Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

0.028383229 = product of:
  0.056766458 = sum of:
    0.056766458 = product of:
      0.08514968 = sum of:
        0.029968852 = weight(_text_:j in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029968852 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
        0.055180833 = weight(_text_:n in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055180833 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Editor

Lopes, M.I. u. J. Beall

Location

N

0.010700313 = product of:
  0.021400627 = sum of:
    0.021400627 = product of:
      0.06420188 = sum of:
        0.06420188 = weight(_text_:22 in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06420188 = score(doc=1842,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.4094577 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A system of library classification that flashed across the inquiring mind of young Melvil Louis Kossuth Dewey (known as Melvil Dewey) in 1873 is still the most popular classification scheme.. The modern library classification begins with Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Melvil Dewey devised DDC in 1876. DDC has is credit of 128 years of boudless success. The DDC is being taught as a practical subject throughout the world and it is being used in majority of libraries in about 150 countries. This is the result of continuous revision that 22nd Edition of DDC has been published in July 2003. No other classification scheme has published so many editions. Some welcome changes have been made in DDC 22. To reduce the Christian bias in 200 religion, the numbers 201 to 209 have been devoted to specific aspects of religion. In the previous editions these numbers were devoted to Christianity. to enhance the classifier's efficiency, Table 7 has been removed from DDC 22 and the provision of adding group of persons is made by direct use of notation already available in schedules and in notation -08 from Table 1 Standard Subdivision. The present book is an attempt to explain, with suitable examples, the salient provisions of DDC 22. The book is written in simple language so that the students may not face any difficulty in understanding what is being explained. The examples in the book are explained in a step-by-step procedure. It is hoped that this book will prove of great help and use to the library professionals in general and library and information science students in particular.

Content

1. Introduction to DDC 22 2. Major changes in DDC 22 3. Introduction to the schedules 4. Use of Table 1 : Standard Subdivisions 5. Use of Table 2 : Areas 6. Use of Table 3 : Subdivisions for the arts, for individual literatures, for specific literary forms 7. Use to Table 4 : Subdivisions of individual languages and language families 8. Use of Table 5 : Ethic and National groups 9. Use of Table 6 : Languages 10. Treatment of Groups of Persons

Object

DDC-22

0.008088676 = product of:
  0.016177353 = sum of:
    0.016177353 = product of:
      0.048532058 = sum of:
        0.048532058 = weight(_text_:22 in 2280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048532058 = score(doc=2280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2280)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2008 18:09:52

0.0071494477 = product of:
  0.014298895 = sum of:
    0.014298895 = product of:
      0.042896684 = sum of:
        0.042896684 = weight(_text_:22 in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042896684 = score(doc=1467,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

28. 2.2008 17:22:52

Object

DDC-22

0.0066597452 = product of:
  0.0133194905 = sum of:
    0.0133194905 = product of:
      0.03995847 = sum of:
        0.03995847 = weight(_text_:j in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03995847 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.005055423 = product of:
  0.010110846 = sum of:
    0.010110846 = product of:
      0.030332536 = sum of:
        0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 1935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030332536 = score(doc=1935,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1935, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1935)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2008 13:03:30

0.005004613 = product of:
  0.010009226 = sum of:
    0.010009226 = product of:
      0.030027678 = sum of:
        0.030027678 = weight(_text_:22 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030027678 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

15. 7.2018 16:22:16

Footnote

Rez. in: Mitteilungen VÖB 48(1995) H.1, S.66-68 (K. Niedermair) - Vgl. auch Lepsky, K. in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519; Bibliothek: Forschung u. Praxis 19(1995) H.2, S.251-254 (G. Hartwieg; auch in: LDV-Forum Bd. 12, Nr. 2, Jg. 1995, S.22-29 [unter: http://www.jlcl.org/1995_Heft2/Rezensionen_19-27.pdf]) .

