Search (39 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016) 0.04 
    0.037338786 = product of:
  0.07467757 = sum of:
    0.07467757 = product of:
      0.11201635 = sum of:
        0.0505817 = weight(_text_:j in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0505817 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
        0.061434645 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061434645 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Source
    Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al
  2. Hauer, M.: Tiefenindexierung im Bibliothekskatalog : 17 Jahre intelligentCAPTURE (2019) 0.04 
    0.036943115 = product of:
  0.07388623 = sum of:
    0.07388623 = product of:
      0.11082934 = sum of:
        0.037107762 = weight(_text_:h in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037107762 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
        0.07372157 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07372157 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166
  3. Bredack, J.; Lepsky, K.: Automatische Extraktion von Fachterminologie aus Volltexten (2014) 0.02 
    0.021734625 = product of:
  0.04346925 = sum of:
    0.04346925 = product of:
      0.065203875 = sum of:
        0.02473851 = weight(_text_:h in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02473851 = score(doc=4872,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
        0.040465362 = weight(_text_:j in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040465362 = score(doc=4872,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    ABI-Technik. 34(2014) H.1, S.2-8
  4. Kasprzik, A.: Voraussetzungen und Anwendungspotentiale einer präzisen Sacherschließung aus Sicht der Wissenschaft (2018) 0.02 
    0.021550149 = product of:
  0.043100297 = sum of:
    0.043100297 = product of:
      0.064650446 = sum of:
        0.021646196 = weight(_text_:h in 5195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021646196 = score(doc=5195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5195)
        0.04300425 = weight(_text_:22 in 5195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04300425 = score(doc=5195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5195)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Große Aufmerksamkeit richtet sich im Moment auf das Potential von automatisierten Methoden in der Sacherschließung und deren Interaktionsmöglichkeiten mit intellektuellen Methoden. In diesem Kontext befasst sich der vorliegende Beitrag mit den folgenden Fragen: Was sind die Anforderungen an bibliothekarische Metadaten aus Sicht der Wissenschaft? Was wird gebraucht, um den Informationsbedarf der Fachcommunities zu bedienen? Und was bedeutet das entsprechend für die Automatisierung der Metadatenerstellung und -pflege? Dieser Beitrag fasst die von der Autorin eingenommene Position in einem Impulsvortrag und der Podiumsdiskussion beim Workshop der FAG "Erschließung und Informationsvermittlung" des GBV zusammen. Der Workshop fand im Rahmen der 22. Verbundkonferenz des GBV statt.
    Source
    ABI-Technik. 38(2018) H.4, S.332-335
  5. Franke-Maier, M.: Anforderungen an die Qualität der Inhaltserschließung im Spannungsfeld von intellektuell und automatisch erzeugten Metadaten (2018) 0.02 
    0.021550149 = product of:
  0.043100297 = sum of:
    0.043100297 = product of:
      0.064650446 = sum of:
        0.021646196 = weight(_text_:h in 5344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021646196 = score(doc=5344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5344)
        0.04300425 = weight(_text_:22 in 5344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04300425 = score(doc=5344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5344)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Spätestens seit dem Deutschen Bibliothekartag 2018 hat sich die Diskussion zu den automatischen Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek von einer politisch geführten Diskussion in eine Qualitätsdiskussion verwandelt. Der folgende Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit Fragen der Qualität von Inhaltserschließung in digitalen Zeiten, wo heterogene Erzeugnisse unterschiedlicher Verfahren aufeinandertreffen und versucht, wichtige Anforderungen an Qualität zu definieren. Dieser Tagungsbeitrag fasst die vom Autor als Impulse vorgetragenen Ideen beim Workshop der FAG "Erschließung und Informationsvermittlung" des GBV am 29. August 2018 in Kiel zusammen. Der Workshop fand im Rahmen der 22. Verbundkonferenz des GBV statt.
