Search (831 results, page 1 of 42)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Badia, A.: Data, information, knowledge : an information science analysis (2014) 0.08
    0.07744224 = product of:
      0.15488449 = sum of:
        0.15488449 = sum of:
          0.11178964 = weight(_text_:i in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11178964 = score(doc=1296,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.65227187 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    I analyze the text of an article that appeared in this journal in 2007 that published the results of a questionnaire in which a number of experts were asked to define the concepts of data, information, and knowledge. I apply standard information retrieval techniques to build a list of the most frequent terms in each set of definitions. I then apply information extraction techniques to analyze how the top terms are used in the definitions. As a result, I draw data-driven conclusions about the aggregate opinion of the experts. I contrast this with the original analysis of the data to provide readers with an alternative viewpoint on what the data tell us.
    Date
    16. 6.2014 19:22:57
  2. Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012) 0.07
    0.07154127 = product of:
      0.14308254 = sum of:
        0.14308254 = sum of:
          0.099987686 = weight(_text_:i in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.099987686 = score(doc=2546,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As we move toward implementing RDA: Resource Description and Access, I have been pondering how we might manage the transition to new cataloging rules effectively. I was a practicing cataloger when Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., was implemented and remember it as a traumatic process. The published literature that I found focused on the impact of the then-new rules on specific formats and genres, but no one seems to have addressed the process of implementation and what type of training worked well (or did not). After a bit of sleuthing, I found a pertinent presentation by Arlene G. Taylor, which she graciously agreed to repurpose as this guest editorial.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Papadakis, I. et al.: Highlighting timely information in libraries through social and semantic Web technologies (2016) 0.07
    0.066491924 = product of:
      0.13298385 = sum of:
        0.13298385 = sum of:
          0.07141977 = weight(_text_:i in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07141977 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
          0.06156408 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06156408 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  4. McTavish, J.: Everyday life classification processes and technologies (2014) 0.05
    0.05319354 = product of:
      0.10638708 = sum of:
        0.10638708 = sum of:
          0.05713582 = weight(_text_:i in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05713582 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
          0.049251262 = weight(_text_:22 in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049251262 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To "classify" in Library and Information Sciences (LIS) usually involves an engagement with formally established classification systems, such as the Dewey Decimal Classification. In this research I suggest an alternative path for LIS scholars - one that considers the application of LIS theories about classification to the investigation of everyday life "classification" processes and technologies.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  5. Hetmanski, M.: ¬The actual role of metaphors in knowledge organization (2014) 0.05
    0.04877007 = product of:
      0.09754014 = sum of:
        0.09754014 = sum of:
          0.060601693 = weight(_text_:i in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060601693 = score(doc=1406,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the paper I argue that metaphors widely used in presenting knowledge organization, despite of their methodological correctness, play an ambiguous role. They are mostly conceived and used as models of information/knowledge organization such as library documents, databases and internet tools and devices. But due to their suggestive power and pervasive role, they can also obscure the structure of such organization. One can expect explanatory (descriptive) benefits from spatial (e.g. terrestrial or aquatic) metaphors comparing modes of organizing and accessing knowledge to oceans, pathways networks or even rhizomes. But mapping or metaphorically presenting cognitive undertakings such as searching, browsing or retrieving information/knowledge can obscure their actual essence. As held by the cognitive theory of metaphor (Lakoff, Johnson, Ritchie), certain aspects of complex phenomena (i.e. knowledge organization) are repeatedly obscured and hidden. I argue that metaphors containing probability concepts, although not immediately intuitive or comprehensible, are more fruitful effective in mapping knowledge organization.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  6. Campanario, J.M.: Large increases and decreases in journal impact factors in only one year : the effect of journal self-citations (2011) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    I studied the factors (citations, self-citations, and number of articles) that influenced large changes in only 1 year in the impact factors (IFs) of journals. A set of 360 instances of journals with large increases or decreases in their IFs from a given year to the following was selected from journals in the Journal Citation Reports from 1998 to 2007 (40 journals each year). The main factor influencing large changes was the change in the number of citations. About 54% of the increases and 42% of the decreases in the journal IFs were associated with changes in the journal self-citations.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:53:00
  7. Kijenska-Dqbrowska, I.; Kuiminska, M.: Classifications and interdisciplinarity within scientific disciplines and its influence on contemporary e-society in Poland (2014) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 1474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=1474,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 1474, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1474)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 1474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=1474,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1474, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1474)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  8. Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:13:38
    Series
    BARC/2015/I/002
  9. Aslanidi, M.; Papadakis, I.; Stefanidakis, M.: Name and title authorities in the music domain : alignment of UNIMARC authorities format with RDA (2018) 0.05
    0.04654435 = product of:
      0.0930887 = sum of:
        0.0930887 = sum of:
          0.049993843 = weight(_text_:i in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049993843 = score(doc=5178,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
          0.043094855 = weight(_text_:22 in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043094855 = score(doc=5178,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 3.2019 12:17:22
  10. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.05
    0.04510611 = product of:
      0.09021222 = sum of:
        0.09021222 = product of:
          0.36084887 = sum of:
            0.36084887 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.36084887 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  11. Liu, R.-L.: ¬A passage extractor for classification of disease aspect information (2013) 0.04
    0.040641725 = product of:
      0.08128345 = sum of:
        0.08128345 = sum of:
          0.050501406 = weight(_text_:i in 1107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050501406 = score(doc=1107,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 1107, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1107)
          0.03078204 = weight(_text_:22 in 1107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03078204 = score(doc=1107,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1107, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1107)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Retrieval of disease information is often based on several key aspects such as etiology, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and symptoms of diseases. Automatic identification of disease aspect information is thus essential. In this article, I model the aspect identification problem as a text classification (TC) problem in which a disease aspect corresponds to a category. The disease aspect classification problem poses two challenges to classifiers: (a) a medical text often contains information about multiple aspects of a disease and hence produces noise for the classifiers and (b) text classifiers often cannot extract the textual parts (i.e., passages) about the categories of interest. I thus develop a technique, PETC (Passage Extractor for Text Classification), that extracts passages (from medical texts) for the underlying text classifiers to classify. Case studies on thousands of Chinese and English medical texts show that PETC enhances a support vector machine (SVM) classifier in classifying disease aspect information. PETC also performs better than three state-of-the-art classifier enhancement techniques, including two passage extraction techniques for text classifiers and a technique that employs term proximity information to enhance text classifiers. The contribution is of significance to evidence-based medicine, health education, and healthcare decision support. PETC can be used in those application domains in which a text to be classified may have several parts about different categories.
    Date
    28.10.2013 19:22:57
  12. Panzer, M.: Dewey: how to make it work for you (2013) 0.04
    0.040641725 = product of:
      0.08128345 = sum of:
        0.08128345 = sum of:
          0.050501406 = weight(_text_:i in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050501406 = score(doc=5797,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
          0.03078204 = weight(_text_:22 in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03078204 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "As knowledge brokers, we are living in interesting times for libraries and librarians. We wonder sometimes if our traditional tools like the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system can cope with the onslaught of information. The categories provided don't always seem adequate for the knowledge-discovery habits of today's patrons. They have grown accustomed to new ways for their information needs to be met, from the fire-and-forget style of a hard-to-control classic Google search to the pervasive, always-on style of Google Now, anticipating users' information needs without their having even asked a verbal question. Contrariwise, I believe that we, as librarians, could be making better use of our tools. Many (like the DDC) are a reflection of the same social and epistemological forces that brought about modernity at the turn of the last century. We as librarians are in the unique position of providing services that are as ground-breaking as these tools. As we see the need to provide unique and cutting-edge knowledge discovery to our users, I argue in this article that the DDC can play a key role in fulfilling this purpose."
    Source
    Knowledge quest. 42(2013) no.2, S.22-29
  13. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.04
    0.039895155 = product of:
      0.07979031 = sum of:
        0.07979031 = sum of:
          0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042851865 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
  14. Bianchini, C.: Colon Classification and Nuovo Soggettario : the case of the Library of the Natural History Museum of Udine, Italy (2012) 0.04
    0.039895155 = product of:
      0.07979031 = sum of:
        0.07979031 = sum of:
          0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042851865 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:05:47
    Location
    I
  15. Barat, A.H.: Hungarians in the history of the UDC (2014) 0.04
    0.039895155 = product of:
      0.07979031 = sum of:
        0.07979031 = sum of:
          0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042851865 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    I outline a major segment of the history of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in Hungary and all related important events and activities. Significant and committed specialists who played prominent role on a national and international level are also mentioned. It's not an overstatement, that the usage and publications of the UDC in Hungary are significant milestones in the international history of UDC. The usage of UDC has been very widespread and it is found in different types of libraries. People who were responsible for the developing of information retrieval systems and quality of these methods were very engaged and participated in international activities. There were several huge libraries such as special, academic, municipal and national library where UDC has been employed since quite early on and the leaders of these pioneer libraries travelled widely and were active in international researches and practices.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  16. Kaminska, A.; Pulak, I.: Knowledge organization in a digital learning environment in the experiences of pedagogy students (2014) 0.04
    0.039895155 = product of:
      0.07979031 = sum of:
        0.07979031 = sum of:
          0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 1469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042851865 = score(doc=1469,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 1469, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1469)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 1469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=1469,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1469, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1469)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  17. Wang, Y.; Lee, J.-S.; Choi, I.-C.: Indexing by Latent Dirichlet Allocation and an Ensemble Model (2016) 0.04
    0.039895155 = product of:
      0.07979031 = sum of:
        0.07979031 = sum of:
          0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 3019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042851865 = score(doc=3019,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 3019, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3019)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 3019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=3019,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3019, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3019)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 6.2016 21:39:22
  18. Huvila, I.: Affective capitalism of knowing and the society of search engine (2016) 0.04
    0.039895155 = product of:
      0.07979031 = sum of:
        0.07979031 = sum of:
          0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 3246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042851865 = score(doc=3246,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 3246, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3246)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 3246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=3246,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3246, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3246)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  19. Lardera, M.; Gnoli, C.; Rolandi, C.; Trzmielewski, M.: Developing SciGator, a DDC-based library browsing tool (2017) 0.04
    0.039895155 = product of:
      0.07979031 = sum of:
        0.07979031 = sum of:
          0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042851865 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
    Location
    I
  20. Sears' list of subject headings (2018) 0.04
    0.039895155 = product of:
      0.07979031 = sum of:
        0.07979031 = sum of:
          0.042851865 = weight(_text_:i in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042851865 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21.12.2018 18:22:12
    Type
    i

Types

  • a 742
  • m 60
  • el 51
  • s 21
  • x 8
  • b 4
  • i 4
  • n 1
  • p 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications