Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  1. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.04
    0.043100297 = product of:
      0.086200595 = sum of:
        0.086200595 = product of:
          0.12930089 = sum of:
            0.043292392 = weight(_text_:h in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043292392 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
            0.0860085 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0860085 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1983, Göttingen, 3.-7.10.1983: Fachinformation und Bildschirmtext. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  2. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.03
    0.026417308 = product of:
      0.052834615 = sum of:
        0.052834615 = product of:
          0.07925192 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
            0.060698044 = weight(_text_:j in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060698044 = score(doc=6386,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.5, S.251-262
  3. Krause, J.; Womser-Hacker, C.: PADOK-II : Retrievaltests zur Bewertung von Volltextindexierungsvarianten für das deutsche Patentinformationssystem (1990) 0.02
    0.021734625 = product of:
      0.04346925 = sum of:
        0.04346925 = product of:
          0.065203875 = sum of:
            0.02473851 = weight(_text_:h in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02473851 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
            0.040465362 = weight(_text_:j in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040465362 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 41(1990) H.1, S.13-19
  4. Lepsky, K.; Siepmann, J.; Zimmermann, A.: Automatische Indexierung für Online-Kataloge : Ergebnisse eines Retrievaltests (1996) 0.02
    0.019017797 = product of:
      0.038035594 = sum of:
        0.038035594 = product of:
          0.057053387 = sum of:
            0.021646196 = weight(_text_:h in 3251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021646196 = score(doc=3251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 3251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3251)
            0.035407193 = weight(_text_:j in 3251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035407193 = score(doc=3251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 3251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3251)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 43(1996) H.1, S.47-56
  5. Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: OPAC-Erweiterung durch automatische Indexierung : Empirische Untersuchung mit Daten aus dem Österreichischen Verbundkatalog (2002) 0.02
    0.016300969 = product of:
      0.032601938 = sum of:
        0.032601938 = product of:
          0.048902903 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
            0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030349022 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ABI-Technik. 23(2003) H.4, S.305-314
  6. Munkelt, J.; Schaer, P.; Lepsky, K.: Towards an IR test collection for the German National Library (2018) 0.02
    0.016300969 = product of:
      0.032601938 = sum of:
        0.032601938 = product of:
          0.048902903 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
            0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030349022 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Automatic content indexing is one of the innovations that are increasingly changing the way libraries work. In theory, it promises a cataloguing service that would hardly be possible with humans in terms of speed, quantity and maybe quality. The German National Library (DNB) has also recognised this potential and is increasingly relying on the automatic indexing of their catalogue content. The DNB took a major step in this direction in 2017, which was announced in two papers. The announcement was rather restrained, but the content of the papers is all the more explosive for the library community: Since September 2017, the DNB has discontinued the intellectual indexing of series Band H and has switched to an automatic process for these series. The subject indexing of online publications (series O) has been purely automatical since 2010; from September 2017, monographs and periodicals published outside the publishing industry and university publications will no longer be indexed by people. This raises the question: What is the quality of the automatic indexing compared to the manual work or in other words to which degree can the automatic indexing replace people without a signi cant drop in regards to quality?
  7. Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: Einführung der automatischen Indexierung im Österreichischen Verbundkatalog? : Bericht über eine empirische Studie (2003) 0.01
    0.011802398 = product of:
      0.023604795 = sum of:
        0.023604795 = product of:
          0.070814386 = sum of:
            0.070814386 = weight(_text_:j in 1878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070814386 = score(doc=1878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 1878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1878)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Chevallet, J.-P.; Bruandet, M.F.: Impact de l'utilisation de multi terms sur la qualité des résponses dùn système de recherche d'information a indexation automatique (1999) 0.01
    0.009537777 = product of:
      0.019075554 = sum of:
        0.019075554 = product of:
          0.05722666 = sum of:
            0.05722666 = weight(_text_:j in 6253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05722666 = score(doc=6253,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.39718705 = fieldWeight in 6253, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6253)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Organisation des connaissances en vue de leur intégration dans les systèmes de représentation et de recherche d'information. Ed.: J. Maniez, et al
  9. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.01
    0.0084302835 = product of:
      0.016860567 = sum of:
        0.016860567 = product of:
          0.0505817 = sum of:
            0.0505817 = weight(_text_:j in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0505817 = score(doc=5863,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
  10. Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983) 0.01
    0.0071673747 = product of:
      0.014334749 = sum of:
        0.014334749 = product of:
          0.04300425 = sum of:
            0.04300425 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04300425 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 3.1996 13:22:21
  11. Lohmann, H.: Verbesserung der Literatursuche durch Dokumentanreicherung und automatische Inhaltserschließung : Das Projekt 'KASCADE' an der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf (1999) 0.01
    0.0061846273 = product of:
      0.012369255 = sum of:
        0.012369255 = product of:
          0.037107762 = sum of:
            0.037107762 = weight(_text_:h in 1221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037107762 = score(doc=1221,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 1221, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1221)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Munkelt, J.: Erstellung einer DNB-Retrieval-Testkollektion (2018) 0.01
    0.005901199 = product of:
      0.011802398 = sum of:
        0.011802398 = product of:
          0.035407193 = sum of:
            0.035407193 = weight(_text_:j in 4310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035407193 = score(doc=4310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4310)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Buckley, C.; Allan, J.; Salton, G.: Automatic routing and retrieval using Smart : TREC-2 (1995) 0.01
    0.0050581703 = product of:
      0.010116341 = sum of:
        0.010116341 = product of:
          0.030349022 = sum of:
            0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 5699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030349022 = score(doc=5699,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5699, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5699)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Grummann, M.: Sind Verfahren zur maschinellen Indexierung für Literaturbestände Öffentlicher Bibliotheken geeignet? : Retrievaltests von indexierten ekz-Daten mit der Software IDX (2000) 0.00
    0.004123085 = product of:
      0.00824617 = sum of:
        0.00824617 = product of:
          0.02473851 = sum of:
            0.02473851 = weight(_text_:h in 1879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02473851 = score(doc=1879,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1879, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1879)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 24(2000) H.3, S.297-318
  15. Gödert, W.; Liebig, M.: Maschinelle Indexierung auf dem Prüfstand : Ergebnisse eines Retrievaltests zum MILOS II Projekt (1997) 0.00
    0.0036076994 = product of:
      0.007215399 = sum of:
        0.007215399 = product of:
          0.021646196 = sum of:
            0.021646196 = weight(_text_:h in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021646196 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 31(1997) H.1, S.59-68
  16. Lohmann, H.: KASCADE: Dokumentanreicherung und automatische Inhaltserschließung : Projektbericht und Ergebnisse des Retrievaltests (2000) 0.00
    0.0018038497 = product of:
      0.0036076994 = sum of:
        0.0036076994 = product of:
          0.010823098 = sum of:
            0.010823098 = weight(_text_:h in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010823098 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.096073404 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)