Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

Meng, M.: ¬A conceptual framework for online education programs (1993) 0.09

0.09376865 = product of:
  0.28130594 = sum of:
    0.28130594 = weight(_text_:analogies in 7822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28130594 = score(doc=7822,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38810563 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047327764 = queryNorm
        0.724818 = fieldWeight in 7822, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7822)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract: Stresses the differences between library user training programmes designed for paper besed systems and those for online databases, such as online catalogues. Clarifies 2 aspects of databases, the structure and the access method, and discusses the pitfalls of making analogies to print materials. Searches involving print materials are dominated by linear or sequential patterns, while online searches are dominated by spatial or juxtapositional patterns

Chianese, A.; Cantone, F.; Caropreso, M.; Moscato, V.: ARCHAEOLOGY 2.0 : Cultural E-Learning tools and distributed repositories supported by SEMANTICA, a System for Learning Object Retrieval and Adaptive Courseware Generation for e-learning environments. (2010) 0.03
```
0.029359091 = product of:
  0.08807727 = sum of:
    0.08807727 = sum of:
      0.056015976 = weight(_text_:group in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056015976 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
      0.032061294 = weight(_text_:22 in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032061294 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

The focus of the present research has been the development and the application to Virtual Archaeology of a Web-Based framework for Learning Objects indexing and retrieval. The paper presents the main outcomes of a experimentation carried out by an interdisciplinary group of Federico II University of Naples. Our equipe is composed by researchers both in ICT and in Humanities disciplines, in particular in the domain of Virtual Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Informatics in order to develop specific ICT methodological approaches to Virtual Archaeology. The methodological background is the progressive diffusion of Web 2.0 technologies and the attempt to analyze their impact and perspectives in the Cultural Heritage field. In particular, we approached the specific requirements of the so called Learning 2.0, and the possibility to improve the automation of modular courseware generation in Virtual Archaeology Didactics. The developed framework was called SEMANTICA, and it was applied to Virtual Archaeology Domain Ontologies in order to generate a didactic course in a semi-automated way. The main results of this test and the first students feedback on the course fruition will be presented and discussed..

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
Stahl, G.: Group cognition : computer support for building collaborative knowledge (2006) 0.03
```
0.02686432 = product of:
  0.08059296 = sum of:
    0.08059296 = product of:
      0.16118592 = sum of:
        0.16118592 = weight(_text_:group in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16118592 = score(doc=2391,freq=46.0), product of:
            0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.73578453 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
              6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
                46.0 = termFreq=46.0
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

This book explores the software design, social practices, and collaboration theory that would be needed to support group cognition - collective knowledge that is constructed by small groups online. Innovative uses of global and local networks of linked computers make new ways of collaborative working, learning, and acting possible. In "Group Cognition", Gerry Stahl explores the technological and social reconfigurations that are needed to achieve computer-supported collaborative knowledge building - group cognition that transcends the limits of individual cognition. Computers can provide active media for social group cognition where ideas grow through the interactions within groups of people; software functionality can manage group discourse that results in shared understandings, new meanings, and collaborative learning. Stahl offers software design prototypes, analyses empirical instances of collaboration, and elaborates a theory of collaboration that takes the group, rather than the individual, as the unit of analysis. Stahl's design studies concentrate on mechanisms to support group formation, multiple interpretive perspectives, and the negotiation of group knowledge in applications as varied as collaborative curriculum development by teachers, writing summaries by students, and designing space voyages by NASA engineers. His empirical analysis shows how, in small-group collaborations, the group constructs intersubjective knowledge that emerges from and appears in the discourse itself. This discovery of group meaning becomes the springboard for Stahl's outline of a social theory of collaborative knowing. Stahl also discusses such related issues as the distinction between meaning making at the group level and interpretation at the individual level, appropriate research methodology, philosophical directions for group cognition theory, and suggestions for further empirical work.

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 59(2008) no.9, S.1531. (C. Caldeira): "Successful, real-world organizations employ groups to get work done. Despite the large number of years of collaborative models in work-group paradigm, it is a little surprising that there are very few books about the subject. Furthermore, most of those studies are mainly focused on work group performance management and work productivity. This text belongs to the advanced type, and is a valuable resource for graduate students in a wide range of courses and for a large spectrum of professionals interested in collaborative work. Due to its advanced level, some topics are relatively difficult to understand if the reader does not have some background in collaborative work and group cognition. Students who use this book will rapidly understand the most important topics of the science of collaboration for computer-supported cooperative work and computer-supported collaborative learning, and their relation to the business world of our days. The main concern and fundamental idea of this book is to set its focus primarily on work group, and not on individuals. Stahl's baseline is to use the science of collaboration for computer-supported cooperative work and computer-supported collaborative learning to conduct comparative studies on group interaction, group meaning, group cognition, group discourse, and thinking. The book is divided into three distinct parts. The first one is about the design of computer support for collaborative work and presents eight studies centered on software tools and their particular applications: The first three are AI applications for collaborative computer-supported cooperative work and computer-supported collaborative learning, the fourth and the fifth are about collaborative media, and the last ones are a combination of computational technology and collaborative functions. The second part is focused on the analysis on knowledge building in the collaborative work of small groups. It is developed with support on five essays published by Stahl from 2000 to 2004. In the first of those chapters, he describes a model of collaborative knowledge building and how to share knowledge production. The second criticizes some cooperative work and collaborative learning research methodologies that make the collaborative phenomena hard to perceive. The remaining chapters mostly provide mechanisms to understand in new and better ways collaborative processes. The third part contains the theoretical corpus of the book. Chapters 14 through 21 contain the most recent of Stahl's contributions to the theoretical foundations of computer-supported cooperative work and computer-supported collaborative learning. Chapters 16 to 18 provide much material about topics directly related to group cognition research and collaborative work in modern organizations. Finally, the last part of the book contains an exhaustive list of references that will be of great value to all interested in the multiple aspects and fields of cooperative work and collaborative learning."
E-Learning weltweit : Lernen und Lehren (2005) 0.01
```
0.014679546 = product of:
  0.044038635 = sum of:
    0.044038635 = sum of:
      0.028007988 = weight(_text_:group in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028007988 = score(doc=3224,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.1278514 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
      0.016030647 = weight(_text_:22 in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016030647 = score(doc=3224,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Content

"Im vergangenen Jahr veröffentlichten die Economist Intelligence Unit - der Wirtschaftsinformationsdienst von der Economist Group - und IBM eine weltweite Vergleichsstudie unter, dem Titel "The -2003 e-learning readiness rankings": In dieser bewerteten sie, in welchem Umfang die 60 grössten Volkswirtschaften E-Learning-Strategien und -Lösungen verfolgen und einsetzen. Die Studie basiert auf Daten der Economist Intelligence Unit, der UNESCO, der Weltbank sowie anderer öffentlicher und privater Organisationen. Beurteilt wurden die Länder dabei nach vier verschiedenen Kategorien. Ermittelt wurde zum einen der Grad der Konnektivität, also in welcher Weise die einzelnen Länder technologische Voraussetzungen wie Breitbandvernetzung und Nutzungsmöglichkeiten zur mobilen Kommunikation beim 'E-Learning zur Verfügung stellen. Zum anderen evaluierten die Verfasser die Leistungsfähigkeit der verschiedenen Länder und warfen dabei etwa einen Blick auf deren Ausbildungssysteme und Angebote des betrieblichen Lernens. In einer dritten Kategorie erfassten die Autoren ferner die Bereitstellung und den Zugang zu Online-Inhalten etwa in Form öffentlicher Datenbanken und Bibliotheken. Schließlich wurde die kulturelle Einstellung zum Thema E-Learning in der Studie erfasst. Die Autoren gingen dabei folgenden Fragen nach: In welcher Weise unterstützen und fördern nationale Einrichtungen E-Learning? In welchen Ländern besitzen Lernprozesse insgesamt einen hohen Stellenwert für die Allgemeinheit? Und wo finden progressive Ideen besonderen Zuspruch? Ausgewertet wurden die Ergebnisse für die vier Einzelbereiche Ausbildung, Unternehmen, staatliche Einrichtungen und Gesellschaft. Deutschland konnte sich innerhalb der Studie mit seinem 17. Rang insgesamt im oberen Mittelfeld platzieren. In den Bereichen Staat und Gesellschaft landete es an 