Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.03
    0.026628839 = product of:
      0.09320093 = sum of:
        0.028993348 = weight(_text_:j in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028993348 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030630698 = queryNorm
            0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
        0.06420758 = sum of:
          0.028993348 = weight(_text_:j in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028993348 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030630698 = queryNorm
              0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
          0.035214234 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035214234 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030630698 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  2. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.03
    0.025105907 = product of:
      0.08787067 = sum of:
        0.02733519 = weight(_text_:j in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02733519 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030630698 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
        0.060535483 = sum of:
          0.02733519 = weight(_text_:j in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02733519 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030630698 = queryNorm
              0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
          0.033200294 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033200294 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030630698 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Matthews, J.: ¬The value of information in library catalogs (2000) 0.02
    0.020501394 = product of:
      0.07175487 = sum of:
        0.04783658 = weight(_text_:j in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04783658 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030630698 = queryNorm
            0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
        0.02391829 = product of:
          0.04783658 = sum of:
            0.04783658 = weight(_text_:j in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04783658 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  4. Voß, J.; Hellmich, J.: »Am Kerngeschäft der Bibliothekare kann sich plötzlich jeder beteiligen« (2007) 0.01
    0.014496674 = product of:
      0.050738357 = sum of:
        0.033825573 = weight(_text_:j in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033825573 = score(doc=397,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030630698 = queryNorm
            0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
        0.016912786 = product of:
          0.033825573 = sum of:
            0.033825573 = weight(_text_:j in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033825573 = score(doc=397,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  5. Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004) 0.01
    0.012238479 = product of:
      0.042834677 = sum of:
        0.034534603 = product of:
          0.06906921 = sum of:
            0.06906921 = weight(_text_:3d in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06906921 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21879539 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.31567943 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008300073 = product of:
          0.016600147 = sum of:
            0.016600147 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016600147 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    1. Introduction With the diversification of the material available in library collections such as: music, film, 3D objects, cartographic material and electronic resources like CD-ROMS and Web sites, the existing cataloguing principles and codes are no longer adequate to enable the user to find, identify, select and obtain a particular entity. The problem is not only that material fails to be appropriately represented in the catalogue records but also access to such material, or parts of it, is difficult if possible at all. Consequently, the need emerged to develop new rules and build up a new conceptual model able to cope with all the requirements demanded by the existing library material. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records developed by an IFLA Study Group from 1992 through 1997 present a generalised view of the bibliographic universe and are intended to be independent of any cataloguing code or implementation (Tillett, 2002). Outstanding scholars like Antonio Panizzi, Charles A. Cutter and Seymour Lubetzky formulated the basic cataloguing principles of which some can be retrieved, as Denton (2003) argues as updated versions, between the basic lines of the FRBR model: - the relation work-author groups all the works of an author - all the editions, translations, adaptations of a work are clearly separated (as expressions and manifestations) - all the expressions and manifestations of a work are collocated with their related works in bibliographic families - any document (manifestation and item) can be found if the author, title or subject of that document is known - the author is authorised by the authority control - the title is an intrinsic part of the work + authority control entity
    Date
    17. 6.2015 14:40:22
  6. Byrd, J.; Charbonneau, G.; Charbonneau, M.; Courtney, A.; Johnson, E.; Leonard, K.; Morrison, A.; Mudge, S.; O'Bryan, A.; Opasik, S.; Riley, J.; Turchyn, S.: ¬A white paper on the future of cataloging at Indiana University (2006) 0.01
    0.010354767 = product of:
      0.03624168 = sum of:
        0.02416112 = weight(_text_:j in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02416112 = score(doc=3225,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030630698 = queryNorm
            0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
        0.01208056 = product of:
          0.02416112 = sum of:
            0.02416112 = weight(_text_:j in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02416112 = score(doc=3225,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  7. Carlyle, A.; Summerlin, J.: Transforming catalog displays : record clustering for works of fiction (2002) 0.01
    0.010250697 = product of:
      0.035877436 = sum of:
        0.02391829 = weight(_text_:j in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02391829 = score(doc=5626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030630698 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
        0.011959145 = product of:
          0.02391829 = sum of:
            0.02391829 = weight(_text_:j in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02391829 = score(doc=5626,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  8. Krause, J.; Mayr, P.: Allgemeiner Bibliothekszugang und Varianten der Suchtypologie : Konsequenzen für die Modellbildung in vascoda (2007) 0.01
    0.010250697 = product of:
      0.035877436 = sum of:
        0.02391829 = weight(_text_:j in 5998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02391829 = score(doc=5998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030630698 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 5998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5998)
        0.011959145 = product of:
          0.02391829 = sum of:
            0.02391829 = weight(_text_:j in 5998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02391829 = score(doc=5998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 5998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  9. Lee, H.-L.; Clyde, J.: Users' perspectives of the "Collection" and the online catalogue (2004) 0.01
    0.008786311 = product of:
      0.030752089 = sum of:
        0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020501392 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030630698 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
        0.010250696 = product of:
          0.020501392 = sum of:
            0.020501392 = weight(_text_:j in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020501392 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  10. Voss, J.: LibraryThing : Web 2.0 für Literaturfreunde und Bibliotheken (2007) 0.01
    0.0078455955 = product of:
      0.027459584 = sum of:
