Search (44 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.06
    0.059253808 = product of:
      0.118507616 = sum of:
        0.118507616 = product of:
          0.17776142 = sum of:
            0.09196805 = weight(_text_:n in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09196805 = score(doc=3582,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
            0.08579337 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08579337 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  2. Wakeling, S.; Creaser, C.; Pinfield, S.; Fry, J.; Spezi, V.; Willett, P.; Paramita, M.: Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open-access mega-journal authors : results of a large-scale survey (2019) 0.02
    0.023652691 = product of:
      0.047305383 = sum of:
        0.047305383 = product of:
          0.07095807 = sum of:
            0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024974043 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
            0.045984026 = weight(_text_:n in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045984026 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Open-access mega-journals (OAMJs) are characterized by their large scale, wide scope, open-access (OA) business model, and "soundness-only" peer review. The last of these controversially discounts the novelty, significance, and relevance of submitted articles and assesses only their "soundness." This article reports the results of an international survey of authors (n = 11,883), comparing the responses of OAMJ authors with those of other OA and subscription journals, and drawing comparisons between different OAMJs. Strikingly, OAMJ authors showed a low understanding of soundness-only peer review: two-thirds believed OAMJs took into account novelty, significance, and relevance, although there were marked geographical variations. Author satisfaction with OAMJs, however, was high, with more than 80% of OAMJ authors saying they would publish again in the same journal, although there were variations by title, and levels were slightly lower than subscription journals (over 90%). Their reasons for choosing to publish in OAMJs included a wide variety of factors, not significantly different from reasons given by authors of other journals, with the most important including the quality of the journal and quality of peer review. About half of OAMJ articles had been submitted elsewhere before submission to the OAMJ with some evidence of a "cascade" of articles between journals from the same publisher.
  3. Taubert, N.: Open Access und digitale Publikation aus der Perspektive von Wissenschaftsverlagen (2016) 0.02
    0.018393612 = product of:
      0.036787223 = sum of:
        0.036787223 = product of:
          0.110361665 = sum of:
            0.110361665 = weight(_text_:n in 3251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.110361665 = score(doc=3251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.57165027 = fieldWeight in 3251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3251)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Taubert, N.; Weingart, P.: Wandel des wissenschaftlichen Publizierens : eine Heuristik zur Analyse rezenter Wandlungsprozesse (2016) 0.02
    0.018393612 = product of:
      0.036787223 = sum of:
        0.036787223 = product of:
          0.110361665 = sum of:
            0.110361665 = weight(_text_:n in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.110361665 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.57165027 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.01
    0.014748422 = product of:
      0.029496845 = sum of:
        0.029496845 = product of:
          0.044245265 = sum of:
            0.019979235 = weight(_text_:j in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019979235 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
            0.024266029 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024266029 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  6. Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017) 0.01
    0.014748422 = product of:
      0.029496845 = sum of:
        0.029496845 = product of:
          0.044245265 = sum of:
            0.019979235 = weight(_text_:j in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019979235 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
            0.024266029 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024266029 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  7. Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018) 0.01
    0.014748422 = product of:
      0.029496845 = sum of:
        0.029496845 = product of:
          0.044245265 = sum of:
            0.019979235 = weight(_text_:j in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019979235 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
            0.024266029 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024266029 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  8. Loos, A.: ¬Die Million ist geknackt (2015) 0.01
    0.012133013 = product of:
      0.024266027 = sum of:
        0.024266027 = product of:
          0.07279808 = sum of:
            0.07279808 = weight(_text_:22 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07279808 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 4.2015 17:22:03