11. Stelle, im Ausbildungsbereich auf dem 16. und in der betrieblichen Ausbildung auf dem 24. Platz. An der Spitze der Studie finden sich neben Schweden Kanada und die USA. Gerade hier sind die technologischen Voraussetzungen für den Einsatz von E-Learning gegeben. Zudem schnitten alle drei' Länder aufgrund ihres allgemein starken Ausbildungssystems, in dem, sie etwa lebenslanges Lernen unterstützen und sich durch ein hohes Ausbildungsniveau auszeichnen, beim Ranking besonders gut ab. Die Studie -legt den Schluss nahe, dass Europa und hier insbesondere die skandinavischen Länder sich im E-Learning-Bereich positiv entwickeln. Die südeuröpäischen Länder widmen sich dem Thema dagegen nur zögerlich und rangieren im europäischen Vergleich eher auf hinteren Plätzen. Aus dem asiatischen Raum haben sich vor allem Süd-Korea (Rang 5) und Singapur (Rang 6) gut aufgestellt.
Bundesweite Förderprogramme und Landesinitiativen zur Verbreitung des computergestützten Lernens in der Aus- und Weiterbildung gaben den Ausschlag für eine Untersuchung des Einsatzes von E-Learning an deutschen Hochschulen. Durchgeführt wurde sie vom Institut für Medien- und Kompetenzforschung und dem Multimedia Kontor Hamburg. Gegründet wurde das Kontor von den staatlichen Hochschulen in Hamburg, die sich in einem gemeinsamen E-Learning-Consortium . zusammengeschlossen hallen. Das Kernergebnis der Studie, an der sich vor allem Hochschulen beteiligt haben, die diese neue Lernform tatsächlich einsetzen, lautet: E-LearnIng ist Bestandteil, aber nicht Alltag in der Hochschule. Danach setzt die Mehrheit von 86 der 95 befragten Hochschulen Computer in Lehrveranstal- tungen ein. Vor allem an großen und staatlichen Einrichtungen werden computergestützte Lernformen angeboten. Bei den Lernangeboten handelt es sich an 63 Hochschulen um Präsenzveranstaltungen mit Online-Unterstützung. Blended-Learning-Arrangements, also allgemein netzgestützte Angebote, und reine Online-Studiengänge werden nur an 40 beziehungsweise 22 Lehrstätten angeboten. Durchschnittlich setzen neun von zehn befragten Hochschulen aktuell E-Learning in ihren Lehrveranstaltungen ein. Ziel der Untersuchung war es auch, zu ermitteln, wie E-Learning-Angebote innerhalb verschiedener Studiengänge genutzt werden. Die Verfasser kommen zu dem Schluss, dass die Differenzierung der E-Learning-Angebote nach Fächergruppen deutliche Schwerpunkte erkennen lässt. So sind Disziplinen mit ausgeprägter Computeraffinität wie Informatik und Ingenieurwissenschaften neben Fächern mit hohen Studierendenzahlen wie etwa Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften klare Vorreiter in der neuen computergestützten Hochschullehre. Im Mittelfeld finden sich dagegen kreativ-gestalterische Studiengänge wie Kunst, Design und Mediengestaltung sowie Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaften, aber auch Natur- und Umweltwissenschaften. Für diese lässt sich vermuten, dass aufgrund ihres hohen Praxisanteils der Computer hier nur bedingt zum Einsatz kommen kann. Dass Rechtswissenschaften und Technikstudiengänge auf den hinteren Plätzen rangieren, kann kaum überraschen. Denn hier wird der Computer nur selten als LehrLern-Medium eingesetzt. Anders sieht es aus in den medizinisch-pharmazeutischen Disziplinen. Denn in der Medizinerausbildung und -praxis kommen Computer häufig zum Einsatz. Die niedrigen Einsatzzahlen müssen daher erstaunen. Neben der Ermittlung des Umfangs und der Verteilung auf unterschiedliche Studiengänge analysierten die Autoren die Akzeptanzwerte von E-Learning-Angeboten. Befragt wurden, Hochschulvertreter. Die waren selbst weniger im Hochschulbetrieb eingebunden, sondern bekleideten Leitungspositionen. Rund die Hälfte von ihnen denkt, dass Lehrende gegenüber dem Einsatz von E-Learning-Angeboten positiv eingestellt sind. Jeder Neunte glaubt hingegen an eine Befürwortung klassischer Präsenzveranstaltungen. Eine höhere Akzeptanz vermuten die Befragten dabei bei den Lehrenden von Fachhochschulen. Auch den Studierenden insgesamt werden höhere Akzeptanzwerte bescheinigt. Die Befragten schätzen dabei aber, dass nur bis zu fünf Prozent aller Studierenden gegenwärtig mit E-Learning arbeiten. Die Befragten geben ferner Auskunft darüber, wie sie die Lernergebnisse unter Einsatz neuer Techniken einschätzen. Nur ein Viertel schätzt dabei die Qualität von Prüfungsergebnissen beim E-Learning im Vergleich zu Präsenzveranstaltungen als besser ein. Jeder Zweite kann keinen Qualitätsunterschied ausmachen. Allerdings geht die Hälfte der befragten Hochschulmitarbeiter davon aus, dass die Nutzer den neuen Technologie bis 2007 bessere Eregbnisse in Tests erzielen werden. Entsprechend prognostizieren die Befragten einen Anstieg der studentischen E-Learning-Nutzer innerhalb der nächsten Jahre: Drei von vier Hochschulvertretern kommen zu dem Schluss, dass künftig mehr Studierende mit Hilfe des Computers lernen werden."
Azzaro, S.; Cleary, K.: One, two, three ... infinity : a computer assisted learning package for the first time user of SilverPlatter CD-ROMs (1994) 0.01
```
0.013070395 = product of:
  0.039211184 = sum of:
    0.039211184 = product of:
      0.07842237 = sum of:
        0.07842237 = weight(_text_:group in 8103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07842237 = score(doc=8103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.35798392 = fieldWeight in 8103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8103)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

At the start of the academic year reference staff are hard pressed to provide sufficient assistance to first time users of CD-ROMs, who have missed bibliographic instruction classes, or who need more guidance before searching. The literature on CD-ROMs was reviewed, and a survey conducted to estimate the training needs of searchers. It was found that 100% of the inexperienced searchers required assistance while searching, and 50% of their search strategies were later rated as poor. More than half the experienced searchers also needed the librarians assistance, and 31% of this group demonstrated a poor understanding of searching techniques. The survey findings were incorporated into CDIntro, a computer assisted learning package designed by the authors
Bowman, B.J.; Grupe, F.H.; Simkin, M.G.: Teaching end-user applications with computer-based training : theory and an empirical investigation (1995) 0.01
```
0.013070395 = product of:
  0.039211184 = sum of:
    0.039211184 = product of:
      0.07842237 = sum of:
        0.07842237 = weight(_text_:group in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07842237 = score(doc=2261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.35798392 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Assessment of Computer Based Training (CBT) are difficult to generalize, but some evidence suggests that CBT can be more cost effective that traditional classroom teaching, with comparable student learning. Reviews the current literature and describes an empirical study of CBT effectiveness for teaching microcomputer software in a required college level business class. Students were divided into an experimental class (using CBT) and a control group (using traditional lectures). An analysis of inflential learning factors could find no meaningful differences between these 2 groups. The statistical results of 6 different course performance measures indicated that the experimental students performed as well as the control studuents on homework assignements and hand-on skill tests, and were equally satisfied with their training

Dirks, H.: Lernen im Internet oder mit Gedrucktem? : Eine Untersuchung zeigt: Fernunterrichts-Teilnehmer wollen beides! (2002) 0.01

0.012824517 = product of:
  0.03847355 = sum of:
    0.03847355 = product of:
      0.0769471 = sum of:
        0.0769471 = weight(_text_:22 in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0769471 = score(doc=1512,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 11. 8.2002 15:05:22

Wood, A.D.G.: Instructional technology in the business environment (1995) 0.01

0.012824517 = product of:
  0.03847355 = sum of:
    0.03847355 = product of:
      0.0769471 = sum of:
        0.0769471 = weight(_text_:22 in 8110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0769471 = score(doc=8110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8110)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source: Multimedia today. 3(1995) no.1, S.18-22

Picking, R.: ¬A comparative study of computer-based document manipulation techniques (1994) 0.01
```
0.011203195 = product of:
  0.033609584 = sum of:
    0.033609584 = product of:
      0.06721917 = sum of:
        0.06721917 = weight(_text_:group in 1491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06721917 = score(doc=1491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.30684334 = fieldWeight in 1491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1491)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Techniques to aid the manipulation of a computer based document were tested by a group of 38 novice users. The subjects were given a period of time to browse the document, and were subsequently given a set of goal related tasks in a questionnaire/answer session. The techniques tested were sequential paging, index referral, text fins and embedded hypertext links. 3 differing types of link mechansms were assessed and compared with each other. Sequential paging and index referral were the most commonly used of the techniques. Text find was employed more for goal related tasks than for browsing. The hypertext link technique was generally unpopular, especially for goal related tasks. In order to establish the importance of the text find technique, the effect on reading strategies without this facility was also investigated. For browsing operations, an increase in paging and decrease in hypertext linking was observed. In the case of goal directed searching, an increase was observed in paging and index referral techniques. The study calls into question the usefulness of hypertext in educational software
Ellett, R.: ¬An evaluation of the effectiveness of OCLC Online Computer Library Center's Web-based module on cataloging Internet resources using the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules and MARC21 (2002) 0.01
```
0.011203195 = product of:
  0.033609584 = sum of:
    0.033609584 = product of:
      0.06721917 = sum of:
        0.06721917 = weight(_text_:group in 5463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06721917 = score(doc=5463,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.30684334 = fieldWeight in 5463, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5463)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

In January 2001, the OCLC Institute released its first online learning course, Cataloging Internet Resources Using MARC21 and AACR2. This research investigated whether participants using this Web-based tool would gain experience equivalent to that of librarians who are already proficient in the skill of cataloging Internet resources. A pre-course/post-course comparison of test results of librarians not experienced with cataloging Internet resources indicated an increase of 35 percent (from 51 to 86 percent) of the correct answers after taking the Web-based course. The group experienced with cataloging Internet resources answered an average of 71 percent of the questions correctly.
Karampiperis, P.; Sampson, D.: Supporting accessible hypermedia in web-based educational systems : defining an accessibility application profile for learning resources (2004) 0.01
```
0.011203195 = product of:
  0.033609584 = sum of:
    0.033609584 = product of:
      0.06721917 = sum of:
        0.06721917 = weight(_text_:group in 5924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06721917 = score(doc=5924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.30684334 = fieldWeight in 5924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5924)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

