Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Broadbent, E."
  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Broadbent, E.: ¬A study of the use of the subject catalog, Marriott Library, University of Utah (1984) 0.00
    0.0027415988 = product of:
      0.0054831975 = sum of:
        0.0054831975 = product of:
          0.010966395 = sum of:
            0.010966395 = weight(_text_:a in 315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010966395 = score(doc=315,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 315, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=315)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Broadbent, E.: ¬A study of humanities faculty library information seeking behavior (1986) 0.00
    0.001938603 = product of:
      0.003877206 = sum of:
        0.003877206 = product of:
          0.007754412 = sum of:
            0.007754412 = weight(_text_:a in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007754412 = score(doc=360,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037706986 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this study is to obtain information which would help planners of the online catalog design a catalog which would be relevant to the needs of university faculty. Data was obtained by means of a questionnaire mailed to the faculty, College of Humanities, University of Utah. It was found that (1) references in books or articles they read; (2) the Subject Catalog; and (3) printed indexes, bibliographies and research guides in that order were the three most utilized information sources. Browsing was an important fourth. The faculty would like more in-depth coverage of the local library collection rather than access to other library catalogs or online databases from the catalog terminal. Feedback and comments in response to an open-ended question varied.
    Type
    a