Search (63 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.02
    0.024067469 = product of:
      0.048134938 = sum of:
        0.048134938 = product of:
          0.07220241 = sum of:
            0.035556704 = weight(_text_:c in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035556704 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
            0.036645703 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036645703 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
  2. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.02
    0.024067469 = product of:
      0.048134938 = sum of:
        0.048134938 = product of:
          0.07220241 = sum of:
            0.035556704 = weight(_text_:c in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035556704 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
            0.036645703 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036645703 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  3. Hjoerland, B.; Nicolaisen, J.: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve" : a comment to Begthol (2003) (2004) 0.02
    0.022349088 = product of:
      0.044698175 = sum of:
        0.044698175 = product of:
          0.06704726 = sum of:
            0.02514328 = weight(_text_:j in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02514328 = score(doc=3023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
            0.04190398 = weight(_text_:c in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04190398 = score(doc=3023,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Classification for information retrieval and classification for knowledge discovery: relationships between 'professional' and 'naive' classifications" in: Knowledge organization. 30(2003), no.2, S.64-73; vgl. dazu auch die Erwiderung von C. Beghtol in: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.62-63.
  4. Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004) 0.02
    0.020056225 = product of:
      0.04011245 = sum of:
        0.04011245 = product of:
          0.060168672 = sum of:
            0.029630585 = weight(_text_:c in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029630585 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
            0.030538088 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030538088 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.19-22
  5. Zhang, J.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬A new similarity measure for subject hierarchical structures (2014) 0.02
    0.018560458 = product of:
      0.037120916 = sum of:
        0.037120916 = product of:
          0.05568137 = sum of:
            0.02514328 = weight(_text_:j in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02514328 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
            0.030538088 = weight(_text_:22 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030538088 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 4.2015 16:22:13
  6. Beghtol, C.: Classification for information retrieval and classification for knowledge discovery : relationships between "professional" and "naïve" classifications (2003) 0.02
    0.018257957 = product of:
      0.036515914 = sum of:
        0.036515914 = product of:
          0.054773867 = sum of:
            0.02514328 = weight(_text_:j in 3021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02514328 = score(doc=3021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 3021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3021)
            0.029630585 = weight(_text_:c in 3021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029630585 = score(doc=3021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 3021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3021)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. Stellungnahme dazu in: Hjoerland, B., J. Nicolaisen: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve": a comment to Beghtol (2003). In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.55-61.
  7. Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992) 0.02
    0.017375931 = product of:
      0.034751862 = sum of:
        0.034751862 = product of:
          0.052127793 = sum of:
            0.021334782 = weight(_text_:j in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021334782 = score(doc=2072,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.14894515 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
            0.03079301 = weight(_text_:c in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03079301 = score(doc=2072,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.19803005 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
  8. Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003) 0.01
    0.014848365 = product of:
      0.02969673 = sum of:
        0.02969673 = product of:
          0.044545095 = sum of:
            0.020114625 = weight(_text_:j in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020114625 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
            0.02443047 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02443047 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 9.2004 17:22:35
  9. Bowker, G.C.; Star, S.L.: Sorting things out : classification and its consequences (1999) 0.01
    0.014606364 = product of:
      0.029212728 = sum of:
        0.029212728 = product of:
          0.043819092 = sum of:
            0.020114625 = weight(_text_:j in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020114625 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
            0.02370447 = weight(_text_:c in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02370447 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Is this book sociology, anthropology, or taxonomy? Sorting Things Out, by communications theorists Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star, covers a lot of conceptual ground in its effort to sort out exactly how and why we classify and categorize the things and concepts we encounter day to day. But the analysis doesn't stop there; the authors go on to explore what happens to our thinking as a result of our classifications. With great insight and precise academic language, they pick apart our information systems and language structures that lie deeper than the everyday categories we use. The authors focus first on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), a widely used scheme used by health professionals worldwide, but also look at other health information systems, racial classifications used by South Africa during apartheid, and more. Though it comes off as a bit too academic at times (by the end of the 20th century, most writers should be able to get the spelling of McDonald's restaurant right), the book has a clever charm that thoughtful readers will surely appreciate. A sly sense of humor sneaks into the writing, giving rise to the chapter title "The Kindness of Strangers," for example. After arguing that categorization is both strongly influenced by and a powerful reinforcer of ideology, it follows that revolutions (political or scientific) must change the way things are sorted in order to throw over the old system. Who knew that such simple, basic elements of thought could have such far-reaching consequences? Whether you ultimately place it with social science, linguistics, or (as the authors fear) fantasy, make sure you put Sorting Things Out in your reading pile.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 27(2000) no.3, H.175-177 (B. Kwasnik); College and research libraries 61(2000) no.4, S.380-381 (J. Williams); Library resources and technical services 44(2000) no.4, S.107-108 (H.A. Olson); JASIST 51(2000) no.12, S.1149-1150 (T.A. Brooks)
  10. Zackland, M.; Fontaine, D.: Systematic building of conceptual classification systems with C-KAT (1996) 0.01
    0.013827606 = product of:
      0.027655212 = sum of:
        0.027655212 = product of:
          0.082965635 = sum of:
            0.082965635 = weight(_text_:c in 5145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082965635 = score(doc=5145,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 5145, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5145)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    C-KAT is a method and a tool which supports the design of feature oriented classification systems for knowlegde based systems. It uses a specialized Heuristic Classification conceptual model named 'classification by structural shift' which sees the classification process as the matching of different classifications of the same set of objects or situations organized around different structural principles. To manage the complexity induced by the cross-product, C-KAT supports the use of a leastcommittment strategy which applies in a context of constraint-directed reasoning. Presents this method using an example from the field of industrial fire insurance
    Object
    C-KAT
  11. Beghtol, C.: Response to Hjoerland and Nicolaisen (2004) 0.01
    0.012780569 = product of:
      0.025561137 = sum of:
        0.025561137 = product of:
          0.038341705 = sum of:
            0.017600296 = weight(_text_:j in 3536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017600296 = score(doc=3536,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.12287348 = fieldWeight in 3536, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3536)
            0.020741409 = weight(_text_:c in 3536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020741409 = score(doc=3536,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 3536, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3536)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Hjoerland, B., J. Nicolaisen: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve": a comment to Beghtol (2003). In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.55-61. - Vgl. die Erwiderung von Nicolaisen und Hjoerland in KO 31(2004) no.3, S.199-201.
  12. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.01
    0.012215234 = product of:
      0.024430469 = sum of:
        0.024430469 = product of:
          0.073291406 = sum of:
            0.073291406 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073291406 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  13. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 3: facets (2017) 0.01
    0.011852235 = product of:
      0.02370447 = sum of:
        0.02370447 = product of:
          0.07111341 = sum of:
            0.07111341 = weight(_text_:c in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07111341 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Farradane, J.E.L.: ¬A scientific theory of classification and indexing : further considerations (1952) 0.01
    0.011733531 = product of:
      0.023467062 = sum of:
        0.023467062 = product of:
          0.070401184 = sum of:
            0.070401184 = weight(_text_:j in 1655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070401184 = score(doc=1655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 1655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1655)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Fortsetzung von: J. Doc. 6(1950) S.83-99.
  15. Austin, D.: Citation order and linguistic structure (1976) 0.01
    0.010057313 = product of:
      0.020114627 = sum of:
        0.020114627 = product of:
          0.060343876 = sum of:
            0.060343876 = weight(_text_:j in 2804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060343876 = score(doc=2804,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 2804, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2804)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    The variety of librarianship. Essays in honor of J. W. Metcalfe. Ed. by W. Boyd Rayward
  16. Perreault, J.: Categories and relators : a new schema (1994) 0.01
    0.008709889 = product of:
      0.017419778 = sum of:
        0.017419778 = product of:
          0.05225933 = sum of:
            0.05225933 = weight(_text_:j in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05225933 = score(doc=8863,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.3648396 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the works of Aristotle, Ramon Lull, I. Kant and the experiences with relationships published in the works of S.R. Ranganathan, E.de Grolier, J. Mills, J.C. Costello, E. Wall, R. Pagès, A. Leroy, P. Braffort, M. Kervégant, J.C. Gardin and J. Farradane, categories and relationships were collected, analyzed, grouped and classified in a triadic way so that a scheme resulted by which 120 relationships could be defined and identified by their positions and their codes. The exercise was meant to create and supply a tool for the replacement of the non-significant relation symbol, the colon, in the UDC by a letter code which could express the actual relationship contained in a classificatory statement. Examples for their application illustrate different cases occuring
  17. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.00814349 = product of:
      0.01628698 = sum of:
        0.01628698 = product of:
          0.04886094 = sum of:
            0.04886094 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04886094 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  18. Zins, C.: Knowledge organization : an epistemological perspective (2004) 0.01
    0.00790149 = product of:
      0.01580298 = sum of:
        0.01580298 = product of:
          0.04740894 = sum of:
            0.04740894 = weight(_text_:c in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04740894 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Gnoli, C.; Ledl, A.; Park, Z.; Trzmielewski, M.: Phenomenon-based vs. disciplinary classification : possibilities for evaluating and for mapping (2018) 0.01
    0.00790149 = product of:
      0.01580298 = sum of:
        0.01580298 = product of:
          0.04740894 = sum of:
            0.04740894 = weight(_text_:c in 4804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04740894 = score(doc=4804,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 4804, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4804)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01
    0.007125554 = product of:
      0.014251108 = sum of:
        0.014251108 = product of:
          0.042753324 = sum of:
            0.042753324 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042753324 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95

Years

Types

  • a 56
  • m 6
  • s 3
  • More… Less…