Search (110 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.04
    0.044545095 = product of:
      0.08909019 = sum of:
        0.08909019 = product of:
          0.13363528 = sum of:
            0.060343876 = weight(_text_:j in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060343876 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
            0.073291406 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073291406 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  2. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.04
    0.044545095 = product of:
      0.08909019 = sum of:
        0.08909019 = product of:
          0.13363528 = sum of:
            0.060343876 = weight(_text_:j in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060343876 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
            0.073291406 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073291406 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  3. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.04
    0.044545095 = product of:
      0.08909019 = sum of:
        0.08909019 = product of:
          0.13363528 = sum of:
            0.060343876 = weight(_text_:j in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060343876 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
            0.073291406 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073291406 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  4. Riege, U.: Thesaurus und Klassifikation Sozialwissenschaften : Entwicklung der elektronischen Versionen (1998) 0.04
    0.037120916 = product of:
      0.07424183 = sum of:
        0.07424183 = product of:
          0.11136274 = sum of:
            0.05028656 = weight(_text_:j in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05028656 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
            0.061076175 = weight(_text_:22 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061076175 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  5. Alkämper, H.: ¬Die Neugestaltung des Parlamentsthesaurus PARTHES (1998) 0.04
    0.037120916 = product of:
      0.07424183 = sum of:
        0.07424183 = product of:
          0.11136274 = sum of:
            0.05028656 = weight(_text_:j in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05028656 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
            0.061076175 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061076175 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  6. Schenkel, M.: Vom Leitkartenthesaurus zum Online-Bibliotheksthesaurus : Die Revision des Dokumentationssystems der Bibliothek des Deutschen Bundestages (1949-1998) (1998) 0.04
    0.037120916 = product of:
      0.07424183 = sum of:
        0.07424183 = product of:
          0.11136274 = sum of:
            0.05028656 = weight(_text_:j in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05028656 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
            0.061076175 = weight(_text_:22 in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061076175 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  7. Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997) 0.03
    0.02969673 = product of:
      0.05939346 = sum of:
        0.05939346 = product of:
          0.08909019 = sum of:
            0.04022925 = weight(_text_:j in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04022925 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
            0.04886094 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04886094 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
  8. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.03
    0.025984641 = product of:
      0.051969282 = sum of:
        0.051969282 = product of:
          0.07795392 = sum of:
            0.035200592 = weight(_text_:j in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035200592 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
            0.042753324 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042753324 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  9. Aitchison, J.; Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Thesaurus : a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future (2004) 0.02
    0.022272548 = product of:
      0.044545095 = sum of:
        0.044545095 = product of:
          0.06681764 = sum of:
            0.030171938 = weight(_text_:j in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030171938 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
            0.036645703 = weight(_text_:22 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036645703 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:46:13
  10. Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996) 0.02
    0.018257957 = product of:
      0.036515914 = sum of:
        0.036515914 = product of:
          0.054773867 = sum of:
            0.02514328 = weight(_text_:j in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02514328 = score(doc=6050,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
            0.029630585 = weight(_text_:c in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029630585 = score(doc=6050,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
  11. Wang, J.: Automatic thesaurus development : term extraction from title metadata (2006) 0.02
    0.018257957 = product of:
      0.036515914 = sum of:
        0.036515914 = product of:
          0.054773867 = sum of:
            0.02514328 = weight(_text_:j in 5063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02514328 = score(doc=5063,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5063, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5063)
            0.029630585 = weight(_text_:c in 5063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029630585 = score(doc=5063,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 5063, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5063)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The application of thesauri in networked environments is seriously hampered by the challenges of introducing new concepts and terminology into the formal controlled vocabulary, which is critical for enhancing its retrieval capability. The author describes an automated process of adding new terms to thesauri as entry vocabulary by analyzing the association between words/phrases extracted from bibliographic titles and subject descriptors in the metadata record (subject descriptors are terms assigned from controlled vocabularies of thesauri to describe the subjects of the objects [e.g., books, articles] represented by the metadata records). The investigated approach uses a corpus of metadata for scientific and technical (S&T) publications in which the titles contain substantive words for key topics. The three steps of the method are (a) extracting words and phrases from the title field of the metadata; (b) applying a method to identify and select the specific and meaningful keywords based on the associated controlled vocabulary terms from the thesaurus used to catalog the objects; and (c) inserting selected keywords into the thesaurus as new terms (most of them are in hierarchical relationships with the existing concepts), thereby updating the thesaurus with new terminology that is being used in the literature. The effectiveness of the method was demonstrated by an experiment with the Chinese Classification Thesaurus (CCT) and bibliographic data in China Machine-Readable Cataloging Record (MARC) format (CNMARC) provided by Peking University Library. This approach is equally effective in large-scale collections and in other languages.
  12. ¬3rd Infoterm Symposiums Terminology Work in Subject Fields, Vienna, 12.-14.11.1991 (1992) 0.02
    0.017383616 = product of:
      0.034767233 = sum of:
        0.034767233 = product of:
          0.052150846 = sum of:
            0.028446374 = weight(_text_:j in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028446374 = score(doc=4648,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.19859353 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
            0.02370447 = weight(_text_:c in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02370447 = score(doc=4648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält 47 Beiträge den Schwerpunkten der Tagung: Biology and related fields - Engineering and natural sciences - Medicine - Information science and information technology - Law and economics - Social sciences and humanities - Terminology research and interdisciplinary aspects; darunter: OESER, E. u. G. BUDIN: Explication and representation of qualitative biological and medical concepts: the example of the pocket knowledge data base on carnivores; HOHENEGGER, J.: Specles as the basic units in taxonomy and nomenclature; LAVIETER, L. de, J.A. DESCHAMPS u. B. FELLUGA: A multilingual environmental thesaurus: past, present, and future; TODESCHINI, C. u. G. Thoemig: The thesaurus of the International Nuclear Information System: experiences in an international environment; CITKINA, F.: Terminology of mathematics: contrastive analysis as a basis for standardization and harmonization; WALKER, D.G.: Technology and engineering terminolgy: translation problems encountered and suggested solutions; VERVOOM, A.J.: Terminology and engineering sciences; HIRS, W.M.: ICD-10, a missed chance and a new opportunity for medical terminology standardization; THOMAS, P.: Subject indexes in medical literature; RAHMSTORF, G.: Analysis of information technology terms; NEGRINI, G.: Indexing language for research projects and its graphic display; BATEWICZ, M.: Impact of modern information technology on knowledge transfer services and terminology; RATZINGER, M.: Multilingual product description (MPD): a European project; OHLY, H.P.: Terminology of the social sciences and social context approaches; BEAUGRANDE, R. de: Terminology and discourse between the social sciences and the humanities; MUSKENS, G.: Terminological standardisation and socio-linguistic diversity: dilemmas of crosscultural sociology; SNELL, B.: Terminology ten years on; ZHURAVLEV, V.F.: Standard ontological structures of systems of concepts of active knowledge; WRIGHT, S.E.: Terminology standardization in standards societies and professional associations in the United States; DAHLBERG; I.: The terminology of subject fields - reconsidered; AHMAD, K. u. H. Fulford: Terminology of interdisciplinary fields: a new perspective; DATAA, J.: Full-text databases as a terminological support for translation
  13. Burkart, M.: Thesaurus (2004) 0.02
    0.01604498 = product of:
      0.03208996 = sum of:
        0.03208996 = product of:
          0.048134938 = sum of:
            0.02370447 = weight(_text_:c in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02370447 = score(doc=2913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
            0.02443047 = weight(_text_:22 in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02443047 = score(doc=2913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Der Thesaurus als Dokumentationssprache wird in der DIN 1463-1in seinen wesentlichen Merkmalen beschrieben. Dort wird der Thesaurus im informationswissenschaftlichen Sinne so definiert: "Ein Thesaurus im Bereich der Information und Dokumentation ist eine geordnete Zusammenstellung von Begriffen und ihren (vorwiegend natürlichsprachigen) Bezeichnungen, die in einem Dokumentationsgebiet zum Indexieren, Speichern und Wiederauffinden dient. Er ist durch folgende Merkmale gekennzeichnet: a) Begriffe und Bezeichnungen werden eindeutig aufeinander bezogen ("terminologische Kontrolle"), indem - Synonyme möglichst vollständig erfasst werden, - Homonyme und Polyseme besonders gekennzeichnet werden, - für jeden Begriff eine Bezeichnung (Vorzugsbenennung, Begriffsnummer oder Notation) festgelegt wird, die den Begriff eindeutig vertritt, b) Beziehungen zwischen Begriffen (repräsentiert durch ihre Bezeichnungen) werden dargestellt." Diese Definition wäre zu ergänzen um folgende: c) Der Thesaurus ist präskriptiv, indem er für seinen Geltungsbereich festlegt, welche begrifflichen Einheiten zur Verfügung gestellt werden und durch welche Bezeichnungen diese repräsentiert werden. Im Folgenden sollen die wichtigsten Elemente und Prinzipien von Thesauri und die Thesaurusmethodik vorgestellt werden. Dies kann in diesem Rahmen nur auf eine sehr kursorische und allgemeine Art und Weise geschehen. Außerdem beschränkt sich die Darstellung auf den Thesauruseinsatz im klassischen Bereich von Information und Dokumentation. Auf die Behandlung von Spezialproblemen oder auf besondere Thesaurusformen (z.B. mehrsprachige Thesauri) kann hier nicht eingegangen werden, ebenso auf die erweiterten Anforderungen, die an Thesauri im Kontext von Wissensrepräsentation oder Hypertext zu stellen sind. Allerdings überschneidet sich der klassische IuD-Bereich zunehmend mit erweiterten Formen (etwa im Rahmen von Internetanwendungen). Da der Thesaurus im dokumentarischen Sinn alle Grundelemente des Thesaurusprinzips in klarer Form aufweist, wird dieser Bereich für eine Einführung gewählt. Für eine intensivere Auseinandersetzung mit der Thematik wird die Lektüre von Wersig empfohlen, auf den sich auch die folgenden Ausführungen in weiten Teilen stützen. Eine weitere grundsätzliche Einführung in diesen Bereich, allerdings eher ausgerichtet auf die Spezifika des englischen Sprachraums, findet sich bei Lancaster.
    Date
    5. 4.2013 10:18:22
  14. Hitzeroth, C.: Bibliographie zur Thesaurus-Literatur (1988) 0.02
    0.01580298 = product of:
      0.03160596 = sum of:
        0.03160596 = product of:
          0.09481788 = sum of:
            0.09481788 = weight(_text_:c in 5139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09481788 = score(doc=5139,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.6097744 = fieldWeight in 5139, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5139)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989) 0.01
    0.014251108 = product of:
      0.028502217 = sum of:
        0.028502217 = product of:
          0.08550665 = sum of:
            0.08550665 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08550665 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
  16. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.01
    0.014039358 = product of:
      0.028078716 = sum of:
        0.028078716 = product of:
          0.042118073 = sum of:
            0.020741409 = weight(_text_:c in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020741409 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.13338815 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
            0.021376662 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021376662 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
  17. Panyr, J.: Thesaurus und wissensbasierte Systeme - Thesauri und Wissensbasen (1988) 0.01
    0.013409751 = product of:
      0.026819501 = sum of:
        0.026819501 = product of:
          0.0804585 = sum of:
            0.0804585 = weight(_text_:j in 22) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0804585 = score(doc=22,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 22, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=22)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.01
    0.012215234 = product of:
      0.024430469 = sum of:
        0.024430469 = product of:
          0.073291406 = sum of:
            0.073291406 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073291406 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  19. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002) 0.01
    0.011852235 = product of:
      0.02370447 = sum of:
        0.02370447 = product of:
          0.07111341 = sum of:
            0.07111341 = weight(_text_:c in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07111341 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Rodejohann, J.: Probleme mit politisch geprägten Benennungen von Begriffen bei der Erstellung eines politikwissenschaftlichen Thesaurus (1987) 0.01
    0.011733531 = product of:
      0.023467062 = sum of:
        0.023467062 = product of:
          0.070401184 = sum of:
            0.070401184 = weight(_text_:j in 978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070401184 = score(doc=978,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04507926 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 978, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=978)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 90
  • el 10
  • m 7
  • s 4
  • n 3
  • r 2
  • ? 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…