    Source
    ABI-Technik. 38(2018) H.4, S.327-331
  6. Busch, D.: Domänenspezifische hybride automatische Indexierung von bibliographischen Metadaten (2019) 0.02 
    0.018471558 = product of:
  0.036943115 = sum of:
    0.036943115 = product of:
      0.05541467 = sum of:
        0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 5628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018553881 = score(doc=5628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5628)
        0.036860786 = weight(_text_:22 in 5628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036860786 = score(doc=5628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5628)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.6, S.465-469
  7. Munkelt, J.; Schaer, P.; Lepsky, K.: Towards an IR test collection for the German National Library (2018) 0.02 
    0.016300969 = product of:
  0.032601938 = sum of:
    0.032601938 = product of:
      0.048902903 = sum of:
        0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018553881 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
        0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030349022 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Automatic content indexing is one of the innovations that are increasingly changing the way libraries work. In theory, it promises a cataloguing service that would hardly be possible with humans in terms of speed, quantity and maybe quality. The German National Library (DNB) has also recognised this potential and is increasingly relying on the automatic indexing of their catalogue content. The DNB took a major step in this direction in 2017, which was announced in two papers. The announcement was rather restrained, but the content of the papers is all the more explosive for the library community: Since September 2017, the DNB has discontinued the intellectual indexing of series Band H and has switched to an automatic process for these series. The subject indexing of online publications (series O) has been purely automatical since 2010; from September 2017, monographs and periodicals published outside the publishing industry and university publications will no longer be indexed by people. This raises the question: What is the quality of the automatic indexing compared to the manual work or in other words to which degree can the automatic indexing replace people without a signi cant drop in regards to quality?
  8. Kempf, A.O.: Automatische Inhaltserschließung in der Fachinformation (2013) 0.01 
    0.01358414 = product of:
  0.02716828 = sum of:
    0.02716828 = product of:
      0.04075242 = sum of:
        0.015461569 = weight(_text_:h in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015461569 = score(doc=905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
        0.02529085 = weight(_text_:j in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02529085 = score(doc=905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2013.64.issue-2-3/iwp-2013-0011/iwp-2013-0011.xml?format=INT.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.2/3, S.96-106
  9. Martins, A.L.; Souza, R.R.; Ribeiro de Mello, H.: ¬The use of noun phrases in information retrieval : proposing a mechanism for automatic classification (2014) 0.01 
    0.012314371 = product of:
  0.024628742 = sum of:
    0.024628742 = product of:
      0.03694311 = sum of:
        0.012369255 = weight(_text_:h in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012369255 = score(doc=1441,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
        0.024573857 = weight(_text_:22 in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024573857 = score(doc=1441,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  10. Glaesener, L.: Automatisches Indexieren einer informationswissenschaftlichen Datenbank mit Mehrwortgruppen (2012) 0.01 
    0.008191286 = product of:
  0.016382571 = sum of:
    0.016382571 = product of:
      0.049147714 = sum of:
        0.049147714 = weight(_text_:22 in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049147714 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 9.2012 19:43:22
  11. Mao, J.; Xu, W.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Yuille, A.L.: Explain images with multimodal recurrent neural networks (2014) 0.01 
    0.0071533336 = product of:
  0.014306667 = sum of:
    0.014306667 = product of:
      0.04292 = sum of:
        0.04292 = weight(_text_:j in 1557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04292 = score(doc=1557,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 1557, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1557)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Lepsky, K.; Müller, T.; Wille, J.: Metadata improvement for image information retrieval (2010) 0.01 
    0.005901199 = product of:
  0.011802398 = sum of:
    0.011802398 = product of:
      0.035407193 = sum of:
        0.035407193 = weight(_text_:j in 4995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035407193 = score(doc=4995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4995)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Lichtenstein, A.; Plank, M.; Neumann, J.: TIB's portal for audiovisual media : combining manual and automatic indexing (2014) 0.01 
    0.005901199 = product of:
  0.011802398 = sum of:
    0.011802398 = product of:
      0.035407193 = sum of:
        0.035407193 = weight(_text_:j in 1981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035407193 = score(doc=1981,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 1981, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1981)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. Böhm, A.; Seifert, C.; Schlötterer, J.; Granitzer, M.: Identifying tweets from the economic domain (2017) 0.01 
    0.005901199 = product of:
  0.011802398 = sum of:
    0.011802398 = product of:
      0.035407193 = sum of:
        0.035407193 = weight(_text_:j in 3495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035407193 = score(doc=3495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 3495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3495)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Munkelt, J.: Erstellung einer DNB-Retrieval-Testkollektion (2018) 0.01 
    0.005901199 = product of:
  0.011802398 = sum of:
    0.011802398 = product of:
      0.035407193 = sum of:
        0.035407193 = weight(_text_:j in 4310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035407193 = score(doc=4310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4310)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  16. Mödden, E.: Inhaltserschließung im Zeitalter von Suchmaschinen und Volltextsuche (2018) 0.01 
    0.0051538562 = product of:
  0.0103077125 = sum of:
    0.0103077125 = product of:
      0.030923137 = sum of:
        0.030923137 = weight(_text_:h in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030923137 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 21(2018) H.1, S.47-51
  17. Junger, U.; Schwens, U.: ¬Die inhaltliche Erschließung des schriftlichen kulturellen Erbes auf dem Weg in die Zukunft : Automatische Vergabe von Schlagwörtern in der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (2017) 0.01 
    0.0051195538 = product of:
  0.0102391075 = sum of:
    0.0102391075 = product of:
      0.030717323 = sum of:
        0.030717323 = weight(_text_:22 in 3780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030717323 = score(doc=3780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3780)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    19. 8.2017 9:24:22
  18. Wiesenmüller, H.: Maschinelle Indexierung am Beispiel der DNB : Analyse und Entwicklungmöglichkeiten (2018) 0.01 
    0.0051020575 = product of:
  0.010204115 = sum of:
    0.010204115 = product of:
      0.030612344 = sum of:
        0.030612344 = weight(_text_:h in 5209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030612344 = score(doc=5209,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 5209, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5209)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag untersucht die Ergebnisse des bei der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB) eingesetzten Verfahrens zur automatischen Vergabe von Schlagwörtern. Seit 2017 kommt dieses auch bei Printausgaben der Reihen B und H der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie zum Einsatz. Die zentralen Problembereiche werden dargestellt und an Beispielen illustriert - beispielsweise dass nicht alle im Inhaltsverzeichnis vorkommenden Wörter tatsächlich thematische Aspekte ausdrücken und dass die Software sehr häufig Körperschaften und andere "Named entities" nicht erkennt. Die maschinell generierten Ergebnisse sind derzeit sehr unbefriedigend. Es werden Überlegungen für mögliche Verbesserungen und sinnvolle Strategien angestellt.
  19. Schöneberg, U.; Gödert, W.: Erschließung mathematischer Publikationen mittels linguistischer Verfahren (2012) 0.01 
    0.0050581703 = product of:
  0.010116341 = sum of:
    0.010116341 = product of:
      0.030349022 = sum of:
        0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030349022 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://at.yorku.ca/c/b/f/j/99.htm
  20. Wiesenmüller, H.: DNB-Sacherschließung : Neues für die Reihen A und B (2019) 0.00 
    0.004373192 = product of:
  0.008746384 = sum of:
    0.008746384 = product of:
      0.026239151 = sum of:
        0.026239151 = weight(_text_:h in 5212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026239151 = score(doc=5212,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 5212, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5212)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    "Alle paar Jahre wird die Bibliothekscommunity mit Veränderungen in der inhaltlichen Erschließung durch die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek konfrontiert. Sicher werden sich viele noch an die Einschnitte des Jahres 2014 für die Reihe A erinnern: Seither werden u.a. Ratgeber, Sprachwörterbücher, Reiseführer und Kochbücher nicht mehr mit Schlagwörtern erschlossen (vgl. das DNB-Konzept von 2014). Das Jahr 2017 brachte die Einführung der maschinellen Indexierung für die Reihen B und H bei gleichzeitigem Verlust der DDC-Tiefenerschließung (vgl. DNB-Informationen von 2017). Virulent war seither die Frage, was mit der Reihe A passieren würde. Seit wenigen Tagen kann man dies nun auf der Website der DNB nachlesen. (Nebenbei: Es ist zu befürchten, dass viele Links in diesem Blog-Beitrag in absehbarer Zeit nicht mehr funktionieren werden, da ein Relaunch der DNB-Website angekündigt ist. Wie beim letzten Mal wird es vermutlich auch diesmal keine Weiterleitungen von den alten auf die neuen URLs geben.)"

Authors

Languages

  • d 22
  • e 16
  • a 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 34
  • el 9
  • x 3
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes