Search (124 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Schmale, W.: Strategische Optionen für universitäre Repositorien in den Digital Humanities (2018) 0.04 
    0.036444277 = product of:
  0.05466641 = sum of:
    0.0036702133 = weight(_text_:s in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0036702133 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
    0.0509962 = product of:
      0.0764943 = sum of:
        0.038419954 = weight(_text_:29 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038419954 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
        0.038074344 = weight(_text_:22 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038074344 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    20. 9.2018 12:22:39
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 70(2018) H.1, S.21-29
  2. Herb, U.: Überwachungskapitalismus und Wissenschaftssteuerung (2019) 0.02 
    0.019696753 = product of:
  0.029545128 = sum of:
    0.0041945297 = weight(_text_:s in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0041945297 = score(doc=5624,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
    0.025350599 = product of:
      0.076051794 = sum of:
        0.076051794 = weight(_text_:29 in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076051794 = score(doc=5624,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.5385337 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Der Text ist eine überarbeitete Version des von Herb, U. (2018): Zwangsehen und Bastarde : Wohin steuert Big Data die Wissenschaft? In: Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 69(2-3), S. 81-88. DOI:10.1515/iwp-2018-0021.
    Date
    29. 6.2019 17:46:17
    4. 8.2019 19:52:29
    Issue
    [29. Juli 2019].
  3. Loos, A.: ¬Die Million ist geknackt (2015) 0.02 
    0.018699042 = product of:
  0.028048562 = sum of:
    0.006291794 = weight(_text_:s in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006291794 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
    0.021756768 = product of:
      0.065270305 = sum of:
        0.065270305 = weight(_text_:22 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065270305 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    7. 4.2015 17:22:03
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2015, H.1, S.10-11
  4. Bläsi, C.: Literary studies, business studies - and information science? : Yes, it's a key discipline for the empowerment of publishing studies for the digital age (2015) 0.01 
    0.012553803 = product of:
  0.018830704 = sum of:
    0.0041945297 = weight(_text_:s in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0041945297 = score(doc=2986,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
    0.014636174 = product of:
      0.04390852 = sum of:
        0.04390852 = weight(_text_:29 in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04390852 = score(doc=2986,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    6. 6.2016 10:29:10
    Pages
    S.81-92
  5. Schleim, S.: Warum die Wissenschaft nicht frei ist (2017) 0.01 
    0.012466028 = product of:
  0.018699042 = sum of:
    0.0041945297 = weight(_text_:s in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0041945297 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
    0.014504513 = product of:
      0.043513536 = sum of:
        0.043513536 = weight(_text_:22 in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043513536 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    9.10.2017 15:48:22
  6. Ergül, A.; Böhm, A.; Schmidt, E.; Hissen, S.; Sariklis, T.: Erfolgsfaktoren für die Durchsetzung von PDF/A als weltweiter Standard für elektronische Langzeitarchivierung (2012) 0.01 
    0.011998079 = product of:
  0.017997118 = sum of:
    0.005190466 = weight(_text_:s in 4794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005190466 = score(doc=4794,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 4794, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4794)
    0.012806652 = product of:
      0.038419954 = sum of:
        0.038419954 = weight(_text_:29 in 4794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038419954 = score(doc=4794,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4794, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4794)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    12. 1.2013 18:29:53
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.6, S.361-366
  7. Müller, S.: Schattenbibliotheken : Welche Auswirkungen haben Sci-Hub und Co. auf Verlage und Bibliotheken? (2019) 0.01 
    0.011921277 = product of:
  0.017881915 = sum of:
    0.005190466 = weight(_text_:s in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005190466 = score(doc=765,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
    0.012691448 = product of:
      0.038074344 = sum of:
        0.038074344 = weight(_text_:22 in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038074344 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.5, S.397-404
  8. Beinert, T.; Schoger, A.: Vernachlässigte Pflicht oder Sammlung aus Leidenschaft? : Zum Stand der Webarchivierung in deutschen Bibliotheken (2015) 0.01 
    0.010984577 = product of:
  0.016476866 = sum of:
    0.0036702133 = weight(_text_:s in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0036702133 = score(doc=2532,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
    0.012806652 = product of:
      0.038419954 = sum of:
        0.038419954 = weight(_text_:29 in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038419954 = score(doc=2532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    12. 1.2016 9:45:29
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 62(2015) H.3/4, S.172-183
  9. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.01 
    0.010907775 = product of:
  0.016361661 = sum of:
    0.0036702133 = weight(_text_:s in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0036702133 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.012691448 = product of:
      0.038074344 = sum of:
        0.038074344 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038074344 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.363-374
  10. Hrachovec, H.: Offen gesagt: Beschwerden eines Archivars (2018) 0.01 
    0.010907775 = product of:
  0.016361661 = sum of:
    0.0036702133 = weight(_text_:s in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0036702133 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
    0.012691448 = product of:
      0.038074344 = sum of:
        0.038074344 = weight(_text_:22 in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038074344 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    20. 9.2018 12:22:52
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 70(2018) H.1, S.8-20
  11. Münch, V.: They have a dream (2019) 0.01 
    0.009349521 = product of:
  0.014024281 = sum of:
    0.003145897 = weight(_text_:s in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003145897 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
    0.010878384 = product of:
      0.032635152 = sum of:
        0.032635152 = weight(_text_:22 in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032635152 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.1, S.25-39
  12. Solomon, D.J.; Björk, B.-C.: Publication fees in open access publishing : sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2012) 0.01 
    0.009125548 = product of:
  0.013688322 = sum of:
    0.004540712 = weight(_text_:s in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004540712 = score(doc=754,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.10403037 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