  9. Fecher, B.; Sokolovska, N.; Friesike, S.; Wagner, G.G.: Governance von Forschungsinfrastruktur am Beispiel von Open Access : Oligopolisierung des Verlagswesens, Plattformisierung der wissenschaftlichen Kommunikation (2019) 0.01
    0.010729606 = product of:
      0.021459213 = sum of:
        0.021459213 = product of:
          0.064377636 = sum of:
            0.064377636 = weight(_text_:n in 5501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064377636 = score(doc=5501,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 5501, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5501)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Dobránszki, J.: Do open access data files represent an academic Risk? (2015) 0.01
    0.009989617 = product of:
      0.019979235 = sum of:
        0.019979235 = product of:
          0.059937704 = sum of:
            0.059937704 = weight(_text_:j in 2253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059937704 = score(doc=2253,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 2253, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2253)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Schleim, S.: Warum die Wissenschaft nicht frei ist (2017) 0.01
    0.008088676 = product of:
      0.016177353 = sum of:
        0.016177353 = product of:
          0.048532058 = sum of:
            0.048532058 = weight(_text_:22 in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048532058 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.10.2017 15:48:22
  12. Ferro, N.; Silvello, G.: NESTOR: a formal model for digital archives (2013) 0.01
    0.0076640043 = product of:
      0.015328009 = sum of:
        0.015328009 = product of:
          0.045984026 = sum of:
            0.045984026 = weight(_text_:n in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045984026 = score(doc=2707,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Muresan, S.; Gonzalez-Ibanez, R.; Ghosh, D.; Wacholder, N.: Identification of nonliteral language in social media : a case study on sarcasm (2016) 0.01
    0.0076640043 = product of:
      0.015328009 = sum of:
        0.015328009 = product of:
          0.045984026 = sum of:
            0.045984026 = weight(_text_:n in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045984026 = score(doc=3155,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Maflahi, N.; Thelwall, M.: How quickly do publications get read? : the evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articles (2018) 0.01
    0.0076640043 = product of:
      0.015328009 = sum of:
        0.015328009 = product of:
          0.045984026 = sum of:
            0.045984026 = weight(_text_:n in 4015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045984026 = score(doc=4015,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 4015, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4015)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Schönfelder, N.: Mittelbedarf für Open Access an ausgewählten deutschen Universitäten und Forschungseinrichtungen : Transformationsrechnung (2019) 0.01
    0.0076640043 = product of:
      0.015328009 = sum of:
        0.015328009 = product of:
          0.045984026 = sum of:
            0.045984026 = weight(_text_:n in 5427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045984026 = score(doc=5427,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 5427, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5427)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Müller, S.: Schattenbibliotheken : Welche Auswirkungen haben Sci-Hub und Co. auf Verlage und Bibliotheken? (2019) 0.01
    0.0070775915 = product of:
      0.014155183 = sum of:
        0.014155183 = product of:
          0.04246555 = sum of:
            0.04246555 = weight(_text_:22 in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04246555 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.5, S.397-404
  17. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.01
    0.0070775915 = product of:
      0.014155183 = sum of:
        0.014155183 = product of:
          0.04246555 = sum of:
            0.04246555 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04246555 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
  18. Schmale, W.: Strategische Optionen für universitäre Repositorien in den Digital Humanities (2018) 0.01
    0.0070775915 = product of:
      0.014155183 = sum of:
        0.014155183 = product of:
          0.04246555 = sum of:
            0.04246555 = weight(_text_:22 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04246555 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 9.2018 12:22:39
  19. Hrachovec, H.: Offen gesagt: Beschwerden eines Archivars (2018) 0.01
    0.0070775915 = product of:
      0.014155183 = sum of:
        0.014155183 = product of:
          0.04246555 = sum of:
            0.04246555 = weight(_text_:22 in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04246555 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 9.2018 12:22:52
  20. Tozer, J.: How long is the perfect book? : Bigger really is better. What the numbers say (2019) 0.01
    0.0066597452 = product of:
      0.0133194905 = sum of:
        0.0133194905 = product of:
          0.03995847 = sum of:
            0.03995847 = weight(_text_:j in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03995847 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Languages

  • e 26
  • d 17

Types

  • a 41
  • el 8
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…