-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.03
0.029299825 = product of:
0.05859965 = sum of:
0.029444784 = weight(_text_:m in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029444784 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.029154865 = product of:
0.05830973 = sum of:
0.05830973 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05830973 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
- Type
- m
-
Umstätter, W.; Rehm, M.; Dorogi, Z.: ¬Die Halbwertszeit in der naturwissenschaftlichen Literatur (1982)
0.02
0.01803873 = product of:
0.03607746 = sum of:
0.012619193 = weight(_text_:m in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012619193 = score(doc=5279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
0.023458267 = product of:
0.046916533 = sum of:
0.046916533 = weight(_text_:da in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046916533 = score(doc=5279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1475006 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7981725 = idf(docFreq=990, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.31807688 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7981725 = idf(docFreq=990, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Aus der Benutzung der Universitätsbibliothek Ulm wurde eine Halbwertszeit-Funktion in der naturwissenschaftlichen Literatur von t1/2=5 Jahren bestimmt. Eine interessante Abweichung von dieser Halbwertszeit-Funktion ist bei der Bestellung der neuesten Zeitschriften zu beobachten. Der Grund hierfür liegt vermutlich darin, daß Wissenschaftler das Vierfache an neuester Literatur lesen müssen, um wissenschaftliche Trends zu überschauen. Eine weitere Abweichung ist in der ältesten Literatur festzustellen, bei den sog. 'citation classics'. Übereinstimmung zeigt sich im Zitier- und Kopierverhalten bei Zeitschriftenliteratur, die älter als 2 Jahre ist. Etwa 27% der an die UB Ulm gerichteten Literaturanforderungen betreffen Zeitschriftenaufsätze mit einem Alter von über 10 Jahren, da diese Bestände für die Benutzer nur schwer zugänglich sind. Dies zeigt die große Bedeutung einer Freihand-Bibliothek
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.02
0.016742757 = product of:
0.033485513 = sum of:
0.01682559 = weight(_text_:m in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01682559 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.016659923 = product of:
0.033319846 = sum of:
0.033319846 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033319846 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.02
0.016742757 = product of:
0.033485513 = sum of:
0.01682559 = weight(_text_:m in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01682559 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.016659923 = product of:
0.033319846 = sum of:
0.033319846 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033319846 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
- Type
- m
-
Freitas, J.L.; Gabriel Jr., R.F.; Bufrem, L.S.: Theoretical approximations between Brazilian and Spanish authors' production in the field of knowledge organization in the production of journals on information science in Brazil (2012)
0.02
0.015223314 = product of:
0.060893256 = sum of:
0.060893256 = sum of:
0.044233333 = weight(_text_:da in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044233333 = score(doc=144,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1475006 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7981725 = idf(docFreq=990, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.29988578 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7981725 = idf(docFreq=990, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
0.016659923 = weight(_text_:22 in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016659923 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This work identifies and analyzes literature about knowledge organization (KO), expressed in scientific journals' communication of information science (IS). It performs an exploratory study on the Base de Dados Referencial de Artigos de Periódicos em Ciência da Informação (BRAPCI, Reference Database of Journal Articles on Information Science) between the years 2000 and 2010. The descriptors relating to "knowledge organization" are used in order to recover and analyze the corresponding articles and to identify descriptors and concepts which integrate the semantic universe related to KO. Through the analysis of content, based on metrical studies, this article gathers and interprets data relating to documents and authors. Through this, it demonstrates the development of this field and its research fronts according to the observed characteristics, as well as noting the transformation indicative in the production of knowledge. The work describes the influences of the Spanish researchers on Brazilian literature in the fields of knowledge and information organization. As a result, it presents the most cited and productive authors, the theoretical currents which support them, and the most significant relationships of the Spanish-Brazilian authors network. Based on the constant key-words analysis in the cited articles, the co-existence of the French conception current and the incipient Spanish influence in Brazil is observed. Through this, it contributes to the comprehension of the thematic range relating to KO, stimulating both criticism and self-criticism, debate and knowledge creation, based on studies that have been developed and institutionalized in academic contexts in Spain and Brazil.
- Content
- Beitrag einer Section "Selected Papers from the 1ST Brazilian Conference on Knowledge Organization And Representation, Faculdade de Ciência da Informação, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Brasília, DF Brasil, October 20-22, 2011" Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_3_g.pdf.
-
Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009)
0.02
0.015170588 = product of:
0.030341176 = sum of:
0.017846234 = weight(_text_:m in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017846234 = score(doc=2751,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.012494942 = product of:
0.024989884 = sum of:
0.024989884 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024989884 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:05:07
-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.02
0.015170588 = product of:
0.030341176 = sum of:
0.017846234 = weight(_text_:m in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017846234 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.012494942 = product of:
0.024989884 = sum of:
0.024989884 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024989884 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
-
Dobrota, M.; Dobrota, M.: ARWU ranking uncertainty and sensitivity : what if the award factor was Excluded? (2016)
0.02
0.015170588 = product of:
0.030341176 = sum of:
0.017846234 = weight(_text_:m in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017846234 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.012494942 = product of:
0.024989884 = sum of:
0.024989884 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024989884 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:40:53
-
Nicholas, D.; Ritchie, M.: Literature and bibliometrics (1978)
0.01
0.014871862 = product of:
0.059487447 = sum of:
0.059487447 = weight(_text_:m in 1081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059487447 = score(doc=1081,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.7776402 = fieldWeight in 1081, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1081)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Type
- m
-
Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998)
0.01
0.014649913 = product of:
0.029299825 = sum of:
0.014722392 = weight(_text_:m in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014722392 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.014577433 = product of:
0.029154865 = sum of:
0.029154865 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029154865 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 1.1999 16:22:37
-
Zitt, M.; Lelu, A.; Bassecoulard, E.: Hybrid citation-word representations in science mapping : Portolan charts of research fields? (2011)
0.01
0.014313344 = product of:
0.028626688 = sum of:
0.018214235 = weight(_text_:m in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018214235 = score(doc=4130,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.2381027 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
0.010412452 = product of:
0.020824904 = sum of:
0.020824904 = weight(_text_:22 in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020824904 = score(doc=4130,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The mapping of scientific fields, based on principles established in the seventies, has recently shown a remarkable development and applications are now booming with progress in computing efficiency. We examine here the convergence of two thematic mapping approaches, citation-based and word-based, which rely on quite different sociological backgrounds. A corpus in the nanoscience field was broken down into research themes, using the same clustering technique on the 2 networks separately. The tool for comparison is the table of intersections of the M clusters (here M=50) built on either side. A classical visual exploitation of such contingency tables is based on correspondence analysis. We investigate a rearrangement of the intersection table (block modeling), resulting in pseudo-map. The interest of this representation for confronting the two breakdowns is discussed. The amount of convergence found is, in our view, a strong argument in favor of the reliability of bibliometric mapping. However, the outcomes are not convergent at the degree where they can be substituted for each other. Differences highlight the complementarity between approaches based on different networks. In contrast with the strong informetric posture found in recent literature, where lexical and citation markers are considered as miscible tokens, the framework proposed here does not mix the two elements at an early stage, in compliance with their contrasted logic.
- Date
- 8. 1.2011 18:22:50
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.01
0.014313344 = product of:
0.028626688 = sum of:
0.018214235 = weight(_text_:m in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018214235 = score(doc=995,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.2381027 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.010412452 = product of:
0.020824904 = sum of:
0.020824904 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020824904 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.01
0.012620713 = product of:
0.025241425 = sum of:
0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010515994 = score(doc=2734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.014725431 = product of:
0.029450862 = sum of:
0.029450862 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029450862 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008)
0.01
0.012557067 = product of:
0.025114134 = sum of:
0.012619193 = weight(_text_:m in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012619193 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.012494942 = product of:
0.024989884 = sum of:
0.024989884 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024989884 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:03:12
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Costas, R., M. Bordons u. T.N. van Leeuwen u.a.: Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753.
-
Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012)
0.01
0.012557067 = product of:
0.025114134 = sum of:
0.012619193 = weight(_text_:m in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012619193 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.012494942 = product of:
0.024989884 = sum of:
0.024989884 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024989884 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:23:32
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.01
0.012557067 = product of:
0.025114134 = sum of:
0.012619193 = weight(_text_:m in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012619193 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.012494942 = product of:
0.024989884 = sum of:
0.024989884 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024989884 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016)
0.01
0.012557067 = product of:
0.025114134 = sum of:
0.012619193 = weight(_text_:m in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012619193 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.012494942 = product of:
0.024989884 = sum of:
0.024989884 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024989884 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 19. 3.2016 12:22:00
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.01
0.012557067 = product of:
0.025114134 = sum of:
0.012619193 = weight(_text_:m in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012619193 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.012494942 = product of:
0.024989884 = sum of:
0.024989884 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024989884 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.01
0.012557067 = product of:
0.025114134 = sum of:
0.012619193 = weight(_text_:m in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012619193 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.012494942 = product of:
0.024989884 = sum of:
0.024989884 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024989884 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
-
Solla Price, D. de: Little science, big science (1963)
0.01
0.010515994 = product of:
0.042063978 = sum of:
0.042063978 = weight(_text_:m in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042063978 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.030740997 = queryNorm
0.54987466 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Type
- m