    0.00914761 = product of:
      0.027442828 = sum of:
        0.027442828 = weight(_text_:29 in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027442828 = score(doc=754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Open access (OA) journals distribute their content at no charge and use other means of funding the publication process. Publication fees or article-processing charges (APC)s have become the predominant means for funding professional OA publishing. We surveyed 1,038 authors who recently published articles in 74 OA journals that charge APCs stratified into seven discipline categories. Authors were asked about the source of funding for the APC, factors influencing their choice of a journal and past history publishing in OA and subscription journals. Additional information about the journal and the authors' country were obtained from the journal website. A total of 429 (41%) authors from 69 journals completed the survey. There were large differences in the source of funding among disciplines. Journals with impact factors charged higher APCs as did journals from disciplines where grant funding is plentiful. Fit, quality, and speed of publication were the most important factors in the authors' choice of a journal. OA was less important but a significant factor for many authors in their choice of a journal to publish. These findings are consistent with other research on OA publishing and suggest that OA publishing funded through APCs is likely to continue to grow.
    Date
    20. 4.2013 18:29:36
    Footnote
    Vgl. Erratum in: JASIST 64(2013) no.5, S.1089.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.98-107
  13. Vincent-Lamarre, P.; Boivin, J.; Gargouri, Y.; Larivière, V.; Harnad, S.: Estimating open access mandate effectiveness : the MELIBEA score (2016) 0.01 
    0.008570056 = product of:
  0.012855085 = sum of:
    0.0037074753 = weight(_text_:s in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0037074753 = score(doc=3162,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
    0.00914761 = product of:
      0.027442828 = sum of:
        0.027442828 = weight(_text_:29 in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027442828 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    18.10.2016 14:29:07
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.11, S.2815-2828
  14. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.01 
    0.0085468665 = product of:
  0.025640598 = sum of:
    0.025640598 = product of:
      0.07692179 = sum of:
        0.07692179 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07692179 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  15. Brown, D.J.: Repositories and journals: are they in conflict? : a literature review of relevant literature (2010) 0.01 
    0.007846127 = product of:
  0.01176919 = sum of:
    0.002621581 = weight(_text_:s in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002621581 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
    0.00914761 = product of:
      0.027442828 = sum of:
        0.027442828 = weight(_text_:29 in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027442828 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:35:08
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 62(2010) no.2, S.112-143
  16. Björk, B.-C.; Laakso, M.; Welling, P.; Paetau, P.: Anatomy of green open access (2014) 0.01 
    0.007846127 = product of:
  0.01176919 = sum of:
    0.002621581 = weight(_text_:s in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002621581 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
    0.00914761 = product of:
      0.027442828 = sum of:
        0.027442828 = weight(_text_:29 in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027442828 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:10:46
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.237-250
  17. Cabanac, G.: Bibliogifts in LibGen? : a study of a text-sharing platform driven by biblioleaks and crowdsourcing (2016) 0.01 
    0.007846127 = product of:
  0.01176919 = sum of:
    0.002621581 = weight(_text_:s in 2850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002621581 = score(doc=2850,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2850, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2850)
    0.00914761 = product of:
      0.027442828 = sum of:
        0.027442828 = weight(_text_:29 in 2850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027442828 = score(doc=2850,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2850, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2850)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Research articles disseminate the knowledge produced by the scientific community. Access to this literature is crucial for researchers and the general public. Apparently, "bibliogifts" are available online for free from text-sharing platforms. However, little is known about such platforms. What is the size of the underlying digital libraries? What are the topics covered? Where do these documents originally come from? This article reports on a study of the Library Genesis platform (LibGen). The 25 million documents (42 terabytes) it hosts and distributes for free are mostly research articles, textbooks, and books in English. The article collection stems from isolated, but massive, article uploads (71%) in line with a "biblioleaks" scenario, as well as from daily crowdsourcing (29%) by worldwide users of platforms such as Reddit Scholar and Sci-Hub. By relating the DOIs registered at CrossRef and those cached at LibGen, this study reveals that 36% of all DOI articles are available for free at LibGen. This figure is even higher (68%) for three major publishers: Elsevier, Springer, and Wiley. More research is needed to understand to what extent researchers and the general public have recourse to such text-sharing platforms and why.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.4, S.874-884
  18. Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011) 0.01 
    0.0077912677 = product of:
  0.011686902 = sum of:
    0.002621581 = weight(_text_:s in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002621581 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
    0.009065321 = product of:
      0.02719596 = sum of:
        0.02719596 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02719596 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1614-1628
  19. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.01 
    0.0077912677 = product of:
  0.011686902 = sum of:
    0.002621581 = weight(_text_:s in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002621581 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
    0.009065321 = product of:
      0.02719596 = sum of:
        0.02719596 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02719596 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.6, S.614-635
  20. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.01 
    0.0077912677 = product of:
  0.011686902 = sum of:
    0.002621581 = weight(_text_:s in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002621581 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04014573 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
    0.009065321 = product of:
      0.02719596 = sum of:
        0.02719596 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02719596 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:11:17
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.412-431

Authors

Languages

  • d 69
  • e 54

Types

  • a 118
  • el 17
  • m 4
  • s 3
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications