Search (82 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × author_ss:"Hjoerland, B."
  1. Nicolaisen, J.; Hjoerland, B.: ¬A rejoinder to Beghtol (2004) (2004) 0.02
    0.023365475 = product of:
      0.04673095 = sum of:
        0.04673095 = product of:
          0.070096426 = sum of:
            0.010291085 = weight(_text_:s in 3006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010291085 = score(doc=3006,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.20806074 = fieldWeight in 3006, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3006)
            0.05980534 = weight(_text_:c in 3006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05980534 = score(doc=3006,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1569245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 3006, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3006)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Response to Hjoerland and Nicolaisen. In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.62-63 sowie: Hjoerland, B., J. Nicolaisen: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve": a comment to Beghtol (2003). In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.55-61.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.3, S.199-201
  2. Hjoerland, B.: Fundamentals of knowledge organization (2003) 0.02
    0.021915635 = product of:
      0.04383127 = sum of:
        0.04383127 = product of:
          0.0657469 = sum of:
            0.00594156 = weight(_text_:s in 3025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00594156 = score(doc=3025,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 3025, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3025)
            0.05980534 = weight(_text_:c in 3025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05980534 = score(doc=3025,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1569245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 3025, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3025)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.83-116
    Source
    Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
  3. Hjoerland, B.; Nicolaisen, J.: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve" : a comment to Begthol (2003) (2004) 0.02
    0.015811436 = product of:
      0.03162287 = sum of:
        0.03162287 = product of:
          0.047434308 = sum of:
            0.0051455423 = weight(_text_:s in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0051455423 = score(doc=3023,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.10403037 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
            0.042288765 = weight(_text_:c in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042288765 = score(doc=3023,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1569245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Classification for information retrieval and classification for knowledge discovery: relationships between 'professional' and 'naive' classifications" in: Knowledge organization. 30(2003), no.2, S.64-73; vgl. dazu auch die Erwiderung von C. Beghtol in: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.62-63.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.55-61
  4. Hjoerland, B.; Christensen, F.S.: Work tasks and socio-cognitive relevance : a specific example (2002) 0.02
    0.015768334 = product of:
      0.03153667 = sum of:
        0.03153667 = product of:
          0.047305 = sum of:
            0.004159092 = weight(_text_:s in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004159092 = score(doc=5237,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
            0.043145906 = weight(_text_:22 in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043145906 = score(doc=5237,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15930945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 7.2006 14:11:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53(2002) no.11, S.960-965
  5. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.02
    0.015768334 = product of:
      0.03153667 = sum of:
        0.03153667 = product of:
          0.047305 = sum of:
            0.004159092 = weight(_text_:s in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004159092 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
            0.043145906 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043145906 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15930945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
  6. Hjoerland, B.: Information seeking and subject representation : an activity-theoretical approach to information science (1997) 0.01
    0.014618216 = product of:
      0.029236432 = sum of:
        0.029236432 = product of:
          0.043854646 = sum of:
            0.0079714395 = weight(_text_:s in 6963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0079714395 = score(doc=6963,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.16116315 = fieldWeight in 6963, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6963)
            0.035883207 = weight(_text_:c in 6963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035883207 = score(doc=6963,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1569245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 6963, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6963)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: nfd 49(1998) H.1, S.59-60 (G. Wersig), Erwiderung des Autors darauf in nfd: 49(1998) H.2, S.122-126; JASIS 49(1998) no.11, S.1043 (C. Chen); College and research libraries 59(1998) no.3, S.287-288 (P. Wilson)
    Pages
    224 S
  7. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.01
    0.013515714 = product of:
      0.027031427 = sum of:
        0.027031427 = product of:
          0.04054714 = sum of:
            0.0035649359 = weight(_text_:s in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0035649359 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
            0.036982205 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036982205 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15930945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:22:55
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.72-77
  8. Hjoerland, B.: User-based and cognitive approaches to knowledge organization : a theoretical analysis of the research literature (2013) 0.01
    0.011263095 = product of:
      0.02252619 = sum of:
        0.02252619 = product of:
          0.033789285 = sum of:
            0.00297078 = weight(_text_:s in 629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00297078 = score(doc=629,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 629, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=629)
            0.030818505 = weight(_text_:22 in 629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030818505 = score(doc=629,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15930945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 629, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=629)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:49:13
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.1, S.11-27
  9. Hjoerland, B.: Classical databases and knowledge organisation : a case for Boolean retrieval and human decision-making during search (2014) 0.01
    0.011263095 = product of:
      0.02252619 = sum of:
        0.02252619 = product of:
          0.033789285 = sum of:
            0.00297078 = weight(_text_:s in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00297078 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
            0.030818505 = weight(_text_:22 in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030818505 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15930945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.13
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  10. Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022) 0.01
    0.011263095 = product of:
      0.02252619 = sum of:
        0.02252619 = product of:
          0.033789285 = sum of:
            0.00297078 = weight(_text_:s in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00297078 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
            0.030818505 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030818505 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15930945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18.11.2023 13:47:22
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 49(2022) no.2, S.98 - 120
  11. Hjoerland, B.: Fundamentals of knowledge organization (2003) 0.01
    0.0087662535 = product of:
      0.017532507 = sum of:
        0.017532507 = product of:
          0.02629876 = sum of:
            0.002376624 = weight(_text_:s in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.002376624 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
            0.023922136 = weight(_text_:c in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023922136 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1569245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article is organized in 10 sections: (1) Knowledge Organization (KO) is a wide interdisciplinary field, muck broader than Library and Information Science (LIS). (2) Inside LIS there have been many different approaches and traditions of KO with little mutual influence. These traditions have to a large extent been defined by new technology, for which reason the theoretical integration and underpinning has not been well considered. The most important technology-driven traditions are: a) Manual indexing and classification in libraries and reference works, b) Documentation and scientific communication, c) Information storage and retrieval by computers, d) Citation based KO and e) Full text, hypertext and Internet based approaches. These traditions taken together define very muck the special LIS focus an KO. For KO as a field of research it is important to establish a fruitful theoretical frame of reference for this overall field. This paper provides some suggestions. (3) One important theoretical distinction to consider is the one between social and intellectual forms of KO. Social forms of KO are related to professional training, disciplines and social groups while intellectual organization is related to concepts and theories in the fields to be organized. (4) The social perspective includes in addition the systems of genres and documents as well as the social system of knowledge Producers, knowledge intermediaries and knowledge users. (5) This social system of documents, genres and agents makes available a very complicated structure of potential subject access points (SAPs), which may be used in information retrieval (IR). The basic alm of research in KO is to develop knowledge an how to optimise this system of SAPs and its utilization in IR. (6) SAPs may be seen as signs, and their production and use may be understood from a social semiotic point of view. (7) The concept of paradigms is also helpful because different groups and interests tend to be organized according to a paradigm and to develop different criteria of relevance, and thus different criteria of likeliness in KO. (8) The basic unit in KO is the semantic relation between two concepts, and such relations are embedded in theories. (9) In classification like things are grouped together, but what is considered similar is not a trivial question. (10) The paper concludes with the considering of methods for KO. Basically the methods of any field are connected with epistemological theories. This is also the case with KO. The existing methods as described in the literature of KO fit into a classification of basic epistemological views. The debate about the methods of KO at the deepest level therefore implies an epistemological discussion.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 30(2003) no.2, S.87-111
