Search (111 results, page 6 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Belém, F.M.; Almeida, J.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.: ¬A survey on tag recommendation methods : a review (2017) 0.01 
    0.007693157 = product of:
  0.015386314 = sum of:
    0.015386314 = product of:
      0.030772628 = sum of:
        0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030772628 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045425482 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:30:22
  2. Cho, H.; Donovan, A.; Lee, J.H.: Art in an algorithm : a taxonomy for describing video game visual styles (2018) 0.01 
    0.007693157 = product of:
  0.015386314 = sum of:
    0.015386314 = product of:
      0.030772628 = sum of:
        0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030772628 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045425482 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The discovery and retrieval of video games in library and information systems is, by and large, dependent on a limited set of descriptive metadata. Noticeably missing from this metadata are classifications of visual style-despite the overwhelmingly visual nature of most video games and the interest in visual style among video game users. One explanation for this paucity is the difficulty in eliciting consistent judgements about visual style, likely due to subjective interpretations of terminology and a lack of demonstrable testing for coinciding judgements. This study presents a taxonomy of video game visual styles constructed from the findings of a 22-participant cataloging user study of visual styles. A detailed description of the study, and its value and shortcomings, are presented along with reflections about the challenges of cultivating consensus about visual style in video games. The high degree of overall agreement in the user study demonstrates the potential value of a descriptor like visual style and the use of a cataloging study in developing visual style taxonomies. The resulting visual style taxonomy, the methods and analysis described herein may help improve the organization and retrieval of video games and possibly other visual materials like graphic designs, illustrations, and animations.
  3. Jun, W.: ¬A knowledge network constructed by integrating classification, thesaurus and metadata in a digital library (2003) 0.01 
    0.0072885007 = product of:
  0.014577001 = sum of:
    0.014577001 = product of:
      0.029154003 = sum of:
        0.029154003 = weight(_text_:w in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029154003 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045425482 = queryNorm
            0.16841541 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  4. Bazillion, R.J.; Caplan, P.: Metadata fundamentals for all librarians (2003) 0.01 
    0.0072885007 = product of:
  0.014577001 = sum of:
    0.014577001 = product of:
      0.029154003 = sum of:
        0.029154003 = weight(_text_:w in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029154003 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045425482 = queryNorm
            0.16841541 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez.: JASIST 56(2005) no.13, S.1264 (W. Koehler: "Priscilla Caplan provides us with a sweeping but very welcome survey of the various approaches to metadata in practice or proposed in libraries and archives today. One of the key strengths of the book and paradoxically one of its key weaknesses is that the work is descriptive in nature. While relationships between one system and another may be noted, no general conclusions of a practical or theoretical nature are drawn of the relative merits of one metadata or metametadata scheure as against another. That said, let us remember that this is an American Library Association publication, published as a descriptive resource. Caplan does very well what she sets out to do. The work is divided into two parts: "Principles and Practice" and "Metadata Schemes," and is further subdivided into eighteen chapters. The book begins with short yet more than adequate chapters defining terms, vocabularies, and concepts. It discusses interoperability and the various levels of quality among systems. Perhaps Chapter 5, "Metadata and the Web" is the weakest chapter of the work. There is a brief discussion of how search engines work and some of the more recent initiatives (e.g., the Semantic Web) to develop better retrieval agents. The chapter is weck not in its description but in what it fails to discuss. The second section, "Metadata Schemes," which encompasses chapters six through eighteen, is particularly rich. Thirteen different metadata or metametadata schema are described to provide the interested librarian with a better than adequate introduction to the purpose, application, and operability of each metadata scheme. These are: library cataloging (chiefly MARC), TEI, Dublin Core, Archival Description and EAD, Art and Architecture, GILS, Education, ONIX, Geospatial, Data Documentation Initiative, Administrative Metadata, Structural Metadata, and Rights Metadata. The last three chapters introduce concepts heretofore "foreign" to the realm of the catalog or metadata. Descriptive metadata was . . . intended to help in finding, discovering, and identifying an information resource." (p. 151) Administrative metadata is an aid to ". . . the owners or caretakers of the resource." Structural metadata describe the relationships of data elements. Rights metadata describe (or as Caplan points out, may describe, as definition is still as yet ambiguous) end user rights to use and reproduce material in digital format. Keeping in mind that the work is intended for the general practitioner librarian, the book has a particularly useful glossary and index. Caplan also provides useful suggestions for additional reading at the end of each chapter. 1 intend to adopt Metadata Fundamentals for All Librarians when next I teach a digital cataloging course. Caplan's book provides an excellent introduction to the basic concepts. It is, however, not a "cookbook" nor a guidebook into the complexities of the application of any metadata scheme."
  5. Duval, E.; Hodgins, W.; Sutton, S.; Weibel, S.L.: Metadata principles and practicalities (2002) 0.01 
    0.0072885007 = product of:
  0.014577001 = sum of:
    0.014577001 = product of:
      0.029154003 = sum of:
        0.029154003 = weight(_text_:w in 1208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029154003 = score(doc=1208,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045425482 = queryNorm
            0.16841541 = fieldWeight in 1208, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1208)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  6. Khoo, M.J.; Ahn, J.-w.; Binding, C.; Jones, H.J.; Lin, X.; Massam, D.; Tudhope, D.: Augmenting Dublin Core digital library metadata with Dewey Decimal Classification (2015) 0.01 
    0.0072885007 = product of:
  0.014577001 = sum of:
    0.014577001 = product of:
      0.029154003 = sum of:
        0.029154003 = weight(_text_:w in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029154003 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045425482 = queryNorm
            0.16841541 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Wessel, C.: "Publishing and sharing your metadata application profile" : 2. SCHEMAS-Workshop in Bonn (2001) 0.01 
    0.0061545256 = product of:
  0.012309051 = sum of:
    0.012309051 = product of:
      0.024618102 = sum of:
        0.024618102 = weight(_text_:22 in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024618102 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045425482 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 3.2001 17:10:22
  8. Baker, T.: ¬A grammar of Dublin Core (2000) 0.01 
    0.0061545256 = product of:
  0.012309051 = sum of:
    0.012309051 = product of:
      0.024618102 = sum of:
        0.024618102 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024618102 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045425482 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:01:22
  9. Rice, R.: Applying DC to institutional data repositories (2008) 0.01 
    0.0061545256 = product of:
  0.012309051 = sum of:
    0.012309051 = product of:
      0.024618102 = sum of:
        0.024618102 = weight(_text_:22 in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024618102 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045425482 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  10. Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012) 0.01 
    0.0061545256 = product of:
  0.012309051 = sum of:
    0.012309051 = product of:
      0.024618102 = sum of:
        0.024618102 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024618102 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045425482 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
  11. Gömpel, R.; Altenhöner, R.; Kunz, M.; Oehlschläger, S.; Werner, C.: Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in Buenos Aires : Aus den Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control, der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC sowie der Information Technology Section (2004) 0.00 
    0.0030772628 = product of:
  0.0061545256 = sum of:
    0.0061545256 = product of:
      0.012309051 = sum of:
        0.012309051 = weight(_text_:22 in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012309051 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045425482 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    "Libraries: Tools for Education and Development" war das Motto der 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz, dem Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, der vom 22.-27. August 2004 in Buenos Aires, Argentinien, und damit erstmals in Lateinamerika stattfand. Rund 3.000 Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer, davon ein Drittel aus spanischsprachigen Ländern, allein 600 aus Argentinien, besuchten die von der IFLA und dem nationalen Organisationskomitee gut organisierte Tagung mit mehr als 200 Sitzungen und Veranstaltungen. Aus Deutschland waren laut Teilnehmerverzeichnis leider nur 45 Kolleginnen und Kollegen angereist, womit ihre Zahl wieder auf das Niveau von Boston gesunken ist. Erfreulicherweise gab es nunmehr bereits im dritten Jahr eine deutschsprachige Ausgabe des IFLA-Express. Auch in diesem Jahr soll hier über die Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control berichtet werden. Die Arbeit der Division mit ihren Sektionen Bibliography, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing sowie der neuen Sektion Knowledge Management bildet einen der Schwerpunkte der IFLA-Arbeit, die dabei erzielten konkreten Ergebnisse und Empfehlungen haben maßgeblichen Einfluss auf die tägliche Arbeit der Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. Erstmals wird auch ausführlich über die Arbeit der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC und der Information Technology Section berichtet.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 96
  • d 13
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 102
  • el 8
  • s 6
  • m 3
  • b 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications