Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zhang, J."
  1. Zhang, J.; Wolfram, D.: Visualization of term discrimination analysis (2001) 0.02
    0.02494381 = product of:
      0.04988762 = sum of:
        0.04988762 = product of:
          0.09977524 = sum of:
            0.09977524 = weight(_text_:y in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09977524 = score(doc=5210,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.46046585 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Zang and Wolfram compute the discrimination value for terms as the difference between the centroid value of all terms in the corpus and that value without the term in question, and suggest selection be made by comparing density changes with a visualization tool. The Distance Angle Retrieval Environment (DARE) visually projects a document or term space by presenting distance similarity on the X axis and angular similarity on the Y axis. Thus a document icon appearing close to the X axis would be relevant to reference points in terms of a distance similarity measure, while those close to the Y axis are relevant to reference points in terms of an angle based measure. Using 450 Associated Press news reports indexed by 44 distinct terms, the removal of the term ``Yeltsin'' causes the cluster to fall on the Y axis indicating a good discriminator. For an angular measure, cosine say, movement along the X axis to the left will signal good discrimination, as movement to the right will signal poor discrimination. A term density space could also be used. Most terms are shown to be indifferent discriminators. Different measures result in different choices as good and poor discriminators, as does the use of a term space rather than a document space. The visualization approach is clearly feasible, and provides some additional insights not found in the computation of a discrimination value.
  2. Zhang, L.; Liu, Q.L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.F.; Pan, Y.; Yu, Y.: Semplore: an IR approach to scalable hybrid query of Semantic Web data (2007) 0.02
    0.020366535 = product of:
      0.04073307 = sum of:
        0.04073307 = product of:
          0.08146614 = sum of:
            0.08146614 = weight(_text_:y in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08146614 = score(doc=231,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wolfram, D.; Ma, F.: Public health and social media : a study of Zika virus-related posts on Yahoo! Answers (2020) 0.02
    0.020366535 = product of:
      0.04073307 = sum of:
        0.04073307 = product of:
          0.08146614 = sum of:
            0.08146614 = weight(_text_:y in 5672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08146614 = score(doc=5672,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 5672, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5672)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Zhang, J.; An, L.; Tang, T.; Hong, Y.: Visual health subject directory analysis based on users' traversal activities (2009) 0.02
    0.017281577 = product of:
      0.034563154 = sum of:
        0.034563154 = product of:
          0.06912631 = sum of:
            0.06912631 = weight(_text_:y in 3112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06912631 = score(doc=3112,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 3112, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3112)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Zhang, J.; Wolfram, D.; Wang, P.; Hong, Y.; Gillis, R.: Visualization of health-subject analysis based on query term co-occurrences (2008) 0.01
    0.014401315 = product of:
      0.02880263 = sum of:
        0.02880263 = product of:
          0.05760526 = sum of:
            0.05760526 = weight(_text_:y in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05760526 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Li, D.; Tang, J.; Ding, Y.; Shuai, X.; Chambers, T.; Sun, G.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, J.: Topic-level opinion influence model (TOIM) : an investigation using tencent microblogging (2015) 0.01
    0.014401315 = product of:
      0.02880263 = sum of:
        0.02880263 = product of:
          0.05760526 = sum of:
            0.05760526 = weight(_text_:y in 2345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05760526 = score(doc=2345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 2345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2345)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.: ¬A user term visualization analysis based on a social question and answer log (2013) 0.01
    0.014401315 = product of:
      0.02880263 = sum of:
        0.02880263 = product of:
          0.05760526 = sum of:
            0.05760526 = weight(_text_:y in 2715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05760526 = score(doc=2715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 2715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Li, D.; Luo, Z.; Ding, Y.; Tang, J.; Sun, G.G.-Z.; Dai, X.; Du, J.; Zhang, J.; Kong, S.: User-level microblogging recommendation incorporating social influence (2017) 0.01
    0.014401315 = product of:
      0.02880263 = sum of:
        0.02880263 = product of:
          0.05760526 = sum of:
            0.05760526 = weight(_text_:y in 3426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05760526 = score(doc=3426,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21668325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 3426, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3426)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Zhang, J.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬A new similarity measure for subject hierarchical structures (2014) 0.01
    0.007625506 = product of:
      0.015251012 = sum of:
        0.015251012 = product of:
          0.030502023 = sum of:
            0.030502023 = weight(_text_:22 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030502023 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15767346 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045026023 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 4.2015 16:22:13