-
Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018)
0.02
0.015351249 = product of:
0.030702498 = sum of:
0.030702498 = product of:
0.046053745 = sum of:
0.015419668 = weight(_text_:h in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015419668 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
0.030634077 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030634077 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
-
Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H.J.: Finding the needle : controlled vocabularies, resource discovery, and Dublin Core (2000)
0.01
0.014856073 = product of:
0.029712146 = sum of:
0.029712146 = product of:
0.08913644 = sum of:
0.08913644 = weight(_text_:k in 438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08913644 = score(doc=438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=438)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.01
0.014295902 = product of:
0.028591804 = sum of:
0.028591804 = product of:
0.08577541 = sum of:
0.08577541 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08577541 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.01
0.014295902 = product of:
0.028591804 = sum of:
0.028591804 = product of:
0.08577541 = sum of:
0.08577541 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08577541 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.01
0.014295902 = product of:
0.028591804 = sum of:
0.028591804 = product of:
0.08577541 = sum of:
0.08577541 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08577541 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Gradmann, S.: Container - Content - Context : zur Evolution bibliothekarischer Metadaten von Katalogdaten zu Library Linked Data (2012)
0.01
0.012733776 = product of:
0.025467552 = sum of:
0.025467552 = product of:
0.07640266 = sum of:
0.07640266 = weight(_text_:k in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07640266 = score(doc=1023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Handbuch Bibliothek: Geschichte, Aufgaben, Perspektiven. Hrsg.: Umlauf, K. u. S. Gradmann
-
Schroeder, K.: Persistent Identifiers im Kontext der Langzeitarchivierung : EPICUR auf dem 2. Bibliothekskongress in Leipzig (2004)
0.01
0.012601095 = product of:
0.02520219 = sum of:
0.02520219 = product of:
0.037803285 = sum of:
0.025467552 = weight(_text_:k in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025467552 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
0.0123357335 = weight(_text_:h in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0123357335 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 16(2004) H.2, S.11-14
-
Wessel, C.: "Publishing and sharing your metadata application profile" : 2. SCHEMAS-Workshop in Bonn (2001)
0.01
0.012280999 = product of:
0.024561998 = sum of:
0.024561998 = product of:
0.036842994 = sum of:
0.0123357335 = weight(_text_:h in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0123357335 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
0.024507262 = weight(_text_:22 in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024507262 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 3.2001 17:10:22
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 35(2001) H.2, S.189-192
-
Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012)
0.01
0.012280999 = product of:
0.024561998 = sum of:
0.024561998 = product of:
0.036842994 = sum of:
0.0123357335 = weight(_text_:h in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0123357335 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.024507262 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024507262 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.01
0.012253631 = product of:
0.024507262 = sum of:
0.024507262 = product of:
0.073521785 = sum of:
0.073521785 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073521785 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.01
0.011552835 = product of:
0.02310567 = sum of:
0.02310567 = product of:
0.069317006 = sum of:
0.069317006 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069317006 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.01
0.011552835 = product of:
0.02310567 = sum of:
0.02310567 = product of:
0.069317006 = sum of:
0.069317006 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069317006 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Anutariya, C.; Wuwongse, K.; Akama, E.; Nantajeewarawat, E.: RDF Declarative Description (RDD) : A Language for Metadata (2002)
0.01
0.01061148 = product of:
0.02122296 = sum of:
0.02122296 = product of:
0.06366888 = sum of:
0.06366888 = weight(_text_:k in 1278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06366888 = score(doc=1278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 1278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1278)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wen, D.; Sakaguchi, T.; Sugimoto, S.; Tabata, K.: Multilingual Access to Dublin Core Metadata of ULIS Library (2002)
0.01
0.01061148 = product of:
0.02122296 = sum of:
0.02122296 = product of:
0.06366888 = sum of:
0.06366888 = weight(_text_:k in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06366888 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16142878 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.01
0.01021136 = product of:
0.02042272 = sum of:
0.02042272 = product of:
0.061268155 = sum of:
0.061268155 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061268155 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.01
0.01021136 = product of:
0.02042272 = sum of:
0.02042272 = product of:
0.061268155 = sum of:
0.061268155 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061268155 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.01
0.01021136 = product of:
0.02042272 = sum of:
0.02042272 = product of:
0.061268155 = sum of:
0.061268155 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061268155 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15835609 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Neuroth, H.; Tappenbeck, I.; Wessel, C.: ¬Der 8. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative Workshop (2000)
0.01
0.010176461 = product of:
0.020352922 = sum of:
0.020352922 = product of:
0.061058767 = sum of:
0.061058767 = weight(_text_:h in 4970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061058767 = score(doc=4970,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.54347324 = fieldWeight in 4970, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4970)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 34(2000) H.11, S.1807-1817
-
Nerlich, H.; Stoll, C.: ¬Der Deutsche Dublin Core Tag 1999 (1999)
0.01
0.008722682 = product of:
0.017445363 = sum of:
0.017445363 = product of:
0.052336086 = sum of:
0.052336086 = weight(_text_:h in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052336086 = score(doc=4404,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 50(1999) H.8, S.497-500
-
Behme, H.: Angelpunkt : Wo die Extensible Markup Language derzeit steht (2001)
0.01
0.008722682 = product of:
0.017445363 = sum of:
0.017445363 = product of:
0.052336086 = sum of:
0.052336086 = weight(_text_:h in 5762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052336086 = score(doc=5762,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11234917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045220956 = queryNorm
0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 5762, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5762)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- iX. 2001, H.6, S.52-54
