Search (139 results, page 2 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Yi, K.: ¬A semantic similarity approach to predicting Library of Congress subject headings for social tags (2010) 0.01
    0.011655438 = product of:
      0.023310876 = sum of:
        0.023310876 = product of:
          0.034966312 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 3707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=3707,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3707, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3707)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 3707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=3707,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3707, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3707)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.8, S.1658-1672
  2. Matthews, B.; Jones, C.; Puzon, B.; Moon, J.; Tudhope, D.; Golub, K.; Nielsen, M.L.: ¬An evaluation of enhancing social tagging with a knowledge organization system (2010) 0.01
    0.011655438 = product of:
      0.023310876 = sum of:
        0.023310876 = product of:
          0.034966312 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 4171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=4171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4171)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 4171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=4171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4171)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 62(2010) nos.4/5, S.447-465
  3. Sun, A.; Bhowmick, S.S.; Nguyen, K.T.N.; Bai, G.: Tag-based social image retrieval : an empirical evaluation (2011) 0.01
    0.011655438 = product of:
      0.023310876 = sum of:
        0.023310876 = product of:
          0.034966312 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 4938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=4938,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4938, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4938)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 4938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=4938,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4938, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4938)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Tags associated with social images are valuable information source for superior image search and retrieval experiences. Although various heuristics are valuable to boost tag-based search for images, there is a lack of general framework to study the impact of these heuristics. Specifically, the task of ranking images matching a given tag query based on their associated tags in descending order of relevance has not been well studied. In this article, we take the first step to propose a generic, flexible, and extensible framework for this task and exploit it for a systematic and comprehensive empirical evaluation of various methods for ranking images. To this end, we identified five orthogonal dimensions to quantify the matching score between a tagged image and a tag query. These five dimensions are: (i) tag relatedness to measure the degree of effectiveness of a tag describing the tagged image; (ii) tag discrimination to quantify the degree of discrimination of a tag with respect to the entire tagged image collection; (iii) tag length normalization analogous to document length normalization in web search; (iv) tag-query matching model for the matching score computation between an image tag and a query tag; and (v) query model for tag query rewriting. For each dimension, we identify a few implementations and evaluate their impact on NUS-WIDE dataset, the largest human-annotated dataset consisting of more than 269K tagged images from Flickr. We evaluated 81 single-tag queries and 443 multi-tag queries over 288 search methods and systematically compare their performances using standard metrics including Precision at top-K, Mean Average Precision (MAP), Recall, and Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG).
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.12, S.2364-2381
  4. Yoon, K.: Conceptual syntagmatic associations in user tagging (2012) 0.01
    0.011655438 = product of:
      0.023310876 = sum of:
        0.023310876 = product of:
          0.034966312 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=240,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 240, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=240)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=240,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 240, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=240)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.923-935
  5. Knautz, K.; Stock, W.G.: Collective indexing of emotions in videos (2011) 0.01
    0.011655438 = product of:
      0.023310876 = sum of:
        0.023310876 = product of:
          0.034966312 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 67(2011) no.6, S.975-994
  6. Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008) 0.01
    0.01125326 = product of:
      0.02250652 = sum of:
        0.02250652 = product of:
          0.03375978 = sum of:
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
            0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030791596 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.117-127
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  7. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.01
    0.01125326 = product of:
      0.02250652 = sum of:
        0.02250652 = product of:
          0.03375978 = sum of:
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
            0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030791596 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.5, S.1089-1104
  8. Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019) 0.01
    0.01125326 = product of:
      0.02250652 = sum of:
        0.02250652 = product of:
          0.03375978 = sum of:
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
            0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030791596 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 71(2019) no.2, S.155-175
  9. Bentley, C.M.; Labelle, P.R.: ¬A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation (2008) 0.01
