-
Z39.19-1993: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual thesauri (1993)
0.03
0.030034773 = product of:
0.060069546 = sum of:
0.060069546 = sum of:
0.0054055275 = weight(_text_:a in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054055275 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
0.0048061023 = weight(_text_:s in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0048061023 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
0.049857914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049857914 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16108091 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This 1993 edition is the authoritative guide constructing single-language thesauri, one of the most powerful tools for information retrieval. Written by experts, Z39.19 shows how to formulate descriptors, establish relationships among terms, and present the information in print and on a screen. Also included are thesaurus maintenance procedures and recommended features for thesaurus management systems
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.180-181 (M. Hudon)
-
Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen : Gestaltung und Erschließung von Dokumenten, Bibliotheksmanagement, Codierungs- und Nummerungssysteme, Bestandserhaltung in Archiven und Bibliotheken (2002)
0.01
0.012813592 = product of:
0.025627185 = sum of:
0.025627185 = sum of:
0.0013513819 = weight(_text_:a in 1704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0013513819 = score(doc=1704,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.025478978 = fieldWeight in 1704, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1704)
0.002686693 = weight(_text_:s in 1704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002686693 = score(doc=1704,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.05372105 = fieldWeight in 1704, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1704)
0.02158911 = weight(_text_:22 in 1704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02158911 = score(doc=1704,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16108091 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.1340265 = fieldWeight in 1704, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1704)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Am Anfang war das Wort. Sehr viel später erfand ein gewisser Herr Gutenberg ein Handgießinstrument zur Herstellung von Drucktypen. Und was sich daraus entwickelte, ist bekannt: Die moderne Informations- und Kommunikationsgesellschaft, deren Dynamik nicht zuletzt von der Effektivität der Daten-, Dokumenten- und Schriftgutverwaltung abhängt. Beim DIN-Taschenbuch 343 Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen handelt es sich um ein Normenkompendium, das genau diese Verfahren aufgreift: Es stellt der interessierten Fachöffentlichkeit insgesamt 22 nationale und internationale Normen der Bereiche "Gestaltung und Erschließung von Dokumenten", "Bibliotheksmanagement", "Codierungs- und Nummerungssysteme" sowie "Bestandserhaltung in Archiven und Bibliotheken" vor. Die Auswahl der Normen verdeutlicht zweierlei: Zum einen den Einfluss der sich ständig weiterentwickelnden und dabei konvergierenden Technologien, der u.a. das Publizieren und die Datenrecherche beeinflusst. Zum zweiten die Notwendigkeit, neue Anforderungen zu berücksichtigen, die sich aus dem stetig zunehmenden internationalen Datenaustausch ergeben. Das DIN-Taschenbuch verschafft einen genauen Überblick über den Zusammenhang zwischen einschlägigen DIN- und ISO-Normen und klärt über Namencodes von Ländern und deren Untereinheiten auf (DIN ISO 3166-2:2001). Komplettiert wird das Werk durch den vollständigen Abdruck des DINFachberichts 13 "Bau- und Nutzungplanung von wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken". Dort werden Bibliotheken als Servicezentren verstanden, die zunehmend digitalisierte Informationsquellen bereit stellen.
