Search (878 results, page 1 of 44)

0.14211056 = product of:
  0.42633167 = sum of:
    0.42633167 = weight(_text_:analogies in 4475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.42633167 = score(doc=4475,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.38810563 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047327764 = queryNorm
        1.0984939 = fieldWeight in 4475, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4475)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Academic libraries in the UK are placing an increased emphasis on engagement and partnership building with academics. Attempts to articulate what is meant by this engagement rely on analogies from the commercial world, notably from sales- driven environments. This language can prove counteractive to true faculty engagement. It retains a focus on a transactional approach to the detriment of partnership and often alienates academics (and librarians) reacting against their increasingly marketised and managerialised institutions. Therefore, we argue that it is necessary to abandon the technical vocabulary of sales and customer relations and develop better analogies to describe library liaison work.

0.14211056 = product of:
  0.42633167 = sum of:
    0.42633167 = weight(_text_:analogies in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.42633167 = score(doc=5555,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.38810563 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047327764 = queryNorm
        1.0984939 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The author provides an examination of how ideas about place and space have been used in thinking about the organization of knowledge. The spatial analogies of Paul Otlet (1868-1944) in relation to his overall vision are traditional and conventional. Notions of space, place, position, location, and movement are frequent in the work of other leading innovators (Martin Schrettinger, Melvil Dewey, Wilhelm Ostwald, Emanuel Goldberg, and Suzanne Briet) concerning specific practical aspects of knowledge organization. Otlet's spatial imagery is more original and more ingenious when applied to technical problems compared to his overall vision.

Content

Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Information and Space: Analogies and Metaphors'.

0.11603278 = product of:
  0.34809834 = sum of:
    0.34809834 = weight(_text_:analogies in 5552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.34809834 = score(doc=5552,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38810563 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047327764 = queryNorm
        0.8969165 = fieldWeight in 5552, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5552)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The combinatorial thinking of the chemist and Nobel laureate Wilhelm Ostwald grew out of his activities in chemistry and was further developed in his philosophy of nature. Ostwald used combinatorics as an analogous, creative, and interdisciplinary way of thinking in areas like knowledge organization and in his theory of colors and forms. His work marginally influenced art movements like the German Werkbund, the Dutch De Stijl, and the Bauhaus. Ostwald's activities and his use of spatial analogies such as bridge, net, or pyramid can be viewed as support for a relation between information-or "in-formation," or Bildung (education, formation)-and form.

Content

Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Information and Space: Analogies and Metaphors'.

0.08288056 = product of:
  0.24864167 = sum of:
    0.24864167 = weight(_text_:analogies in 5561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24864167 = score(doc=5561,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38810563 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047327764 = queryNorm
        0.6406546 = fieldWeight in 5561, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5561)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The author discusses the architectural plans of the Mundaneum made in the 1930s by the Belgian modernist architect Maurice Heymans in the footsteps of Le Corbusier and in collaboration with Paul Otlet. The Mundaneum was the utopian concept of a world center for the accumulation, organization, and dissemination of knowledge, invented by the visionary encyclopedist and internationalist Paul Otlet. In Heymans's architecture, a complex architectural metaphor is created for the Mundaneum, conveying its hidden meaning as a center of initiation into synthesized knowledge. In particular, this article deconstructs the metaphorical architectural complex designed by Heymans and focuses on how the architectural spaces as designed by Heymans are structured in analogy to schemes for the organization of knowledge made by Otlet. In three different designs of the Mundaneum, the analogy is studied between, on the one hand, the architectural structure (designed by Heymans) and, on the other hand, the structure of the cosmology, the book Monde, and the vision of knowledge dissemination as invented by Otlet. The article argues that the analogies between the organization of architectural space and knowledge, as expressed in the drawings of Heymans and Otlet, are elaborated by means of a mode of visual thinking that is parallel to and rooted in the art of memory and utopian imagination.

Content

Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Information and Space: Analogies and Metaphors'.

0.08288056 = product of:
  0.24864167 = sum of:
    0.24864167 = weight(_text_:analogies in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24864167 = score(doc=5563,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38810563 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047327764 = queryNorm
        0.6406546 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Spatial metaphors abound in the language we use to speak about the organization of information. Well-established notions such as "architecture of databases," "knowledge architect," or "information design" convey their meaning by drawing analogies between the organization of information and the organization of space. The notion "architecture of databases," for example, relies on the idea that a database provides us, like a building, multiple spaces where we can position different objects that we can exploit for different functions. Just as a building is a fixed construction, the interior of which can be furnished and refurbished time and again, we can add or remove objects of knowledge or data in the categories of a database. A "knowledge architect" is another example. Through metaphor, this notion defines the job of someone who, like an architect, combines technical and artistic skills and who is able to coordinate the overall construction process; not for the purpose of constructing a building but for constructing tools to manage flows of knowledge or relevant information that is meant to remain in place (Tonfoni, 1998). "Information design" is a third example. It underscores metaphorically the idea that the development of an information system involves, as is the case in design, a complex process of planning before actual construction can occur. Furthermore, one applies the word "design" to information systems to imply that they are modeled in a smart way, to minimize the user's efforts and to do so in respect to his or her personal needs.

Content

Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Information and Space: Analogies and Metaphors'.

0.07251909 = product of:
  0.108778626 = sum of:
    0.07516904 = product of:
      0.22550711 = sum of:
        0.22550711 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22550711 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40124533 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.033609584 = product of:
      0.06721917 = sum of:
        0.06721917 = weight(_text_:group in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06721917 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.30684334 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.07032649 = product of:
  0.21097946 = sum of:
    0.21097946 = weight(_text_:analogies in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21097946 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38810563 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047327764 = queryNorm
        0.5436135 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The use of quantum concepts and formalisms in the information sciences is assessed through an analysis of published literature. Five categories are identified: use of loose analogies and metaphors between concepts in quantum physics and library/information science; use of quantum concepts and formalisms in information retrieval; use of quantum concepts and formalisms in studying meaning and concepts; quantum social science, in areas adjacent to information science; and the qualitative application of quantum concepts in the information disciplines. Quantum issues have led to demonstrable progress in information retrieval and semantic modelling, with less clear-cut progress elsewhere. Whether there may be a future "quantum turn" in the information sciences is debated, the implications of such a turn are considered, and a research agenda outlined.

0.067708746 = product of:
  0.20312622 = sum of:
    0.20312622 = sum of:
      0.16465268 = weight(_text_:group in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16465268 = score(doc=665,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.7516097 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
      0.03847355 = weight(_text_:22 in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03847355 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

We present a methodological approach, called Group Informatics, for understanding the social connections that are created between members of technologically mediated groups. Our methodological approach supports focused thinking about how online groups differ from each other, and diverge from their face-to-face counterparts. Group Informatics is grounded in 5 years of empirical studies of technologically mediated groups in online learning, software engineering, online political discourse, crisis informatics, and other domains. We describe the Group Informatics model and the related, 2-phase methodological approach in detail. Phase one of the methodological approach centers on a set of guiding research questions aimed at directing the application of Group Informatics to new corpora of integrated electronic trace data and qualitative research data. Phase 2 of the methodological approach is a systematic set of steps for transforming electronic trace data into weighted social networks.

Date

22. 3.2013 19:36:45

0.060432576 = product of:
  0.09064886 = sum of:
    0.06264087 = product of:
      0.1879226 = sum of:
        0.1879226 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1879226 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40124533 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.028007988 = product of:
      0.056015976 = sum of:
        0.056015976 = weight(_text_:group in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056015976 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.2557028 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.

Content

PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.

0.058605403 = product of:
  0.17581621 = sum of:
    0.17581621 = weight(_text_:analogies in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17581621 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38810563 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047327764 = queryNorm
        0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the interest in and the use of classification in archives, both in terms of the intellectual organization of information in an organic-functional, functional or thematic hierarchical structure and at the level of information representation and retrieval of the informational content. Starting by looking at the concept of "classification," we go on to analyze the information access tools relative to Portuguese archives. This enables us to understand how classification has been used to establish the organizational schedules that provide context to the informational production of the entities (persons, families, corporate bodies) that generate the archives, and how such schedules represent (or not) with scientific objectivity the informational reality being considered. We then discuss the usefulness of classification in archives as a tool for the representation and subsequent retrieval of the informational content, thus enabling an across-the-board access to information, alongside the access by creators and authors that the organic-functional schedules provide. Comparisons, analogies and differences regarding the use of indexing languages in other information systems, especially libraries, where subject classifications have been in widespread use since the end of the 19th century, are also established.

0.058605403 = product of:
  0.17581621 = sum of:
    0.17581621 = weight(_text_:analogies in 5557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17581621 = score(doc=5557,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38810563 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047327764 = queryNorm
        0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 5557, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5557)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Information and Space: Analogies and Metaphors'.

0.058605403 = product of:
  0.17581621 = sum of:
    0.17581621 = weight(_text_:analogies in 5559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17581621 = score(doc=5559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38810563 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047327764 = queryNorm
        0.45301124 = fieldWeight in 5559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5559)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Information and Space: Analogies and Metaphors'.

0.057637297 = product of:
  0.17291188 = sum of:
    0.17291188 = sum of:
      0.13443834 = weight(_text_:group in 3821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13443834 = score(doc=3821,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.6136867 = fieldWeight in 3821, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3821)
      0.03847355 = weight(_text_:22 in 3821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03847355 = score(doc=3821,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3821, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3821)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Words symbolically represent communicative and behavioral intent, and can provide clues to a communicator's future actions in online communication. This paper describes a sociotechnical study conducted from 2008 through 2015 to identify deceptive communicative intent within group context as manifested in language-action cues. Specifically, this study used an online team-based game that simulates real-world deceptive insider scenarios to examine several dimensions of group communication. First, we studied how language-action cues differ between groups with and groups without a compromised actor. We also examine how these cues differ within groups in terms of the group members' individual and collective interactions with the compromised actor. Finally, we look at how the cues of compromised actors differ from those of noncompromised actors, and how communication behavior changes after an actor is presented with an ethical dilemma. The results of the study further our understanding of language-action cues as indicators for unmasking a potential deceptive insider.

Date

16.11.2017 13:02:22

0.0519306 = product of:
  0.15579179 = sum of:
    0.15579179 = sum of:
      0.110905975 = weight(_text_:group in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.110905975 = score(doc=2592,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.5062657 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
      0.04488581 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04488581 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

In June 2009, the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Heads of Technical Services in Large Research Libraries Interest Group established the Task Force on Cost/Value Assessment of Bibliographic Control to address recommendation 5.1.1.1 of On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, which focused on developing measures for costs, benefits, and value of bibliographic control. This paper outlines results of that task force's efforts to develop and articulate metrics for evaluating the cost and value of cataloging activities specifically, and offers some next steps that the community could take to further the profession's collective understanding of the costs and values associated with bibliographic control.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.05163353 = product of:
  0.15490058 = sum of:
    0.15490058 = sum of:
      0.116427034 = weight(_text_:group in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.116427034 = score(doc=666,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.53146833 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
      0.03847355 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03847355 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The proliferation of digital knowledge repositories (DKRs) used for distributed and collocated work raises important questions about how to manage these technologies. This study investigates why individuals contribute information to DKRs by applying and extending transactive memory theory. Data from knowledge workers (N = 208) nested in work groups (J = 17) located in Europe and the United States revealed, consistent with transactive memory theory, that perceptions of experts' retrieval of information were positively related to the likelihood of information provision to DKRs. The relationship between experts' perceptions of retrieval and information provision varied from group to group, and cross-level interactions indicated that trust in how the information would be used and the interdependence of tasks within groups could explain that variation. Furthermore, information provision to DKRs was related to communication networks in ways consistent with theorizing regarding the formation of transactive memory systems. Implications for theory and practice are discussed, emphasizing the utility of multilevel approaches for conceptualizing and modeling why individuals provide information to DKRs.

Date

22. 3.2013 19:39:00

0.050112695 = product of:
  0.15033808 = sum of:
    0.15033808 = product of:
      0.45101422 = sum of:
        0.45101422 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45101422 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40124533 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.048031084 = product of:
  0.14409325 = sum of:
    0.14409325 = sum of:
      0.11203195 = weight(_text_:group in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11203195 = score(doc=1648,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.5114056 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
      0.032061294 = weight(_text_:22 in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032061294 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This is an edited collection of 39 original papers and as many commentaries and replies. The target papers and replies were written by senior members of the MIND Group, while all commentaries were written by junior group members. All papers and commentaries have undergone a rigorous process of anonymous peer review, during which the junior members of the MIND Group acted as reviewers. The final versions of all the target articles, commentaries and replies have undergone additional editorial review. Besides offering a cross-section of ongoing, cutting-edge research in philosophy and cognitive science, this collection is also intended to be a free electronic resource for teaching. It therefore also contains a selection of online supporting materials, pointers to video and audio files and to additional free material supplied by the 92 authors represented in this volume. We will add more multimedia material, a searchable literature database, and tools to work with the online version in the future. All contributions to this collection are strictly open access. They can be downloaded, printed, and reproduced by anyone.

Date

27. 1.2015 11:48:22

Imprint

Frankfurt am Main : MIND Group

0.043027937 = product of:
  0.12908381 = sum of:
    0.12908381 = sum of:
      0.097022526 = weight(_text_:group in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.097022526 = score(doc=3692,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.44289026 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.032061294 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032061294 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16573377 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047327764 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The death of Brian Vickery sees a great era of classification research coming towards an end. Born in Australia, he completed his schooling in England, before going up to Brasenose to read Chemistry just before the outbreak of the Second World War. Brian was never in the services, but after Oxford he worked as a chemist in the Royal Ordnance Factory from 1941-45. After the War he became a librarian at Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI). He was a delegate at the Royal Society Scientific Information Conference held in 1948. One of the offshoots of that conference was the formation of a small committee of scientists under the leadership of Professor J.D. Bernal, to make a study of library classification. After two years of discussions, they elicited the assistance of Jack Wells, then editor of the British National Bibliography, and Brian. They circularized a group of colleagues and convened a meeting in February 1952 which led to the formation of the Classification Research Group. As is well known, this Group, all practising librarians, were to exert a groundbreaking influence on the organization and retrieval of information.

Date

22. 7.2010 19:32:06

0.04176058 = product of:
  0.12528174 = sum of:
    0.12528174 = product of:
      0.3758452 = sum of:
        0.3758452 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3758452 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40124533 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.041751843 = product of:
  0.12525553 = sum of:
    0.12525553 = product of:
      0.25051105 = sum of:
        0.25051105 = weight(_text_:group in 3522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25051105 = score(doc=3522,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.21906674 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047327764 = queryNorm
            1.1435376 = fieldWeight in 3522, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.628715 = idf(docFreq=1173, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3522)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Editor

ISBD Examples Study Group for the ISBD Review Group

Imprint

IFLA / ISBD Review Group : The Hague

Issue

Compiled by the ISBD Examples Study Group for the ISBD Review Group.