          0.06867192 = sum of:
            0.06867192 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06867192 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  17. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.01
    0.00572266 = product of:
      0.03433596 = sum of:
        0.03433596 = product of:
          0.06867192 = sum of:
            0.06867192 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06867192 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  18. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.01
    0.00572266 = product of:
      0.03433596 = sum of:
        0.03433596 = product of:
          0.06867192 = sum of:
            0.06867192 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06867192 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  19. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.01
    0.00572266 = product of:
      0.03433596 = sum of:
        0.03433596 = product of:
          0.06867192 = sum of:
            0.06867192 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06867192 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  20. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.01
    0.00572266 = product of:
      0.03433596 = sum of:
        0.03433596 = product of:
          0.06867192 = sum of:
            0.06867192 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06867192 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12678011 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03620396 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180