-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.12
0.12347858 = sum of:
0.053415764 = product of:
0.21366306 = sum of:
0.21366306 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21366306 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38017118 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.070062816 = product of:
0.14012563 = sum of:
0.14012563 = weight(_text_:e.g in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14012563 = score(doc=400,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.598997 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.11
0.1140749 = product of:
0.2281498 = sum of:
0.2281498 = product of:
0.4562996 = sum of:
0.17805256 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805256 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38017118 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.27824706 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27824706 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4752481 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Weathers, B.: Selection of electronic resources (1998)
0.10
0.09779535 = product of:
0.1955907 = sum of:
0.1955907 = sum of:
0.13483596 = weight(_text_:e.g in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13483596 = score(doc=3023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.57638514 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
0.06075475 = weight(_text_:22 in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075475 = score(doc=3023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the selection, acquisition and collection development of electronic library resources with particular reference to the selection of: CD-ROM databases; laser disk; and Internet and WWW information sources. Includes selected Web sites which provide help to librarians in evaluating electronic resources, e.g. http://www.ala.org/ICONN/overview.html
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 14:08:01
-
Houston, R.D.; Harmon, E.G.: Re-envisioning the information concept : systematic definitions (2002)
0.10
0.0960265 = product of:
0.192053 = sum of:
0.192053 = sum of:
0.10786875 = weight(_text_:e.g in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10786875 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.4611081 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.08418425 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08418425 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
22. 2.2007 19:22:13
-
Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994)
0.09
0.08800456 = product of:
0.17600912 = sum of:
0.17600912 = sum of:
0.13348079 = weight(_text_:e.g in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13348079 = score(doc=2574,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.57059216 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.042528324 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042528324 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A method (HICLAS, DeBoeck & Rosenberg, 1988) for studying the internal structure of semantic concepts is presented. The proposed method reveals the internal structure of the extension as well as the intesion of a concept, together with a correspondence relation that shows the mutual dependence of both structures. Its use is illustrated with the analysis of simple concepts (e.g. sports) and conjunctive concepts (e.g. birds that are also pets). The underlying structure that is revealed can be interpreted as a differentiation of the simple concepts studied and for conjunctive concepts the proposed method is able to extract non-inherited and emergent features (Hampton, 1988)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 19:17:40
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009)
0.08
0.08475045 = sum of:
0.069561765 = product of:
0.27824706 = sum of:
0.27824706 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27824706 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4752481 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0151886875 = product of:
0.030377375 = sum of:
0.030377375 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030377375 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
-
Toledo, E.G. -> Gimenez Toledo, E.:
0.08
0.08090157 = product of:
0.16180314 = sum of:
0.16180314 = product of:
0.32360628 = sum of:
0.32360628 = weight(_text_:e.g in 4853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.32360628 = score(doc=4853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
1.3833243 = fieldWeight in 4853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4853)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Burnett, I.S.: Quality, speed and access : alternative cataloguing sources (1994)
0.08
0.078236274 = product of:
0.15647255 = sum of:
0.15647255 = sum of:
0.10786875 = weight(_text_:e.g in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10786875 = score(doc=2336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.4611081 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
0.0486038 = weight(_text_:22 in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0486038 = score(doc=2336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Offers advice on avaluating alternative cataloguing sources. The steps should be: identify the possible providers; network for advice; test or sample attractive systems; develop criteria based on library size, type and location (e.g. cost and equipment needs, currency of records, types of materials accessed, customer service and reputation of vendor, impact on staff/time and other library services and ability to share or network information); and evaluate the possible services; and implement the new service
- Date
- 17.10.1995 18:22:54
-
Tenopir, C.: Integrating electronic reference (1995)
0.08
0.078236274 = product of:
0.15647255 = sum of:
0.15647255 = sum of:
0.10786875 = weight(_text_:e.g in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10786875 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.4611081 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
0.0486038 = weight(_text_:22 in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0486038 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports on a survey of ARL (Ass. of Research Libraries) members in the USA in 1994, which sought to find out the electronic reference services that are offered by these libraries and how the services affect reference staff, the expectations of users, and user instruction. The services covered include CD-ROM, intermediary online searching, end user online (e.g. FirstSearch), tape loaded databases and user access to the Internet, including electronic mail facilities. Highlights the additional workload the provision of these services involves, and the sometimes unrealistic expectations of users especially with regard to Internet resources
- Date
- 25.11.1995 19:22:01
-
Understanding metadata (2004)
0.08
0.078236274 = product of:
0.15647255 = sum of:
0.15647255 = sum of:
0.10786875 = weight(_text_:e.g in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10786875 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.4611081 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.0486038 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0486038 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
- Date
- 10. 9.2004 10:22:40
-
Park, J.-r.: Cross-lingual name and subject access : mechanisms and challenge (2007)
0.08
0.078236274 = product of:
0.15647255 = sum of:
0.15647255 = sum of:
0.10786875 = weight(_text_:e.g in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10786875 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.4611081 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
0.0486038 = weight(_text_:22 in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0486038 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper considers issues surrounding name and subject access across languages and cultures, particularly mechanisms and knowledge organization tools (e.g., cataloging, metadata) for cross-lingual information access. The author examines current mechanisms for cross-lingual name and subject access and identifies major factors that hinder cross-lingual information access. The author provides examples from the Korean language that demonstrate the problems with cross-language name and subject access.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Oliveira Lima, J.A. de; Palmirani, M.; Vitali, F.: ¬A time-aware ontology for legal resources (2008)
0.08
0.07543247 = product of:
0.15086494 = sum of:
0.15086494 = sum of:
0.1144121 = weight(_text_:e.g in 2244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1144121 = score(doc=2244,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.489079 = fieldWeight in 2244, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2244)
0.03645285 = weight(_text_:22 in 2244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03645285 = score(doc=2244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- This paper presents a new approach to associating metadata to legal documents by exploiting a fully developed information ontology of legal resources that takes time into account. Our information ontology is technically an application of the FRBR model to organization of legal documents. Our contribution clarifies not only the diachronic evolution of the legal resources in time, but it also puts the theoretical grounding for the modeling of the relationships between the different entities participating to the legislative process workflow (e.g. bills, amendments). Our model is also applicable to all artefacts of the publishing process. Moreover the time dimension can be used to support successful interconnections between different legal resources (e.g. between normative acts and case-law) that need precise point-in-time referencing.
- Date
- 27.12.2008 9:49:22
-
Petric, K.; Petric, T.; Krisper, M.; Rajkovic, V.: User profiling on a pilot digital library with the final result of a new adaptive knowledge management solution (2011)
0.08
0.07543247 = product of:
0.15086494 = sum of:
0.15086494 = sum of:
0.1144121 = weight(_text_:e.g in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1144121 = score(doc=4560,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.489079 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
0.03645285 = weight(_text_:22 in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03645285 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article, several procedures (e.g., measurements, information retrieval analyses, power law, association rules, hierarchical clustering) are introduced which were made on a pilot digital library. Information retrievals of web users from 01/01/2003 to 01/01/2006 on the internal search engine of the pilot digital library have been analyzed. With the power law method of data processing, a constant information retrieval pattern has been established, stable over a longer period of time. After this, the data have been analyzed. On the basis of the accomplished measurements and analyses, a series of mental models of web users for global (educational) purposes have been developed (e.g., the metamodel of thought hierarchy of web users, the segmentation model of web users), and the users were profiled in four different groups (adventurers, observers, applicable, and know-alls). The article concludes with the construction of a new knowledge management solution called multidimensional rank thesaurus.
- Date
- 13. 7.2011 14:47:22
-
Beak, J.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Contours of knowledge : core and granularity in the evolution of the DCMI domain (2014)
0.08
0.07543247 = product of:
0.15086494 = sum of:
0.15086494 = sum of:
0.1144121 = weight(_text_:e.g in 1415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1144121 = score(doc=1415,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.489079 = fieldWeight in 1415, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1415)
0.03645285 = weight(_text_:22 in 1415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03645285 = score(doc=1415,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1415, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1415)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Domain analysis reveals the contours of knowledge in diverse discourse communities. The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) conferences represent the cutting edge of research in metadata for the digital age. Beak and Smiraglia (2013) discovered a shared epistemology revealed by co-citation perceptions of the domain, a common ontological base, social semantics, and a limited but focused intent. User groups did not emerge from that analysis, raising an interesting question about the content of core thematic extension versus a highly granular intension. We analyzed keywords from the titles by year to identify core and granular topics as they arose over time. The results showed that only 36 core keywords, e.g. "Dublin Core," "Metadata," "Linked Data," "Applications," etc. represents the domain's extension. However, there was much rich terminology among the granularity, e.g., "development," "description," "interoperability," "analysis," "applications," and "classification" and even "domain" pointed to the domain's intension.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Li, G.; Siddharth, L.; Luo, J.: Embedding knowledge graph of patent metadata to measure knowledge proximity (2023)
0.08
0.07543247 = product of:
0.15086494 = sum of:
0.15086494 = sum of:
0.1144121 = weight(_text_:e.g in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1144121 = score(doc=920,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.489079 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
0.03645285 = weight(_text_:22 in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03645285 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Knowledge proximity refers to the strength of association between any two entities in a structural form that embodies certain aspects of a knowledge base. In this work, we operationalize knowledge proximity within the context of the US Patent Database (knowledge base) using a knowledge graph (structural form) named "PatNet" built using patent metadata, including citations, inventors, assignees, and domain classifications. We train various graph embedding models using PatNet to obtain the embeddings of entities and relations. The cosine similarity between the corresponding (or transformed) embeddings of entities denotes the knowledge proximity between these. We compare the embedding models in terms of their performances in predicting target entities and explaining domain expansion profiles of inventors and assignees. We then apply the embeddings of the best-preferred model to associate homogeneous (e.g., patent-patent) and heterogeneous (e.g., inventor-assignee) pairs of entities.
