Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.09
    0.08800456 = product of:
      0.17600912 = sum of:
        0.17600912 = sum of:
          0.13348079 = weight(_text_:e.g in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13348079 = score(doc=2574,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044842023 = queryNorm
              0.57059216 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.042528324 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042528324 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044842023 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A method (HICLAS, DeBoeck & Rosenberg, 1988) for studying the internal structure of semantic concepts is presented. The proposed method reveals the internal structure of the extension as well as the intesion of a concept, together with a correspondence relation that shows the mutual dependence of both structures. Its use is illustrated with the analysis of simple concepts (e.g. sports) and conjunctive concepts (e.g. birds that are also pets). The underlying structure that is revealed can be interpreted as a differentiation of the simple concepts studied and for conjunctive concepts the proposed method is able to extract non-inherited and emergent features (Hampton, 1988)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  2. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.02
    0.021264162 = product of:
      0.042528324 = sum of:
        0.042528324 = product of:
          0.08505665 = sum of:
            0.08505665 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08505665 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.9-22
  3. Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971) 0.02
    0.018226424 = product of:
      0.03645285 = sum of:
        0.03645285 = product of:
          0.0729057 = sum of:
            0.0729057 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0729057 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
  4. Hjoerland, B.: Concept theory (2009) 0.02
    0.016854495 = product of:
      0.03370899 = sum of:
        0.03370899 = product of:
          0.06741798 = sum of:
            0.06741798 = weight(_text_:e.g in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06741798 = score(doc=3461,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23393378 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.28819257 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2168427 = idf(docFreq=651, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Concept theory is an extremely broad, interdisciplinary and complex field of research related to many deep fields with very long historical traditions without much consensus. However, information science and knowledge organization cannot avoid relating to theories of concepts. Knowledge organizing systems (e.g., classification systems, thesauri, and ontologies) should be understood as systems basically organizing concepts and their semantic relations. The same is the case with information retrieval systems. Different theories of concepts have different implications for how to construe, evaluate, and use such systems. Based on a post-Kuhnian view of paradigms, this article put forward arguments that the best understanding and classification of theories of concepts is to view and classify them in accordance with epistemological theories (empiricism, rationalism, historicism, and pragmatism). It is also argued that the historicist and pragmatist understandings of concepts are the most fruitful views and that this understanding may be part of a broader paradigm shift that is also beginning to take place in information science. The importance of historicist and pragmatic theories of concepts for information science is outlined.
  5. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.01
    0.01215095 = product of:
      0.0243019 = sum of:
        0.0243019 = product of:
          0.0486038 = sum of:
            0.0486038 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0486038 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  6. Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006) 0.01
    0.010632081 = product of:
      0.021264162 = sum of:
        0.021264162 = product of:
          0.042528324 = sum of:
            0.042528324 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042528324 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-33
  7. Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013) 0.01
    0.009113212 = product of:
      0.018226424 = sum of:
        0.018226424 = product of:
          0.03645285 = sum of:
            0.03645285 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03645285 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
  8. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.01
    0.0075943437 = product of:
      0.0151886875 = sum of:
        0.0151886875 = product of:
          0.030377375 = sum of:
            0.030377375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030377375 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  9. Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012) 0.01
    0.0075943437 = product of:
      0.0151886875 = sum of:
        0.0151886875 = product of:
          0.030377375 = sum of:
            0.030377375 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030377375 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:11:25
  10. Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014) 0.01
    0.0075943437 = product of:
      0.0151886875 = sum of:
        0.0151886875 = product of:
          0.030377375 = sum of:
            0.030377375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030377375 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  11. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.0075943437 = product of:
      0.0151886875 = sum of:
        0.0151886875 = product of:
          0.030377375 = sum of:
            0.030377375 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030377375 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15702912 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044842023 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22