Search (1038 results, page 2 of 52)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.04
    0.040329076 = product of:
      0.08065815 = sum of:
        0.08065815 = sum of:
          0.043731 = weight(_text_:w in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043731 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
          0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036927152 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  2. Mustafa El Hadi, W.; Favier, L.: Bridging the gaps between knowledge organization and digital humanities (2014) 0.04
    0.040329076 = product of:
      0.08065815 = sum of:
        0.08065815 = sum of:
          0.043731 = weight(_text_:w in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043731 = score(doc=1462,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
          0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036927152 = score(doc=1462,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Kluge, A.; Singer, W.: ¬Das Gehirn braucht so viel Strom wie die Glühbirne (2012) 0.04
    0.040329076 = product of:
      0.08065815 = sum of:
        0.08065815 = sum of:
          0.043731 = weight(_text_:w in 4167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043731 = score(doc=4167,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 4167, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4167)
          0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 4167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036927152 = score(doc=4167,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4167, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4167)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2018 18:10:21
  4. Tang, X.-B.; Liu, G.-C.; Yang, J.; Wei, W.: Knowledge-based financial statement fraud detection system : based on an ontology and a decision tree (2018) 0.04
    0.040329076 = product of:
      0.08065815 = sum of:
        0.08065815 = sum of:
          0.043731 = weight(_text_:w in 4306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043731 = score(doc=4306,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 4306, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4306)
          0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 4306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036927152 = score(doc=4306,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4306, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4306)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2018 10:22:43
  5. Sears' list of subject headings (2018) 0.04
    0.040329076 = product of:
      0.08065815 = sum of:
        0.08065815 = sum of:
          0.043731 = weight(_text_:w in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043731 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
          0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036927152 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21.12.2018 18:22:12
    Imprint
    Ipswich, Mas. : Grey House Publishing / H W Wilson
  6. Wu, Q.: ¬The w-index : a measure to assess scientific impact by focusing on widely cited papers (2010) 0.04
    0.037564073 = product of:
      0.075128146 = sum of:
        0.075128146 = product of:
          0.15025629 = sum of:
            0.15025629 = weight(_text_:w in 3428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15025629 = score(doc=3428,freq=34.0), product of:
                0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.8679932 = fieldWeight in 3428, product of:
                  5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                    34.0 = termFreq=34.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the principles of the h-index, I propose a new measure, the w-index, as a particularly simple and more useful way to assess the substantial impact of a researcher's work, especially regarding excellent papers. The w-index can be defined as follows: If w of a researcher's papers have at least 10w citations each and the other papers have fewer than 10(w+1) citations, that researcher's w-index is w. The results demonstrate that there are noticeable differences between the w-index and the h-index, because the w-index plays close attention to the more widely cited papers. These discrepancies can be measured by comparing the ranks of 20 astrophysicists, a few famous physical scientists, and 16 Price medalists. Furthermore, I put forward the w(q)-index to improve the discriminatory power of the w-index and to rank scientists with the same w. The factor q is the least number of citations a researcher with w needed to reach w+1. In terms of both simplicity and accuracy, the w-index or w(q)-index can be widely used for evaluation of scientists, journals, conferences, scientific topics, research institutions, and so on.
    Object
    W-index
  7. Dahl, E.; Pauen, M.: Schuld und freier Wille (2010) 0.03
    0.033607565 = product of:
      0.06721513 = sum of:
        0.06721513 = sum of:
          0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036442503 = score(doc=3713,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
          0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030772628 = score(doc=3713,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die Diskussion: Hassemer, W.: Haltet den geborenen Dieb! In: FAZ vom 15.06.2010. Roth, G., G. Merkel: Haltet den Richter!: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 26.06.2010, S.xx. Walter, M.: Unzulässige Überinterpretation: Schuld und Strafe. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.xxx vom 05.07.2010, S.xx. Janich, P.: Stillschweigende Hirngespinste: Die FR-Debatte zur Willensfreiheit. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.158 vom 12.07.2010, S.20-21. Lüderssen, K.: Wer determiniert die Hirnforscher?: Was ist Willensfreiheit (4) [Interview]. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.164 vom 19.07.2010, S.20-21. Pauen, M.: Das Schuldprinzip antasten, ohne es abzuschaffen: Was ist Willensfreiheit (5) oder: Wer ist verantwortlich für die Abschaffung von Verantwortung?. In: Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr.170 vom 26.07.2010, S.22-23.