  12. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009) 0.01
    0.0056315474 = product of:
      0.011263095 = sum of:
        0.011263095 = product of:
          0.016894642 = sum of:
            0.00148539 = weight(_text_:s in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00148539 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.030030979 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
            0.015409253 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015409253 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15930945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:13:27
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.643
  13. Hjoerland, B.: Subject representation and information seeking : contributions to a theory based on the theory of knowledge (1993) 0.00
    0.001386364 = product of:
      0.002772728 = sum of:
        0.002772728 = product of:
          0.008318184 = sum of:
            0.008318184 = weight(_text_:s in 7555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008318184 = score(doc=7555,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 7555, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7555)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    [Dissertation]. - Zusammenfassung in: Knowledge organization 21(1994) no.2, S.94-98
  14. Albrechtsen, H.; Hjoerland, B.: Understandings of language and cognition : implications for classification research (1994) 0.00
    0.001386364 = product of:
      0.002772728 = sum of:
        0.002772728 = product of:
          0.008318184 = sum of:
            0.008318184 = weight(_text_:s in 8884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008318184 = score(doc=8884,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 8884, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8884)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S. -
  15. Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001) 0.00
    0.001386364 = product of:
      0.002772728 = sum of:
        0.002772728 = product of:
          0.008318184 = sum of:
            0.008318184 = weight(_text_:s in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008318184 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 35(2001), S.249-298
  16. Hjoerland, B.: Answer to Professor Szostak (concept theory) (2010) 0.00
    0.0013721446 = product of:
      0.002744289 = sum of:
        0.002744289 = product of:
          0.008232867 = sum of:
            0.008232867 = weight(_text_:s in 3323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008232867 = score(doc=3323,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.1664486 = fieldWeight in 3323, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3323)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Bezug zu: Hjoerland, B.: Concept theory. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.8, S.1519-1536.
    Footnote
    Erwiderung zu: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S.1076-1077.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S.1078-1080
  17. Hjoerland, B.: Theory of information science : Reply to Professor Gernot Wersig (1998) 0.00
    0.001188312 = product of:
      0.002376624 = sum of:
        0.002376624 = product of:
          0.0071298718 = sum of:
            0.0071298718 = weight(_text_:s in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0071298718 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.2, S.122-126
  18. Hjoerland, B.: Does informetrics need a theory? : a rejoinder to professor anthony van raan (2017) 0.00
    0.001188312 = product of:
      0.002376624 = sum of:
        0.002376624 = product of:
          0.0071298718 = sum of:
            0.0071298718 = weight(_text_:s in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0071298718 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.12, S.2846
  19. Hjoerland, B.; Scerri, E.; Dupré, J.: Forum: The Philosophy of Classification : The Periodic Table and the Philosophy of Classification - What is the Nature of the Periodic Table as a Classification System? - A Note on the Debate Between Hjørland and Scerri on the Significance of the Periodic Table (2011) 0.00
    0.0010291084 = product of:
      0.0020582168 = sum of:
        0.0020582168 = product of:
          0.0061746505 = sum of:
            0.0061746505 = weight(_text_:s in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0061746505 = score(doc=4294,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.124836445 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Thanks to Professor Eric Scerri for engaging in debate in this journal (Scerri 2011) by replying to my review (Hjørland 2008a) of his book (Scerri 2007). One of my points has been that we in our community (Knowledge Organization, KO / Library and Information Science, LIS) have been too isolated from broader academic fields related to classification and the organization of knowledge. The present debate is a step towards reversing this situation. Bezug zu: Scerri, E.R.: The periodic table: its story and its significance. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007. xxii, 346 S. und die Rezension dazu in: KO 35(2008) no.4, S.251-254 (B. Hjoerland).
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 38(2011) no.1, S.9-24
  20. Hjoerland, B.: Concept theory (2009) 0.00
    8.575904E-4 = product of:
      0.0017151808 = sum of:
        0.0017151808 = product of:
          0.0051455423 = sum of:
            0.0051455423 = weight(_text_:s in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0051455423 = score(doc=3461,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.049461924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045493204 = queryNorm
                0.10403037 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S. 1076-1077 und die Erwiderung darauf von B. Hjoerland (S.1078-1080)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.8, S.1519-1536