        0.008542246 = weight(_text_:j in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008542246 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030630698 = queryNorm
            0.08776677 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
        0.018917339 = sum of:
          0.008542246 = weight(_text_:j in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008542246 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030630698 = queryNorm
              0.08776677 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
          0.010375093 = weight(_text_:22 in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010375093 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.030630698 = queryNorm
              0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 10:36:23
  11. Block, B.; Labner, J.; Rusch, B.: Katalogisierung kooperativ gemacht (2007) 0.01
    0.0073219254 = product of:
      0.025626738 = sum of:
        0.017084492 = weight(_text_:j in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017084492 = score(doc=38,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030630698 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
        0.008542246 = product of:
          0.017084492 = sum of:
            0.017084492 = weight(_text_:j in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017084492 = score(doc=38,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  12. Lügger, J.: Neustart für Bibliotheken ins Informationszeitalter (2006) 0.01
    0.0073219254 = product of:
      0.025626738 = sum of:
        0.017084492 = weight(_text_:j in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017084492 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030630698 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
        0.008542246 = product of:
          0.017084492 = sum of:
            0.017084492 = weight(_text_:j in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017084492 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
  13. Libraries and Google (2005) 0.01
    0.0058575408 = product of:
      0.020501392 = sum of:
        0.013667595 = weight(_text_:j in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013667595 = score(doc=1973,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030630698 = queryNorm
            0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
        0.0068337973 = product of:
          0.013667595 = sum of:
            0.013667595 = weight(_text_:j in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013667595 = score(doc=1973,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.09732894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    Introduction: Libraries and Their Interrelationships with Google - William Miller Disruptive Beneficence: The Google Print Program and the Future of Libraries - Mark Sandler The Google Library Project at Oxford - Ronald Milne The (Uncertain) Future of Libraries in a Google World: Sounding an Alarm - Rick Anderson A Gaggle of Googles: Limitations and Defects of Electronic Access as Panacea - -Mark Y. Herring Using the Google Search Appliance for Federated Searching: A Case Study - Mary Taylor Google's Print and Scholar Initiatives: The Value of and Impact on Libraries and Information Services - Robert J. Lackie Google Scholar vs. Library Scholar: Testing the Performance of Schoogle - Burton Callicott; Debbie Vaughn Google, the Invisible Web, and Librarians: Slaying the Research Goliath - Francine Egger-Sider; Jane Devine Choices in the Paradigm Shift: Where Next for Libraries? - Shelley E. Phipps; Krisellen Maloney Calling the Scholars Home: Google Scholar as a Tool for Rediscovering the Academic Library - Maurice C. York Checking Under the Hood: Evaluating Google Scholar for Reference Use - Janice Adlington; Chris Benda Running with the Devil: Accessing Library-Licensed Full Text Holdings Through Google Scholar - Rebecca Donlan; Rachel Cooke Directing Students to New Information Types: A New Role for Google in Literature Searches? - Mike Thelwall Evaluating Google Scholar as a Tool for Information Literacy Rachael Cathcart - Amanda Roberts Optimising Publications for Google Users - Alan Dawson Google and Privacy - Paul S. Piper Image: Google's Most Important Product - Ron Force Keeping Up with Google: Resources and Strategies for Staying Ahead of the Pack - Michael J. Krasulski; Steven J. Bell
    Footnote
    Weitere Rez. in JASIST 59(2008) H.9, S.1531-1533 (J. Satyanesan): "Libraries and Google is an interesting and enlightening compilation of 18 articles on Google and its impact on libraries. The topic is very current, debatable, and thought provoking. Google has profoundly empowered individuals and transformed access to information and librarians are very much concerned about its popularity and visibility. In this book, the leading authorities discuss the usefulness of Google, its influence and potential menace to libraries, and its implications for libraries and the scholarly communication. They offer practical suggestions to cope with the changing situation. The articles are written from different perspective and express all shades of opinion, both hopeful and fearful. One can discern varied moods-apprehension, resignation, encouragement, and motivation-on the part of the librarians. This is an important book providing a wealth of information for the 21st century librarian. There is a section called "Indexing, Abstracting & Website/Internet Coverage," which lists major indexing and abstracting services and other tools for bibliographic access. The format of the articles is uniform with an introduction, key words, and with the exception of two articles the rest have summaries and conclusions. References and notes of varying lengths are included in each article. This book has been copublished simultaneously as Internet Reference Quarterly, 10(3/4), 2005. Although there are single articles written on Google and libraries, this is the first book-length treatment of the topic.
  14. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.00
    0.0035571745 = product of:
      0.02490022 = sum of:
        0.02490022 = product of:
          0.04980044 = sum of:
            0.04980044 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04980044 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  15. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.00
    0.0029643124 = product of:
      0.020750185 = sum of:
        0.020750185 = product of:
          0.04150037 = sum of:
            0.04150037 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04150037 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.00
    0.0023714497 = product of:
      0.016600147 = sum of:
        0.016600147 = product of:
          0.033200294 = sum of:
            0.033200294 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033200294 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.00
    0.0023714497 = product of:
      0.016600147 = sum of:
        0.016600147 = product of:
          0.033200294 = sum of:
            0.033200294 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033200294 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.00
    0.0023714497 = product of:
      0.016600147 = sum of:
        0.016600147 = product of:
          0.033200294 = sum of:
            0.033200294 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033200294 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  19. Erdei, K.: Kein Umzug für Zettel : Die digitalisierten Kataloge im Neubau der UB Kiel (2001) 0.00
    0.0020750186 = product of:
      0.014525129 = sum of:
        0.014525129 = product of:
          0.029050259 = sum of:
            0.029050259 = weight(_text_:22 in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029050259 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    28. 4.2001 16:49:22
  20. Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000) 0.00
    0.0020750186 = product of:
      0.014525129 = sum of:
        0.014525129 = product of:
          0.029050259 = sum of:
            0.029050259 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029050259 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10726349 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030630698 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.

Languages

  • e 20
  • d 11

Types

  • a 25
  • m 4
  • b 3
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…