-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.02
0.02404056 = product of:
0.04808112 = sum of:
0.04808112 = product of:
0.09616224 = sum of:
0.09616224 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09616224 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.02
0.02404056 = product of:
0.04808112 = sum of:
0.04808112 = product of:
0.09616224 = sum of:
0.09616224 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09616224 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.02
0.02404056 = product of:
0.04808112 = sum of:
0.04808112 = product of:
0.09616224 = sum of:
0.09616224 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09616224 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.02
0.02404056 = product of:
0.04808112 = sum of:
0.04808112 = product of:
0.09616224 = sum of:
0.09616224 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09616224 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.02
0.02103549 = product of:
0.04207098 = sum of:
0.04207098 = product of:
0.08414196 = sum of:
0.08414196 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08414196 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.02
0.02103549 = product of:
0.04207098 = sum of:
0.04207098 = product of:
0.08414196 = sum of:
0.08414196 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08414196 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.02
0.02103549 = product of:
0.04207098 = sum of:
0.04207098 = product of:
0.08414196 = sum of:
0.08414196 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08414196 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.02
0.02103549 = product of:
0.04207098 = sum of:
0.04207098 = product of:
0.08414196 = sum of:
0.08414196 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08414196 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.02
0.02103549 = product of:
0.04207098 = sum of:
0.04207098 = product of:
0.08414196 = sum of:
0.08414196 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08414196 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.02
0.02103549 = product of:
0.04207098 = sum of:
0.04207098 = product of:
0.08414196 = sum of:
0.08414196 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08414196 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.02
0.02103549 = product of:
0.04207098 = sum of:
0.04207098 = product of:
0.08414196 = sum of:
0.08414196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08414196 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.02
0.02103549 = product of:
0.04207098 = sum of:
0.04207098 = product of:
0.08414196 = sum of:
0.08414196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08414196 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.02
0.02103549 = product of:
0.04207098 = sum of:
0.04207098 = product of:
0.08414196 = sum of:
0.08414196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08414196 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992)
0.02
0.01803042 = product of:
0.03606084 = sum of:
0.03606084 = product of:
0.07212168 = sum of:
0.07212168 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07212168 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.02
0.01803042 = product of:
0.03606084 = sum of:
0.03606084 = product of:
0.07212168 = sum of:
0.07212168 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07212168 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.02
0.016999243 = product of:
0.033998486 = sum of:
0.033998486 = product of:
0.06799697 = sum of:
0.06799697 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06799697 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.02
0.016999243 = product of:
0.033998486 = sum of:
0.033998486 = product of:
0.06799697 = sum of:
0.06799697 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06799697 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.02
0.01502535 = product of:
0.0300507 = sum of:
0.0300507 = product of:
0.0601014 = sum of:
0.0601014 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0601014 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
Booth, P.F.: Indexing : the manual of good practice (2001)
0.01
0.0131993275 = product of:
0.026398655 = sum of:
0.026398655 = product of:
0.05279731 = sum of:
0.05279731 = weight(_text_:d.h in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05279731 = score(doc=1968,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27376357 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.19285733 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: nfd - Information Wissenschaft und Praxis 54(2003) H.7, S.440-442 (R. Fugmann): "Das Buch beginnt mit dem Kapitel "Myths about Indexing" und mit der Nennung von weit verbreiteten Irrtümern über das Indexieren, und zwar vorrangig über das Registermachen. Mit einem einzigen Satz ist die Problematik treffend skizziert, welcher das Buch gewidmet ist: "With the development of electronic documents, it has become possible to store very large amounts of information; but storage is not of much use without the capability to retrieve, to convert, transfer and reuse the information". Kritisiert wird die weit verbreitet anzutreffende Ansicht, das Indexieren sei lediglich eine Sache vom "picking out words from the text or naming objects in images and using those words as index headings". Eine solche Arbeitsweise führt jedoch nicht zu Registern, sondern zu Konkordanzen (d.h. zu alphabetischen Fundstellenlisten für Textwörter) und"... is entirely dependent an the words themselves and is not concerned with the ideas behind them". Das Sammeln von Information ist einfach. Aber die (Wieder-) Auffindbarkeit herzustellen muss gelernt werden, wenn mehr ermöglicht werden soll als lediglich das Wiederfinden von Texten, die man in allen Einzelheiten noch genau in Erinnerung behalten hat (known-item searches, questions of recall), die Details der sprachlichen Ausdrucksweise für die gesuchten Begriffe eingeschlossen. Die Verfasserin beschreibt aus ihrer großen praktischen Erfahrung, welche Schritte hierzu auf der gedanklichen und technischen Ebene unternommen werden müssen. Zu den erstgenannten Schritten rechnet die Abtrennung von Details, welche nicht im Index vertreten sein sollten ("unsought terms"), weil sie mit Sicherheit kein Suchziel darstellen werden und als "false friends" zur Überflutung des Suchenden mit Nebensächlichkeiten führen würden, eine Entscheidung, welche nur mit guter Sachkenntnis gefällt werden kann. All Dasjenige hingegen, was in Gegenwart und Zukunft (!) ein sinnvolles Suchziel darstellen könnte und "sufficiently informative" ist, verdient ein Schlagwort im Register. Man lernt auch durch lehrreiche Beispiele, wodurch ein Textwort unbrauchbar für das Register wird, wenn es dort als (schlechtes) Schlagwort erscheint, herausgelöst aus dem interpretierenden Zusammenhang, in welchen es im Text eingebettet gewesen ist. Auch muss die Vieldeutigkeit bereinigt werden, die fast jedem natursprachigen Wort anhaftet. Sonst wird der Suchende beim Nachschlagen allzu oft in die Irre geführt, und zwar um so öfter, je größer ein diesbezüglich unbereinigter Speicher bereits geworden ist.
Der Zugang zum Informationsspeicher ist auch von verwandten Begriffen her zu gewährleisten, denn der Suchende lässt sich gern mit seiner Fragestellung zu allgemeineren und vor allem zu spezifischeren Begriffen leiten. Verweisungen der Art "siehe auch" dienen diesem Zweck. Der Zugang ist auch von unterschiedlichen, aber bedeutungsgleichen Ausdrücken mithilfe einer Verweisung von der Art "siehe" zu gewährleisten, denn ein Fragesteller könnte sich mit einem von diesen Synonymen auf die Suche begeben haben und würde dann nicht fündig werden. Auch wird Vieles, wofür ein Suchender sein Schlagwort parat hat, in einem Text nur in wortreicher Umschreibung und paraphrasiert angetroffen ("Terms that may not appear in the text but are likely to be sought by index users"), d.h. praktisch unauffindbar in einer derartig mannigfaltigen Ausdrucksweise. All dies sollte lexikalisch ausgedrückt werden, und zwar in geläufiger Terminologie, denn in dieser Form erfolgt auch die Fragestellung. Hier wird die Grenze zwischen "concept indexing" gegenüber dem bloßen "word indexing" gezogen, welch letzteres sich mit der Präsentation von nicht interpretierten Textwörtern begnügt. Nicht nur ist eine solche Grenze weit verbreitet unbekannt, ihre Existenz wird zuweilen sogar bestritten, obwohl doch ein Wort meistens viele Begriffe ausdrückt und obwohl ein Begriff meistens durch viele verschiedene Wörter und Sätze ausgedrückt wird. Ein Autor kann und muss sich in seinen Texten oft mit Andeutungen begnügen, weil ein Leser oder Zuhörer das Gemeinte schon aus dem Zusammenhang erkennen kann und nicht mit übergroßer Deutlichkeit (spoon feeding) belästigt sein will, was als Unterstellung von Unkenntnis empfunden würde. Für das Retrieval hingegen muss das Gemeinte explizit ausgedrückt werden. In diesem Buch wird deutlich gemacht, was alles an außertextlichem und Hintergrund-Wissen für ein gutes Indexierungsergebnis aufgeboten werden muss, dies auf der Grundlage von sachverständiger und sorgfältiger Interpretation ("The indexer must understand the meaning of a text"). All dies lässt gutes Indexieren nicht nur als professionelle Dienstleistung erscheinen, sondern auch als Kunst. Als Grundlage für all diese Schritte wird ein Thesaurus empfohlen, mit einem gut strukturierten Netzwerk von verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen und angepasst an den jeweiligen Buchtext. Aber nur selten wird man auf bereits andernorts vorhandene Thesauri zurückgreifen können. Hier wäre ein Hinweis auf einschlägige Literatur zur Thesaurus-Konstruktion nützlich gewesen.
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.01
0.01202028 = product of:
0.02404056 = sum of:
0.02404056 = product of:
0.04808112 = sum of:
0.04808112 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04808112 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15534045 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044359796 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