  8. Chang, Y.-W.; Huang, M.-H.: ¬A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science : using three bibliometric methods (2012) 0.03
    0.033607565 = product of:
      0.06721513 = sum of:
        0.06721513 = sum of:
          0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036442503 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
          0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030772628 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.22-33
  9. Concepts in Context : Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010 (2011) 0.03
    0.033607565 = product of:
      0.06721513 = sum of:
        0.06721513 = sum of:
          0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036442503 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
          0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030772628 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:34:18
    Editor
    Gödert, W.
  10. Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013) 0.03
    0.033607565 = product of:
      0.06721513 = sum of:
        0.06721513 = sum of:
          0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036442503 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
          0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030772628 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:34:49
  11. Babik, W.: Knowledge organization for the system of indexing and retrieval of information on the folk culture of the Polish Carpathian region (2014) 0.03
    0.033607565 = product of:
      0.06721513 = sum of:
        0.06721513 = sum of:
          0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036442503 = score(doc=1457,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
          0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030772628 = score(doc=1457,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  12. Vom Buch zur Datenbank : Paul Otlets Utopie der Wissensvisualisierung (2012) 0.03
    0.033607565 = product of:
      0.06721513 = sum of:
        0.06721513 = sum of:
          0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036442503 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030772628 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Gegen Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts geriet das Dokumentationswesen in eine Krise: wie lässt sich das kulturelle Wissen nachhaltiger organisieren? Paul Otlet (1868-1944), ein belgischer Industriellenerbe und studierter Rechtsanwalt, entwickelte zusammen mit Henri La Fontaine ab 1895 ein Ordnungs- und Klassifikationssystem, das das millionenfach publizierte "Weltwissen" dokumentieren sollte. Otlets Anspruch war die Schaffung eines "Instrument d'ubiquité", das zur "Hyper-Intelligence" führen sollte. Jahrzehnte vor Web und Wikis weisen diese Ideen auf eine globale Vernetzung des Wissens hin. Der vorliegende Titel erinnert an den Pionier Paul Otlet mit einer ausführlichen Einleitung von Frank Hartmann (Bauhaus-Universität Weimar), Beiträgen von W. Boyd Rayward (University of Illinois), Charles van den Heuvel (Königlich Niederländische Akademie der Wissenschaften) und Wouter Van Acker (Universität Gent).
    Date
    22. 8.2016 16:06:54
  13. Zhou, D.; Lawless, S.; Wu, X.; Zhao, W.; Liu, J.: ¬A study of user profile representation for personalized cross-language information retrieval (2016) 0.03
    0.033607565 = product of:
      0.06721513 = sum of:
        0.06721513 = sum of:
          0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 3167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036442503 = score(doc=3167,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 3167, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3167)
          0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 3167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030772628 = score(doc=3167,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3167, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3167)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  14. Roy, W.; Gray, C.: Preparing existing metadata for repository batch import : a recipe for a fickle food (2018) 0.03
    0.033607565 = product of:
      0.06721513 = sum of:
        0.06721513 = sum of:
          0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036442503 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
          0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030772628 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10.11.2018 16:27:22
  15. Lu, W.; Ding, H.; Jiang, J.: ¬A document expansion framework for tag-based image retrieval (2018) 0.03
    0.033607565 = product of:
      0.06721513 = sum of:
        0.06721513 = sum of:
          0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 4630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036442503 = score(doc=4630,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 4630, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4630)
          0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 4630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030772628 = score(doc=4630,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4630, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  16. Wehling, E.: Framing-Manual : Unser gemeinsamer freier Rundfunk ARD (2019) 0.03
    0.033607565 = product of:
      0.06721513 = sum of:
        0.06721513 = sum of:
          0.036442503 = weight(_text_:w in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036442503 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.030772628 = weight(_text_:22 in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030772628 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045425482 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch den Kommentar in Open Password , Nr.157 vom 22.02.2019: "Vor wenigen Tagen wurde das "Framing-Manual" der Linguistin Elisabeth Wehling bekannt, das sie für 120.000 Euro für die ARD erarbeitet hat und fortlaufend in Workshops für Mitarbeiter eingesetzt wird. Da aus Frau Wehlings Sicht "objektives, faktenbegründetes und rationales Denken" nicht möglich ist, kann es im öffentlichen Streit der Meinungen nur mehr darum gehen, die eigenen Sprachregelungen durchzusetzen und die Rezipienten über Emotionalisierungen und implizite moralische Bewertungen über den Tisch zu ziehen. So sollten Bürger, die den Zwangsbeitrag für Rundfunk und Fernsehen nicht zahlen wollen, als "demokratieferne, wortbrüchige und illoyale Beitragshinterzieher" gebrandmarkt werden und sind "unserem gemeinsamen freien Rundfunk ARD" die "medienkapitalistischen Heuschrecken" entgegenzustellen. Derweil berichtet Meedia von einem zweiten Fall Relotius, einem freien Journalisten, der für die Süddeutsche Zeitung, die Zeit und den Spiegel geschrieben hat und soeben mit einer frei erfundenen Geschichte von der SZ überführt wurde. Das "Framing-Manual" erscheint mir als ein noch größerer Skandal als der Fall Claas Relotius mit seinen vielen erfundenen Geschichten im Spiegel und praktisch der gesamten weiteren "Qualitätspresse", weil die Spitzen der ARD und mit ihnen die nachgeordneten Strukturen das Manual von Frau Wehling willkommen geheißen haben und weiterhin zur Indoktrination ihrer Mitarbeiter verwenden. Fake News und die damit verbundene Kriegserklärung an Wahrheit und Wissenschaft kommen nicht von Donald Trump, sie werden selbst generiert und breiten sich ungehindert mit Wissen und Willen der Verantwortlichen in unserem "Qualitätsfernsehen" aus." (W. Bredemeier)
    Date
    22. 2.2019 9:26:20
  17. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.03
    0.02705539 = product of:
      0.05411078 = sum of:
        0.05411078 = product of:
          0.21644312 = sum of:
            0.21644312 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21644312 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38511774 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  18. Göbel, S.; Sperber, W.: Bibliographische Klassifikationen in der Mathematik : Werkzeuge der inhaltlichen Erschließung und für das Retrieval (2010) 0.03
    0.02550975 = product of:
      0.0510195 = sum of:
        0.0510195 = product of:
          0.102039 = sum of:
            0.102039 = weight(_text_:w in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102039 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.58945394 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Crom, W.: Digitisation and georeferencing of maps : key terms or stimulus words? (2019) 0.03
    0.02550975 = product of:
      0.0510195 = sum of:
        0.0510195 = product of:
          0.102039 = sum of:
            0.102039 = weight(_text_:w in 5623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102039 = score(doc=5623,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.58945394 = fieldWeight in 5623, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5623)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. (2013 ff.) 0.02
    0.024618102 = product of:
      0.049236204 = sum of:
        0.049236204 = product of:
          0.09847241 = sum of:
            0.09847241 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09847241 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045425482 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Languages

  • e 687
  • d 344
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 883
  • el 105
  • m 99
  • s 30
  • x 12
  • r 8
  • b 5
  • i 2
  • p 2
  • ms 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications