-
Aksnes, D.W.: Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution (2006)
0.01
0.009415352 = product of:
0.014123027 = sum of:
0.003145897 = weight(_text_:s in 4925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003145897 = score(doc=4925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4925)
0.01097713 = product of:
0.03293139 = sum of:
0.03293139 = weight(_text_:29 in 4925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03293139 = score(doc=4925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4925)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 11. 2.2006 17:52:29
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.2, S.169-185
-
Gorraiz, J.: "Web of Science" versus "Scopus" oder das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliotheken (2006)
0.01
0.009415352 = product of:
0.014123027 = sum of:
0.003145897 = weight(_text_:s in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003145897 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.01097713 = product of:
0.03293139 = sum of:
0.03293139 = weight(_text_:29 in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03293139 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 4. 6.2006 17:36:29
- Source
- Online Mitteilungen. 2006, Nr.85, S.25-30 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 59(2006) H.1]
-
González, L.; Campanario, J.M.: Structure of the impact factor of journals included in the Social Sciences Citation Index : citations from documents labeled "Editorial Material" (2007)
0.01
0.009415352 = product of:
0.014123027 = sum of:
0.003145897 = weight(_text_:s in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003145897 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.01097713 = product of:
0.03293139 = sum of:
0.03293139 = weight(_text_:29 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03293139 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 3. 3.2007 18:29:17
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.2, S.252-262
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.009349521 = product of:
0.014024281 = sum of:
0.003145897 = weight(_text_:s in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003145897 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.010878384 = product of:
0.032635152 = sum of:
0.032635152 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032635152 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.302-310
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.01
0.009349521 = product of:
0.014024281 = sum of:
0.003145897 = weight(_text_:s in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003145897 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.010878384 = product of:
0.032635152 = sum of:
0.032635152 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032635152 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
- Source
- c't. 2003, H.1, S.38
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.009349521 = product of:
0.014024281 = sum of:
0.003145897 = weight(_text_:s in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003145897 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.010878384 = product of:
0.032635152 = sum of:
0.032635152 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032635152 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1263-1274
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.009349521 = product of:
0.014024281 = sum of:
0.003145897 = weight(_text_:s in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003145897 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.010878384 = product of:
0.032635152 = sum of:
0.032635152 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032635152 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.01
0.009349521 = product of:
0.014024281 = sum of:
0.003145897 = weight(_text_:s in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003145897 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.010878384 = product of:
0.032635152 = sum of:
0.032635152 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032635152 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.800-810
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.01
0.009349521 = product of:
0.014024281 = sum of:
0.003145897 = weight(_text_:s in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003145897 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.010878384 = product of:
0.032635152 = sum of:
0.032635152 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032635152 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1820-1833
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.0085468665 = product of:
0.025640598 = sum of:
0.025640598 = product of:
0.07692179 = sum of:
0.07692179 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07692179 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Remler, A.: Lässt sich wissenschaftliche Leistung messen? : Wer zitiert wird, liegt vorne - in den USA berechnet man Forschungsleistung nach einem Zitat-Index (2000)
0.01
0.008537768 = product of:
0.025613304 = sum of:
0.025613304 = product of:
0.07683991 = sum of:
0.07683991 = weight(_text_:29 in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07683991 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 30.10.2000 17:47:29
-
Case, D.O.; Higgins, G.M.: How can we investigate citation behavior? : A study of reasons for citing literature in communication (2000)
0.01
0.007846127 = product of:
0.01176919 = sum of:
0.002621581 = weight(_text_:s in 4775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002621581 = score(doc=4775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4775)
0.00914761 = product of:
0.027442828 = sum of:
0.027442828 = weight(_text_:29 in 4775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027442828 = score(doc=4775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4775)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 19. 5.2000 20:15:29
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.7, S.635-645
-
Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001)
0.01
0.007846127 = product of:
0.01176919 = sum of:
0.002621581 = weight(_text_:s in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002621581 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.00914761 = product of:
0.027442828 = sum of:
0.027442828 = weight(_text_:29 in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027442828 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 29. 9.2001 14:01:01
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.4, S.297-308
-
Stock, W.G.: Publikation und Zitat : Die problematische Basis empirischer Wissenschaftsforschung (2001)
0.01
0.007846127 = product of:
0.01176919 = sum of:
0.002621581 = weight(_text_:s in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002621581 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
0.00914761 = product of:
0.027442828 = sum of:
0.027442828 = weight(_text_:29 in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027442828 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- 50 S
- Series
- Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd.29
-
Hammond, C.C.; Brown, S.W.: Citation searching : search smarter & find more (2008)
0.01
0.007846127 = product of:
0.01176919 = sum of:
0.002621581 = weight(_text_:s in 2206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002621581 = score(doc=2206,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2206, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2206)
0.00914761 = product of:
0.027442828 = sum of:
0.027442828 = weight(_text_:29 in 2206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027442828 = score(doc=2206,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2206, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2206)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 17. 8.2008 11:05:29
- Source
- Computers in libraries. 28(2008) no.5, S.10-
-
Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008)
0.01
0.0077912677 = product of:
0.011686902 = sum of:
0.002621581 = weight(_text_:s in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002621581 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.009065321 = product of:
0.02719596 = sum of:
0.02719596 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02719596 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 12:54:12
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.2, S.14-20
-
White, H.D.: Authors as citers over time (2001)
0.01
0.0062769013 = product of:
0.009415352 = sum of:
0.0020972649 = weight(_text_:s in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020972649 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.007318087 = product of:
0.02195426 = sum of:
0.02195426 = weight(_text_:29 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02195426 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 29. 9.2001 13:58:38
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.2, S.87-108
-
Frohlich, C.; Resler, L.: Analysis of publications and citations from a geophysics research institute (2001)
0.01
0.0062769013 = product of:
0.009415352 = sum of:
0.0020972649 = weight(_text_:s in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020972649 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
0.007318087 = product of:
0.02195426 = sum of:
0.02195426 = weight(_text_:29 in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02195426 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 29. 9.2001 14:01:26
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.9, S.701-713
-
Wildner, B.: Web of Science - Scopus : Auf der Suche nach Zitierungen (2006)
0.01
0.006233014 = product of:
0.009349521 = sum of:
0.0020972649 = weight(_text_:s in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020972649 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
0.0072522564 = product of:
0.021756768 = sum of:
0.021756768 = weight(_text_:22 in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021756768 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 4. 6.2006 17:22:15
- Source
- Online Mitteilungen. 2006, Nr.85, S.18-20 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 59(2006) H.1]
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.006233014 = product of:
0.009349521 = sum of:
0.0020972649 = weight(_text_:s in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020972649 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.0072522564 = product of:
0.021756768 = sum of:
0.021756768 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021756768 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04014573 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.6, S.549-568