0.0033298726 = product of:
  0.0066597452 = sum of:
    0.0066597452 = product of:
      0.019979235 = sum of:
        0.019979235 = weight(_text_:j in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019979235 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge organization 27(2000) no.3, H.175-177 (B. Kwasnik); College and research libraries 61(2000) no.4, S.380-381 (J. Williams); Library resources and technical services 44(2000) no.4, S.107-108 (H.A. Olson); JASIST 51(2000) no.12, S.1149-1150 (T.A. Brooks)

0.0033298726 = product of:
  0.0066597452 = sum of:
    0.0066597452 = product of:
      0.019979235 = sum of:
        0.019979235 = weight(_text_:j in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019979235 = score(doc=1452,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält u.a.: HAFNER, J.: Klassifikation aus wissenschaftstheoretischer Perspektive; SIMONS, P.: Philosophische Aspekte der Klassifikation; KAUFFER, M.: Sprachliche Klassifikation und Analyse von Nominalkomposita in Speisebezeichnungen anhand informatischer und statistischer Methoden; HAVEKOST, H.: Drehscheibe ISBN: Weg zum internationalen Fachwörterbuch; LORENZ, B.: Sacherschließung von Literatur durch Stichwortsuche im OPAC?; PREUSS, L.: TAXIS - ein elektronischer Bibliothekskatalog; VOLK, M., H. MITTERMAIER, A. SCHURIG u. T. BIEDASSEK: Halbautomatische Volltextanalyse, Datenbankaufbau und Document Retrieval

0.003065602 = product of:
  0.006131204 = sum of:
    0.006131204 = product of:
      0.018393612 = sum of:
        0.018393612 = weight(_text_:n in 2312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018393612 = score(doc=2312,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.095275044 = fieldWeight in 2312, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2312)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Ton Heijligers reflects an the relation of the IME ICC effort to AACR and calls for an examination of the principles and function of the concept of main entry in his brief paper "Main entry into the future?" Ingrid Parent's article "From ISBD (S) to ISBD(CR): a voyage of discovery and alignment" is reprinted from Serials Librarian as it tells of the successful project not only to revise an ISBD, but also to harmonize three Codes for serials cataloguing: ISBD (CR), ISSN and AACR. Gunilla Jonsson's paper "The bibliographic unit in the digital context" is a perceptive discussion of level of granularity issues which must be addressed in deciding what to catalogue. Practical issues and user expectation are important considerations, whether the material to be catalogued is digital or analog. Ann Huthwaite's paper "Class of materials concept and GMDs" as well as Tom Delsey's ensuing comments, originated as Joint Steering Committee restricted papers in 2002. It is a great service to have them made widely available in this form as they raise fundamental issues and motivate work that has since taken place, leading to the current major round of revision to AACR. The GMD issue is about more than a list of terms and their placement in the cataloguing record, it is intertwined with consideration of whether the concept of classes of materials is helpful in organizing cataloguing rules, if so, which classes are needed, and how to allow for eventual integration of new types of materials. Useful in the Code comparison exercise is an extract of the section an access points from the draft of revised RAK (German cataloguing rules). Four short papers compare aspects of the Russian Cataloguing Rules with RAK and AACR: Tatiana Maskhoulia covers corporate body headings; Elena Zagorskaya outlines current development an serials and other continuing resources; Natalia N. Kasparova covers multilevel structures; Ljubov Ermakova and Tamara Bakhturina describe the uniform title and GMD provisions. The website includes one more item by Kasparova "Bibliographic record language in multilingual electronic communication." The volume is rounded out by the appendix which includes the conference agenda, the full list of participants, and the reports from the five working groups. Not for the casual reader, this volume is a must read for anyone working an cataloguing code development at the national or international levels, as well as those teaching cataloguing. Any practising cataloguer will benefit from reading the draft statement of principles and the three presentation papers, and dipping into the background papers."

0.0024974043 = product of:
  0.0049948087 = sum of:
    0.0049948087 = product of:
      0.014984426 = sum of:
        0.014984426 = weight(_text_:j in 41) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014984426 = score(doc=41,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.105320126 = fieldWeight in 41, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=41)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Weitere Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 58(2007) H.1, S.59-60 (J. Fassbender) mit Berücksichtigung der Software Thesaurus Master.

0.0020811702 = product of:
  0.0041623404 = sum of:
    0.0041623404 = product of:
      0.012487021 = sum of:
        0.012487021 = weight(_text_:j in 641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012487021 = score(doc=641,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.08776677 = fieldWeight in 641, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=641)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 60(2007)H.3, S.80-81 (J. Bertram): "Wie aus dem Titel der Publikation hervorgeht, will der Autor eine Bestandsaufnahme zum Einsatz semantischer Technologien im BID-Bereich (Bibliothek - Information - Dokumentation) bzw. BAM-Bereich (Bibliothek - Archiv - Museum) vornehmen. einigem Befremden, dass eines von insgesamt drei Vorwörtern für ein einschlägiges Softwareprodukt wirbt und von einer Firmenmitarbeiterin verfasst worden ist. Nach einer Skizze des gegenwärtigen Standes nationaler und europäischer Bibliothekspolitik folgen kurze Definitionen zu den beteiligten Branchen, zu semantischen Technologien und zu Precision und Recall. Die Ausführungen zu semantischen Technologien hätten durchaus gleich an den Anfang gestellt werden können, schließlich sollen sie ja das Hauptthema der vorliegenden Publikation abgeben. Zudem hätten sie konkreter, trennschärfer und ausführlicher ausfallen können. Der Autor moniert zu Recht das Fehlen einer einheitlichen Auffassung, was unter semantischen Technologien denn nun genau zu verstehen sei. Seine Definition lässt allerdings Fragen offen. So wird z.B. nicht geklärt, was besagte Technologien von den hier auch immer wieder erwähnten semantischen Tools unterscheidet. Das nachfolgende Kapitel über bibliographische Tools vereint eine Aufzählung konkreter Beispiele für Austauschformate, Dokumentationssysteme, Suchmaschinen, Informationsportale und OPACs. Im Anschluss daran stellt der Autor Methoden semantischer Anreicherung (bibliographischer) Daten vor und präsentiert Projekte im Bibliotheksbereich. Der aufzählende Charakter dieses und des vorangestellten Kapitels mag einem schnellen Überblick über die fraglichen Gegenstände dienlich sein, für eine systematische Lektüre eignen sich diese Passagen weniger. Auch wird der Bezug zu semantischen Technologien nicht durchgängig hergestellt.

0.0020811702 = product of:
  0.0041623404 = sum of:
    0.0041623404 = product of:
      0.012487021 = sum of:
        0.012487021 = weight(_text_:j in 4039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012487021 = score(doc=4039,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.08776677 = fieldWeight in 4039, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4039)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Weitere Rez. in: ZfBB 56(2009) H.2, S.131-133 (J. Bertram): "Alles in allem gelingt es den Autoren aber, ein facettenreiches, umfassendes und detailliertes Bild der Wissensorganisation und -repräsentation zu zeichnen, das durch eine Fülle von Literatur fundiert und zugleich praxisorientiert ist. Die behandelten Inhalte gehen über Grundlagen erheblich hinaus. Dies ist einerseits eine Schwäche des Buchs, zugleich aber auch seine Stärke. Als Novize mag man mit ihm zu kämpfen haben, als Experte wird man viele wertvolle Anregungen finden und noch die eine oder andere Wissenslücke schließen können. Entlastendes bieten die Autoren zudem all denjenigen, die von der Wichtigkeit der von einigen bereits als Anachronismus abgeschriebenen Hierarchierelation überzeugt sind, geben sie dieser doch den ihr gebührenden Raum." Weitere Rez. in: IWP 60(2009) H.5, S.300 (R. Ferber); KO 36(2009) no.1, S.63-65 (V. Petras)