- Content
- Enthält 22 vollständig abgedruckte nationale und internationale Normen für die Bereiche Archiv-, Bibliotheks-, Dokumentations-, Museums- und Verlagswesen
- Footnote
- Rez. in: ABI-Technik 21(2002) H.3, S.294-295 (K. Weishaupt); "Im Deutschen Institut für Normung ist der Normenausschuss Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen (NABD) verantwortlich für die nationale Normung für das Erstellen, Publizieren, Erschließen, Erhalten, Wiederauffinden, Vermitteln und die Nutzung von Dokumenten, Daten und Schriftgut für die Bereiche Archiv-, Bibliotheks, Dokumentations-, Museumsund Verlagswesen. Mit dem neuen DIN-Taschenbuch will er einen Überblick über die DIN-Normen geben, die in den letzten Jahren auf internationaler Ebene unter aktiver deutscher Mitarbeit veröffentlicht, dann als DIN-Normen übernommen worden sind und die den veränderten Anforderungen der Informations- und Kommunikationsgesellschaft Rechnung tragen - so die eigenen Angaben des Ausschusses im Vorwort (S. XI). Vor dem Hintergrund dieses recht offen formulierten Anspruches kommt es zu einer Zusammenstellung von 22 Normen, die auf den ersten Blick recht bunt gemischt wirkt: Abgedruckt sind Normen zur Erstellung und Weiterentwicklung von Thesauri, zu Titelangaben von Dokumenten, Kürzungs- und Transliterationsregeln, Sortierregeln, Abschnittsnummerierungen, Ländernamen, zur ISBN, ISSN sowie den Standardnummern ISMN und ISWC für Musikalien, zu Leistungsindikatoren für Bibliotheken und zu Lebensdauer-Klassen von Papier und Karton, Anforderungen an die Aufbewahrung von Archiv- und Bibliotheksgut und zur Alterungsbeständigkeit von Schriften. Der DIN-Fachbericht "Bau- und Nutzungsplanung von wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken" rundet das Werk ab. Negativ ausgedrückt: Es wird niemanden geben, der für seinen beruflichen Alltag all diese Normen benötigt. Die positive Sicht: Das DIN-Taschenbuch deckt so viele Themen ab, dass der Kreis der Interessierten recht groß sein dürfte. Auf alle Fälle ist beeindruckend, zu wie vielen Themen aus den Bereich des Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesens es Normen gibt; vermutlich ist deren Existenz nicht einmal der Fachöffentlichkeit in vollem Umfang bekannt. Ein solches Beispiel ist DIN 1505, Teil 2: "Titelangaben von Dokumenten: Zitierregeln"; diese Norm wendet sich "an Autoren, Verleger und Redakteure und soll für Literaturzusammenstellungen, für Literaturverzeichnisse am Ende einer Schrift bzw. eines Beitrags, im Kontext oder in Fußnoten benutzt werden" (S. 38). Damit ist sie praktisch für alle relevant, die wissenschaftlich arbeiten und Texte schreiben - aber kaum jemand kennt diese Norm! Viele Zeitschriften und Fachgesellschaften haben ihre eigenen Regeln, nach denen zitiert werden soll. Im Institut Arbeit und Technik in Gelsenkirchen ist vor einigen Jahren mit Förderung der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft die Software LibLink entwickelt worden, mit der aus MAB-Daten, die aus einem Bibliothekskatalog exportiert worden waren, automatisiert Literaturverzeichnisse für wissenschaftliche Texte erstellt werden sollten.
Das erwies sich als äußerst schwierig, da es erstens keinen allgemein anerkannten Standard fürs Zitieren gibt und zweitens zwischen Literaturverzeichnissen wissenschaftlicher Texte und Bibliotheksdaten Diskrepanzen bestehen, die nicht automatisiert bereinigt werden können. Wie sich im Laufe des Projektes gezeigt hat, gilt das auch für Literaturverzeichnisse, die nach DIN 1505 gestaltet werden, obwohl diese Norm im Zusammenarbeit mit der Deutschen Bibliothek und dokumentarischen Berufsverbänden entwickelt worden ist und eine eindeutige Nähe zu bibliothekarischen Katalogisierungsregeln aufweist Warum sich die Norm nicht durchgesetzt hat, darüber kann nur spekuliert werden. Möglich ist, dass der Text mit einem Umfang von 18 Seiten - allein für Teil 2 der Norm! - zu umfangreich ist, als dass sich jemand, der sich für Formalia des wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens nur am Rande interessiert, wirklich damit beschäftigen würde. Möglich ist ferner, dass das Zitierformat zu nah an bibliothekarische Regeln angelehnt ist und einige Gepflogenheiten wissenschaftlicher Literaturverzeichnisse, die sich bei aller Uneinheitlichkeit doch durchgesetzt haben - nicht ausreichend berücksichtigt: Die Tendenz geht zu einer recht knappen Zitierweise, außerdem steht das Erscheinungsjahr inzwischen fast immer direkt hinter der Verfasserangabe und nicht irgendwo am Ende einer langen Titelaufnahme. Wie dem auch sei: Es ist bedauerlich, dass die Regelungen der Norm so wenig bekannt sind und damit kaum als Hilfestellung bei der oft auch beklagten Unsicherheit, wie korrekt zu zitieren sei, angesehen werden können. Vielleicht wäre hier eine viel intensivere Öffentlichkeitsarbeit angesagt, der Abdruck in einem neuen DIN-Taschenbuch ist sicherlich ein Schritt in die richtige Richtung. Eine andere Maßnahme wäre eine Aktualisierung der Norm; immerhin ist sie seit Januar 1984 unverändert geblieben. Über Namensverfremdungen wie Ernst T. A. Hoffmann ist die Bibliothekswelt inzwischen hinaus; ob gerade solch eine Regelung der Abkürzung von Vornamen und die Aufführung dieses Beispiels die Akzeptanz der Norm fördern, erscheint mehr als fraglich. Es ist im Rahmen einer Rezension nicht möglich, auf jede einzelne abgedruckte Norm inhaltlich einzugehen, daher nur noch einige Bemerkungen zu besonderen Auffälligkeiten. Das Taschenbuch gibt die internationale Norm ISO 690-2 (in englischer Sprache) wieder: "Information and documentation - Bibliographic references - Part 2: Electronic documents or parts thereof". Bei solch einem Thema, bei dem noch allgemeine Unsicherheit herrscht, ist es sehr hilfreich, mit der Norm eine Richtschnur an die Hand zu bekommen, auch wenn der Text selbst realistischerweise nicht den Anspruch erhebt, das Problem abschließend zu behandeln. Auf ein ganz besonders schwieriges Gebiet haben sich die Normungsausschüsse vorgewagt, als sie die internationale Norm ISO 11620 "Leistungsindikatoren für Bibliotheken" entwickelt haben, die ins Deutsche übersetzt und unverändert als DIN-Norm übernommen worden ist. Der Zweck der Norm wird eher zurückhaltend formuliert: Es geht darum, "den Gebrauch von Leistungsindikatoren in Bibliotheken zu unterstützen und Kenntnisse über die Durchführung von Leistungsmessung zu verbreiten" (S. 171). Dabei wird ausdrücklich zugestanden, dass es auch Leistungsindikatoren geben kann, die in dieser Norm nicht aufgeführt sind. Eine sehr realistische und damit sympathische Sicht für eine Fragestellung, die eins der jüngsten Probleme der bibliothekarischen Berufspraxis berührt und vermutlich nie erschöpfend ausdiskutiert werden kann! Im Vergleich dazu wirken Abkürzungs-, Transliterations- und Ordnungsregeln geradezu trivial. Aber alle, die im Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationsbereich tätig sind, wissen, dass es ohne Sorgfalt im Kleinen nicht geht und exakte Regelungen die tägliche Arbeit eher erleichtern.
- Pages
- 424 S
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.01
0.008309653 = product of:
0.016619306 = sum of:
0.016619306 = product of:
0.049857914 = sum of:
0.049857914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049857914 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16108091 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Panizzi, A.: Rules for the compilation of the catalogue (1841)
0.01
0.006369262 = product of:
0.012738524 = sum of:
0.012738524 = product of:
0.019107785 = sum of:
0.014301682 = weight(_text_:a in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014301682 = score(doc=4940,freq=14.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.0048061023 = weight(_text_:s in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0048061023 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Crestadoro, A.: The art of making catalogues of libraries: or, a method to obtain in a short time a most perfect, complete, and satisfactory printed catalog of the British Museum Library / by a reader therein [i.e. A. Crestadoro]. London: Published and sold by The Literary, Scientific & Artistic Reference Office 1856.
- Pages
- 9 S
-
Baumert, A.: RAKFORM: bibliothekarische Titelaufnahmen nach den Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung in der EDV : Bedienungsanleitung und Quellcode für die programmierte Verarbeitung (1989)
0.01
0.005956784 = product of:
0.011913568 = sum of:
0.011913568 = product of:
0.017870352 = sum of:
0.009459673 = weight(_text_:a in 6007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009459673 = score(doc=6007,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6007, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6007)
0.008410679 = weight(_text_:s in 6007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008410679 = score(doc=6007,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 6007, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6007)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- 158 S
-
Le Boeuf, P.; Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: FRBR - Library Reference Model : draft for World-Wide Review (2016)
0.00
0.004720996 = product of:
0.009441992 = sum of:
0.009441992 = product of:
0.0141629875 = sum of:
0.009065346 = weight(_text_:a in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009065346 = score(doc=2881,freq=10.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
0.0050976416 = weight(_text_:s in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050976416 = score(doc=2881,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The FRBR Review Group worked actively towards a consolidated model starting in 2010, in a series of working meetings held in conjunction with IFLA conferences and at an additional mid-year meeting in April 2012 during which the user task consolidation was first drafted. In 2013 in Singapore, the FRBR Review Group constituted a Consolidation Editorial Group (CEG) to focus on the detailed reassessment of attribute s and relationships, and the drafting of this model document. The CEG (at times with other FRBR Review Group members or invited experts) held five multi-day meetings, as well as discussing progress in detail with the FRBR Review Group as a whole during a working meeting in 2014 in Lyon and another in 2015 in Cape Town.
- Pages
- 71 S
-
Bechhofer, S.; Harmelen, F. van; Hendler, J.; Horrocks, I.; McGuinness, D.L.; Patel-Schneider, P.F.; Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference (2004)
0.00
0.0045550046 = product of:
0.009110009 = sum of:
0.009110009 = product of:
0.013665013 = sum of:
0.009459673 = weight(_text_:a in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009459673 = score(doc=4684,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
0.0042053396 = weight(_text_:s in 4684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0042053396 = score(doc=4684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4684)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Web Ontology Language OWL is a semantic markup language for publishing and sharing ontologies on the World Wide Web. OWL is developed as a vocabulary extension of RDF (the Resource Description Framework) and is derived from the DAML+OIL Web Ontology Language. This document contains a structured informal description of the full set of OWL language constructs and is meant to serve as a reference for OWL users who want to construct OWL ontologies.
-
¬The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (2007)
0.00
0.004254846 = product of:
0.008509692 = sum of:
0.008509692 = product of:
0.012764538 = sum of:
0.006756909 = weight(_text_:a in 3395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006756909 = score(doc=3395,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3395, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3395)
0.006007628 = weight(_text_:s in 3395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006007628 = score(doc=3395,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 3395, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3395)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Defines fifteen metadata elements for resource description in a cross-disciplinary information environment
- Pages
- 15 S
-
¬The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (2012)
0.00
0.004254846 = product of:
0.008509692 = sum of:
0.008509692 = product of:
0.012764538 = sum of:
0.006756909 = weight(_text_:a in 4790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006756909 = score(doc=4790,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4790, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4790)
0.006007628 = weight(_text_:s in 4790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006007628 = score(doc=4790,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4790, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4790)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Defines fifteen metadata elements for resource description in a cross-disciplinary information environment.
- Pages
- 13 S
-
Kaplan, A.G.; Riedling, A.M.: Catalog it! : a guide to cataloging school library materials (2015)
0.00
0.004186509 = product of:
0.008373018 = sum of:
0.008373018 = product of:
0.0125595275 = sum of:
0.009555713 = weight(_text_:a in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009555713 = score(doc=2379,freq=16.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.003003814 = weight(_text_:s in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003003814 = score(doc=2379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This invaluable cataloging resource gives pre-service and practicing school library media specialists the tools they need to be intelligent consumers of commercial cataloging and competent organizers of new materials in their collections. The second edition contains expanded information on Library of Congress Subject Headings and electronic cataloging and cataloging systems, as well as Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC). Whether you're a practicing cataloger looking for a short text to update you on the application of RDA to cataloging records or a school librarian who needs a quick resource to answer cataloging questions, this guide is for you. - Thoroughly updates a best-selling, essential guide to cataloging - Addresses the new standards specifically as they apply to school libraries - Helps school librarians understand and implement the new cataloging standards in their collections - Distills the latest information and presents it in a format that is clear and accessible - Fills the need for up-to-the-minute cataloging guidance for the busy librarian who wants information in a hurry
- Pages
- 230 S
-
Z39.19-2005: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies (2005)
0.00
0.0031126682 = product of:
0.0062253363 = sum of:
0.0062253363 = product of:
0.0093380045 = sum of:
0.0057334276 = weight(_text_:a in 708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0057334276 = score(doc=708,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 708, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=708)
0.0036045765 = weight(_text_:s in 708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0036045765 = score(doc=708,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 708, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=708)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This Standard presents guidelines and conventions for the contents, display, construction, testing, maintenance, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies. This Standard focuses on controlled vocabularies that are used for the representation of content objects in knowledge organization systems including lists, synonym rings, taxonomies, and thesauri. This Standard should be regarded as a set of recommendations based on preferred techniques and procedures. Optional procedures are, however, sometimes described, e.g., for the display of terms in a controlled vocabulary. The primary purpose of vocabulary control is to achieve consistency in the description of content objects and to facilitate retrieval. Vocabulary control is accomplished by three principal methods: defining the scope, or meaning, of terms; using the equivalence relationship to link synonymous and nearly synonymous terms; and distinguishing among homographs.
- Pages
- 188 S
-
Pepper, S.; Moore, G.; TopicMaps.Org Authoring Group: XML Topic Maps (XTM) 1.0 : TopicMaps.Org Specification (2001)
0.00
0.0031126682 = product of:
0.0062253363 = sum of:
0.0062253363 = product of:
0.0093380045 = sum of:
0.0057334276 = weight(_text_:a in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0057334276 = score(doc=1623,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
0.0036045765 = weight(_text_:s in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0036045765 = score(doc=1623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This specification provides a model and grammar for representing the structure of information resources used to define topics, and the associations (relationships) between topics. Names, resources, and relationships are said to be characteristics of abstract subjects, which are called topics. Topics have their characteristics within scopes: i.e. the limited contexts within which the names and resources are regarded as their name, resource, and relationship characteristics. One or more interrelated documents employing this grammar is called a topic map.TopicMaps.Org is an independent consortium of parties developing the applicability of the topic map paradigm [ISO13250] to the World Wide Web by leveraging the XML family of specifications. This specification describes version 1.0 of XML Topic Maps (XTM) 1.0 [XTM], an abstract model and XML grammar for interchanging Web-based topic maps, written by the members of the TopicMaps.Org Authoring Group. More information on XTM and TopicMaps.Org is available at http://www.topicmaps.org/about.html. All versions of the XTM Specification are permanently licensed to the public, as provided by the Charter of TopicMaps.Org.
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Overview (2004)
0.00
0.0031126682 = product of:
0.0062253363 = sum of:
0.0062253363 = product of:
0.0093380045 = sum of:
0.0057334276 = weight(_text_:a in 4682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0057334276 = score(doc=4682,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 4682, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4682)
0.0036045765 = weight(_text_:s in 4682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0036045765 = score(doc=4682,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4682, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4682)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The OWL Web Ontology Language is designed for use by applications that need to process the content of information instead of just presenting information to humans. OWL facilitates greater machine interpretability of Web content than that supported by XML, RDF, and RDF Schema (RDF-S) by providing additional vocabulary along with a formal semantics. OWL has three increasingly-expressive sublanguages: OWL Lite, OWL DL, and OWL Full. This document is written for readers who want a first impression of the capabilities of OWL. It provides an introduction to OWL by informally describing the features of each of the sublanguages of OWL. Some knowledge of RDF Schema is useful for understanding this document, but not essential. After this document, interested readers may turn to the OWL Guide for more detailed descriptions and extensive examples on the features of OWL. The normative formal definition of OWL can be found in the OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax.
-
Resource Description and Access : RDA : developed in a collaborative process led by the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (2013)
0.00
0.003050596 = product of:
0.006101192 = sum of:
0.006101192 = product of:
0.0091517875 = sum of:
0.004054146 = weight(_text_:a in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004054146 = score(doc=898,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
0.0050976416 = weight(_text_:s in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050976416 = score(doc=898,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: BuB 65(2013) H.6, S.461-463 (M. Payer) u.d.T.: Unser deutsches Regelwerk: jetzt in deutscher Sprache.
- Pages
- XIV, 985 S
-
Agnese Galeffi, A.; Bertolini, M.V.; Bothmann, R.L.; Rodríguez, E.E.; McGarry, D.: Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) 2016 (2016)
0.00
0.0028155386 = product of:
0.005631077 = sum of:
0.005631077 = product of:
0.008446615 = sum of:
0.006043564 = weight(_text_:a in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006043564 = score(doc=3284,freq=10.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.11394546 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
0.0024030511 = weight(_text_:s in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024030511 = score(doc=3284,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The original Statement of Principles - commonly known as the "Paris Principles" - was approved by the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles in 1961. Its goal of serving as a basis for international standardization in cataloguing has certainly been achieved: most of the cataloguing codes that were developed worldwide since that time have followed the Principles strictly or at least to a high degree. More than fifty years later, having a common set of international cataloguing principles is still necessary as cataloguers and users around the world use online catalogues as search and discovery systems. At the beginning of the 21st century, IFLA produced a new statement of principles (published in 2009) applicable to online library catalogues and beyond. The current version has been reviewed and updated in 2014 and 2015, and approved in 2016. The 2009 Statement of Principles replaced and explicitly broadened the scope of the Paris Principles from just textual resources to all types of resources, and from just the choice and form of entry to all aspects of bibliographic and authority data used in library catalogues. It included not only principles and objectives, but also guiding rules that should be included in cataloguing codes internationally, as well as guidance on search and retrieval capabilities. This 2016 edition takes into consideration new categories of users, the open access environment, the interoperability and the accessibility of data, features of discovery tools and the significant change of user behaviour in general. This statement builds on the great cataloguing traditions of the world, as well as on the conceptual models in the IFLA Functional Requirements family.
- Pages
- 20 S
-
ISO/DIS 5127: Information and documentation - foundation and vocabulary (2013)
0.00
0.002127423 = product of:
0.004254846 = sum of:
0.004254846 = product of:
0.006382269 = sum of:
0.0033784546 = weight(_text_:a in 6070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033784546 = score(doc=6070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 6070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6070)
0.003003814 = weight(_text_:s in 6070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003003814 = score(doc=6070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 6070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6070)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This standard provides the basic terms and their definitions in the field of information and documentation for the purpose of promoting and facilitating knowledge sharing and information exchange. This International Standard presents terms and definitions of selected concepts relevant to the field of information and documentation. If a definition is from other standards, the priority of selection is TC46 technical standards, then technical standards in relevant field, and then terminology related standards. The scope of this International Standard corresponds to that of ISO/TC46, Standardization of practices relating to libraries, documentation and information centres, publishing, archives, records management, museum documentation, indexing and abstracting services, and information science. ISO 5127 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 46, Information and Documentation, WG4, Terminology of information and documentation. This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 5127:2001), which has been technically revised to overcome problems in the practical application of ISO 5127:2001 and to take account of the new developments in the field of information and documentation.
- Pages
- 221 S
-
ISO 12083: Electronic manuscript preparation and markup (1994)
0.00
0.0019824163 = product of:
0.0039648325 = sum of:
0.0039648325 = product of:
0.011894497 = sum of:
0.011894497 = weight(_text_:s in 2324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011894497 = score(doc=2324,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 2324, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2324)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Hinweis in NfD 46(1995) H.5, S.320; Bezug über Beuth Verlag
- Pages
- 187 S. + 2 Disketten
-
ISO 15489: Records management : Pt. 1: ISO 15489-1: General; Pt.2: ISO/TR 15489-2: Guidelines (2001)
0.00
0.0019824163 = product of:
0.0039648325 = sum of:
0.0039648325 = product of:
0.011894497 = sum of:
0.011894497 = weight(_text_:s in 480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011894497 = score(doc=480,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05001192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 480, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=480)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- VI, 19 S. + VI, 39 S
-
ISO 999: Index of a publication (1975)
0.00
0.0018018426 = product of:
0.0036036852 = sum of:
0.0036036852 = product of:
0.010811055 = sum of:
0.010811055 = weight(_text_:a in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010811055 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Miller, E.; Schloss. B.; Lassila, O.; Swick, R.R.: Resource Description Framework (RDF) : model and syntax (1997)
0.00
0.0017180734 = product of:
0.0034361468 = sum of:
0.0034361468 = product of:
0.01030844 = sum of:
0.01030844 = weight(_text_:a in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01030844 = score(doc=5903,freq=38.0), product of:
0.053039093 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.045999072 = queryNorm
0.19435552 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- RDF - the Resource Description Framework - is a foundation for processing metadata; it provides interoperability between applications that exchange machine-understandable information on the Web. RDF emphasizes facilities to enable automated processing of Web resources. RDF metadata can be used in a variety of application areas; for example: in resource discovery to provide better search engine capabilities; in cataloging for describing the content and content relationships available at a particular Web site, page, or digital library; by intelligent software agents to facilitate knowledge sharing and exchange; in content rating; in describing collections of pages that represent a single logical "document"; for describing intellectual property rights of Web pages, and in many others. RDF with digital signatures will be key to building the "Web of Trust" for electronic commerce, collaboration, and other applications. Metadata is "data about data" or specifically in the context of RDF "data describing web resources." The distinction between "data" and "metadata" is not an absolute one; it is a distinction created primarily by a particular application. Many times the same resource will be interpreted in both ways simultaneously. RDF encourages this view by using XML as the encoding syntax for the metadata. The resources being described by RDF are, in general, anything that can be named via a URI. The broad goal of RDF is to define a mechanism for describing resources that makes no assumptions about a particular application domain, nor defines the semantics of any application domain. The definition of the mechanism should be domain neutral, yet the mechanism should be suitable for describing information about any domain. This document introduces a model for representing RDF metadata and one syntax for expressing and transporting this metadata in a manner that maximizes the interoperability of independently developed web servers and clients. The syntax described in this document is best considered as a "serialization syntax" for the underlying RDF representation model. The serialization syntax is XML, XML being the W3C's work-in-progress to define a richer Web syntax for a variety of applications. RDF and XML are complementary; there will be alternate ways to represent the same RDF data model, some more suitable for direct human authoring. Future work may lead to including such alternatives in this document.
- Content
- RDF Data Model At the core of RDF is a model for representing named properties and their values. These properties serve both to represent attributes of resources (and in this sense correspond to usual attribute-value-pairs) and to represent relationships between resources. The RDF data model is a syntax-independent way of representing RDF statements. RDF statements that are syntactically very different could mean the same thing. This concept of equivalence in meaning is very important when performing queries, aggregation and a number of other tasks at which RDF is aimed. The equivalence is defined in a clean machine understandable way. Two pieces of RDF are equivalent if and only if their corresponding data model representations are the same. Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. RDF Data Model 3. RDF Grammar 4. Signed RDF 5. Examples 6. Appendix A: Brief Explanation of XML Namespaces