- Date
- 22. 3.2023 12:06:55
-
Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999)
0.07
0.073574364 = product of:
0.14714873 = sum of:
0.14714873 = sum of:
0.116771355 = weight(_text_:e.g in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.116771355 = score(doc=297,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.49916416 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
0.030377375 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030377375 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In information needs, seeking and use (INSU) research, individuals have most commonly been perceived as users (e.g., Kuhlthau, 1991; Dervin & Nilan, 1986; Dervin, 1989; Belkin, 1980). The concept user originates from the user of libraries and other information services and information systems. Over the years the scope of the concept has become wider and it is nowadays often understood in the sense of seekers of information (e.g., Wilson, 1981; Marchionini, 1995) and users of information (e.g., Streatfield, 1983). Nevertheless, the concept has remained ambiguous by being on the one hand universal and on the other hand extremely specific. The purpose of this paper is to map and evaluate views on people whose information behaviour has been in one way or another the core of our research area. The goal is to shed some light on various relationships between the different aspects of doers in INSU studies. The paper is inspired by Dervin's (1997) analysis of context where she identified among other themes the nature of subject by contrasting a `transcendental individual' with a `decentered subject', and Talja's (1997) presentation about constituting `information' and `user' from the discourse analytic viewpoint as opposed to the cognitive viewpoint. Instead of the metatheoretical approach applied by Dervin and Talja, a more concrete approach is valid in the present analysis where no direct arguments for or against the underlying metatheories are itemised. The focus is on doers in INSU studies leaving other, even closely-related concepts (i.e., information, information seeking, knowledge etc.), outside the scope of the paper.
- Date
- 22. 3.2002 9:55:52
-
Li, L.; He, D.; Zhang, C.; Geng, L.; Zhang, K.: Characterizing peer-judged answer quality on academic Q&A sites : a cross-disciplinary case study on ResearchGate (2018)
0.07
0.073574364 = product of:
0.14714873 = sum of:
0.14714873 = sum of:
0.116771355 = weight(_text_:e.g in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.116771355 = score(doc=4637,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.49916416 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
0.030377375 = weight(_text_:22 in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030377375 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose Academic social (question and answer) Q&A sites are now utilised by millions of scholars and researchers for seeking and sharing discipline-specific information. However, little is known about the factors that can affect their votes on the quality of an answer, nor how the discipline might influence these factors. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach Using 1,021 answers collected over three disciplines (library and information services, history of art, and astrophysics) in ResearchGate, statistical analysis is performed to identify the characteristics of high-quality academic answers, and comparisons were made across the three disciplines. In particular, two major categories of characteristics of the answer provider and answer content were extracted and examined. Findings The results reveal that high-quality answers on academic social Q&A sites tend to possess two characteristics: first, they are provided by scholars with higher academic reputations (e.g. more followers, etc.); and second, they provide objective information (e.g. longer answer with fewer subjective opinions). However, the impact of these factors varies across disciplines, e.g., objectivity is more favourable in physics than in other disciplines. Originality/value The study is envisioned to help academic Q&A sites to select and recommend high-quality answers across different disciplines, especially in a cold-start scenario where the answer has not received enough judgements from peers.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.07
0.07164219 = sum of:
0.053415764 = product of:
0.21366306 = sum of:
0.21366306 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21366306 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38017118 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.018226424 = product of:
0.03645285 = sum of:
0.03645285 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03645285 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014)
0.07
0.06915175 = product of:
0.1383035 = sum of:
0.1383035 = sum of:
0.09534341 = weight(_text_:e.g in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09534341 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.40756583 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
0.042960096 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042960096 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A lot of information that is already available on the Web, or retrieved from local information systems and social networks is structured in data silos that are not semantically related. Semantic technologies make it emerge that the use of typed links that directly express their relations are an advantage for every application that can reuse the incorporated knowledge about the data. For this reason, data integration, through reengineering (e.g. triplify), or querying (e.g. D2R) is an important task in order to make information available for everyone. Thus, in order to build a semantic map of the data, we need knowledge about data items itself and the relation between heterogeneous data items. In this paper, we present our work of providing Lexical Linked Data (LLD) through a meta-model that contains all the resources and gives the possibility to retrieve and navigate them from different perspectives. We combine the existing work done on knowledge domains (based on the Information Coding Classification) within the Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud (based on the RDF/OWL EurowordNet and the related integrated lexical resources (MultiWordNet, EuroWordNet, MEMODATA Lexicon, Hamburg Methaphor DB).
- Date
- 22. 9.2014 19:01:18
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Wyss, E.G.: Information Management (1994)
0.07
0.06845674 = product of:
0.13691348 = sum of:
0.13691348 = sum of:
0.09438516 = weight(_text_:e.g in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09438516 = score(doc=1330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.40346956 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
0.042528324 = weight(_text_:22 in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042528324 = score(doc=1330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044842023 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- ARBIDO-R. 9(1994) H.1, S.19-22
