Search (44 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992) 0.02
    0.018513763 = product of:
      0.037027527 = sum of:
        0.037027527 = product of:
          0.07405505 = sum of:
            0.07405505 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07405505 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
  2. Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999) 0.02
    0.018513763 = product of:
      0.037027527 = sum of:
        0.037027527 = product of:
          0.07405505 = sum of:
            0.07405505 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07405505 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
  3. Wallis, E.; Lavall, C.: Naming the indexer : where credit is due (1995) 0.02
    0.01796359 = product of:
      0.03592718 = sum of:
        0.03592718 = product of:
          0.07185436 = sum of:
            0.07185436 = weight(_text_:c in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07185436 = score(doc=2961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.02
    0.017454945 = product of:
      0.03490989 = sum of:
        0.03490989 = product of:
          0.06981978 = sum of:
            0.06981978 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06981978 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  5. Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000) 0.02
    0.017454945 = product of:
      0.03490989 = sum of:
        0.03490989 = product of:
          0.06981978 = sum of:
            0.06981978 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06981978 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
  6. Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000) 0.02
    0.015428137 = product of:
      0.030856274 = sum of:
        0.030856274 = product of:
          0.061712548 = sum of:
            0.061712548 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061712548 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
  7. Jörgensen, C.; Liddy, E.D.: Information access or information anxiety? : an explanatory evaluation of book index features (1996) 0.01
    0.014969658 = product of:
      0.029939316 = sum of:
        0.029939316 = product of:
          0.059878632 = sum of:
            0.059878632 = weight(_text_:c in 6855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059878632 = score(doc=6855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 6855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6855)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Craven, T. C.: String indexing (1986) 0.01
    0.014969658 = product of:
      0.029939316 = sum of:
        0.029939316 = product of:
          0.059878632 = sum of:
            0.059878632 = weight(_text_:c in 5604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059878632 = score(doc=5604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.381109 = fieldWeight in 5604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994) 0.01
    0.01234251 = product of:
      0.02468502 = sum of:
        0.02468502 = product of:
          0.04937004 = sum of:
            0.04937004 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04937004 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
  10. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.01
    0.01234251 = product of:
      0.02468502 = sum of:
        0.02468502 = product of:
          0.04937004 = sum of:
            0.04937004 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04937004 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  11. Lavallee, C.: Indexation manuelle et indexation assistee par ordinateur : comparison de la performance de deux index d'une monographie (1996) 0.01
    0.011975727 = product of:
      0.023951454 = sum of:
        0.023951454 = product of:
          0.04790291 = sum of:
            0.04790291 = weight(_text_:c in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04790291 = score(doc=740,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992) 0.01
    0.010799696 = product of:
      0.021599391 = sum of:
        0.021599391 = product of:
          0.043198783 = sum of:
            0.043198783 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043198783 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
  13. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.01
    0.010799696 = product of:
      0.021599391 = sum of:
        0.021599391 = product of:
          0.043198783 = sum of:
            0.043198783 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043198783 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  14. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01
    0.010799696 = product of:
      0.021599391 = sum of:
        0.021599391 = product of:
          0.043198783 = sum of:
            0.043198783 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043198783 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  15. Indexing: providing access to information : looking back, looking ahead. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, Alexandria, VA, May 1993 (1993) 0.01
    0.010585148 = product of:
      0.021170296 = sum of:
        0.021170296 = product of:
          0.04234059 = sum of:
            0.04234059 = weight(_text_:c in 8077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04234059 = score(doc=8077,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 8077, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: ZAFRAN, E.L. u. C. MacKAY: Keeping up with the times (& the deadlines): indexing at BNA (Bureau of National Affairs); PRESCHEL, B.M.: Delivering database information to the user: technology, media, content; MULHOLLAND, S.: Indexing and the challenge of change at PsycINFO; LOCKE, C.: Weaving the social fabric; WEINBERG, B.H.: Computer-assisted database indexing; HODGE, G.M.: Computer-assisted database indexing: the state of the art; HUMPHREY, S.M.: The MedIndEx prototype for computer-assisted MEDLINE database indexing; KOLL, M.B.: Automatic relevance ranking: a searcher's complement to indexing; ANDERSON, J.D.: Indexing standards: are they possible? What good are they? Why bother?; SHUTER, J.: Standards for indexes: where do the come from and what use are they?; COUSINS, G.: Professional indexing in Australia: first steps towards accreditation; McFADDEN, T.G.: I wonder who's indexing the Internet now?; WALLIS, E.: Indexing training and accreditation in UK; BELL, H.K.: Vive la difference! The survival of the softest; LIDDY, E.D. u. C.L. JÖRGENSEN: Reality check: book index characteristics that ficilitate information sccess; KLEINBERG, I.: Making the case for professional indexers: where is the proof?
  16. Liddy, E.D.; Jorgensen, C.: Modelling information seeking behaviours in index use (1993) 0.01
    0.01047876 = product of:
      0.02095752 = sum of:
        0.02095752 = product of:
          0.04191504 = sum of:
            0.04191504 = weight(_text_:c in 7920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04191504 = score(doc=7920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 7920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Jorgensen, C.; Liddy, E.D.: ¬An analysis of information seeking behaviours in index use, or opening Pandora's Box (1994) 0.01
    0.01047876 = product of:
      0.02095752 = sum of:
        0.02095752 = product of:
          0.04191504 = sum of:
            0.04191504 = weight(_text_:c in 8500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04191504 = score(doc=8500,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 8500, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8500)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1994) 0.01
    0.01047876 = product of:
      0.02095752 = sum of:
        0.02095752 = product of:
          0.04191504 = sum of:
            0.04191504 = weight(_text_:c in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04191504 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1997) 0.01
    0.01047876 = product of:
      0.02095752 = sum of:
        0.02095752 = product of:
          0.04191504 = sum of:
            0.04191504 = weight(_text_:c in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04191504 = score(doc=3905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15711682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.01
    0.0077140685 = product of:
      0.015428137 = sum of:
        0.015428137 = product of:
          0.030856274 = sum of:
            0.030856274 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030856274 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15950468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045548957 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.