-
Lee, J.; Min, J.-K.; Oh, A.; Chung, C.-W.: Effective ranking and search techniques for Web resources considering semantic relationships (2014)
0.02
0.019463524 = product of:
0.03892705 = sum of:
0.03892705 = product of:
0.05839057 = sum of:
0.055422384 = weight(_text_:k in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055422384 = score(doc=2670,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.34156775 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029681858 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- On the Semantic Web, the types of resources and the semantic relationships between resources are defined in an ontology. By using that information, the accuracy of information retrieval can be improved. In this paper, we present effective ranking and search techniques considering the semantic relationships in an ontology. Our technique retrieves top-k resources which are the most relevant to query keywords through the semantic relationships. To do this, we propose a weighting measure for the semantic relationship. Based on this measure, we propose a novel ranking method which considers the number of meaningful semantic relationships between a resource and keywords as well as the coverage and discriminating power of keywords. In order to improve the efficiency of the search, we prune the unnecessary search space using the length and weight thresholds of the semantic relationship path. In addition, we exploit Threshold Algorithm based on an extended inverted index to answer top-k results efficiently. The experimental results using real data sets demonstrate that our retrieval method using the semantic information generates accurate results efficiently compared to the traditional methods.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 50(2014) no.1, S.132-155
-
Efron, M.; Winget, M.: Query polyrepresentation for ranking retrieval systems without relevance judgments (2010)
0.02
0.019288149 = product of:
0.038576297 = sum of:
0.038576297 = product of:
0.057864446 = sum of:
0.05430262 = weight(_text_:k in 3469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05430262 = score(doc=3469,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 3469, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3469)
0.003561823 = weight(_text_:s in 3469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003561823 = score(doc=3469,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3469, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3469)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ranking information retrieval (IR) systems with respect to their effectiveness is a crucial operation during IR evaluation, as well as during data fusion. This article offers a novel method of approaching the system-ranking problem, based on the widely studied idea of polyrepresentation. The principle of polyrepresentation suggests that a single information need can be represented by many query articulations-what we call query aspects. By skimming the top k (where k is small) documents retrieved by a single system for multiple query aspects, we collect a set of documents that are likely to be relevant to a given test topic. Labeling these skimmed documents as putatively relevant lets us build pseudorelevance judgments without undue human intervention. We report experiments where using these pseudorelevance judgments delivers a rank ordering of IR systems that correlates highly with rankings based on human relevance judgments.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.6, S.1081-1091
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.02
0.018005218 = product of:
0.036010437 = sum of:
0.036010437 = product of:
0.05401565 = sum of:
0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047490974 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049266554 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1939-1943
-
Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014)
0.02
0.018005218 = product of:
0.036010437 = sum of:
0.036010437 = product of:
0.05401565 = sum of:
0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047490974 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
0.049266554 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049266554 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 9.2014 14:45:22
- Pages
- 91 S
-
Behnert, C.; Plassmeier, K.; Borst, T.; Lewandowski, D.: Evaluierung von Rankingverfahren für bibliothekarische Informationssysteme (2019)
0.02
0.016317615 = product of:
0.03263523 = sum of:
0.03263523 = product of:
0.048952844 = sum of:
0.044797383 = weight(_text_:k in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044797383 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
0.00415546 = weight(_text_:s in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00415546 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 70(2019) H.1, S.14-23
-
Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015)
0.02
0.015504692 = product of:
0.031009383 = sum of:
0.031009383 = product of:
0.046514075 = sum of:
0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029681858 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.04354589 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04354589 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 18:22:56
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.6, S.700-714
-
Tsai, C.-F.; Hu, Y.-H.; Chen, Z.-Y.: Factors affecting rocchio-based pseudorelevance feedback in image retrieval (2015)
0.01
0.011655438 = product of:
0.023310876 = sum of:
0.023310876 = product of:
0.034966312 = sum of:
0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 1607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031998128 = score(doc=1607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1607)
0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 1607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029681858 = score(doc=1607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1607)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Pseudorelevance feedback (PRF) was proposed to solve the limitation of relevance feedback (RF), which is based on the user-in-the-loop process. In PRF, the top-k retrieved images are regarded as PRF. Although the PRF set contains noise, PRF has proven effective for automatically improving the overall retrieval result. To implement PRF, the Rocchio algorithm has been considered as a reasonable and well-established baseline. However, the performance of Rocchio-based PRF is subject to various representation choices (or factors). In this article, we examine these factors that affect the performance of Rocchio-based PRF, including image-feature representation, the number of top-ranked images, the weighting parameters of Rocchio, and similarity measure. We offer practical insights on how to optimize the performance of Rocchio-based PRF by choosing appropriate representation choices. Our extensive experiments on NUS-WIDE-LITE and Caltech 101 + Corel 5000 data sets show that the optimal feature representation is color moment + wavelet texture in terms of retrieval efficiency and effectiveness. Other representation choices are that using top-20 ranked images as pseudopositive and pseudonegative feedback sets with the equal weight (i.e., 0.5) by the correlation and cosine distance functions can produce the optimal retrieval result.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.1, S.40-57
