Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Semantic Web"
  1. Multimedia content and the Semantic Web : methods, standards, and tools (2005) 0.04
    0.04234663 = product of:
      0.08469326 = sum of:
        0.08469326 = sum of:
          0.058385678 = weight(_text_:e.g in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058385678 = score(doc=150,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044842023 = queryNorm
              0.24958208 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
          0.026307581 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026307581 = score(doc=150,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044842023 = queryNorm
              0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    006.7 22
    Date
    7. 3.2007 19:30:22
    DDC
    006.7 22
    Footnote
    Semantic web technologies are explained, and ontology representation is emphasized. There is an excellent summary of the fundamental theory behind applying a knowledge-engineering approach to vision problems. This summary represents the concept of the semantic web and multimedia content analysis. A definition of the fuzzy knowledge representation that can be used for realization in multimedia content applications has been provided, with a comprehensive analysis. The second part of the book introduces the multimedia content analysis approaches and applications. In addition, some examples of methods applicable to multimedia content analysis are presented. Multimedia content analysis is a very diverse field and concerns many other research fields at the same time; this creates strong diversity issues, as everything from low-level features (e.g., colors, DCT coefficients, motion vectors, etc.) up to the very high and semantic level (e.g., Object, Events, Tracks, etc.) are involved. The second part includes topics on structure identification (e.g., shot detection for video sequences), and object-based video indexing. These conventional analysis methods are supplemented by results on semantic multimedia analysis, including three detailed chapters on the development and use of knowledge models for automatic multimedia analysis. Starting from object-based indexing and continuing with machine learning, these three chapters are very logically organized. Because of the diversity of this research field, including several chapters of recent research results is not sufficient to cover the state of the art of multimedia. The editors of the book should write an introductory chapter about multimedia content analysis approaches, basic problems, and technical issues and challenges, and try to survey the state of the art of the field and thus introduce the field to the reader.
  2. Fensel, D.: Ontologies : a silver bullet for knowledge management and electronic commerce (2004) 0.01
    0.010740024 = product of:
      0.021480048 = sum of:
        0.021480048 = product of:
          0.042960096 = sum of:
            0.042960096 = weight(_text_:22 in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042960096 = score(doc=1949,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    004.67/8 22
    DDC
    004.67/8 22
  3. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014) 0.01
    0.009113212 = product of:
      0.018226424 = sum of:
        0.018226424 = product of:
          0.03645285 = sum of:
            0.03645285 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03645285 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 7.2017 13:49:22
  4. Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012) 0.01
    0.009113212 = product of:
      0.018226424 = sum of:
        0.018226424 = product of:
          0.03645285 = sum of:
            0.03645285 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03645285 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2016 14:03:22
  5. Daconta, M.C.; Oberst, L.J.; Smith, K.T.: ¬The Semantic Web : A guide to the future of XML, Web services and knowledge management (2003) 0.01
    0.006075475 = product of:
      0.01215095 = sum of:
        0.01215095 = product of:
          0.0243019 = sum of:
            0.0243019 = weight(_text_:22 in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0243019 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2007 10:37:38

Types