The design and development of web-based educational systems for people with special abilities have recently attracted the attention of the research community. However, although a number of systems that claim to meet accessibility needs and preferences are proposed, most of them are typically supported by hypermedia and multimedia educational content that is specially designed for the user targeted group. Such approaches prevent their user groups (both learners and their tutors) from accessing other available resources. Therefore, it is important to be able to built generic e-learning systems that would allow the reuse of existing learning resources in different accessibility demanding applications. To this end, in this article we propose a methodology for defining an accessibility application profile that captures the accessibility properties of learning objects in a standard form and we examine its application to the IEEE Learning Object Metadata (LOM) standard.

Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.01

0.010687098 = product of:
  0.032061294 = sum of:
    0.032061294 = product of:
      0.06412259 = sum of:
        0.06412259 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06412259 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 27. 1.1996 18:22:06

Griesbaum, J.; Rittberger, M.: ¬A collaborative lecture in information retrieval for students at universities in Germany and Switzerland (2005) 0.01
```
0.010562475 = product of:
  0.031687424 = sum of:
    0.031687424 = product of:
      0.06337485 = sum of:
        0.06337485 = weight(_text_:group in 4356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06337485 = score(doc=4356,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.2892947 = fieldWeight in 4356, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4356)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Content

K3 helps organizing a course with constructivist and instructional elements. It is used to run complex discussions and group work as presenting knowledge in a controlled environment. Besides basic functionalities like acting as a file server to exchange teaching materials and providing asynchronous communication, K3 offers: 1. A sophisticated system of intellectual, semi-automatic and automatic performance parameters as a means of permanent feedback and transparent gratification. 2. A MyK3 version to personalize the system for each user, be it a student or a lecturer. 3. Extended retrieval facilities. 4. A report generator to assemble a single student's or a group's contributions. 5. An elaborated administrator sub-system to enable the lecturers to organize their courses. 6. A visualization component, K3VIS to get a graphical, semistructured overview about a discourse. 7. A role system (moderator, presenter, researcher, and summarizer) to classify the responsibilities of students during a group work. 8. Typed discourse objects to organize and structure a discourse and allow ease of proximate actions, like retrieval and navigation.

Thomas, N.R.: Planning and developing cross-platform interactive multimedia library instruction (1997) 0.01

0.008549679 = product of:
  0.025649035 = sum of:
    0.025649035 = product of:
      0.05129807 = sum of:
        0.05129807 = weight(_text_:22 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05129807 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 27.11.1995 17:07:22

Robinson, D.A.; Lester, C.R.; Hamilton, N.M.: Delivering computer assisted learning across the WWW (1998) 0.01

0.008549679 = product of:
  0.025649035 = sum of:
    0.025649035 = product of:
      0.05129807 = sum of:
        0.05129807 = weight(_text_:22 in 3618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05129807 = score(doc=3618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3618)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 1. 8.1996 22:08:06

Goeller, K.E.: Web-based collaborative learning : a perspective on the future (1998) 0.01

0.008549679 = product of:
  0.025649035 = sum of:
    0.025649035 = product of:
      0.05129807 = sum of:
        0.05129807 = weight(_text_:22 in 3619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05129807 = score(doc=3619,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3619, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3619)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 1. 8.1996 22:08:06

Brusilovsky, P.; Eklund, J.; Schwarz, E.: Web-based education for all : a tool for development adaptive courseware (1998) 0.01

0.008549679 = product of:
  0.025649035 = sum of:
    0.025649035 = product of:
      0.05129807 = sum of:
        0.05129807 = weight(_text_:22 in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05129807 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 1. 8.1996 22:08:06

Franke, F.; Scholle, U.: "Neue Schulungen braucht das Land" : Ergebnisse von zwei Fortbildungsveranstaltungen des Hochschulbibliothekszentrums Nordrhein-Westfalen über die Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz durch DV-basierte Schulungsangebote (2003) 0.01
```
0.00755692 = product of:
  0.022670759 = sum of:
    0.022670759 = product of:
      0.045341518 = sum of:
        0.045341518 = weight(_text_:22 in 2019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045341518 = score(doc=2019,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2019, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2019)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Wie müssen wir virtuelle Rundgänge und Online-Tutorials gestalten, damit sie ihre Zielgruppe auch wirklich erreichen? Worauf müssen wir bei einer guten Präsentation unseres OPACs achten? Was machen wir mit großen Schülergruppen? Diesen Fragen stellten sich insgesamt 22 Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare in Münster und Köln während zweier Fortbildungsveranstaltungen des HBZ im Juni 2003. Ziel der jeweils zweitägigen Workshops, die in Zusammenarbeit mit der Adhoc-Arbeitsgruppe "Informationskompetenz" der AG der Universitätsbibliotheken im VBNW konzipiert wurden, waren Konzepte und erste Schritte zur Umsetzung von elektronischen Angeboten zur Vermittlung von Bibliotheksbzw. Informationskompetenz. Dem voraus ging die konstruktive Bewertung von bereits existierenden Materialien, die zum einen von den Teilnehmern aus ihren Bibliotheken mitgebracht wurden, zum anderen über Bibliotheks-Homepages abrufbar waren. Die Teilnehmer, die in ihren Bibliotheken bereits Benutzerschulungen konzipieren und durchführen, beschäftigten sich dabei in Gruppen u.a. mit den Themen - Virtuelle Rundgänge, - Online-Tutorials - Bibliothekseinführungen für Schüler und Erstsemester - Präsentationen von Online-Katalog und Methoden zur Literatursuche. Im Folgenden werden einige wesentliche und manchmal durchaus kontrovers diskutierte Ergebnisse und Thesen wiedergegeben, die sich aus der Arbeit der Teilnehmer ergeben haben. Sie erheben keinen Anspruch auf Ausgewogenheit oder Vollständigkeit, können aber als Anregungen und Diskussionsgrundlage für zukünftige Projekte dienen.

Date

31.12.2003 18:22:26

Kaplowitz, J.; Contini, J.: Computer-assisted instruction : is it an option for bibliographic instruction in large undergraduate survey classes? (1998) 0.01

0.0074809687 = product of:
  0.022442905 = sum of:
    0.022442905 = product of:
      0.04488581 = sum of:
        0.04488581 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04488581 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 13. 7.1998 22:01:14

Künzel, R.: Neue Medien in Lehre und Studium : Zu den Empfehlungen der Hochschulrektorenkonferenz (1998) 0.01

0.0074809687 = product of:
  0.022442905 = sum of:
    0.022442905 = product of:
      0.04488581 = sum of:
        0.04488581 = weight(_text_:22 in 2353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04488581 = score(doc=2353,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2353, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2353)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.18-21

Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications