Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"dk"
  1. Christensen, F.H.: Publikations- og citationsanalyser (1997) 0.02
    0.02359629 = product of:
      0.04719258 = sum of:
        0.04719258 = product of:
          0.09438516 = sum of:
            0.09438516 = weight(_text_:e.g in 837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09438516 = score(doc=837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.40346956 = fieldWeight in 837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Within informetry publication and citation analyses stand out. The former are defined as quantitative studies of the content of the bibliographic fields, e.g. authors, in a defined document collection, the latter deal with the documents' literature lists and can be citations fron or to a document. Gives examples of how the RANK command in DIALOG can be used to count information units in phrase indexed fields enabling ranked lists of publications to be produced. DIALOG is best for analysing citations 'from'. A citation analysis 'to' is used for research evaluation, although it is agreed that it can only supplement, not supplant peer review. The Danish Library School's Centre for Informetric Studies researches online analysis and other other informetric questions