Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.02
    0.01560256 = product of:
      0.03120512 = sum of:
        0.03120512 = product of:
          0.06241024 = sum of:
            0.06241024 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06241024 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  2. Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003) 0.01
    0.012482047 = product of:
      0.024964094 = sum of:
        0.024964094 = product of:
          0.04992819 = sum of:
            0.04992819 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04992819 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
  3. Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999) 0.01
    0.009361535 = product of:
      0.01872307 = sum of:
        0.01872307 = product of:
          0.03744614 = sum of:
            0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03744614 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:09
  4. GERHARD : eine Spezialsuchmaschine für die Wissenschaft (1998) 0.00
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = product of:
          0.007219314 = sum of:
            0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007219314 = score(doc=381,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 381, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=381)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    RRZN-Info. 1998, BI315, S.9
  5. Wätjen, H.-J.; Diekmann, B.; Möller, G.; Carstensen, K.-U.: Bericht zum DFG-Projekt: GERHARD : German Harvest Automated Retrieval and Directory (1998) 0.00
    0.0015040238 = product of:
      0.0030080476 = sum of:
        0.0030080476 = product of:
          0.006016095 = sum of:
            0.006016095 = weight(_text_:s in 3065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006016095 = score(doc=3065,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 3065, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3065)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    34 S
  6. Fagan, J.C.: Usability studies of faceted browsing : a literature review (2010) 0.00
    0.0010528166 = product of:
      0.0021056333 = sum of:
        0.0021056333 = product of:
          0.0042112665 = sum of:
            0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 4396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042112665 = score(doc=4396,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4396, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4396)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 2010, June, S.58-66
  7. Rocha, R.; Cobo, A.: Automatización de procesos de categorización jerárquica documental en las organizaciones (2010) 0.00
    0.0010528166 = product of:
      0.0021056333 = sum of:
        0.0021056333 = product of:
          0.0042112665 = sum of:
            0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 4838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042112665 = score(doc=4838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Rev. Aporte Santiaguino. 3(2010) no.1, S.93-100
  8. Pika, J.: Universal Decimal Classification at the ETH-Bibliothek Zürich : a Swiss perspective (2007) 0.00
    9.0241426E-4 = product of:
      0.0018048285 = sum of:
        0.0018048285 = product of:
          0.003609657 = sum of:
            0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 5899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003609657 = score(doc=5899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 29(2007), S.229-251
  9. Gnoli, C.; Pusterla, L.; Bendiscioli, A.; Recinella, C.: Classification for collections mapping and query expansion (2016) 0.00
    9.0241426E-4 = product of:
      0.0018048285 = sum of:
        0.0018048285 = product of:
          0.003609657 = sum of:
            0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003609657 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.23-31
  10. Hasubick, J.; Wiesenmüller, H.: RVK-Registerbegriffe in der Katalogrecherche : Chancen und Grenzen (2022) 0.00
    9.0241426E-4 = product of:
      0.0018048285 = sum of:
        0.0018048285 = product of:
          0.003609657 = sum of:
            0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003609657 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 9(2022) Nr.1, S.1-19
  11. Liu, S.: Decomposing DDC synthesized numbers (1996) 0.00
    7.520119E-4 = product of:
      0.0015040238 = sum of:
        0.0015040238 = product of:
          0.0030080476 = sum of:
            0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 5969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0030080476 = score(doc=5969,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5969, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5969)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Schallier, W.: Why organize information if you can find it? : UDC and libraries in an Internet world (2007) 0.00
    7.520119E-4 = product of:
      0.0015040238 = sum of:
        0.0015040238 = product of:
          0.0030080476 = sum of:
            0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0030080476 = score(doc=549,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 29(2007), S.183-190
  13. Beagle, D.: Visualizing keyword distribution across multidisciplinary c-space (2003) 0.00
    6.381033E-4 = product of:
      0.0012762066 = sum of:
        0.0012762066 = product of:
          0.0025524131 = sum of:
            0.0025524131 = weight(_text_:s in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0025524131 = score(doc=1202,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.050964262 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of c-space is proposed as a visualization schema relating containers of content to cataloging surrogates and classification structures. Possible applications of keyword vector clusters within c-space could include improved retrieval rates through the use of captioning within visual hierarchies, tracings of semantic bleeding among subclasses, and access to buried knowledge within subject-neutral publication containers. The Scholastica Project is described as one example, following a tradition of research dating back to the 1980's. Preliminary focus group assessment indicates that this type of classification rendering may offer digital library searchers enriched entry strategies and an expanded range of re-entry vocabularies. Those of us who work in traditional libraries typically assume that our systems of classification: Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), are descriptive rather than prescriptive. In other words, LCC classes and subclasses approximate natural groupings of texts that reflect an underlying order of knowledge, rather than arbitrary categories prescribed by librarians to facilitate efficient shelving. Philosophical support for this assumption has traditionally been found in a number of places, from the archetypal tree of knowledge, to Aristotelian categories, to the concept of discursive formations proposed by Michel Foucault. Gary P. Radford has elegantly described an encounter with Foucault's discursive formations in the traditional library setting: "Just by looking at the titles on the spines, you can see how the books cluster together...You can identify those books that seem to form the heart of the discursive formation and those books that reside on the margins. Moving along the shelves, you see those books that tend to bleed over into other classifications and that straddle multiple discursive formations. You can physically and sensually experience...those points that feel like state borders or national boundaries, those points where one subject ends and another begins, or those magical places where one subject has morphed into another..."
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 9(2003) no.6, x S