    0.009002609 = product of:
      0.018005218 = sum of:
        0.018005218 = product of:
          0.027007826 = sum of:
            0.0023745487 = weight(_text_:s in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0023745487 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
            0.024633277 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024633277 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.205
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  10. DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008) 0.01
    0.009002609 = product of:
      0.018005218 = sum of:
        0.018005218 = product of:
          0.027007826 = sum of:
            0.0023745487 = weight(_text_:s in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0023745487 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
            0.024633277 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024633277 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.211
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  11. Vander Wal, T.: Welcome to the Matrix! (2008) 0.01
    0.009002609 = product of:
      0.018005218 = sum of:
        0.018005218 = product of:
          0.027007826 = sum of:
            0.0023745487 = weight(_text_:s in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0023745487 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
            0.024633277 = weight(_text_:22 in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024633277 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2009 9:15:45
    Pages
    S.7-9
  12. Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008) 0.01
    0.0074662305 = product of:
      0.014932461 = sum of:
        0.014932461 = product of:
          0.044797383 = sum of:
            0.044797383 = weight(_text_:k in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044797383 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.01
    0.005131933 = product of:
      0.010263866 = sum of:
        0.010263866 = product of:
          0.030791596 = sum of:
            0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030791596 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  14. Aagaard, H.: Social indexing at the Stockholm Public Library (2011) 0.00
    0.0013992162 = product of:
      0.0027984325 = sum of:
        0.0027984325 = product of:
          0.008395297 = sum of:
            0.008395297 = weight(_text_:s in 1807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008395297 = score(doc=1807,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 1807, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1807)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Location
    S
    Pages
    S.143-153
  15. Seehaus, S.: Können Suchmaschinen von Sozialer Software profitieren? (2008) 0.00
    0.001119373 = product of:
      0.002238746 = sum of:
        0.002238746 = product of:
          0.006716238 = sum of:
            0.006716238 = weight(_text_:s in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006716238 = score(doc=2306,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.5, S.293-296
  16. Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Fried, M.; Toma, I.; Yan, E.; Foo, S.; Milojevicacute, S.: Upper tag ontology for integrating social tagging data (2010) 0.00
    0.0010282099 = product of:
      0.0020564198 = sum of:
        0.0020564198 = product of:
          0.006169259 = sum of:
            0.006169259 = weight(_text_:s in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006169259 = score(doc=3421,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.124836445 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.3, S.505-521
  17. Huang, S.-L.; Lin, S.-C.; Chan, Y.-C.: Investigating effectiveness and user acceptance of semantic social tagging for knowledge sharing (2012) 0.00
    0.0010282099 = product of:
      0.0020564198 = sum of:
        0.0020564198 = product of:
          0.006169259 = sum of:
            0.006169259 = weight(_text_:s in 2732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006169259 = score(doc=2732,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.124836445 = fieldWeight in 2732, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2732)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 48(2012) no.4, S.599-617
  18. Peters, I.: Benutzerzentrierte Erschließungsverfahren (2013) 0.00
    9.893953E-4 = product of:
      0.0019787906 = sum of:
        0.0019787906 = product of:
          0.0059363716 = sum of:
            0.0059363716 = weight(_text_:s in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0059363716 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.229-237
  19. Chan, L.M.: Social bookmarking and subject indexing (2011) 0.00
    9.893953E-4 = product of:
      0.0019787906 = sum of:
        0.0019787906 = product of:
          0.0059363716 = sum of:
            0.0059363716 = weight(_text_:s in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0059363716 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.127-142
  20. Peters, I.: Folksonomies & Social Tagging (2023) 0.00
    9.794515E-4 = product of:
      0.001958903 = sum of:
        0.001958903 = product of:
          0.0058767083 = sum of:
            0.0058767083 = weight(_text_:s in 796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0058767083 = score(doc=796,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 796, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=796)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die Erforschung und der Einsatz von Folksonomies und Social Tagging als nutzerzentrierte Formen der Inhaltserschließung und Wissensrepräsentation haben in den 10 Jahren ab ca. 2005 ihren Höhenpunkt erfahren. Motiviert wurde dies durch die Entwicklung und Verbreitung des Social Web und der wachsenden Nutzung von Social-Media-Plattformen (s. Kapitel E 8 Social Media und Social Web). Beides führte zu einem rasanten Anstieg der im oder über das World Wide Web auffindbaren Menge an potenzieller Information und generierte eine große Nachfrage nach skalierbaren Methoden der Inhaltserschließung.
    Pages
    S.351-361

Languages

  • e 98
  • d 40
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 124
  • m 9
  • el 8
  • s 3
  • b 2
  • x 2
  • More… Less…

Classifications