-
Hubert, G.; Pitarch, Y.; Pinel-Sauvagnat, K.; Tournier, R.; Laporte, L.: TournaRank : when retrieval becomes document competition (2018)
0.01
0.011655438 = product of:
0.023310876 = sum of:
0.023310876 = product of:
0.034966312 = sum of:
0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 5087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031998128 = score(doc=5087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 5087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5087)
0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 5087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029681858 = score(doc=5087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5087)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 54(2018) no.2, S.252-272
-
Baloh, P.; Desouza, K.C.; Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems : a design science perspectiveA domain analysis (2012)
0.01
0.01125326 = product of:
0.02250652 = sum of:
0.02250652 = product of:
0.03375978 = sum of:
0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029681858 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030791596 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 6.2012 14:22:34
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.948-966
-
Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013)
0.01
0.01125326 = product of:
0.02250652 = sum of:
0.02250652 = product of:
0.03375978 = sum of:
0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029681858 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030791596 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:34:49
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.500-515
-
Bhansali, D.; Desai, H.; Deulkar, K.: ¬A study of different ranking approaches for semantic search (2015)
0.01
0.0053330213 = product of:
0.010666043 = sum of:
0.010666043 = product of:
0.031998128 = sum of:
0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 2696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031998128 = score(doc=2696,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2696, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2696)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
White, H. D.: Co-cited author retrieval and relevance theory : examples from the humanities (2015)
0.00
0.0011872743 = product of:
0.0023745487 = sum of:
0.0023745487 = product of:
0.007123646 = sum of:
0.007123646 = weight(_text_:s in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007123646 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Scientometrics. 102(2015) no.3, S.2275-2299
-
Jindal, V.; Bawa, S.; Batra, S.: ¬A review of ranking approaches for semantic search on Web (2014)
0.00
0.0010282099 = product of:
0.0020564198 = sum of:
0.0020564198 = product of:
0.006169259 = sum of:
0.006169259 = weight(_text_:s in 2799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006169259 = score(doc=2799,freq=6.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.124836445 = fieldWeight in 2799, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2799)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 50(2014) no.2, S.416-425
-
Fuhr, N.: Modelle im Information Retrieval (2013)
0.00
9.893953E-4 = product of:
0.0019787906 = sum of:
0.0019787906 = product of:
0.0059363716 = sum of:
0.0059363716 = weight(_text_:s in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0059363716 = score(doc=724,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.322-335
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M.: ¬The hw-rank : an h-index variant for ranking web pages (2015)
0.00
9.893953E-4 = product of:
0.0019787906 = sum of:
0.0019787906 = product of:
0.0059363716 = sum of:
0.0059363716 = weight(_text_:s in 1694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0059363716 = score(doc=1694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 1694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1694)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Scientometrics. 102(2015) no.3, S.2247-2253
-
Karlsson, A.; Hammarfelt, B.; Steinhauer, H.J.; Falkman, G.; Olson, N.; Nelhans, G.; Nolin, J.: Modeling uncertainty in bibliometrics and information retrieval : an information fusion approach (2015)
0.00
9.893953E-4 = product of:
0.0019787906 = sum of:
0.0019787906 = product of:
0.0059363716 = sum of:
0.0059363716 = weight(_text_:s in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0059363716 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Scientometrics. 102(2015) no.3, S.2255-2274
-
Li, H.; Wu, H.; Li, D.; Lin, S.; Su, Z.; Luo, X.: PSI: A probabilistic semantic interpretable framework for fine-grained image ranking (2018)
0.00
8.3952973E-4 = product of:
0.0016790595 = sum of:
0.0016790595 = product of:
0.0050371783 = sum of:
0.0050371783 = weight(_text_:s in 4577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050371783 = score(doc=4577,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4577, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4577)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.12, S.1488-1501
-
Maylein, L.; Langenstein, A.: Neues vom Relevanz-Ranking im HEIDI-Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg : Perspektiven für bibliothekarische Dienstleistungen (2013)
0.00
7.915163E-4 = product of:
0.0015830325 = sum of:
0.0015830325 = product of:
0.0047490974 = sum of:
0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047490974 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 16(2013) H.3, S.190-200
-
Behnert, C.; Borst, T.: Neue Formen der Relevanz-Sortierung in bibliothekarischen Informationssystemen : das DFG-Projekt LibRank (2015)
0.00
7.915163E-4 = product of:
0.0015830325 = sum of:
0.0015830325 = product of:
0.0047490974 = sum of:
0.0047490974 = weight(_text_:s in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047490974 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 39(2015) H.3, S.384-393
-
Wei, F.; Li, W.; Liu, S.: iRANK: a rank-learn-combine framework for unsupervised ensemble ranking (2010)
0.00
6.996081E-4 = product of:
0.0013992162 = sum of:
0.0013992162 = product of:
0.0041976487 = sum of:
0.0041976487 = weight(_text_:s in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041976487 = score(doc=3472,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.04545348 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.6, S.1232-1243
